hope for taking
Hope implies focusing on outcome, while ignoring to adapt to origin...ignorance implies opportunity for others to take from one that which was given.
back
Perceivable origin (back) or suggested outcome (front)...it's ones free will of choice what to focus on.
emperor
EM'PEROR, noun (Latin impero, to command) - "to bid; to order; to direct; to charge".
Natural order directs (inception towards death) charges (life)...those within tempt each other into consenting to follow BID, verb (Latin peto) - "to ask, to desire, to beseech, to request; to invite".
Following the suggested orders by others, tempts one to lose charge (resistance) within perceivable (velocity). If resistance (life) ignores velocity (inception towards death); then velocity diminishes resistance quicker.
annunaki
a) ANNUN (Latin annuncio; to deliver a message) + AKI (akin; allied by nature)
b) nature generates allies by setting itself apart from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception)...others utilize suggestion to deliver messages of temptation as to lure partials back together.
Suggestions such as...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or abrahamism (father of multitude) or united states; united nations; european union or unicode; uniform; universe or mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot; multiculturalism or equality (same) through diversity (different) etc.
Sleight of hand: "there comes a time, when we need to heed a certain call...when the world must come together as one" https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/michaeljackson/weretheworldusaforafrica.html
In short...suggested "annun" tempts one to ignore perceivable "akin".
These advertisements represent proof of substantial jewish involvement in the greatest criminal endeavor in the history of the world - the Black Holocaust.
Notice how one racket (slavery) is being exposed; while another (holocaust) is being protected. This is about establishing victim status, while bringing it under a protective umbrella. Same trick with establishing "islamophobia" and bringing it underneath the umbrella of "antisemitism".
Theistic Satanists...Lucifer is the word meaning 'light bearer"
a) Notice usage of "THE word" aka placing the-ism before suggested (word), which tempts one to ignore perceivable (sound).
b) if words have meaning, then what about letters? Who LETS others define meaning of suggested words?
c) if letters implies suggested symbolism, then what about perceivable symmetry?
d) what if bearer (form) and light (flow) are distinct from one another, while simultaneously same aka partials (form) within whole (flow)?
e) -ist (satanist) implies ones consent to follow suggested -ism (satanism). Does being (life) need to follow origin (inception towards death) or does it need to resist the temptation thereof?
What if the path of least resistance implies ones choice to ignore resisting?
f) What about satan aka adversary aka adverse (opposite)? Could there be opposition without conflict? Does resistance (life) oppose velocity (inception towards death)? What if resistance could be tempted into a conflict against other resistance by ignoring to resist velocity?
Greek phosphoros, "light-bearer"
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Phosphor
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Phosphorus
Light "bringer". White (pure) phosphorus (light bringer) implies motion (light) generating momentum (spectrum) for bearers of light within the visible light-spectrum. Those bearers of light imply hue (color) man, which are emitting (inception) rays; radius; races (life) towards absence of light (death).
of dawn
DAWN, verb - "to begin to grow"...only within ongoing can temporary (life) begin (inception) and end (death).
Suggested "from dusk till dawn" represents the inversion of perceivable from dawn (inception) till (life) dusk (death).
identified; identification
Suggested IDEN'TICAL, adjective (Latin idem, the same) represents the inversion of perceivable differentiation. To be implies one apart from one another, hence differentiated (life) within momentum (inception toward death) of same motion.
Whatever one perceives exists at a "different" position than ones perception. Awareness implies one being aware of something else. Whole differentiates itself into partials, which partials perceive as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for the sustenance of oneself as apartheid within wholeness.
Perpetuation of oneself implies through intercourse with another one for OFF-spring, hence perpetuation through differentiation.
This 1 and this 1 are not the same, they are ten spaces apart from one another, hence existing at different position. It's the suggestion of look-a-likes which tempts one to believe in sameness.
Light implies sameness; being within the visible spectrum of light implies differentiation of solids (light-bearer) within fluid (light-bringer).
border of the Luciferian
a) LUCID (shine; light) + FERO (wild)
b) white (pure light) and black (absence of light) imply borders for those running wild withing the spectrum of visible light.
c) consenting to suggested the-ism keeps one in the dark, hence ignoring BRIGHT, adjective (Heb. to shine) - "evident; clear; manifest to the mind, as light is to the eyes".
In short...dark (ignorance) or light (discernment).
Edit:
Sleight of hand for "wild"... "Wild thing...you make my heart sing (life)...you make everything groovy (inception towards death)".
Groovy aka GROOVE, noun - "furrow, channel; passage" + THING, noun - "that which comes".
"Wild thing...I think you move me"
How are people not more awake?
a) Conflicts of reason such as "more vs less" or "nothing vs everything" or "people (plural) vs person (singular)" keeps one under the spell of suggestions by another.
b) WAKE; noun (Old English wacian) - "arise, be born, originate" implies status quo of being alive. Others suggest REST (cessation of motion) as to distract from being (life) within motion (inception towards death).
a) All corporations imply oration by corpus (corpse, dead body).
b) consenting to dead language (suggested words) tempts one to ignore being alive within perceivable sound.
c) nature doesn't orate (pray; utter); it abridges sound (whole) into instruments (partials).
way of reasoning
Reason (circular) tempts one to ignore way (onward progression).
solution is...gets us there.
What if being (life) implies within solution (inception towards death), hence struggling to sustain self during dissolution aka "separation into parts, dispersal"?
correct use of frequency
a) correct implies in conflict with incorrect, hence an imbalance. Others suggest sides to tempt choice at center to imbalance self, when consenting to hold onto either.
b) frequency aka FREE (free will of choice) + QUENCH (to extinguish, put out aka heat, light, fire, desire, hunger, thirst).
Aka being free (life) while being quenched (inception towards death).
c) only resistance within velocity can experience frequency...frequent adaptation of resistance to velocity implies resonance; while consenting to other resistance implies dissonance, hence generating friction among resistance (conflicts of reason).
d) suggested Hz (hertz) tempts one to ignore perceivable "hurts" aka being (life) within that which hurts (inception towards death), hence frequent resistance needed for sustenance of self.
a) AMA (amalgam; mixing of differences) LEK (lack; deficiency).
b) Nature sets differences apart from one another; those within nature tempt each other back together (collectivization). Consenting to suggested collectivism amalgamates many, while permitting chosen few to remain apart.
c) jews are efficient; because gentiles consent to suggested deficiencies.
a) -ist (terrorist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (terrorism).
b) TERROR; noun (Latin terreo) - "to frighten"...few utilize suggested to frighten; many consent by being afraid of suggested.
Fear (suggestion) is the mind (perception) killer...if one is willingly killing ones own mind, then one permits others to kill one.
There should be testimony after testimony.
What if looking at suggestions by others tempts one to ignore self aka TEST (trial) IM (within) ONY (one)?
What if ones consent lets the suggestions by others in, hence others utilizing suggested temptations to put ones response-ability (free will of choice) on trial?
Notice further that consenting (by choice) to suggestions (by choice) permits others to be ones "chosen ones".
What if Israel is not truthful?
a) One that striveth with God (Hebrew yisra'el)...strives (life) within change (inception towards death). Those who ignore perceivable change are holding onto suggested truths, which permits others to suggest the contradiction thereof as lies.
b) instead of reasoning over "if...is not..."; try implication of "if not is; then..."
Hey, are you familiar with "sleepydude" on Substack?
a) skimmed through it; liked it; bookmarked it. I do season sleeping with naps though.
b) Familiar aka "a spirit called upon" aka a "domestic"...being implies local (life) within domestic (inception towards death), hence needing to adapt (exhale) to impressing (inhale) aka breathing (Latin spiro; spirit; to breathe).
Others suggest "familiar" to destabilize ones local (Latin loco; place; position).
c) If many consent to suggestions by chosen few, then that implies submission to collectivization, hence permitting a chosen few to establish SUB (submissive) STACK (collective). Furthermore...stacking establishes imbalance, hence leading to toppling over upon those willingly submitting under.
Next in line of thinking...stacking high-rises crushes first down-towns and then sub-urbs. Those who stack are "erecting", while cutting off others within "circumference" aka circumcision.
hidden communications in language
a) ATION (action) reveals reactions. Being implies reaction (life) generated within action (inception towards death) aka expression (temporary growth) within impression (ongoing loss).
Others suggest COMM-UNI-ism aka composition of one (singular) into many (plural). Ones consent to any suggested -ism implies the composition aka the contract between consent and suggested aka ones choice to hold onto what another offers aka ones consent to RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka binding self through mercantile law as buyer (consent) to seller (suggestion).
Meanwhile...nature offers everything (perceivable) to each ones (perception) "free" will of choice. The highest value in perceivable existence implies each ones evaluation thereof...others suggest prices to tempt one to devaluate ones evaluation, when consenting to pay.
Furthermore...suggested "cost" tempts one to ignore perceivable "caust" (burning; corroding). Living within the process of dying implies a "burned offering" (holo-caust). Caust also implies Cause of being.
Sleight of hand: "I will not offer burnt offerings without cost" ~ 1 Chronicles 21:24.
b) LAN'GUAGE, noun (Latin lingua, the tongue, and speech) - "human speech; the expression of ideas by words or significant articulate sounds"
The few suggest speech (artifice; fiction) as the inversion of nature offering sound (natural; reality)...the many ignore perceivable (sound) when consenting to suggested (words). This represents spell-craft.
The grammar of the many represents the grimoire (invocation) of the few. Alphabet (Latin abecadary) for many represents ABaCadDabra for few. The many read books, while the few spell-bind them in-between covers aka blinders/blinkers for horses etc. Consenting to suggested letters implies LETTING; noun - "allowing movement or passage of something" aka blood-letting aka letting the vampire in etc.
Nature doesn't speak...it moves sound (entire) which generates partials (instruments aka in-stru-ments aka minds structured within) aka whole (perceivable) setting itself apart (perception).
Furthermore...suggested words tempt one to hold onto definitions (definite; affixed), which in return tempts one to ignore that sound moves. Sound (liquid) generates instruments (solid) aka liquid (inception towards death) generating solid (life).
Adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (phonic; sound)...ignoring sound for word based definitions implies DEAF PHONETICIAN (de-fi-ni-tion).
how something means two things
a) If one (perception) ignores oneness (perceivable) for dualism (suggested), then one ignores self (singular) for others (plural).
b) life being moved from inception towards death doesn't imply being in-between two states, but a different unit (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of same motion.
c) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of ingredient (growth) out of base (loss). Alchemy.
Only within loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life).
Others suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) as the inversion of transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything).
d) consider EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...if energy is one, then what else could be two?
What if...all is one in energy? What if..."all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone...ALL(in)ONE"?
e) being implies one apart from one another...others tempt ones together (many) to remain apart (few). Apartheid (growth) within wholeness (loss).
In short...two only exists if one ignores self for another one. Nature doesn't count, it designates units (Latin unus; one)...others suggest one to count. https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg
f) ME'ANING, noun - "that which exists in the mind, view or contemplation as a settled aim or purpose, though not directly expressed".
Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto. The words upheld within ones mind/memory tempt one to ignore being an instrument within flowing sound.
Consenting to suggested permits those suggesting to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning thereof, while tricking oneself into conflicts of reason (true vs false) against one another over the suggested meaning.
which you seem to definitely grasp
Definite implies affixed; while grasping implies ones choice to hold onto suggested, hence affixing it within ones mind/memory. That's the self imposed slavery permitting others to be masters.
Discerning self to be (life) within change (inception towards death) inspires one to let go of temptations, instead of holding onto them.
Wanting to hold onto an apple makes it poisonous; needing to adapt to hunger makes apples nutritious. Hunger implies ongoing; anything inside ongoing implies temporary...the latter tempts (want); the former inspires one to resist temptation (need). Being implies choice in-between need/want balance.
because I don't grasp it to any significant degree yet
a) others suggest "because" as the inversion of cause (perceivable) towards being (perception). Ones consent to suggested permits those suggesting to shape suggestions (fiction) in the name of perceivable cause (reality).
This tempts one to view reality through the lens of fiction. In "They Live" they made it about fighting others to consent to suggested glasses. In reality...many willingly wear glasses (suggested); ignoring sight (perceivable), while fighting each other (reasoning) over what is being shown to them.
Inspiration (reality) is always available for anyone choosing to resist information (fiction).
For example I can mostly follow along with what you write but I couldn't easily write the same comments.
a) Attempting to follow sameness (inception towards death) destroys differences (life)...resisting sameness grows differences.
b) I adapt to a moving system (sound)...you try to mimic something affixed (words), while affixing it with your consent.
c) WRITTEN aka "laws, statutes; laws enacted by the supreme power and recorded; as contradistinguished from unwritten or common law".
Written implies as suggested by others; common implies as consented to by many...natural implies unwritten. Nature doesn't write books aka compositions bound aka volumes...it sets units (ones) free (choice).
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9gOQgfPW4Y
- "Pump up the volume"
- "We gonna get ya"
- "Automatic, push back, won't get chosen"
- "Systematic, genetic, command your soul"
- M.A.R.R.S aka mars aka war aka conflict of reason.
If I had to guess
Gambling for suggested outcomes (guess) tempts one to ignore being a "guest" within perceivable origin. Conjecture (guess) tempts one to ignore being in-between injection (inception) and expulsion (death).
you post the comments
a) About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) + Comment Score (10972)...ask yourself if you view comments as posts?
b) only nature offers (action); those within imply offering (reaction)...reacting to what others are selling (retail) tempts one to ignore what nature is offering (wholesale).
The happy merchant of temptations calls it a "free market"; because ones free will of choice is tempted into a market for buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) of livestock.
as practice
a) Adapting to perceivable inspiration while resisting consenting to suggested information aka frequency of resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
b) PRAC'TICAL, adjective (Latin practicus) - "active use; opposed to speculative"...being implies reactive (life) used by active (inception towards death).
SPEC (special; particular) CUL (culus; fundamental) ATIVE (active; action) aka being particular reaction within foundation of whole action.
to open up others to this way
Only way (inception towards death) opens (inception) and closes (death) wanderers (life). Others tempt one to follow directions, hence tempting one wayward (to turn away) from ones position as resistance within velocity.
my question is...
...a suggested attempt to gain suggested answers, while ignoring to be (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death), hence struggling to sustain self while being dissolved.
Question implies QUAERERE (to seek) TION (action) aka want for outcome, while ignoring need to resist origin. Reaction doesn't need to seek action; it needs to react to being enacted upon.
Others suggest progressivism to tempt one on a quest (questions) for the holy grail (answers), yet whatever one finds will tempt one to seek more, because unlike suggested progressivism...perceivable progress doesn't end; it starts (inception) and ends (death) those living within.
do you have any recommendations for reading resources on this broad topic?
The solution lies within your question...resource aka ones REsponse to perceivable SOURCE, while resisting the suggested answers by others.
how have you developed your ability to see language in this way?
The short version...noticed lies; looked for truth just to find more lies, then questioned if there's any truth that cannot be changed, which in return led me to comprehend being within change (perceivable) while holding onto truth (suggested), which permits others to lie (contradict truth).
This led from natural law over motion to energy and oneness to ones self discernment, all the while working on resisting the temptation to hold onto what others are suggesting. The more one lets go of suggested; the less burden one carries within perceivable.
Reason confines ones mind to conflicts against others; while implication (if/then) allows ones free will of choice to draw from everything (perceivable) nature has to offer...an inexhaustible offer which exhausts those growing within.
Many thanks for any reply or assistance.
Thanks for inspiring me to reply and being implies assisted (inception towards death) stance (life).
passage of time
Suggested passage of time tempts one to ignore being passenger aka TIME/EMIT aka EMIT', verb (Latin emitto) - "to send forth"...being (life) send forth (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand from Back to the Future: EMMETT (emit) the TIME traveler.
accelerated
Being implies resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death). Living implies delay within process of dying...others suggest progressivism (fastening) to tempt one to ignore resisting.
- Ones consent to suggested money tempts one into a conflict of reason (rich vs poor)
- Ones consent to suggested vaccine tempts one into a conflict of reason (vaxxed vs unvaxxed)
- Ones consent to suggested words tempts one into a conflict of reason (truth vs lies)
Consenting to a suggested side (left or right) puts one into a conflict of reason (left vs right), while tempting one to ignore that ones consenting choice can only exist in-between left/right balance.
In short...consenting to any suggested side tempts ones choice off center, while permitting a chosen one control over both sides.
They control the entire checker board guys.
White (pure light) and black (absence of light)...neither can be perceived by one within the visible spectrum of light aka by a hue (color) man.
Others suggest black and white sides to distract hue-man from being spec (special; partial) within entire (whole). Only within spectrum can one perceive color, and only within light can there be a spectrum of color.
under the direction...
...distracts one from being (life) within direction (inception towards death). Neither over, nor under, but in-between aka IN (within) BE (being) TWEEN (two).
all wars...
...suggested by few represent the reasoning mind (want vs not want) of the consenting many.
The only difference between big mac vs whooper or ukraine vs russia is the branding of the sides...choosing either tempts one into the same conflict of reason. Take any conflict of reason (truth vs lie; good vs bad; us vs them etc.), then switch sides and notice that you're still within the same conflict.
Conflict cannot be resolved with reason for reason equals conflict.
Example...if two boxers go into one ring, then both are going to lose. They are tricked to fight about who spends more resistance into loss, while being deceived to view not losing as much as the other guy as growth.
Reasonable vs unreasonable still implies a conflict of reason. Implication (if/then) avoids reasoning (vs). Natural order implies motion, and so if motion; then everything else within.
How could one reason against motion, while being (life) moved (inception towards death) within?
heteroscedastic
Aka RANDOM; noun - "motion without direction". Being alive implies directed within motion from inception towards death.
Motion implies velocity (always directing forwards), while the momentum (inception towards death) of ongoing motion generates temporary resistance (life) at its center.
Momentum implies balance within motion, and the center of balance implies choice, hence ones "free" will of choice within "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom...random represents the suggested inversion thereof.
hidden subversion
Ones consent to suggested (words; information; fiction) tempts one to ignore; deny; hide perceivable (sound; inspiration; reality).
Nature moves sound forwards; those within tempt each other to hold onto suggested words, while ignoring to resist being an instrument moved within sound. If an instrument resists sound it "resonates", while ignoring to resist implies "dissonance".
Example: suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound). Adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIAN (from phonic; sound), while ignoring it for suggested definitions implies DEAF PHONETICIAN.
Another example...if I suggest having a box and you consent, then your consent permits me to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) what's in the box. That box represents your mind/memory, and your consent gives my suggestions the permission to enter information into it.
give up
Only nature gives all (perceivable) to each one (perception)...others tempt one to hold onto suggested, which when consented to, tempts one to give up.
a) I and others...a division between one and another.
b) Issue (flowing out aka egress), which implies a division from entry.
c) division itself aka divided vision implies in-between ones perception and all perceivable.
d) "schizo", as coined by Eugene Bleuler, is based on Sigismund Schlomo Freunds psychological analysis racket aka utilizing logic (conflicts of reason about suggested) to tempt others to ignore perceivable psyche (animating power).
In short...division (reason) by means of suggestion.
Couldn't help myself...
Precipitating itself from the origin breaks into many parts
a) "itself" implies oneself applying "self" to origin, hence ignoring to be partial within whole. Why? Self implies among other, while whole implies entire (sound).
Self can only exist within entire aka in-sanus (within sound) hence per-sonos (by sound). Applying "self" to origin implies personification of origin aka idolatry aka "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" aka labeling perceivable (sound) with suggested (word) etc.
b) others suggest pluralism (many) to distract one from discerning self as partial (one) within whole (oneness). Ones singular consent to suggested pluralism establishes collectivism aka permitting few to collectivize consenting many underneath suggested -isms.
c) instead of using suffix (-ing) try utilizing origin (-tion aka action)...precipita-tion implies action precipitating reactions. Doing that allows one to discern self as reaction (life) precipitates within action (inception towards death).
Choosing suffix tempts one to Latin suffixus; suffigere "to fasten", which for resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) implies increase of "suffering".
mini 'sources' within low perceivable view.
a) Perceivable (whole) implies only source for each ones perception (partial)...ignoring this by consenting to suggestions by others tempts one to view another as source (suggested information) for source (perceivable inspiration), hence establishing a mediator; media (Latin medius; middle) aka merchants in the middle, selling fiction as reality to anyone willingly buying into it.
b) Consenting to suggested tempts one to seek understanding aka to want to stand under others, which in return prevents one from growing self discernment within perceivable.
Perceivable moving through ones perception implies impression towards expression. Consenting to suggested implies self imposed repression of expression, while ignoring impression.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature". https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/madonna/humannature.html
Notice the next lines:
- "You wouldn't let me say the words I longed to say"
- "You didn't want to see life through my eyes"
That implies others denying perceivable for suggested, while trying to repress one who is longing to express self.
c) ones view is low if one chooses to stand under what others are showing, and ones view is high if one looks down upon others. Both implies suggested sides tempting one into a conflict of reason (low vs high), while ignoring ones sight as center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
Resisting the temptation to view what others show (suggest) from a low or high position, allows one to draw from everything nature offers through each one. Information tempts one to view it from high or low position; inspiration inspires one to resist temptation. Ones position within inspiration implies center, hence reacting by breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) within surrounding action aka within-spirit-action (inspiration).
If highest equals jew; then "tallest"...
Maybe you think I'm schizophrenic and I'm not
a) Schizo aka schism (Latin scindo) - "to divide"
b) "I'm not" aka I am (implies something) + not (implies nothing)...that's a division of something and nothing.
c) any word shaped implies a division of letters, and any suggested word implies a division within perceivable sound.
d) the conflict of reason...I'm vs I'm not...also implies division.
a) "This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." - Sigismund Schlomo Freud about the Irish.
b) IRE, noun (Latin ira, wrath). Sleight of hand: "roth ira"...
c) From Homer's Illiad: "Thus will persist, relentless in his ire"
d) Eye/I (life) of the storm (inception towards death) aka center of agitation (wrath)...others utilize psychoanalysis aka suggested logic to distract from perceivable psyche as to calm (pacify ones mind).