Number; nombre - "designation of a unit" (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence each chosen one.
Nature implies oneness (whole) generating ones (partials)...those within tempt one to count one another.
COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one, for ascertaining the whole number of units in a collection"...that implies collectivism.
"to obstruct" or "to oppose"
- Can motion (inception towards death) be obstructed or opposed?
- Can matter (life) be obstructed or opposed?
- Could matter obstruct or oppose each other to distract from motion?
identify that which is "religious" from that which is not.
a) Identical implies "same"...being implies different. Same motion (inception towards death) differentiates matter (life).
b) Different matter tempts each other with religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) to behave alike, hence mimicking sameness, while ignoring to be different from one another.
c) Nothing (Latin nihilo) implies ones de-nial of everything perceivable, when consenting to suggested nihil-ism.
are they not true regardless of who wrote them
Those reading are consenting to suggested truism. Those writing are advertising ones consenting mind AD (towards) VERT (turn), hence turning minds against each other within conflicts of reason (true vs false).
are they not true...or at all
If all changes; then whatever truth ones holds onto also changes into a lie.
Do certain people accept them as moral precepts and adhere to them only because of the medium in which they come?
Acceptance implies by free will of choice; which is the medium/middle of balance....accepting suggestions by another one tempts one to ignore being medium within all perceivable balance.
If one ignores balance (need/want); then one establishes imbalance (want vs not want) for ones free will of choice; which tries to bind itself to a suggested side, instead of balancing as matter (life) during motion (inception towards death).
there are many
What if there can be only one? How many "energy" exists?
When you sort through it all...
...you ignore being one (partials) sorted within all (whole). SORT, verb - "to separate".
taking things back their foundations
Ation/action (inception towards death) founds reactions (life)...trying to take tempts one to ignore being taken back to origin.
what we now call religion
CALL, verb (Heb. to hold or restrain)...consenting to religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) restrains self, while permitting others to call the shots.
conclusion I've reached
a) ION (action) sets apart...others suggest CON (together; with) as the inversion thereof, while ones consent to suggested cludere/closes/shuts one off from perceivable.
b) Rising implies within origin; reaching implies towards outcome. The only outcome of life implies death.
Sleight of hand: Jack Reacher aka jack/jacob/ya'aqobh - "a supplanter". Few supplant suggestions for many to reach by consent.
conventional religion
a) CON (together; with) + VENIRE (to come) + TION (action)...an inversion of coming to be (life) apart within action (inception towards death).
b) RE (response) + LIGARE (to bind) + ION (action)...once again inverting actions (balance) setting reactions (choice) free from one another.
specific reasoning
Specific implies particulars apart from one another...reasoning tempts together aka against one another. Reason destroys specification....if one ignore implication of whole.
b)
exist elsewhere
a) EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...where else could anything EX (proceeding from)?
b) -ist (exist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (existentialism). Perceiving EX implies within; out of; proceeding from perceivable.
competing agendas
COM (together; with) contradicts AGEN (action aka setting apart). Action (inception towards death) sets reactions (life) apart from one another. It's only those reactions which wield a free will of choice to COMe together, by for example consenting to suggested COMmunism.
bound by "plausible deniability" when they interact with us.
a) What if buyer (consent) can be tricked to bind self to product sold (suggestion), while ignoring merchant selling?
In other words...why do believers (buyers) bind themselves to "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" (product), while ignoring "in nomine" (merchant selling in the name of product)?
Religion (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"...ones free will of choice has to submit (Islam) for that new bond.
b) What if de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) implies ones consent to suggested nihil-ism...could that be plausible?
They communicate directly to your monologue
a) COM (together; with) contradicts mono (one and only)
b) Direction (inception towards death) sets reactors (life) apart from one another.
c) LOGUE (logic; reasoning against another) contradicts MONO (being one apart from one another)
monologue, can manipulate
How could MONO (singular) be MANI (plural) without ignoring ONEself for others?
random
What if few suggest without a course (random) as the inversion of being (life) within a course (inception towards death) aka choice (free) within balance (dom).
Random contradicts freedom.
the behavior of animals
Being (life) within animation (inception towards death) cannot have/hold onto/possess anything without ignoring/denying everything moving.
If one consents to "have"; then one ignores everything perceivable for suggested nothing, hence establishing "have nots".
Most people only interact
a) Interact aka internal action implies each ones reaction inside of action.
b) Action (sound) sets reactions (person; per sonos; by sound) apart from one another...others suggest pluralism (most people) to distracts singular (one) from discerning self.
anti-human
Hue (color) of man implies light establishing visible spectrum of light internally for each ray of light within.
Ignoring to be apart from one another by consenting to be mixed together implies ones anti-hue-man stance. If rays of light aim against each other; then they're reflecting; blending each other and casting shadows around...sounds familiar?
animals & are very picky about their associations
Because animation (inception towards death) causes being (life) to be apart from one another, hence disassociated aka unbound aka as FREE will of choice.
the positive ones...
...ignore being singular (one), while fighting others within a conflict of reason (positive vs negative). Ones consent to suggested the-ism tempts one into such a conflict of reason.
If ONE; then position (life) within negation (inception towards death) aka positioned to rise during procession of fall.
choosing to cause harm
Choice implies effect caused by balance...choosing to ignore this harms self.
If someone with freewill...in the most horrific ways
Ones free will of choice (life) originates within the one and only way (inception towards death)....others suggest horror to tempt one to fear outcomes instead.
deliberately choosing
DELIBERATE, verb - "to balance in the mind"...balancing as choice implies in-between perceivable need (outside) and suggested want (inside).
Deliberating within mind implies reasoning (wanting vs not wanting suggested) aka internal imbalance of choice. Anything formed by deliberation is either for or against a suggested measure aka a conflict.
after
- Front/forward of life...death.
- Back/aft of life...inception.
Living implies before (forward being) and after (being backwards)...while within process of dying.
The process of dying generates life...resisting the temptation thereof re-generates living while dying.
could be soul...or...
If soul/sole, then one and only...not or else.
The pyramids seem to be both a machine, and spiritual
a) PYR (fire) AMID (in the middle)
b) To be both implies being (life) within towards (inception towards death). Suggested "both" tempts one to consent to dualism; hence viewing one and another one as two aka as both.
Both corrupts ones sight within oneness...if consented to. Both implies an adjective, hence an addition to a pronoun (one) aka more than one aka two.
There cannot exist more than one in all of nature...only each one within the whole oneness of it.
c) Machine/machina/magh/magic - "artificial work; to be able"...ones consent enables artificial suggestions.
Sleight of hand: Pink Floyd - 'Welcome to the Machine'
- "Welcome to the machine"
- "What did you dream?"
- "It's all right we told you what to dream"
d) Spiritual (Latin spira; to breathe) implies ones adaptation to natural, hence nature (process of dying) breathing life into each one within.
Suggested spiritual-ism tempts one to permit another to take ones breath away.
Sleight of hand: Berlin - "Take my breath away"
- "Watching every motion"
- "On this endless ocean"
- "Turning and returning"
- "Watching in slow motion"
gold
a) Aka G'old..."good old" aka the good old days/daze.
b) Shining implies a reflection of light...not the source of light. Many are being tricked by few into a daze by the shinning, while getting confused within origin of light.
The more one focuses on a suggested reflection of light; the less sight one has within perceivable light...within which one exists as re (response) flectere (to bend) of light aka as ray within spectrum of visible light. Hence...rain-bow.
Rain implies irrigation aka supplying land (life) with water (inception towards death).
eternal value
Eternal value (all ongoing perceivable) generates internal evaluation (ones temporal perception) .
Eternal/aeternus/aevum/aiw - "life force" aka force (inception towards death) generating life as re-en-force-ment (response within force of mind).
What's mind? Mentis/matrix/memory...momentum of motion for matter within.
divinity, purity
Division (life) within pure (inception towards death) aka natural order separating itself into chaos.Natural order (inception towards death) purifies all chaos (life)..no matter how chaotic life gets.
reduction
Is it reduction to acknowledge letters used to shape words? Is it reduction to acknowledge perceivable sound underneath suggestible words?
etymological...reasoning with yourself in a form of self-debate
a) Reasoning implies a conflict against others; hence choosing a side, which brands everyone else as ones opposite. For example...agree vs disagree; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; yes vs no; me vs you; us vs them etc.
One cannot choose a side within any conflict of reason without opposing others.
b) Notice that YOURself implies a conflict of reason...MYself vs YOURself.
The foundation for this...nature designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one) aka each one's self. If one chooses to claim self as "me; myself or I"; then one brands every other one as "YOU".
ME generates YOU. Nature implies oneness (whole) generating ones (partials). Ones claim over self (me) implies self possession, which in return permits another (you) to establish demonic possession aka dai-mon - "divider; provider" by dividing one into a conflict of reason against others through provided suggestions.
If one consents to a suggestion (want or not want); then one establishes a conflict of reason (want versus not want).
c) Reason implies form vs form; implication implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Few suggest inFORMation to tempt many to ignore perceivable inSPIRation. Latin spiro (to breathe) implies forms adaptation to flow aka life adapting to being moved from inception towards death aka reaction (exhale) adapting to action (inhale).
generally understood definition
a) Definite (fixed) contradicts tion (action aka motion). Ones consent to suggested information implies ones free will of choice holding onto a definition, while ignoring perceivable inspiration...which one cannot hold onto, since it moves. Hold onto your breath to discern that for self.
The trick...suggested definition aka DEAF PHONETICIAN tempts one to ignore perceivable PHONIC (sound; entire aka all perceivable offered to each ones perception).
b) Understand implies "standing under" aka ones consent submitting self to the suggestion of another, while ignoring to stand up/rise/sustain self within KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Understanding (suggested information) contradicts knowledge (perceivable inspiration).
c) Being implies reactor (life) within generator (inception towards death) aka reaction within action aka form within flow aka matter within motion.
Few collectivize many into "gentiles" by tricking each one to react to suggestions by few instead of perceivable generation. If reactor ignores generation; then it ignores re-generation of self.
In other words...suggested "actors" under "directors" tempts one to ignore being directed (inception towards death) reactors (life).
Simply suggesting the word "actor" inverts reality, where matter reacts to enacting motion...if one consents to suggested, which ignores perceivable.
with your own "devil's advocate" (contrarian perspective)
a) If one exists (life) WITHin (inception towards death); then that implies a separation by motion into matter....matter cannot own anything within motion.
Few utilize suggestion to tempt many to CLAIM ownership by consent aka to buy into what few are selling aka to take into possession aka to avow; to confess; to belong etc.
b) Reason implies contrary (versus); which contradicts implication (if/then).
There's no conflict within implication...if motion; then matter + if balance; then choice + if whole; then partials + if all; then ones + If inception towards death; then life etc.
Nature doesn't reason...it moves; which implies those being moved. It's those within nature who choose to ignore perceivable for each others suggestions, who are reasoning against one another over the suggested while ignoring implication of all perceivable.
This is the foundation for the great work of masonry...hiding reality (perceivable inspiration; implication) underneath fiction (suggested information; reason).
c) Advocate aka ad (towards) vocare (to call) implies suggested progressivism tempting ones consent forwards, while ignore that perception (life) needs to resist wanted temptations within perceivable (inception towards death).
Life cannot consent to suggested progressivism without destroying itself...yet few can suggest progressivism to tempt many to willingly destroy each other.
to find a truth
Consenting to suggested information implies wanting (truth) or not wanting (lies) it; while ignoring perceivable need (change).
Applying change to truth changes it into a lie and vice versa. Take for example "I AM"...that's a truth suggested during change (inception towards death), hence moving towards becoming a lie...no matter how hard one tries to hold onto ones life.
In short...suggested words contradict perceivable sound. The former tempts one to hold onto it as truth; which permits others to use contradiction as lies, while perceivable sound simply changes aka moves.
you may not have been previously aware of without exploring your own logical constructs.
What if one uses implication (if/then) instead of logic/reason aka logos/words?
What if one is aware of perceivable sound as the foundation of any suggestible words shaped within?
What if suggested information tempts one to own it; while perceivable inspiration sets each one within as FREE will of choice?
What if consenting by free will of choice binds one to the suggestions of another aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew)?
What if nature doesn't CON (together; with) STRUCT (building matter)...but instead sets matter (life) apart from one another within motion (inception towards death)?
just reacting
What if just/iustus/ius/right (inception towards death) generates reactions (life)? What if right implies ones rite of passage?
Thinking would require
What if require aka re quaerere implies ones reaction seeking something?
What if ones mind/memory reacts to everything already available?
What if seeking (suggested) tempts one to ignore available (perceivable)?
I'm NOT convinced people 'with NO inner voice' exist.
What convinced you that NO; NOT; NOTHING can exist?
actual retarded
Actual/action implies motion; retardation aka re tardo (delayed response)...what if retardation implies ones delayed response (life) to motion (inception towards death)?
through medicine
Medicine/medic/med - "take appropriate measures" implies ones free will of choice taking possession of suggested moderation...which tempts one to ignore perceivable moderation moving through one, hence being FREE (will of choice) within DOM (-inance of balance).
Balance moderates choice...measuring other choices imbalances ones choice.
disconnect from nature
Nature/natus - "born" implies within by separation of whole into partials.
DIS (apart) CON (together) NECTERE (to bind) implies ones choice to bind self to a suggested contradiction.
a) What if one exists within soul/sole?
b) What if logi (logic/reason) tempts one to ignore being bios (one's life) within zoe (inception towards death animation)?
c) What if nature implies perceivable sound (flow), while those within suggest words (form) to distract from that?
d) What if matter (hylic/hylo) can only exist within motion?
e) Does an inner monologue exist before ones consent to a suggested language by another?
f) What if logue (logic/reason/conflict/one side vs another) contradicts mono (one and only aka sole/soul)?
reality of being
Aka each ones RE-sponse to ALL perceivable...not to each others suggestions.
first cycle
a) What came first...cycle or line?
b) What if line (inception towards death) exists before circle of life ?
c) Who suggests that life is a circle aka a wheel of fortune aka a leap of fate aka a band of hope and a path unwinding?
d) Look into this guy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tim_Rice,_1_December_2020.jpg
final
There's no end (fin) to all (al)...only the ones (life) within all have a beginning (inception) and end (death).
community
COM (together; with) contradicts UNIT (unus; one). Being implies one apart from one another, not together with.
a) Plane (inception towards death) sets free (life)...choosing to consent to the suggestion of another attaches "a cord" aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew), which permits those suggesting to pull the strings of those consenting.
b) ACCORD; verb - "come into agreement" implies slavery (one submitting to another by willing consent), which establishes war (agreement vs disagreement aka a conflict of reason) within the mind/memory of the willing slave.
Furthermore; that attached cord permits another to pull at ones heart (Latin cordis; cor) strings.
c) SEEM, from root -sem (one together with) tempts one to ignore being one apart from one another.
Seem implies same; being implies different from one another.
the generations to come
Coming to be (life) within generation (inception towards death)...few are farming the re-generation aka re-action of many.
generations in place
Aka placed (life) within generation (inception towards death)...which implies ones need to resist temptation.
to enslave
Towards (inception towards death) sets free (life)...using ones free will of choice to consent to suggested progressivism enslaves one to another, while going with the flow towards death instead of resisting to sustain life.
It's never
It (matter) can only be now (momentum) within ever (motion)...suggested "never" aka nothing-everything implies a contradiction in terms.
How many of your favorites are real?
a) How many? Each one.
b) Favorite implies each ones rite (inception towards death) of disposition (life).
c) Real implies ones response within all, hence implying AL favoring RE by setting itself apart.
youtube
Aka one (you) permitting another one to siphon/channel/tube suggested information into ones consenting mind/memory.
This implies few utilizing collectivism to gather favor by many.
skipping the middle man
To be implies middle (ones perception) within surrounding (all perceivable)...skipping implies ignoring self for suggested mediation (media) by another.
SKIP, verb - "to pass without notice; to omit"...few celebrate "passover", which implies tempting many with suggested information to pass within perceivable inspiration without noticing it, hence ignoring/denying its existence when favoring the suggested counter-offer.
so you got Source/God.. and your "soul"
a) Source implies soul/sole...there can be only one source (whole) for each one (partial) within.
b) Suggested monotheism (god) tempts one to ignore that ones consent to the-ism contradicts mono (sole; one and only). Why? Because ones consent attaching itself to another ones suggestion implies 1 +1 = 2 aka dual-ism.
c) AND "a conjunction, connective or conjoining word" signifies that a word or part of a sentence is to be added to what precedes.
If source precedes everything coming out of it; then one cannot add anything to source. How could a partial within whole add anything to whole?
If a fish takes a piss then that ain't an addition to water, but a transmutation of ingredients within source aka alchemy.
If EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power", then AND what else?
Long story short...ego implies suggested information held within; which in return prevents one from rising within perceivable inspiration, which one cannot hold onto.
As for higher self...
a) Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)...high vs low implies a suggested conflict of reason tempting one to ignore that.
Take two boxers within a ring for example...neither is rising; both are falling out against each other, while trying to diminish how much they lose fighting.
b) Self implies perpetuation of one through another, hence inter-course for off-spring. To RISE as one implies to RAISE another. Meanwhile...most coomers are loosing, while spending self.
carry this knowledge
That's the suggested inversion of being (ones perception) moved within knowledge (all perceivable).
Carrying aka burdening self aka trans-port tempts one to ignore being a vessel (life) within a flowing sea/see (inception towards death), while being tempted into a port, where others load and unload suggested information into ones consenting mind/memory.
Knowledge inspires those within to rise; understanding tempts one to carry burdens, while standing under another.
How do more "gibs me dats" endanger a merchant? Consider the merchant... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bD6LfnOd6U
You have fans amongst the youth haha
Fan/fanatic/fancy - "an inclination"...choice exists at center of balance; any inclination tempts one off-center.
You have such a breadth of knowledge
a) Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) implies being within (in) spirit (spir) of action (ation). The edge implies being in-between inhale and exhale aka the incoming force breathing life into one, and ones expressed adaptation to it.
Suggested in-form-ation tempts one to hold onto; while in-spir-ation can't be held onto.
b) HAVE implies "to own, possess; be subject to, to grasp; to seize"...that's why few suggest a conflict of reason between the haves and have nots.
c) Distance between the sides (breadth) tempts being (choice) between sides (balance) into a conflict aka distance/disagreement, discord/strife (imbalance).
breaking down words and their roots, something I have always had a talent for myself
Notice that LEGO is based upon e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka suggested in parts with an instruction to make whole. Then look at their slogans..."rebuild the world" + "I can build what I want" + "just imagine..." etc.
Same spiel with words...letters and dictionaries to build words and meaning.
Why? To distract one from the initial break...ALL (whole) into each ONE (partial). One doesn't need to follow suggested directions to rebuild perceivable all.
To the point
Aka suggested progressivism tempting one forwards, while ignoring to be life sentence before point of death.
All the "point" rhetoric tempts one to embrace death aka end of sentence (point).
I break down words and sentences I see and hear from others in my own life
I drives them mad because they choose to hold together, what you choose to break apart. They don't like you having that power over what they believed was definite (affixed definition).
Btw work on "own"...life can't be possessed; held onto etc. while being moved from inception towards death. It's free (will of choice) to be alive.
broadcast
Aka from suggesting few towards consenting many...few teachers; many students + few leaders; many followers + few cops; many robbers + few rich; many poor + few discerning; many ignoring + few strong; many weak etc.
Meanwhile in nature...oneness (whole) casts narrow ones (partials), which in return positions one within all aka having full sight (perception) within spectrum (perceivable)...consenting to suggested narrows ones sight down.
Suggestion tempts ones sight to not only narrow down to a screen; but inwards (information held) instead of outwards (inspiration passing).
biting the hook
- HOOK (consenting to suggested)
- LINE (inception towards death)
- SINKER (life)
Meanwhile...ones perception within all perceivable implies a vessel free to roam.
Notice that Captain Hook lost his hand...you're the captain with the manual (manus; hand) choice to get hooked.
within the cube from all four directions of news
There' s only one direction (inception towards death)...each one within exist at the center thereof aka in-between left/right + up/down + front/back...hence within a cube. Counting directions tempts one to ignore being directed.
Suggested news (north; east; west; south) tempts one to ignore being compass rose/rose of the winds/compass star... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compass_rose
Watching the news aka focusing on suggested tempts center to incline outwards into circumference, which in return permits those broadcasting from center... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBS_Broadcast_Center ...to cut others off circumference.
If I can ask a question of you
a) Free will of choice...each one wields it.
b) TION implies action generating reactions. QUEST/QUERY (to seek) implies reacting to a suggested outcome, hence waiting for a responding answer, while ignoring to enacted upon.
why do you think Saturn is so important to esoteric cults and media?
a) Because eso tero (more within) implies few suggesting more information to consenting many, than all perceivable inspiration has to offer.
ESO (suggested information) or EXO (perceivable inspiration)...the former tempt ones vessel into a port where others load and unload suggested information into ones consenting mind/memory, while the latter implies open sea (seeing openly aka ones unrestricted sight).
b) Media/medius/middle implies each perceiving one within all perceivable (exo)...ones consent to suggested (eso) permits others at the center, while off-centering self.
Few control the middle (media); because many incline to watch. Many incline so much that few sell them sofas to lean back...
Bonus... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_erectus aka "upright men; an extinct species of archaic human"...that's a masonic sleight of hand for the spinelessness among many. Hence the 33 vertebrae required to straighten up and erect oneself.
https://pixy.org/src/59/591806.jpg
c) As for Saturn...turning (turn) setting (set), hence satan (adverse; to turn).
Direction (inception towards death) generates waves (life)...turning that setting establishes circles aka circular reasoning aka ball/baal at center; ring that binds/ouroboros around circumference.
There also a whole thing about astro (star) logy (logic/reason), hence tempting the compass star into circular reasoning, hence from center into circumference, and even more crazy...all suggested constellations have another star...ones affixed focus when consenting to watch. That's how few can run math with constellations, while keeping perceiving center (ones sight) within a suggested perimeter (circumference), hence outside of self, while contemplating within self.
I'm too lazy to go over that right now, tho...anyway; thanks for the inspiration and greetings to the young ones.
Their goal is to degrade
a) If velocity (inception towards death) generates resistance (life); then resisting perceivable refines one; while consenting to suggested degrades one.
b) Few suggest goals (aka progressivism towards outcome) to tempt many to ignore perceivable origin.
c) Focusing on suggested information narrows ones sight within perceivable inspiration...it's self deprivation to ignore perceivable for suggested.
d) Ongoing loss (inception towards death) generates temporary rise (life)...others tempt one to ignore rising by submitting; by binding self; by standing under (understanding); by following orders; by becoming a part within a collective; by burdening self with debt; by holding onto etc.
in a coherent way
Way (inception towards death) sets apart wanderer (life)...each one needs to resist coherence (sticking together).
there's no way
a) Nothing implies ones ignorance of everything aka EVERY; adjective - "each, considered indefinitely as a unitary part of an aggregate; all, of a collective or aggregate number, taken one by one".
b) There was a way (inception towards death) before anyone came to be (life) within it.
there's no way...in a coherent way
a) If there's no way; then why contemplate coherence?
b) Way implies motion/action/change aka that which generates matter/reaction/recharge.
So basically you are pretending
a) Pretend implies putting forward...being implies put (life) forwards (inception towards death).
b) Another word for pretension is "allegation" aka ALL (al) LAW (lega) ACTION (tion) which implies base for being.
The issue...words. Why? Pretension (suggested information) tempts one to ignore allegation (perceivable inspiration). That's how spell-craft works.
c) Nature moves, hence implying change. Those within tempt each other to hold onto words, while ignoring change. What I do makes it harder for others to hold onto, because I help nature taking apart the sandcastles others hold onto by simply describing how nature moves, and how holding onto anything within a moving system contradicts itself.
show an audio recording
Ones consent to a suggested show implies ones re-cord aka response to cord aka the string attached to puppeteers aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
Sleight of hand: "cause it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He1TntAK2fs
helping others
All (perceivable) supports each one (perception)...if one resists the temptation of wanting to help (suggestion) others. Otherwise; that which supports (inception towards death) also destroys ones life.
Each seed needs to struggle for the sustenance of self, which only then permits others to help themselves to the fruits of ones labor.
In other words...velocity (inception towards death) generates resistance (life), which makes resistance fertile. Helping others implies spending resistance until infertility.
"Ask and ye shall receive" doesn't help one sustain self; it tempts one in dependency to another.
not motivated
Leitmotif aka Leit (lead) motive (brought forward) aka that which leads (inception toward death) brings forward (life).
Motion motivates matter; matter is remote within motion.
Languages are different sounds for the same data.
a) Different languages are shaped (suggestion) within same sound (perceivable). That implies spell-craft and it's utilized to build a fictitious layer (suggested information) within reality (perceivable inspiration).
The trick...information tempts one to hold onto; while inspiration cannot be held onto.
b) DATA (Latin datum; things given) from root DO (to give)...nature gives all (perceivable) to each one (perception). The suggestions by others tempts one to "take", while ignoring that all is already given.
If I give you an apple and you'll take it; then you ignore that seed and soil where given before fruit came to be.
Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies taking (to buy) + giving (to sell)...a mercantile contract based on ones ignorance of being FREE will of choice within all nature offers.
One cannot give what nature already gave and one cannot take without ignoring that nature moves.
Separate the word, the sound, the letters from the meaning.
a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole"
b) Sound implies all; each one within implies "insane person" aka in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound) aka all setting itself apart internally/inherently into each one instrument (mind structured within).
c) Few suggest the words "insane person" to distract one from perceivable sound (in sanus + per sonos).
d) It's called "letter" because shaping perceivable sound into suggestible words requires ones consent to LET it happen.
Oneself is the LETTER of whatever words another suggests.
e) As for meaning...one signal moves (perceivable inspiration) another signal tempts one to hold onto (suggested information). Few tempt many to attach meaning to latter, while ignoring former.
The root of MEAN aka mei implies "change"...not truth; belief; proof; definition; information; accuracy; certainty; legitimacy; principle; actuality; axiom; correctness; verisimilitude etc.
If you look for meaning in words...
...then you're a deaf phonetician (definition) aka deaf to phonics (sound), hence ignoring perceivable (sound) for suggested (word) aka falling for spell-craft.
looking during the day light
Ones sight within all light implies by FREE will of choice...looking/locking implies focusing on the suggestions by another, hence narrowing ones sight.
search with a flash light
a) Being implies flash (life) within light (inception towards death) aka "spark of life".
b) Ones doesn't need to search for; one needs to resist wanted temptations, while being (life) forwarded (inception towards death).
c) Those within light don't need to search for it...each one needs to discern self (enlightenment), while resisting the wanted temptation of ignorance (darkness).
Sleight of hand: "Exit light (out of discernment) enter night (into ignorance) take my hand (consent to my suggestion) and we're off to never-never land (denial of potential)"... https://genius.com/Metallica-enter-sandman-lyrics
a) Coherent implies sticking together...free will of choice implies wielded apart from one another. It's many who are being tempted to stick together, when consenting to suggested choices by a few chosen ones.
In short...coherence tempts each disciple to follow motivation.
b) What if others tempt one to "try" for something suggested; while ignoring to be re-trial within everything perceivable?
What if nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...while the suggestions by another imply a trial of ones resistance among temptation?
It's like you are not even
Free will of choice implies odd (choice) within even (balance) resisting the temptation to respond like others.
very few options for "friends".
a) Few suggest "options" to tempt many to ignore "option" aka each ones "mandatory" free will of choice.
b) Consenting to any suggestion puts one into a conflict of reason (friend vs enemy) against all other ones...no matter which side one chooses.
c) Imagine a child choosing his/her first "friend"...at that moment everyone else was branded a chosen enemy.
In other words...suggested "friend or foe" tempts anyone who consents into the same conflict of reason.
Fixing ignores procession; while stretching towards dissolves one during procession...intent distracts from being (life) processed (inception towards death).
a) Refined product (white sugar) draws many in.
b) STRAP, verb - "to fasten or bind"...aka bound (strap) to ignorance (black); when tempted towards refinement (white).
Pure (inception towards death) generates impurities (life)...impurity struggles during re-purification.
c) MEL'ASSES, noun (Greek; black or honey) aka "ignorant one"...many are stuck within that modus operandi.