a) One (matter) within him (motion) self (momentum)...that's how him (god) moves her (spirit) through each off-spring (essence).
b) One with himself implies together (synthesis); each one within himself implies apart (analysis)...few suggest love and hate to tempt many together into conflict against one another.
c) God generates spirit to animate essence...holding onto love contradicts animation by inverting it into animosity aka hate.
Example...holding onto your lovely cat will soon turn into hateful animosity when the want to hold onto ignores the need to let go of. The lovely cat hates to be held for too long.
Ones choice in-between the need to let go and the want to hold onto implies reality...the measurement taken about how long is too long represents fiction. That's why saying how MUCH we love one another represents fictitious measurements taken, while ignoring reality (need/want balance).
B) He is together with those that choose Him. Hate is for devils who choose to war against Him with their free will of choice to choose to war against Him.
C)
God generates spirit to animate essence...holding onto love contradicts animation by inverting it into animosity aka hate.
I don't see how, God is love and means to love.
Those choosing hate, choose against love, which is made from God, so they make themsleves devils, satans, adversaries.
You clearly don't know my cats, or toad or turtle.. They know love and I know their capacity for it and tread accordingly.. (usually)
The young toad prefers my limited interaction, the 19 yr old turtle prefers to self regulate her attention to you and your attention to her..
The mini cat named Kitty is much the same at 10 but is more generous with her affections.
The same age, though larger cat, Japser is very jealous for all available affection. (Literally a living teddy bear)
All mean relatively well within their skill sets (edit: and) are extremely affectionate within theirs bounds of choosing.
Consequences occur when one forces them outside their limits..
Only solid (life) within liquid (inception towards death) can experience dust (vapor) aka the exhalation of moisture. Rib refers to ripping apart solid during fluid aka Adam (motion) > Eve (momentum) > rip/rib (matter) with Christ (anointed one) implying the protective lubrication during the separation process of matter from one another.
He is together with those that choose Him
Together implies "towards getting"...towards implying motion; getting implying matter. Only matter (life) can get everything from motion (inception towards death).
Notice furthermore toget-HER aka him (motion) > her (momentum) > off-spring (matter)...matter GETs what his motion moves TOwards HER momentum.
The word (articulation of sound) TO-GET-HER distracts one from discerning the natural process of sound by using synthesis (putting together) to invert analysis (setting apart).
How could you see if you hold onto "love" (or anything else)? Sight requires clarity aka the moving animation (perceivable inspiration) from nature...others suggest love and hate to confine ones mental (logic) and physical (reason) sight within circular obscurity by holding together what nature sets apart from one another.
God was love and hate before one was given the will to choose a side...choosing to hold onto either side corrupts sight.
"Hasidic judaism originated in Eastern Europe in the 18th century and centers on a fervent devotion to God through love" aka HASI-DIC (hasse dich; hate you) preaching LOVE/EVOL (evil).
Those choosing hate, choose against love, which is made from God, so they make themselves devils, satans, adversaries...
...and vice versa. Choice only works in-between balance, while choosing to hold onto either side imbalances choice.
Motion delineates (inception towards death) matter (life)...putting life in-between sides that cannot be held onto. Holding onto artificial sides like love or hate shape delineation into ad (against) versary (to turn) aka drawing a circle (reason) inside a line (implication).
Choosing love or hate establishes a circle (versus/verto; to turn) which in return prevents one from thinking straight.
The young toad prefers my limited interaction
Both the young toad and you represent the internal (life) of action (inception towards death)...that's the natural inter-action separating each one from one another.
What you call limitation by preference represents the free will of choice of each to prefer one over the other...which further limits free will of choice by binding self to another.
the 19 yr old turtle
Does a turtle need to measure age? While thinking about that...remember the "slow-moving" tortoise vs the fast-moving hare from Aesop's Fables. (try to mentally take the versus conflict out of it).
Does matter (life) need to measure the speed of motion (inception towards death)? Can it be measured from in-between?
is more generous with her affections.
It's cause which generates effect...effects calling affection to one another "generous" are distracting each other from cause. God implies the one and only generator...each being within a reactor. Reacting to one another's generous affection tempts one to ignore re-generation.
Notice that the financiers represent both the most generous ones by offering everything for a price to anyone who can pay, while also the most stingy ones, since they offer nothing of any value (fiat) to each ones FREE will of choice aka the only God given price.
Finance (an end, settlement, retribution) implies an affect by one another...nature generating being implies cause generating each effect from one another.
Jasper; Kitty and you are forced to be free (life) inside limitation (inception towards death)...others tempt you to set outside boundaries for one another, which distracts from origin. Whatever boundaries you choose to set...your free will of choice can also break.
Nature implies the force that breaks apart each being...holding onto boundaries permits few to exploit the natural break, while setting up more artificial boundaries for many...unbeknownst to the one believing consensus protecting boundaries.
Removed an unnecessary sentence
Can there be unnecessary sentience within nature for any beings life sentence? Can one within God remove anything from God?
a) One (matter) within him (motion) self (momentum)...that's how him (god) moves her (spirit) through each off-spring (essence).
b) One with himself implies together (synthesis); each one within himself implies apart (analysis)...few suggest love and hate to tempt many together into conflict against one another.
c) God generates spirit to animate essence...holding onto love contradicts animation by inverting it into animosity aka hate.
Example...holding onto your lovely cat will soon turn into hateful animosity when the want to hold onto ignores the need to let go of. The lovely cat hates to be held for too long.
Ones choice in-between the need to let go and the want to hold onto implies reality...the measurement taken about how long is too long represents fiction. That's why saying how MUCH we love one another represents fictitious measurements taken, while ignoring reality (need/want balance).
One Matter, Himself, splits One into both..
A) Dust to make a rib.
B) He is together with those that choose Him. Hate is for devils who choose to war against Him with their free will of choice to choose to war against Him.
C)
I don't see how, God is love and means to love.
Those choosing hate, choose against love, which is made from God, so they make themsleves devils, satans, adversaries.
You clearly don't know my cats, or toad or turtle.. They know love and I know their capacity for it and tread accordingly.. (usually)
The young toad prefers my limited interaction, the 19 yr old turtle prefers to self regulate her attention to you and your attention to her..
The mini cat named Kitty is much the same at 10 but is more generous with her affections.
The same age, though larger cat, Japser is very jealous for all available affection. (Literally a living teddy bear)
All mean relatively well within their skill sets (edit: and) are extremely affectionate within theirs bounds of choosing.
Consequences occur when one forces them outside their limits..
Edit: Removed an unnecessary sentence
"for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return" ~Genesis 3:19
Only solid (life) within liquid (inception towards death) can experience dust (vapor) aka the exhalation of moisture. Rib refers to ripping apart solid during fluid aka Adam (motion) > Eve (momentum) > rip/rib (matter) with Christ (anointed one) implying the protective lubrication during the separation process of matter from one another.
Together implies "towards getting"...towards implying motion; getting implying matter. Only matter (life) can get everything from motion (inception towards death).
Notice furthermore toget-HER aka him (motion) > her (momentum) > off-spring (matter)...matter GETs what his motion moves TOwards HER momentum.
The word (articulation of sound) TO-GET-HER distracts one from discerning the natural process of sound by using synthesis (putting together) to invert analysis (setting apart).
Guess who meticulously crafts spells out of letters... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4WLy44C5.jpg
How could you see if you hold onto "love" (or anything else)? Sight requires clarity aka the moving animation (perceivable inspiration) from nature...others suggest love and hate to confine ones mental (logic) and physical (reason) sight within circular obscurity by holding together what nature sets apart from one another.
God was love and hate before one was given the will to choose a side...choosing to hold onto either side corrupts sight.
"Hasidic judaism originated in Eastern Europe in the 18th century and centers on a fervent devotion to God through love" aka HASI-DIC (hasse dich; hate you) preaching LOVE/EVOL (evil).
...and vice versa. Choice only works in-between balance, while choosing to hold onto either side imbalances choice.
Motion delineates (inception towards death) matter (life)...putting life in-between sides that cannot be held onto. Holding onto artificial sides like love or hate shape delineation into ad (against) versary (to turn) aka drawing a circle (reason) inside a line (implication).
Choosing love or hate establishes a circle (versus/verto; to turn) which in return prevents one from thinking straight.
Both the young toad and you represent the internal (life) of action (inception towards death)...that's the natural inter-action separating each one from one another.
What you call limitation by preference represents the free will of choice of each to prefer one over the other...which further limits free will of choice by binding self to another.
Does a turtle need to measure age? While thinking about that...remember the "slow-moving" tortoise vs the fast-moving hare from Aesop's Fables. (try to mentally take the versus conflict out of it).
Does matter (life) need to measure the speed of motion (inception towards death)? Can it be measured from in-between?
It's cause which generates effect...effects calling affection to one another "generous" are distracting each other from cause. God implies the one and only generator...each being within a reactor. Reacting to one another's generous affection tempts one to ignore re-generation.
Notice that the financiers represent both the most generous ones by offering everything for a price to anyone who can pay, while also the most stingy ones, since they offer nothing of any value (fiat) to each ones FREE will of choice aka the only God given price.
Finance (an end, settlement, retribution) implies an affect by one another...nature generating being implies cause generating each effect from one another.
Affect (synthesis) contradicts effect (analysis)...if chosen.
Jasper; Kitty and you are forced to be free (life) inside limitation (inception towards death)...others tempt you to set outside boundaries for one another, which distracts from origin. Whatever boundaries you choose to set...your free will of choice can also break.
Nature implies the force that breaks apart each being...holding onto boundaries permits few to exploit the natural break, while setting up more artificial boundaries for many...unbeknownst to the one believing consensus protecting boundaries.
Can there be unnecessary sentience within nature for any beings life sentence? Can one within God remove anything from God?