Agree or disagree?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
There's only one order aka the natural order carrying will (life) in (inception) and out (death)...others suggest orders to tempt ones will to willingly carry burdens, which represents the origin of sin.
Nature neither asks questions, nor gives answers...beings trick each other with artificial questions and answers to ignore that nature represents a solution aka the transformation of solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/happen
Nature gives choice to being before being can take chance from one another...a happenstance implies a fictitious distraction from reality aka a mind control device.
Taking a chance by given choice implies "gambling"...
a) Others suggest modern or ancient and left or right to tempt ones choice to choose a side to hold onto, while ignoring that choice can only work within a moving balance in-between.
Choosing a side distracts one sight...others suggest sides as a mind control device to manipulate ones sight.
b) Modern/mode/med - "take appropriate measures"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mode
Taking measures misappropriates motion given. Why? Because motion moves, while taking measurements tempts ones mind to ignore being moved.
Ignorance represents the main device/devis -"intent, desire" to manipulate self and others. Sleight of hand: "the devil is in the details".
That's the suggestion which tempts consent into a circular conflict internally (logic) and externally (reason) aka a mind control device.
Only within action can one ex (to express) per (by) ment (mind) aka mentally react to physical enactment.
Ultra implies "holding extreme positions"....tempting ones free will of choice to hold onto agree or disagree implies extreme positioning. Using suggestion to tempt choice to hold onto a side implies projection of ultra.