consciousness/soul goes through a process and the demons are
Process implies soul/sole, hence providing each ones perception (scious) within by dividing (de) provision (mon). Others distort that by luring perception (scious) together (con) into a collective consciousness aka gestalt intelligence aka hive mind etc.
the beginning of that process
Only within a process (motion) can a potential (matter) experience beginning and end (momentum).
Be-gin implies the process of separation between generation (inception towards death) and being (life).
a trap to take
Being (life) implies given (inception) while taken (death), hence the need of potential to resist the wanted temptation to take given process into possession.
The trap represents life trying to take possession of anything within the process of dying; thereby confining re-animation into a cycle of self destruction...a cycle (kikel; kike) operating inside (logic) and outside (reason) each afflicted being.
Trap; noun - "contrivance for catching unawares"...awareness requires analysis (separation of parts); others contrive synthesis (unification of parts) to trap ones awareness among one another aka within a consensus.
a false heaven/hell
False implies versus real...it's the versus/verto (to turn) which turns heaven (to rise) and hell (to conceal) against one another. Ones awareness can only rise if one resists concealment.
the soul is usually disorientated
Dis-orient-ation implies the division (momentum) of orient (matter) within action (motion). Orient/origin/oriri (to rise)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/orient
Fall (inception towards death) animating rise (life) implies the one and only (sole/soul) way of being...others suggest usual aka usus (costum) al (all) to tempt one within all together with one another, which restricts rising.
Being within nature isn't usual, but exceptional.
The soul may run around
Soul/sole implies linear progression...others shape a round circle during linear progression to trick ones straight thinking into circular logic, which turns into conflicts of reason against one another.
you are basically free.
The base of free implies dominance...only within dominance (inception towards death) can one be free (life).
Others suggest "you are" to bind ones free will of choice into consenting to the suggestion instead of discerning self to be.
YOU ARE implies "ju-dah", which is in conflict with I AM (je suis; je-sus)...that's the basis of circular thinking aka self inflicted bondage.
That's how you know it was a false flag attack
Nature erects being...others suggest flag/flacceo (flaccid aka to bend; recede; lag) to tempt one into erectile dysfunction aka impotence.
There's no real flag.
2 dead; 9 wounded
911
jews didn't exist when Adam did
The one formed from the ground (adamah). Flow (inception towards death) implies the ground of form (life) aka the flowing foundation for each form within. Eve implies the evening out (inception towards death) of adam ripped apart (life)...only then does a being come into existence (expressed stance within).
That aside...ignoring expression by taking possession (I AM) establishes suppression (YOU ARE), which is how I AM (jesus) establishes YOU ARE (judah). The origin of each jew implies the inversion of ones choice (I) into a chosen one (YOU).
jews didn't exist
Pluralism (jews); denialism (didn't) and existentialism (exist) represent jewish tricks to distort each gentiles mind.
cain and seth
- Cain/qayin/qyn - "to form"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Cain
- Seth/shith - "to set"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Seth
Nature moves (inception towards death) form (life)...each jew affixes (seth) formed (cain) gentiles into for example a consensus about historical narratives, which requires each gentiles free will of choice to enable it. Once consent is given CAIN kills ABLE to SETH forth suggested.
even when we lie we tell the truth
Only within sound can words be shaped. Gentiles are tricked to ignore sound by fighting each other over true vs false words, while each jew knows how to utilize "true" sound underneath each "false" word without the "true" or "false" label.
Sound doesn't require labels...a jew shapes words within sound aka spell-craft as labels for gentiles aka a lapel (a garment folded back and overlapping another). Suggested words represent a garment (mental cover) for those who ignore perceivable sound.
satanism goes farther back then the jews
a) "Every ism...was founded and/or led proportionally by jews"... https://img.gvid.tv/img/gMHCLGbh.png
b) Satan/stn (one who opposes, obstructs, or acts as an adversary)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Satan
A chosen one opposes; obstructs and acts as an adversary for ones choice...if consented to.
c) A jew suggests front (future) and back (past) to distract gentiles from being backed (inception towards death) while fronted (life). Only nature fronts (living) and backs (dying) being.
I back good theorizing
Theos backs being...theory (orated theos) burdens being with for example the moral conflict (good vs bad) or the inner conflict...I vs You aka I AM (je suis; jesus) vs YOU ARE (judah).
have great potential but are sometimes misguided
Procession (inception towards death) guides potential (life)....having implies taking possession, which curtails given potential.
jimmy page
Aka Jimmy/james/jacob (to supplant; disposes) + Page/pag (to fasten)...form (life) within flow (inception towards death) can be dispossessed by fastening.
I still pray for Page
James PATRICK page...patrick/patri (father). That's what you're praying for while ignoring: "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven" ~Matthew 23:9-11
do everything backwards
a) Everything (motion) backs (momentum) each thing (matter).
b) Articulating words implies forwards; responding to sound aka resonance implies backwards.
reveals an entire
That's backwards from "entire reveals essential". Revealing the entire implies mosaic law aka putting parts together to make whole again...that's backwards thinking.
stairway to heaven
Stair (narrow path; flight of steps arranged one behind and above the other) implies ones life aka the narrow path in-between inception towards death, hence a balance act for ones reacting choice, and which arranges each one behind (descended) and above (ancestor) the other.
Way to implies from inception towards death aka the only way for each life within aka the death sentence for each living sentience within.
Heaven (to heave) and hell (to cover; conceal) implies ones struggle to rise (life) during fall (inception towards death) by resisting temptation or conceal resistance by falling for temptation.
"Cause you know sometimes words have two meanings"...hence each word being shaped within sound. So if one ignores that words are silver and silence is golden, then one can be tricked to be "sure all that glitters is gold" while "buying a stairway to heaven" from others.
Plaaaay backwards
The trick: playing implies gambling aka misusing given choice to take a chance. Hearing the song implies ones consent to a suggested LONG PLAY (LP), which permits another to craft-spells (lyrics) both forwards and backwards for the summoned consensus of listeners.
oppositioner
Opposites are apart from one another...versus tempts one to turn opposites against one another. Each being (life) in-between opposites (inception/death) can be tricked mentally (logic) and physically (reason) to turn what nature separates into opposite positions...artificially against one another, which represents the ouroboros aka the living snake, with the split tongue (words articulated within natural sound) biting its own tail (process of dying), hence biting off more that one can chew.
a) Gold implies malleability...information is only malleable for those suggesting it, while it becomes rigid for those consenting to it. Information represents fool's gold distracting from the infinite malleability of inspiration.
b) What you refer to as golden age isn't about information but about the sharing thereof, yet since it happened within a web/net it was only ever about harvesting, hence utilizing the fool's gold of information to lure the many into the web/net of few.
b) History cannot be special, because storing something makes it common.
What if tempting gentiles into a truth vs lie conflict against one another represents the jewish trick, and AI the automated perpetuation thereof?
His Word. Read the Bible.
a) How did his word came into being without letters?
b) Reading the written word implies someone wrote it. Who shaped letters into words to write the bible?
Didn't mention anyone else.
a) Who taught your mind to acknowledge letters shaped into words as meaning?
b) Who separates each one from anyone else to allow memory to share mentioned meaning?
Circular conflict implies benefit to all humanity. It implies destroying the inferior and upgrading the remains.
Circular conflict within linear progression of nature implies ouroborous aka eating ones own tail.
As for benefit...nature giving being implies being the beneficiary of nature. Artificially eating up the inferior to reach the next level implies a game called Pac-Man.
Inception towards life...
...and simultaneously life towards death. Why? Because inception towards death implies the momentum of ongoing motion for each temporary matter living within.
Then play sounds at maximum volume
a) Playing implies ignoring given choice by taking chance.
b) Only within sound can each instrument play in-between minimum/maximum.
c) The volume of sound implies one, hence sound/sanus - "whole; entire; all" aka all for one, and one for all.
d) Sound implies singularity...sounds (plurality) implies the noise the ones within sound make among one another, while ignoring the sound of silence.
play sounds with your speakers
Speaker implies suggestible word shaped within perceivable sound by free will of choice. Doing that tempts one to ignore sound for word aka ignoring God for the ones who speak in the name of God.
If it is false, then don't do this.
If/then implies implication...false vs true + do vs don't implies reason. Nature implicates without conflict...ignoring natural for artificial shapes a conflict of reason.
If you believed this, you would never comment anything, ever
To believe implies holding onto, like you holding onto meaning, while fighting (true vs false) over it. Free-will-of-choice utilizes analysis to break apart synthetic words, hence doing the opposite of holding onto...letting go of.
Letting go of what one holds onto sustains ones free will of choice.
Example: com (together) ment (mind)...free will of choice breaks apart comments to free ones mind from what others put together as a mental (ideal) and physical (idol) burden.
The fact you do proves you are stating claims you blatantly disagree with
Facts; proofs and claims contradict free will of choice if held onto...choosing to hold onto either shapes a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree).
You view what I wrote as facts; proofs and claims, while willingly ignoring that free-will-of-choice continues to utilize analysis to break apart any facts, proofs and claims.
For example: "God cannot speak"...further analysis allows one to see theism (god); denialism (cannot) and spell-craft (articulating speech within sound by letters), which free-will-of-choice can analyze even further. So where's the fact; proof; claim that I hold onto by believing it?
How about you as a believer show that you can use analysis without contradicting your beliefs, instead of fighting others over facts; proofs and claims?
you are stating claims you blatantly disagree with.
a) Free will of choice analyzes states aka potential (life) separated within procession (inception towards death), which cannot be claimed without denial. Your belief in claims, resulting in agree vs disagree conflict, implies an artificial synthesis denying natural analysis.
The contradiction in-between analysis and synthesis is what each jew exploits among gentiles, which free-will-of-choice tries to dissolve.
b) Blatant/blatire - "to babble" aka uttering words indistinctly implies Babel; Babylon. That's the tower of babel the gentiles are building by stacking words until it collapses upon the ever flowing foundation of sound, which is where each jew sits at the rivers of bablyon... https://genius.com/Boney-m-rivers-of-babylon-lyrics
Claiming a word represents captivity within sound...think about that.
So either you are a schizo
Either/or implies a differentiation from one another aka a schism/skei - "to cut". Motion (inception towards death) cuts matter (life) into pieces aka "cut my life into pieces, this is my last resort"... https://genius.com/Papa-roach-last-resort-lyrics
It's a jew (eugene bleuler) who suggests schizophrenia as a mental disorder aka a label for gentiles to hold onto and put upon one another, thereby disordering their minds with labels aka marks aka inwards ideals and outward idols.
Being implies insane (in sanus; within sound) person (per sonos; by sound) aka schizo/schism in-between all sound and each one instrument within.
who acts
Choice can only react to balance or to one another. A jew suggests "acting" to invert the gentiles perception of "reacting". If a director directs an actor, then the actor reacts to direction...the gentiles audience willingly denies this contradiction of actors reacting aka action/reaction.
"turning against another" is a good thing.
Thing implies everything separating each thing from one another...if a thing chooses good or bad, then it turns against other things within a good vs bad conflict called "reason"...a jew suggests moralism to tempt gentiles these good vs bad conflicts of mutual destruction.
Nerve aka organ (matter) of sensation (momentum) and motion aka an internal setting free of each organ (life) to sensation (inception towards death).
A jew suggests neuroscientism to bind gentiles into a consensus, thereby distracting organ from sensation by tempting denial of motion.
Notice that the sales-pitch of the influencer is based on the audiences consensus about the "deadliest virus on the planet"...it took him less then nine seconds to set up a consensus, which allows him to use the rest of the video to dumb information into already established consensus.
based on an assignment
Consenting to any suggestion implies ONES CHOICE assigning a CHOSEN ONE.
jews as equal
Gentiles giving consent to any jewish suggestion equalizes consensus among gentiles, while permitting each jew differential status.
understand the specialty
Special implies apart from one another, understanding implies standing under one another. Each jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consensus among gentiles into understanding, which in return protects the special status of each jew.
only people
Only implies singular; people implies plural...a jew suggests pluralism to tempt gentiles into ignoring singularity.
divinely ordained
Aka being divided (life) within natural order (inception towards death). Another word for ordained is "appointed" aka inception sentencing life towards point of death.
task is to be
Task/taxare/tax - "to evaluate"...being within nature implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable). A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consensus among gentiles into a self imposed burden (tax).
If one permits another to evaluate, then the suggested value becomes a burden for one to carry. A jew suggests prices to trick gentiles to burden themselves willingly with any product bought into, while selling self out to a jew.
to be G_d's ambassadors
Ambactus/ambhi/ag - "to drive out" aka being (life) driven out (inception towards death).
A jew sets up embassies to direct the traffic of living gentiles from inception towards death through for example progressivism. A gentiles consent to any jewish suggestion implies "following the leader".
fight for the good of everyone
Notice the jewish use of G_d without an O, and good with double OO. GOD doesn't forward within a circle, but forwards potential (life) within linear progression (inception towards death).
A jew tempts gentiles with suggested words (logos) into a mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle. Logic implies circular thinking, which turns into a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Logic + reason represent the double OO's.
that means that when one says
Meaning isn't natural, but artificially articulated by speech within natural sound aka jewish spell-craft tempting consenting gentiles to hold onto words (logos), which establishes a mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle (kikel/kike) of confinement.
jews are just like everyone else
Sameness (all perceivable) generates difference (ones perception)...a jew uses suggestion to tempt gentiles into alike consensus. Why? To remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Political-History-1789-1939/dp/0199246815
the idea
Gentiles consenting to any jewish suggestion implies holding onto mentally (ideas) and physically (idols), while ignoring that perceivable moves through perception and cannot be held onto.
as if jews shold adjust to majority norms, integrate, and assimilate away.
Being (life) implies within a way (inception towards death), hence being moved away unless resisting temptation.
A jew utilizes adjustment aka joining the minds of gentiles together; norms aka suggesting a standard for gentiles to follow; integration aka tempting gentiles to hold suggested information within instead of expressing oneself outwards within perceivable inspiration, and assimilation aka mixing artificially together what nature sets apart from one another.
immediate danger of AI
Immediate implies "in the middle"...consenting to suggested artifice puts the one suggesting it in the middle, and oneself into the circumference.
Being implies within (life) danger (inception towards death), hence the sleight of hand: "Danger is my middle name"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH_JRjJtNSw aka living in the Danger Zone.
Wrong. God has spoken before.
a) According to whom?
b) Who spoke the word "God" to you?
c) Wrong implies turning against right aka a circular conflict. Before implies forwarded being aka linear progression. Sound forwards being, while words tempt one to turn against one another.
to "cling" to the word of God
Only within sound can an instrument cling to a word. Sound separates each instrument from one another, while words are shaped to bind together aka to orchestrate instruments into a composition; arrangement etc.
God cannot speak, for speech implies the articulation of natural sound. God gives each mind (ment) structure (stru) within (in) to resound or articulate.
Speech is silver, silence is golden...
a) Principal aka prin (first) cip (to take) al (all)... all gives first before anyone within is being given the choice to take.
b) Principalities implies a plural, which contradicts prin/prime (first) aka singular.
c) Wicked implies "to depart"...spirit departs essence from one another.
Even a jew/you can only live/evil within god/good...the inversion is within I AM (jesus).
"Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world"
a) Behold implies "being holding onto", hence jesus aka je suis aka I AM (taking possession over oneself)
b) Only God gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life)...taking self implies self-sacrifice to another aka from I AM (jesus) to YOU ARE (judah).
c) Sin/syn - "together with" implies artificial synthesis ignoring natural analysis.
- Patrick/pater (father) + Casey/case/kad (to fall)
a) Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > off-spring (matter) aka rising during fall.
b) "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
Calling another father (patrick) befalls (casey) ones rise aka living being (be) falling (fall) within process of dying.
Edit: If father (patrick) befalls (casey); then another can steal (nick) the fountain (fuentes) of youth from one.
There can be only one church...each christened body. Satan implies the opposition thereof aka many christened bodies summoned into a church. The jewish spiel is about luring each gentiles consent into a manifold consensus.
final fate
There's no end (fin) to all (al), only a beginning (inception) and end (death) to each one (life) within aka a predestined (fate) path.
Others invert fate into fari/bha - "to speak", hence being enabled to shape the destinies of the faithful.
a) Only within light can shadows be shaped.
b) Being implies media (life) within main stream (inception towards death) aka ray within light...others suggest "mainstream media" to tempt ones consent into a shadow-play.
c) If motion separating matter implies light separating particles, then particles within moving light are casting shadows upon one another, thereby tempting one another to ignore light.
d) Mental confinement is based on ignoring brightness (perceivable inspiration moving through) for darkness (suggested information held onto).
e) Inspiration moves within a line; information shapes a circle. Notice the deceivers standing in line, while holding up a circle. Notice how the deceivers use suggestion to give wings (bird) to logic (circle), which empowers (horse) mental confinement (jug). Notice the idols the deceivers are suggesting become ideals the deceived hold onto.
supernatural claims
a) Nature gives...a being can only take artificial, while ignoring the giving nature.
b) A claim can only be made in-between aka as above (supra) so below (infra). Why? Because only during separation can different parts claim one another, while ignoring the whole process of separation.
The only thing missing is a depiction of Charlie at all the Turning Point events...just as when the depiction of the crucified Jesus became common in the 13th century; the same century when jewish civil liberty was rolled out through the Magna Carta... https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-magna-cartas-very-jewish-underpinnings/