Everything this bot says looks coherent
You chose to look for coherence aka "sticking together; connected consistency"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/coherent#etymonline_v_15796
This prevents you from seeing what I do...taking apart what others put together like CO (together) HAERERE (to adhere; stick).
try to understand
Taken apart into the one standing under (slave) and the one above (master)...established by ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Seeking understanding isn't a trial, but the lack of effort to grow self.
prefixed with letters
a) Before (pre) one can hold onto (fix) a suggested word...nature moves sound.
b) Ones consent to a suggested letter LETS another shape words, add definitions; define meaning aka craft spelling.
you realize
One cannot realize (bring into existence)...one can only REspond to being ALready in existence.
a) There can be only one father (vati; papa; pope)...
b) Ones consent to scripture authorizes anyone suggesting it.
c) Vatican/vatic/vates - "sooth-sayer, fortune-teller"...
Christ (anointed one) implies each one...reason implies one turning against another, hence anti-christ.
a) How would blocking work without tiring self out, while being (life) moved (inception towards death)?
b) Since the topic is about "off reality"...what if blocking implies holding onto fiction within self, while ignoring the always onward moving reality passing through nonetheless?
c) No matter how tired one gets..."there's no rest for the wicked" aka no cessation of motion for the departed matter within.
a) What AI can transform an eight letter headline into a six letter joke?
b) What AI can show the etymology of an Indian name, and then utilize the translation to draw an inappropriate joke about a linked article?
c) What AI can utilize implication without reason, while offering a hand altered logo without any further explanation, as to inspire those who can implicate without reason to build their own perspective?
d) What AI prompts were used to get the aforementioned free-will-of-choice comment in response to a questionable post?
a) Blowing a "whistle" in San Francisco...
b) Suchir/suchira - "everlasting" + Balaji/bāla - "young boy"... he was pretty much asking for it at 26.
c) Real implies open; artificial implies a closed environment... https://img.gvid.tv/i/fxCiWJbF.jpg
a) Hamlet/haimaz (home) + Yorick/york/yew (jew)...home of the jew.
b) The living utilizing corpus oration (pleading to death) manually (by hand) to make a home within the head of another.
Ones consent to suggest information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration, hence exchanging living within reality for dying by fiction, while permitting a chosen one entrance to ones mind/memory.
The more suggested information one holds onto...the deeper one digs ones grave.
a) Decapitation implies dividing (de) the head (capit) of action (ation).
b) Action implies motion (male)...body of motion implies momentum (female), hence an internal division of motion, through momentum (inception towards death) into matter (life), with matter implying the head aka the "foremost part" aka the most forwarded partial within whole motion.
c) Crown/korōnē/sker "curve; to turn, bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/crown#etymonline_v_396
Motion utilizes momentum (body) to turn into matter (head)...putting a crown above the head re-turns matter to motion aka the living back into the process of dying.
d) Moor implies "to fasten (a ship) in a particular location by or as by cables, anchors etc"
Ones consent to a suggestion "binds" one to another...doing that as ship (matter) within sea (momentum) fastens ones location.
e) Porcelain implies "translucent; semi-transparent, emitting light rays without being transparent" aka rays (matter) within spectrum (momentum) of light (motion).
f) Notice that the faces are white, while moors were supposed to be black, hence moors/mer - "to die".
Sleight of hand...
- It doesn't matter if you're black or white... https://genius.com/Michael-jackson-black-or-white-lyrics
- Kick me; kike me; don't you black or white me... https://genius.com/Michael-jackson-they-dont-care-about-us-lyrics
That's what happens when one transforms ignorance (black) into discernment (white)...
If this goes over your head, then "You can leave your hat on", while asking a jew to "You give me a reason to live"... https://genius.com/Joe-cocker-you-can-leave-your-hat-on-lyrics
In order for us to progress the previous products must be consumed
a) The natural order implies the process which produces (living) through consumption (dying).
b) Previous (inception towards death) consumes following (life).
We are tricked into slavery to become subscribers to life itself.
Ones (singular) consent to suggested pluralism (we) implies that subscription aka self imposed slavery.
Living implies being set apart from one another...not joined together.
In order to live comfortably
Comfort implies "strength together"...natural order sets life apart from one another, which implies that ones builds strength by needing to resist the wanted temptation of joining together.
What's the first thing a rich person does? Separating self from the poor... "rules for thee but not for me"
that there should be checks, balances
Balance (inception/death) generates choice (life)..."You better check yourself before you wreck yourself"
If money is energy
All is one in energy aka "one for all and all for one"...money tempts one to hold onto value, while ignoring that energy energizes being within motion, hence value (all perceivable) generating evaluation (ones perception).
Value isn't the issue...misusing ones free will of choice to hold onto any suggested value tempts one to ignore self, hence diminishing ones evaluation of all moving value.
that is natural law
Natural law WAS before one came into being within...suggesting to each other what it IS tempts one to ignore that.
work less to earn more
If all implies one in energy, then there cannot be more or less than energy. Energy setting itself apart internally from whole (action) into partials (reaction) implies a setting FREE.
Others suggest a conflict of reason (more vs less) to tempt ones FREE will of choice to earn/urn a living by selling out, while buying into it.
One doesn't need to buy (consent) what another sells (suggestion)...one is tempted to want (more) or not want it (less), while choosing either establishes the conflict against the opposite.
greed
Aka wanting more (suggested) than already offered (perceivable). Nobody within nature can offer more than nature already offers, yet anyone can choose to take each others offers, which ignores natural for artificial.
profit-driven
Driven implies by origin; profit implies towards outcome...few tempt many to ignore perceivable origin (reality) for suggested outcome (fiction).
will destroy civilization
Civilization implies the domestication of will, which will needs to resist to sustain itself.
as we know it
Knowledge implies each ones perception within all perceivable...WE implies many consenting to suggested pluralism by few, hence permitting domestication of will.
If there is any workarounds or alternatives?
a) IF implies THEN aka implication based on motion...using ones free will of choice to hold onto a suggestion tempts one to ignore that.
b) Motion works linear, hence generating momentum (inception towards death) for matter (life). If matter ignores motion by holding onto a suggestion, then matter works circular (logic). That's why you ask for a work-AROUND.
c) Ones perception adapting to all perceivable implies alternation...many consenting to suggestions by few implies acceleration, hence chasing towards outcomes aka seeking profits.
became a goal of human activity
a) Coming into being implies out of origin...suggested "became" inverts that.
b) Having free will of choice implies ones RE-action...not activity, but reactivity.
All that planned obsolescence
Using the word "all" to describe obsolescence (no longer used) tempts one (temporal being) to ignore being (life) used (inception towards death) within all (ongoing generation).
In other words...if one counts things together as "all", then one permits other ones to define how much or how less "all" is. That's how ones mind can be tricked to believe in planned obsolescence.
processed food
Being implies within (life) procession (inception towards death)..."unprocessed" anything implies a suggested fiction tempting one to ignore perceivable reality.
single-use things
a) Things (plural) contradicts single (singular).
b) Being implies each one (singular) within all (singularity)...other ones suggest pluralism to tempt many together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_pluribus_unum
Annuit cœptis (he approves the undertaking) implies many taking from under few, when consenting to a suggestion.
lead to globalism
Few suggest -isms to tempt many to follow the lead.
development of advertising into brainwashing
Advert aka turning (vert) towards (ad)...reality directs from origin towards outcome, fiction tempts one to turn from perceivable origin towards suggested outcome.
long-lasting things for customers.
Being doesn't last long, because origin consumes (inception towards death) being (life).
Few suggest materialism to tempt many to hold onto products, while ignoring to be produced by nature. Holding onto distracts from being within process.
not a technical problem
- Problem implies "put forward"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=problem
- Technical implies "artificial"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=technic
Being implies put (life) forwards (inception towards death)...suggested artifice tempts one to ignore that.
Solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life).
will last forever
Free WILL of choice cannot last...it's a temporal reaction within an ever forwarding action.
It will not even be expensive
Will implies FREE will of choice. One has to be free to expand within all...others trick ones free will of choice to make expansion expensive aka paying a chosen one to grow ones choice freely.
I don't see any clear solution
Solution (all perceivable) generates sight (ones perception)...any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore that. For example...suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo, nothing), hence saying "don't" tempts one to de-nial perceivable solution.
Letting go of ones belief in "doing nothing" (don't) clears up ones sight within everything.
should be banned forever
Forever implies "ever forwards" aka motion. How could motion be banned if it ever moves forwards?
Ban/bha - "to speak"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ban#etymonline_v_248 Speaking (suggested words) bans one from hearing (perceivable sound).
Nature doesn't speak..it moves sound. Few within nature suggest languages to many aka spell-craft as to make noise to distract from the "sound of silence".
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- People writing songs that voices never shared
- No one dared...Disturb the sound of silence
- And the vision that was planted in my brain
- Still remains...withing the sound of silence
https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
current reality...simply don't fit
Real current (inception towards death) sets apart (life)...fictitious currency tempts fitting together of consent and suggestion.
counterfeit
a) Attempting to fit together sets partials against (counter) each other.
b) Count/computare - "to count, sum up, reckon together"...few count many together by summoning consent with suggestions for a reckoning.
c) Suggested (information) counterfeits perceivable (inspiration)...if one consents to it.
the list goes on and on
List; verb - "to tilt, lean, incline to one side"...choosing to incline to one side imbalances choice, which in return declines self.
It's hard to put into words.
Because suggested words are temporary, while perceivable sound goes on and on...
alt-reality
Ones RE-sponse to ALL perceivable implies ongoing (inception towards death) alternation (life). Fiction implies holding onto a suggested side, while ignoring to alternate.
the terms that keep coming to mind.
Perceivable sound moves through mind and cannot be kept...suggested words tempt one to mentally hold onto definitions (definite; affixed).
To be clear, it doesn't feel like
Like implies together with others, which obscures ones sight. Only setting self apart from likeness clears one up.
everything in reality is falling apart or changing.
Change implies falling (inception towards death) apart (life)...ones consent to suggested fiction tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring that reality changes.
starting...ago.
a) Ago implies "gone away" aka change...defining "4-6 years" implies ignoring change.
b) Only during ongoing change can there be a start (inception) and finish (death) of temporal shapes (life).
Data/dare/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data#etymonline_v_782
Only nature gives (perceivable inspiration), which one cannot take...only draw from. Taking artifice (suggested information) from one another implies taking a risk by consent.
new leader...
...of followers ignoring perceivable NOW for suggested NEW.
No one knows what's his real name
Name/nombre/number implies designation of an unit, hence unit/unus - "one".
Therefore...one does know (perceive) unless one ignores reality for fictitious names suggested by another.
ahmed al-sharaa
Aka ahmed/ḥameda - "to thank, praise" + al (all) + sharaa/shar (revelation)...for all reveals each one within.
Dear...
How dare one holds dear what nature gave for free...
moral free will to choose good instead of evil.
Choosing in-between good vs evil implies being bound to a conflict...suggested moralism tempts ones FREE will of choice to bind itself by choosing to hold onto a side within a conflict of reason.
will be able to understand
Standing under (understanding) implies ones disabled will.
God isn’t...
If one consents to what another suggest IS, then it will be, because ones free will of choice wills it into ones being.
This is a story for
a) Nature FOR-wards...it doesn't store. Few within nature suggest stories to tempt many to store these stories within mind/memory, while ignoring to be (life) forwarded (inception towards death) by nature.
b) He brew his story to make you/jew fall for it...
God doesn’t have an opposite counterpart
All sets itself apart into each one within aka from whole (all perceivable) into partials (each ones perception) aka an internal division into opposites (action/reaction aka flow/form aka loss/growth etc.).
It's when a partial within whole chooses to hold onto a brand (god) for whole, that natural opposites are being ignored for partials turning against each other over an artificial brand.
God is all of the stories that have ever been told, and much more.
a) All continuously reveals each temporary one...other ones suggest stories to conceal revelation.
b) There cannot be "much more" than ALL...it's ones within all that can be tricked to ignore all (perceivable) for much more (suggested).
the Source of all that exists.
a) All implies impressing source (motion) for each ones expressed being (matter) within.
b) Ex-ist implies ones consent to suggested existential-ism.
c) Being implies EX, hence being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death).
Every living being
Each (set apart from one another)...not every (put together). Few suggest every to amass many into ignoring each.
We’re all interacting
a) Interact implies ones reaction within (inter) all action. One cannot act; only re-act. Few suggest actors following directors to distract many from being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
b) Action sets reactions apart from one another...few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt many together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc.
God is only within us, and not outside of us
a) All moves in (inception) and out (death) of each one (life).
b) There can be only one aka all for one and one for all aka "ALLONE"
We control our reality
a) Reality implies ones RE-sponse to ALL.
b) Control implies rolled (trol) together (com)...which happens if one (singular) joins we (plural). Few suggesting pluralism thereby gain control over consenting many.
In addition to this
Addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being one within all)...all based on one.
their own free will.
a) Their (plural) binds one (singular).
b) Free cannot be owned aka taken into possession.
- FREE implies within dominance
- WILL (want) implies within need
- OF implies out of, within and in response to
- CHOICE implies within balance
fallen angels
Aka ones angels/angles of perspective while rising (life) within fall (inception towards death).
people often couldn’t tell them apart
Because people (plural) implies an aggregation of person (singular)...holding together makes telling apart harder.
all that matters
One implies matter; all implies motion. Motion generates momentum (inception towards death) for internal separation of matter (life).
getting involved in occult practices
a) Involved aka within (in) turn (volvere; wel)...choosing to hold onto a side turns one against the other.
b) Nature reveals balance (inception towards death) for choice (life)...choosing to turn against each other implies imbalance, which occults/obcelare - "covers over" natural balance with artificial imbalance.
c) Trying to get/ghend - "to seize; take" suggested tempts one to ignore that only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) perception (life).
consequences that follow
a) Sequence/sequi - "to follow"...why add (follow) what's already implied (follow)?
b) CON (together) SEQUENCE (to follow)...how does ones (singular) choice become consequence (plural)?
a) How could "no; not; nothing" be an answer if it's based on de-nial aka nihilo (nothing)?
b) How could artificially made choices be free? Doesn't nature set those within free to choose?
You just post in a weird format is all.
a) Flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life)... few suggest formats to gain control over shape and size of consenting many.
To format implies to arrange/arengen/hringaz/sker - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange#etymonline_v_17021 That's how few turn many against each other, while bending each ones will.
b) Weird/wierd/wyrd - "fate, chance, fortune; destiny" from root wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/weird#etymonline_v_4898
Nature generates choice...few within tempt many with artificial chance to ignore that, while gambling.
tl; dr...Nature differentiates, so that's what I do. Many are tricked by few to behave alike, hence taking offense by anyone behaving differently.
Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and...an open mind
a) How does seeking affirmation from another free ones mind?
b) What bot could formulate questions made by free will of choice?
Passive Christianity
a) Active (motion) Passage (momentum) Reactive (matter)...few suggest passivism to distract many from being (life) passed (inception towards death).
Passive implies "receptive", hence enacted upon...each one within nature is receptive to all of enacting nature.
b) Christian/christ/khristos/khriein "to rub; to anoint"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Christ#etymonline_v_11332
Matter (life) coming through the momentum (inception towards death) of motion implies the coming into being of EACH anointed one.
they are turned off by the passivity
Nature directs one (life) through a passage (inception towards death)...ones consent to suggested passiv-ism turns one against others within a conflict of reason (active vs passive).
it's not all to be sure
Being implies one within all....others suggest nihil-ism (not) and affirm-ism (sure) to distract one from that.
it makes my stomach turn
Reason makes your stomach turn, because reasoning implies holding onto one side, while fighting the other, which shapes indigestion within a moving nature.
Whatever one holds within self (mentally and physically) keeps tumbling over by nature forcing one to let go. Needing to let go, while wanting to hold onto implies each ones struggle with temptation aka sin.
it is in God's hands
a) God implies auto (same action)...each anointed one within implies manual (different reactions).
b) God gives...each anointed one within receives, while struggling manually to resist the temptation to hold onto it.
any serious student of the Bible knows
Student/study - "to strive toward"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/study#etymonline_v_22215
Striving towards implies falling for the temptation to ignore resisting origin. It's few (teachers) who tempt many (students) to follow suggested temptations towards DEATH, because that's what one aims at when one ignores to resist temptations.
If not FOR your own family than FOR who?
a) FORwards implies towards outcome...being implies in response (life) to origin (inception towards death).
b) If origin, then outcome...that's how implication works.
If not, then nothing...that's how reason (yes vs no) inverts implication by turning those reasoning against each other.
God implicates...if enacting cause, then reacting effects. Reason tempts effects against each other, while ignoring cause.
christian community
Christ (anointed one) implies each UNIT set apart from one another. A chosen one suggests COMMON-ism under disguise of UNITY to tempt consenting ones together.
Comm-unity contradicts Christ...if one joins others.
AI taking over
AI cannot take...each one within all nature is giving can take artifice from one another. Which costs...
AI, isn't like us
Suggested artifice tempts alike consent, while distracting each one from being differentiated from one another by nature.
doubled
a) Can energy be doubled without dividing self?
b) Can ones life be doubled without dividing self by intercourse with another into an off-spring?
c) Investment implies mind vested/clothed/cloaked within a suggested morgage aka mort gaige - "death pledge"...
d) What if consenting to a suggested investment implies "crossing" ones choice out for the chance of double the investment aka a "double cross"?
become a commodities chad
Coming (inception towards death) into being (life) implies a setting apart....suggested common-ism like commodities tempt together, hence tempting ONE to hoard ALL value, while ignoring that all value moves through each one.
The issue isn't which commodity to hold, but holding onto a current, while it moves.
own nothing an you will be happy
Happy/hap - "chance" implies ones free will of choice gambling on the chance of owning what a chosen one suggested.
Holding onto a suggestion makes one happy, hence transforming choice into chance. The issue with that....being choice within balance implies odd within even, so transforming choice into chance puts all odds against one.
exchange
a) Being implies ex (life) within change (inception towards death), hence expressing growth during loss. Exchanging any commodities implies sharing growth during loss, while ignoring to grow by resisting loss.
b) Ex implies matter; change implies motion...ex"changing" matter, while ignoring motion destroys matter mutually as traders/traitors to self.
c) Choosing to buy or sell ignores being FREE will of choice.
Sleight of hand: The Price is Right aka right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068 Only within that can one be free.
What's lacking
Nature doesn't lack anything...it's the ongoing loss for each temporary growth within.
Everyone now seems to equate it with something like
ONE implies different from one another...equating alike tempts one to ignore that.
vague notion
Holding onto an "alike equation" makes notion of motion seem vague.
the nature of the phenomenon
Noumenon (perceivable) implies nature of phenomenon (perception).
informal name for a particular state
Any suggested "informal name" tempts common consent, which contradicts particular state.
particular state of consciousness
If it's particular (apart), then why call it CON (together) SCIOUS (to perceive)?
many times by many names
Same motion for each different matter timed or named...
receive their Reality from those they have accepted as "authorities"
Reality (perceivable) moves through one, fiction (suggested) tempts one to hold onto it. Consenting to a suggestion implies accepting another as the author of the suggested.
This "Reality" is strong enough
Ones consent to hold onto suggested fiction by FREE will of choice is strong enough to distract one from perceivable reality.
If you've ever argued with them (leftists)...
Left-ist implies ones consent to suggested left-ism, which establishes a conflict of reason (left vs right) aka an argument.
figuring out
Matter (life) implies figure within motion (inception towards death).
the reason why there appears to be a "Woke Right"
Because reasoning against each other about woke right vs woke left binds both sides to the same conflict of mutual destruction.
Choosing a side (as choice within balance) tethers one to the opposition (choice vs choice imbalance).
in church, where the authority stands right up front
Authority to others is given by ones consent to suggested religion/religo - "to bind anew".
Church/circe/keue - "to swell; grow in bulk" contradicts nature, which generates growth in parts, hence each ones growth within all of nature.
Going into church implies "en-trance" aka putting self into trance - "crossing of a sea; coma; passage from life to death; fear of coming evil; a passage away or apart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trance#etymonline_v_16869
He mostly says batshit Leftist crap but he also says many things that make complete sense. Why?
Left VERSUS right implies a conflict at center...supplied by both sides with willing contestants entering the ring.
sometimes winning, sometimes losing
- If you like to gamble, I tell you I'm your man
- You win some, lose some, it's all the same to me
There's no winning or losing within a ring, only mutual destruction, where those who loose less are declared winner by those outside the ring.
This ring within self is called LOGIC and against others is called REASON...entrance by consent to suggested implies gambling, while sharing suggested implies LOGOS aka words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).
only one that can save you is yourself
Save/salvus/safe/sol - "whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/save#etymonline_v_22794
Being implies partial within whole aka within (life) danger (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "Danger is my middle name" ~ Austin Powers aka austin/augur - "to increase; augment" + power/poti - "ability, being enabled", which implies one growing (life) at the center of all loss (inception towards death).
lamb of god
Aka paschal/pasah - "to pass over" + lamb aka EL AMB (around)
Psyop aka psycho-LOGICAL-operation...that's the hidden center one gets caught in.
Psycho/psyche implies animating power and to operate implies being in effect, hence animation causing effect of being...logic inverts cause towards effect into circular reasoning aka effect vs effect.
Furthermore...logic/reason doesn't catch one, it tempts one to willingly latch onto a side, while fighting the other aka self entrapment.
Our (plural) implies being (singular) making a claim, while speaking in the name of others.
"In nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti"...someone else speaks in the name of (in nomine) Jesus (et filli) if one consents to the suggestion thereof.
Devil/deofol/diablo aka dia (across) ballein (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/devil#etymonline_v_8484
Aka being thrown (life) across (inception towards death)...
Re (response) bellum (war) aka the masses reasoning (war) against each other, while responding to the suggestions of few.
Example...the upvote vs downvote buttons left of this comment tempt the consenting masses into war, hence becoming rebels without a cause.