Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
Anyone ever heard this interpretation of kabbalah before? Linking it to “digital life”? (m.youtube.com)
posted 78 days ago by Graphenium 78 days ago by Graphenium +6 / -1
15 comments share
15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 77 days ago +2 / -1

Sound moves in one direction...rearranging words within doesn't change that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SwampRangers 1 point 77 days ago +1 / -0

Is that one direction finite or infinite?

Maybe directed finity for one implies undirected infinity for all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 77 days ago +1 / -0

Is that one direction finite or infinite?

a) It was before anyone within can suggest to one another what it is.

b) Finite implies those directed; in-finite implies within those directed. The one directing implies all...not finite or infinite.

c) Finite or infinite implies a measurement taken...direction implies given to those directed. Those who take ignore given.

Maybe...

...implies may/magh (to be able, have power) of a being, not whats directing the state of being. Only within energy can there be power, as in...energy enables power.

for one...for all

Forward implies from all through each one within. Reasoning aka for one vs for another or for all vs not for all tempts one to ignore that.

Reason implies a circle shaped within linear "forward" direction.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points 77 days ago +2 / -0

reason implies a circle

No. It implies a hammer. It implies a fortress. Your beliefs imply a burnt cupcake. Your beliefs imply a piece of paper.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 76 days ago +1 / -1

No. It implies a hammer

a) Putting reason (yes vs no) before implication (if/then) puts the shape before the line it's being shaped within...an inversion.

If/then aren't turned against one another like yes vs no...if cause/then effect; if all/then one; if action/then reaction; if process/then potential etc.

b) If reason implies a hammer, then how does hammering another down helps one to grow?

c) "The nail that sticks out gets hammered down"...it's about synthesis preventing analysis. A society cannot allow free will of choice...any reason will be used to destroy whoever questions what holds society together.

Each member of a society holds a consensus together, while ignoring that nature sets each being apart from one another, hence giving free will of choice. This consensus is where the hammer of reason is used to fight tooth and nail against any implied contradiction to the consensus.

A jew doesn't fight for the consensus...gentiles are fighting (reasoning) against one another, while destroying themselves and the social consensus in the process of nature, while each jew injects artifice into the conflicts from both sides to fuel the flames.

It implies a fortress

Fort/fortis - "strength" within a process is build by resisting (need) the temptation (want) to hold onto. Choosing to hold onto a side within reason, while fighting the other...weakens strength.

Your beliefs

a) Be (being) lief/leubh (to care) implies burdening self, while ignoring that nature relieves each being within.

c) Your implies taking possession, while ignoring that process (inception toward death) relieves potential (life) of burdening possession.

d) The origin of YOU (phonetic jew) implies one taking possession over self as I AM (je suit; jesus)...that implies the jew-dah vs jesus conflict of betrayal aka the inversion of self among another.

a piece of paper

Being implies a piece of all...paper/papy (father) tempts one to ignore that aka "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9

Writing words on paper aka crafting spells implies in the name of the father...

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy