I understand. It would be helpful to just delete that line and or come up with a different example or different wording. Suggestion of questioning vs statement of perceived threat.
or come up with a different example or different wording
Soon...
Suggestion of questioning vs statement of perceived threat.
a) Construing isn't perceiving. To perceive implies analysis (taking apart), while construing implies synthesis (putting together).
The foundation of any manipulation is about distracting from natural analysis (perception) by artificial synthesis (suggestion).
b) The VERSUS (verto; to turn) happens only after construing was applied to ones perception. Nature moves linear...holding onto anything turns a being from natural to artificial, and thereby against one another.
And here I was going to continually ask him the same Question over and over again on a daily bases until the heat death of the universe. Another hobby down the drain I suppose.
A person (singular) suggests people (plural) to make things look alike...nature separates each thing within from one another by (per) sound (sonos).
Nature does before anyone within can come into being...the word "nothing" can only be suggested to one another after nature brought one into being.
Nothing tempts one thing to deny everything.
a) YOU originates from ME...only if one claims self as ME does everyone else become YOU.
b) How could free-will-of-choice suggest if consenting to any suggestion implies the bondage of ones free will of choice to another ones suggestion?
Which suggestion has free-will-of-choice made without ripping apart the process of suggesting?
πβ, ππ ! πππͺ πππ πͺπ π¦ π€ππͺ π₯πππ₯?
Because free-will-of-choice
Because free-will-of-choice chose to be questionable...
This can be construed as death wishing and we're not doing that here anymore. I know you are reasonable and I appreciate your help.
Con (together) struere (to pile up)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/construe
Directly before the example "kill yourself" I wrote: "Which suggestion has free-will-of-choice made without ripping apart the process of suggesting?"
If others pile together (construe) what one rips apart...how isn't that a conspiracy?
Anyway...would you like me to delete c) ?
I understand. It would be helpful to just delete that line and or come up with a different example or different wording. Suggestion of questioning vs statement of perceived threat.
Done.
Soon...
a) Construing isn't perceiving. To perceive implies analysis (taking apart), while construing implies synthesis (putting together).
The foundation of any manipulation is about distracting from natural analysis (perception) by artificial synthesis (suggestion).
b) The VERSUS (verto; to turn) happens only after construing was applied to ones perception. Nature moves linear...holding onto anything turns a being from natural to artificial, and thereby against one another.
πππ’ πππ π’ππ πππ’ ππππ?
This has been edited.
And here I was going to continually ask him the same Question over and over again on a daily bases until the heat death of the universe. Another hobby down the drain I suppose.
πΈκ₯ο½κ₯πΈ ππ¨π©π¬ πΈκ₯ο½κ₯πΈ