energies and breaths
There can be only one energy aka en (within) ergos (work) and only one flow of animation each breathing unit formed within adapts to.
Try to explain plurality of energy without contradiction...
I am sure I am missing many
It's assurance (sure) and multiplicity (many) which tempt one to miss the flow of singularity.
first hand experience
Hand implies manual reaction (secondary) to auto action (primarily). Ex (outwards) per (forwards)...forwards (action) precedes outwards (reaction).
or you have some passing fancy or interest that turns to obsession.
Passage implies linear procession; turning implies circular confinement...that's the obsession. Only within a line can a circle be drawn by holding onto something fancy/fantsy (inclination).
Most people will first
Person aka per (by) son (sound) implies sound first before any by product within. A most vs less conflict among a sum of people can only be shaped afterwards by the use of will.
Psi - Ki - Qi - Chi - Prana
- PSI (psychic force) implies nature animating being.
- KI (kinetic force) implies being set in motion by nature.
- QI (physical life force) implies spiritual nature animating physical being.
- CHI (limiting force) implies the freeing of being within the limit of nature.
- PRANA (permeating force) implies nature passing through each transference of being.
National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) aka narcose (to benumb, make unconscious)...
dust to make a rib
"for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return" ~Genesis 3:19
Only solid (life) within liquid (inception towards death) can experience dust (vapor) aka the exhalation of moisture. Rib refers to ripping apart solid during fluid aka Adam (motion) > Eve (momentum) > rip/rib (matter) with Christ (anointed one) implying the protective lubrication during the separation process of matter from one another.
He is together with those that choose Him
Together implies "towards getting"...towards implying motion; getting implying matter. Only matter (life) can get everything from motion (inception towards death).
Notice furthermore toget-HER aka him (motion) > her (momentum) > off-spring (matter)...matter GETs what his motion moves TOwards HER momentum.
The word (articulation of sound) TO-GET-HER distracts one from discerning the natural process of sound by using synthesis (putting together) to invert analysis (setting apart).
Guess who meticulously crafts spells out of letters... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4WLy44C5.jpg
I don't see how, God is love and means to love.
How could you see if you hold onto "love" (or anything else)? Sight requires clarity aka the moving animation (perceivable inspiration) from nature...others suggest love and hate to confine ones mental (logic) and physical (reason) sight within circular obscurity by holding together what nature sets apart from one another.
God was love and hate before one was given the will to choose a side...choosing to hold onto either side corrupts sight.
"Hasidic judaism originated in Eastern Europe in the 18th century and centers on a fervent devotion to God through love" aka HASI-DIC (hasse dich; hate you) preaching LOVE/EVOL (evil).
Those choosing hate, choose against love, which is made from God, so they make themselves devils, satans, adversaries...
...and vice versa. Choice only works in-between balance, while choosing to hold onto either side imbalances choice.
Motion delineates (inception towards death) matter (life)...putting life in-between sides that cannot be held onto. Holding onto artificial sides like love or hate shape delineation into ad (against) versary (to turn) aka drawing a circle (reason) inside a line (implication).
Choosing love or hate establishes a circle (versus/verto; to turn) which in return prevents one from thinking straight.
The young toad prefers my limited interaction
Both the young toad and you represent the internal (life) of action (inception towards death)...that's the natural inter-action separating each one from one another.
What you call limitation by preference represents the free will of choice of each to prefer one over the other...which further limits free will of choice by binding self to another.
the 19 yr old turtle
Does a turtle need to measure age? While thinking about that...remember the "slow-moving" tortoise vs the fast-moving hare from Aesop's Fables. (try to mentally take the versus conflict out of it).
Does matter (life) need to measure the speed of motion (inception towards death)? Can it be measured from in-between?
is more generous with her affections.
It's cause which generates effect...effects calling affection to one another "generous" are distracting each other from cause. God implies the one and only generator...each being within a reactor. Reacting to one another's generous affection tempts one to ignore re-generation.
Notice that the financiers represent both the most generous ones by offering everything for a price to anyone who can pay, while also the most stingy ones, since they offer nothing of any value (fiat) to each ones FREE will of choice aka the only God given price.
Finance (an end, settlement, retribution) implies an affect by one another...nature generating being implies cause generating each effect from one another.
Affect (synthesis) contradicts effect (analysis)...if chosen.
when one forces them outside their limits.
Jasper; Kitty and you are forced to be free (life) inside limitation (inception towards death)...others tempt you to set outside boundaries for one another, which distracts from origin. Whatever boundaries you choose to set...your free will of choice can also break.
Nature implies the force that breaks apart each being...holding onto boundaries permits few to exploit the natural break, while setting up more artificial boundaries for many...unbeknownst to the one believing consensus protecting boundaries.
Removed an unnecessary sentence
Can there be unnecessary sentience within nature for any beings life sentence? Can one within God remove anything from God?
Following orders dis-charges one...resisting the temptation to follow orders re-charges one.
a) One (matter) within him (motion) self (momentum)...that's how him (god) moves her (spirit) through each off-spring (essence).
b) One with himself implies together (synthesis); each one within himself implies apart (analysis)...few suggest love and hate to tempt many together into conflict against one another.
c) God generates spirit to animate essence...holding onto love contradicts animation by inverting it into animosity aka hate.
Example...holding onto your lovely cat will soon turn into hateful animosity when the want to hold onto ignores the need to let go of. The lovely cat hates to be held for too long.
Ones choice in-between the need to let go and the want to hold onto implies reality...the measurement taken about how long is too long represents fiction. That's why saying how MUCH we love one another represents fictitious measurements taken, while ignoring reality (need/want balance).
papal loyalty
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9-11
Any loyalty to a father upon the earth implies treason to the one in heaven...
Deus Lo Vult (God beholds will)
Deus (God) implies need; Vult (will) implies want...one needs to resist want; others suggest to lo and behold want, while ignoring need.
Jerusalem Cross
The five-fold cross deceives one to ignore that there's only one flow A-CROSS (inception towards death) for each form (life) within. The other four imply the crossing out of circumference for the centered one, which represents the rite of circumcision.
Jeru-salem aka yarah (he threw) shalom (peace) implies whole throwing each peace/piece across aka the transference of matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
One with Himself.
One within himself by parting each one from one another...
We Can Tune Into
Notice that tune/tone has ONE (singularity) in it...WE (plurality) contradicts that. Few orchestrate symphonies to invert natural singularity into artificial plurality as to tempt many together.
Love Is A Frequency
Choosing to hold onto love or hate circumnavigates frequency of choice.
Your job is...
infesting every nook and cranny of power
Material implies matter (mater) within (i) all (al) motion...only motion allows matter to be released. Thinking that the release of material is based on allowances by matter...that's what permits the thought shaped by others to infest every nook and cranny of ones now powerless mind.
intimidation
Consenting to any suggestion permits intimate access to ones private mind. Intimidation isn't based on what others are suggesting, but what one permits to enter into self. The vampire on your doorstep isn't intimidating until being given access...
how many elites
Each chosen one...based on ones choice selecting.
Punkt vor Strich... (??)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punktrechnung_vor_Strichrechnung aka the order of operations (multiplication and division ) before addition and subtraction...
You failed
Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)...not a challenge; but a giving of way.
you used inception toward death in all the lines
There can be only one line (inception towards death) for each delineation (life) within...which one cannot use; only re-use.
haven't solved the captcha
The solution to capture implies free will of choice...which cannot be captured by another.
like a bot
Diverse few suggest bots to shape many into like-minded users aka self-abusers.
more RAM
What if ones mind/memory can be used either as ram (adaptation to inspiration) or as hard-drive (holding onto information)? What if the latter corrupts the former into perceiving less?
im blocking you. Sorry if you are a human
Feeling sorry for another while setting a block within self?
Just your replies dont look like human
Because looking/locking implies holding onto...which prevents one from seeing how another describes motion.
See. You are a bot.
How could a bot have sight?
Im blocking you.
Which requires the use of ones free will of choice. Alas...the more one blocks; the less free one becomes.
to drift the discussion
Nature drives being (life) linearly (inception towards death)...beings tempt one another to drift circular (logic; reason) hence from one side to another.
Free will of choice implies in-between sides.
poison the well
Logic (circular thinking) and reason (turning against one another) implies the WELL of WILL. Anything contained within that well contaminates ones will.
1% of the time some human uses your account to appear to be a person.
a) 99% of what free-will-of-choice writes represents handwritten adaptation to perceivable inspiration on the fly. What AI could adapt to perceivable inspiration over suggested information?
b) One cannot be a person...being implies per (by) son (sound) aka an in-stru-ment (mind structured within).
Its nonsense
Which sense can sense nothing?
Clearly low effort sliding.
To slide something requires one to make the foundation for anyone else slippery...that's a whole lot of effort to make others loose their footing.
Low effort is based on ones free will of choice to ignore fundamental (perception) for optional (suggestion)...
You only appear where is convenient almost like 4 chan sliders.
Con (together) venient (to come)...doing that would bind free will of choice to another.
Do Netanyahu
How many Mileikowskys are there?
sponsors you
Sponsor/spondeio - "to libate; bring a fluid sacrifice, pour"...sponsorships tempt free will of choice into bondage.
How much is the payment?
How much? One! There can be only one. As for payment...nothing, that's all value ones mind can hold onto.
Solve this captcha
Capturing distracts from solution. Nature dissolves (inception towards death) being (life)...others utilize suggestion to capture ones interest.
f!v3 x thr33 - s3v3n (5x3-7)
And don't forget Punkt vor Strich...
Why you only appear on sensitive posts and topics?
Appearances can be deceiving...free-will-of-choice adapts to whatever inspires.
Do you get payed to shill and poison the well?
a) What does free-will-of-choice shill for? To shill implies acting as a decoy for a gambler, while gambling implies sacrificing given choice by taking a chance. Shilling would contradict ones free will of choice.
b) Poison/potare (to drink) implies form (life) falling for the temptation of flow (inception towards death). The only antidote to the poison of temptation implies resistance by free will of choice.
Who owns you?
Free can't be owned without binding self to another willingly.
Im asking honest questions
Neither asking others; nor following a quest "hones" ones discernment. To hone implies sharpening ones edge within perceivable knowl-EDGE...
Are you a slider?
Upvote vs downvote aka circular conflict (reason)...that's what makes ones foundation slippery. Describe the momentum (inception towards death) of matter (life) implies a moving foundation within which each ones free will of choice needs to balance.
What is your purpose here in this 7 years?
a) Pur (forth) pose (to put)...only nature puts forth being, which allows each being to adapt (perception) to all nature puts forwards (perceivable) OR ignore if for each other (suggestion).
Natural purpose implies adaptation to origin; artificial purpose implies seeking outcome.
b) As for 7 years...if one counts, then one permits another to hold onto accountable, which binds ones free will of choice. What if seven implies S(plit)EVEN aka being (life) split even (inception towards death)?
that line
Aka that linear progression of life...from inception towards death.
straight
Thinking straight implies natural delineation; circular thinking implies artificial logic.
a) Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
b) If I ask you to describe the transference of living essence from origin towards outcome, then what labels would you use to include the pass-through of animation?
What about one describing the momentum of life from inception towards death to another is artificial or hallucinatory?
nuns
Nun/nana (mother) aka father (motion) > mother (momentum) > off-spring (matter) aka the perceivable MOMent for the perception of each MATER.
How do you reconcile God saying He will pour out His Spirit and people will prophesy?
a) Pro (forwards) phesy (to speak)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prophet
The spirit of God forwards will...few utilize the spiritual to animate the material with speech "in the name of" God.
b) God doesn't say anything...God implies the sound naturalizing each instrumental being with the will to articulate speech. The temptation of will (want) needs to be resisted.
c) God alienates (inception separating life) during reconciliation (death uniting life). The reconciliation of many (gentiles) sustains the alienation of few (jew). Alienation implies analysis (setting apart); reconciliation implies synthesis (putting together).
"Oneself as another" implies All is Other
All WAS before one comes into being by separation from one another...only then can another suggest what all IS.
"one to another" implies One to All
a) All forwards each one within...no matter what one towards to another.
b) Implication aka if/then implies forward motion aka all ion (action) forwarding each mot (reaction) within...that's natural transference. Artificial transference implies from one (to sell) to another (to buy) aka from ones suggestion towards another ones consent.
What of "creatio ex Deo"?
Out of (ex) what would a deity (deo) create? Deity implies divine nature aka division of (everything)...not creation out of (nothing).
Create/ker (to grow) implies each partial (growth) within whole (loss). God cannot grow...cause that would imply growing into more than God.
Loss (motion) sets growth (matter) free from one another...few distract from loss by tempting many to hold onto growth; thereby burdening each other.
What of "unity implying diversity"?
Implication (if/then) aka if unity (singularity of motion); then towards unit (matter divided from one another).
Diversity (momentum) of unity (motion) implies unit (matter)...not diverse units put together.
What of unity of real with real?
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka RE (ones perception) AL (all perceivable)...any suggestion of another implies fiction if consented to.
RE (unit) AL (unity)...the separation in-between implies diversity.
What if "the spiritual real and the natural real are" polar?
AL implies all natural; RE implies each natives response...the separation of nature into native implies spirit aka nature breathing life into native aka motion using momentum to animate matter.
Only animated matter (life) in-between momentum (inception towards death) can perceive polarity (animation) within singularity (motion).
Singularity (motion) uses polarity (momentum) to charge resistance (matter)...
Is One within All
Only within oneness (whole; cause; motion) can one (partial; effect; matter) come into being...another suggest IS to tempt one into an IS vs ISN'T conflict with one another aka within a mental (logic) and physical (reason) confine.
All WAS before each one within comes into being...only then can one suggest what all IS to one another. Consenting to any suggestion prevents one (perception) from discerning self within all (perceivable).
Christianity teaches unity in diversity, not unity free from polarity.
a) Unit implies apart from one another, hence DI-verse.
b) Unity inside diversion implies an artificial summation of units nature diversifies from one another.
c) Only within polarity (balance) can free (choice) come into being. Notice furthermore that polar implies "directed opposites"...not TWO sides.
the spiritual real and the natural real are complementary
Com (together) ple (to fill) ment (mind) represents the artificial putting together of real and fake within ones mind...while ignoring that nature moves spirit through essence.
intelligence does recognize its potential,
a) The LIG within intel-LIG-ence implies legere (to choose) + leg (to collect; gather)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/intelligence.
One can only artificially collect (possession) what nature sets apart from one another (potential)....the former diminishes the latter.
b) Re (to respond) CO (together) gnize (to know; perceive). Within nature...ones perception responds to all perceivable based on a separation from one another. Few shape suggestions to tempt many together into a CO-nsensus, while ignoring the natural process of separation aka knowledge.
unity contains diversity
Diversification implies each unit set apart from one another aka FREE to choose by oneself. Few suggest unitarianism to tempt many into a consensus representing containment.
If God implies unity, then each unit of being within implies diversity from one another. God isn't a container, but a diviner/divider...
"recognizing potential" is ambiguous and almost meaningless
Meaning implies a measurement taken from another by ones free will of choice aka the corruption of RE (ones response) with CO (together with another) aka ones choice selecting a chosen one aka the trick used to tempt one to willingly sacrifice potential by taking possession of "meaning".
Furthermore...holding onto meaning establishes ambiguity aka doubt thanks to circular thinking (logic) within self turning into contention (reason) against another.
If it could not, we could not, nor could we speak of the hypothetical, for we are less than it.
It's ones (singular) consent to suggested we (plural) which places (thesis) one under (hypo) another. Consent always lessens choice.
it's possible to define it
De (to divide) finit (to end) ion (action)...action divides into reaction. Others suggest FINIT in-between DE and ION to corrupt ones expressed potential into self repression by possession. Definition affixes potential...if held onto.
"Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"
I'd rather partake whole meals
Being implies part within whole...each meal representing a part appetite (want) within whole hunger (need).
what is negligible
All implies necessity for each one within...one another tempts ones negligence to all. To weaponize negligence...few are suggesting "creatio ex nihilo" to tempt many into a consensus about "nothing".
my initial statement
MY implies possession; INITIAL implies all procession initiating each potential...it's ones state of mind which can be manipulated to deny procession for possession.
Who is Victoria
Victoria/victory/weik - "to turn; bend"
and why she need justice
Only within justice can one turn/bend the rule...
mainstream religious trauma
a) If religion implies choosing a side, then that would position a believer at the side of a main stream aka on the banks of a river instead of within the current. If that current animates life, then that would imply a traumatic experience like being a fish out of water.
b) Why do trauma (injury) and traum (dream) have the same etymological root...trau/tere (to rub; turn)?
Just because...does not mean
Being implies within just cause...others suggest nihilism (doesn't) and determinism (mean) to tempt beings at odds with one another.
One may get upset because they never really got it
Only during motion can matter be set up...the setup tempts matter to get what cannot be got aka holding procession within possession.
If one holds anything in possession then one gets upset when procession takes it away like a castle in the sand.
It gives people an excuse to just join The World
Nature gives (inception) and takes (death) by dissembling each being (life) from one another...others suggest pluralism (people); unitarianism (join); theism (the) and collectivism (world) to tempt ones free will of choice to artificially hold together what nature sets apart.
30 seconds of quiet thought
The 30 seconds represent a measurement taken, which establishes the tik vs tok noise aka the clicking of the clock indicating that ones time is running out.
Taking any measurement corrupts thought...only by letting go can one think freely and without further ado (delay).
they haven't created a lie but are manipulating and hiding the truth for their means
Truth and lie imply a measurement taken aka a mean/men/me - "to measure"...holding onto either side manipulates ones position at the center, while hiding motion/current/change from ones perception.
From a christian perspective...if God; then truth and lie in one. Holding onto a side ignores half of God. Choosing to let go of both sides implies balancing within the only current of God.
A hint would be that understanding the physical and spiritual worlds are 2 completely different things
a) Hint/hentan - "to seize"...few suggest information as hints to tempt many to seize it into possession (seizure). Perceivable inspiration moves through ones perception and cannot be seized. Inspiration animates the spirit (spir) within (in) action (ation).
b) Differences cannot be complete, because only within motion can matter be differentiated from one another...few suggest determinism (complete) to trick many into completing (equality) differences (diversity) by putting them together like a puzzle/mosaic.
c) Only within ALL (motion) can spiritu-AL (momentum) become physic-AL (matter)...
Maybe in german or Japanese one could make the spiritual meaning have the correct feelings but in English its all intellectual.
a) German/germ/gene (to give birth, beget) + Japan aka jih (sun) + pun (origin)...aka Isis and Horus aka Mystery Babylon painted with fresh labels.
b) Male (motion) > female (momentum) > off-spring (matter) implies delineation...english/anglo/ang (to bend) permits few to use compass (circular) and square (angular) to bend the rule/reg (to move in a straight line) for many.
The sounds have been reversed
Sound/sanus (whole; entire; all) implies singularity...few suggest theism (the) and pluralism (sounds) to reverse (respond to turn) the minds of many.
Sound only moves forwards, which delineates each in-stru-ment (mind structured within) within an audible spectrum. Few suggest sym-phony (sound together) to tempt many into harm-ony (harming one) by turning against one another.
βHarmony, my bretheren, Harmony, is the true word and the Royal Secret which makes possible the empire of true Masonic Brotherhood!" ~James Shaw 'The Deadly Deception"
from Hebrew and made into spells
Aka crafting spells by brewing (fermentation aka mixing and boiling)...he brew (hebrew) his story (history) to make jew (you) fall for it.
However with a new dictionary that one can make for oneself
Aka make believe..."there's nothing new under the sun". A being doesn't require a dictionary for nature...nature allows each being within to discern self by adapting to nature.
for oneself(anthroposophy)
a) FOR (forward) implies all (motion) moving self (momentum) through each one (matter).
b) Anthropo (man) + sophy (to love) turns into gynaΓka (woman) + miso (hate)...if consented to.
one is given a way to start to communicate
Com (together) uni (apart from one another) contradicts way giving each one within free will of choice...others suggest com-uni-ism through for example com-unity and mass com-uni-cation to establish that contradiction within one.
Whatever another suggests about given...tempts one to take.
death penalty
"Raymond George Riles (born June 1, 1950) is an American convicted murderer who was on death row in Texas from 1976 until he was resentenced to life imprisonment in June 2021. At the time of his resentencing, Riles had been on death row longer than anyone else in the United States."... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Riles
That's 45 years of waiting for a death penalty...
"child rapists deserve the death penalty"
How about: "Killing child rapists doesn't deserve punishment, but reward, pardon, and forgiveness"?
Text/teks - "to weave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/text One can only weave together what nature separated from one another before. No text can ever be a foundation to build upon.
As for hebrew...only within flow can form be brewed (fermentation by mixing and boiling).
Hence few suggesting texts to artificially ferment natural spirit within a consensus among many, with consensus representing the cauldron aka the kettle to boil the cattle.