Nature doesn't do that...a being does to distract one another from nature.
Woven into your tapestry
Free-will-of-choice uses analysis to rip apart what others weave together by synthesis. Questionable views analysis as a woven tapestry because of a view distorted by synthesis.
half truths
Hence a synthesis of half truth vs half lies...
mȳthos...
...implies "speech, thought, word, discourse, conversation". For choice to remain free; one has to break free from those...not hold onto.
Typically
Aka typecasting...casting a symbol; emblem; mark; sign; figure; image; form; kind etc. into a mold.
following
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow.
any variant of said word
Variance/variare - "to change"...sound changes; words tempt one to hold onto meaning; definition; significance; interpretation; consensus etc.
When you describe words as half-truths or lies, then you choose to affix that description within yourself while ignoring the change of sound.
A person (singular) suggests people (plural) to make things look alike...nature separates each thing within from one another by (per) sound (sonos).
Words do not suggest things
Nature does before anyone within can come into being...the word "nothing" can only be suggested to one another after nature brought one into being.
Nothing tempts one thing to deny everything.
You are suggesting things.
a) YOU originates from ME...only if one claims self as ME does everyone else become YOU.
b) How could free-will-of-choice suggest if consenting to any suggestion implies the bondage of ones free will of choice to another ones suggestion?
Which suggestion has free-will-of-choice made without ripping apart the process of suggesting?
c) Here's a simple one..."kill yourself". Does that suggestion have any power without ones willing consent to it? If seduction aka temptation is the power, then is ones free will of choice stronger; weaker or equal to it?
Suggest; verb - "to seduce; to draw to ill by insinuation; to inform secretly"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/suggest
Nature doesn't do that...a being does to distract one another from nature.
Free-will-of-choice uses analysis to rip apart what others weave together by synthesis. Questionable views analysis as a woven tapestry because of a view distorted by synthesis.
Hence a synthesis of half truth vs half lies...
...implies "speech, thought, word, discourse, conversation". For choice to remain free; one has to break free from those...not hold onto.
Aka typecasting...casting a symbol; emblem; mark; sign; figure; image; form; kind etc. into a mold.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow.
Variance/variare - "to change"...sound changes; words tempt one to hold onto meaning; definition; significance; interpretation; consensus etc.
When you describe words as half-truths or lies, then you choose to affix that description within yourself while ignoring the change of sound.
People suggest things.
Words do not suggest things.
You are suggesting things.
A person (singular) suggests people (plural) to make things look alike...nature separates each thing within from one another by (per) sound (sonos).
Nature does before anyone within can come into being...the word "nothing" can only be suggested to one another after nature brought one into being.
Nothing tempts one thing to deny everything.
a) YOU originates from ME...only if one claims self as ME does everyone else become YOU.
b) How could free-will-of-choice suggest if consenting to any suggestion implies the bondage of ones free will of choice to another ones suggestion?
Which suggestion has free-will-of-choice made without ripping apart the process of suggesting?
c) Here's a simple one..."kill yourself". Does that suggestion have any power without ones willing consent to it? If seduction aka temptation is the power, then is ones free will of choice stronger; weaker or equal to it?