"Biological knowledge multiplied by Computing power multiplied by Data equals the Ability to Hack Humans".
Biological aka one's life on circular logic X computing aka putting together X data aka suggested information = ability of others to hack/cut/separate ones perception from all perceivable.
In other words...nature divides into each singular being. Few invert this through multiplication by tempting many together. Multiplying together "hacks" singular being from dividing source.
Yuval Noah Harari
- Yuwal (stream) Noah (rest) Harari (mountain dweller)
Nature implies the stream (inception towards death) within which each mountain grows (life) aka temporary growth (matter) within ongoing loss (motion).
To dwell implies "to lead into error, deceive, mislead"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/dwell#etymonline_v_16021
Rest implies "intermission of labor"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rest#etymonline_v_12911
Therefore...tempting mountains (growth) within stream (loss) into the misleading error of temporary pausing labor, while ignoring the ongoing work of nature.
a) Pinch yourself. That's matter. Breathe. That's momentum. Discern that lack of breath implies lack of life. That's motion.
b) Inception towards death implies loss aka EVEN motion; each ODD life within implies growing matter. Notice how each life has a different lifespan...how odd is that? Notice that standing implies balancing by choice aka finding level...making even.
c) Sense/sentire - "to perceive" implies all perceivable (motion); each ones perception (matter) and a separation (momentum) of all into each one.
Didn't aka "did nothing" implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of all perceivable, which corrupts ones perception with ones consent to the suggestion (nihilism) of another.
Consenting to a suggestion brings together, which inverts the momentum of motion setting matter apart from one another.
I can’t type anything on YouTube without it getting removed, been banned...
That implies ban evasion...a punishable offense. Your license/permission to share was revoked by Alphabet Inc. aka abc/abecadary/abacadabra in corpus oration.
A question...
a) ...harasses ones mind to seek answers.
b) ...conceals perceivable origin (1) underneath suggested outcome (0), hence cyber/cipher/sifr - "zero"
c) ...bull/bhel - "to blow" aka blows up the temptation to seek aka ones desire to get from another.
this statement
Instead of shaping a statement aka trying to affix a state of mind by using questions to steer towards answers...try implication (if/then).
"If Biden's pardoned Fauci as a signal to The People of The United States that they are the last line of defense of the country; then..."
why religious people are so godamn judgmental.
Religion/religio - "to bound anew"...religious people chose willingly to put themselves into bondage, which puts them into opposition of those mentally just/judge.
Bondage implies shirking response-ability (free will of choice) onto another, hence passing judgments onto others for remaining free. Those who shirk response-ability cannot be held responsible for judging/blaming others.
Shirking response-ability (ones choice) onto another (chosen one) establishes judges and courts, dealing with blame.
In short...religion (binding self) damns god (all setting each one free).
the exponential increase in malfunctioning
Only during discharge (inception towards death) can there be function (life)...increase implies function expounding during discharge.
Few trick many to believe in exponential increase without expounding, while viewing loss as malfunctioning. In other words...things breaking isn't malfunction; letting things break is.
one of the strongest revealers
All (whole) reveals each one (partials) by internal separation, hence discharging functional beings.
Few tempt many together to prevent functional beings from recharging (temporary growth) during discharge (ongoing loss).
enthusiasts to not be talking about it
An enthusiast follows suggested enthusiasm while seeking confirmation from others along the way. This ignores en/in (within) thus/theos (god); which demands adaptation to origin...not following towards outcome.
Ignorance of reality, based on confirmation bias, permits few to use bots to feed confirmation to many. In return few feed upon the ignorance of many.
where you are
Matter
how we got here
Momentum
where you came from
Motion
even what you are
Odd (matter) within even (momentum) of entire (motion).
CIA
The three letter agencies aka alphabet agencies are based on ABC (Latin abecedary) aka abracadabra...jewish spellcraft aka "I create as I speak".
In such a universe, a being cannot choose to "be moral or immoral"
Calling it a UNI-verse while denying a dualistic choice (moral or immoral)...implies ONEs own choice denying reality (singular) for fiction (dual).
Furthermore...uni-VERSE implies the suggested verses by others tempting one to turn versus others.
Cannot contradicts ones FREE will of choice, which is why a jew suggests nothing aka nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) to tempt consenting gentiles to de-nial reality for fiction aka perception for suggestion aka everything for nothing.
which renders the concept of morality meaningless.
Meaning implies a trade between a suggested concept of meaning and ones consent rendering it meaningful by filling it with consent.
Nature doesn't require ones consent; it doesn't conceptualize, and one cannot trade with nature, since ONE (partial) cannot give anything to ALL (whole). It's ALL giving being to each ONE within...choosing to ignore this for trading with one another makes one a trader/traitor.
Mean/mian - "wish; desire" from me - "to think"...a jew shapes suggestion to tempt gentile desires to confuse perception. Confused (fused together) thinking implies groupthink aka hivemind aka consciousness.
only to follow
Life following from inception towards death implies "dying"...choosing to resist the temptation of dying implies "living".
Could it be that life can be tricked to ignore self by seeking others to follow towards enumerable outcomes?
socially constructed law
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) forces each one within apart from one another...soci-al implies all together.
A jew suggests social-ism to tempt consenting gentiles together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) etc.
They aren't, because morality requires a free will agent acting in the world.
a) Hunger and thirst imply the agency for choice to react by eating and drinking. It's one free will of choice about what to eat or drink, which tempts a moral vs immoral conflict of reason like eating an apple (moral) vs eating your neighbors apple (immoral).
b) What if hunger/thirst moving through ones free will of choice implies need passing through want? What if one is free to choose want over need by ignoring need for want like hunger for appetite?
What if one needs to resist the wanted temptation of appetite, while hunger and thirst moves through one?
c) How could the universe be moral if hunger and thirst felt by those within aren't?
d) What would ALL require from each ONE within? How could choice be a requirement if it was given freely?
Morality is an attribute of a person.
a) Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies sound attributing each instrumental being within...not with something...but as one within all.
Each being implies an attribute (reaction) within nature (action). It's then how one chooses to react, which establishes a moral vs immoral conflict of reason.
b) Inception > birth > infancy > adulteration > senescence (growing old)...at what point during ones life sentence does a being attribute morally or immorally?
c) Attribute; verb - "to assign; bestow"...onto what? That which nature already gives freely?
What if only ALL gives, while each ONE within struggles with the temptation of taking? What if few trick many to assign and bestow values (prices) upon each other, which in return permits the few to set up a market for buying and selling of many aka slavery?
If you assign "immoral" onto anything, then I can suggest you to buy "moral" from me, by for example using the sales-pitch that my morals are cheaper than your precious choice. How long can you resist the temptation to buy into that, while ignoring that it would sell you out to me?
It's either a choice to move towards the good (God) or away from it.
God implies origin and outcome; there's no getting away from God...only Gods way, which moves each ones life from inception towards death.
It's ones choice to reason (good vs evil) against each other, which tempts one to ignore the one and only way.
I don't think they are trapped in moralism because ultimate reality is indeed moral.
a) I vs you; do vs don't; we vs they; free vs trapped; moralism vs moralist; being cause vs causing to be; initial vs ultimate; reality vs fiction; is vs was; indeed vs debt free; moral vs immoral...that's eleven conflicts of reason within one sentence aka entrap-ment.
b) Reality cannot be moral...a being within reality can choose to respond moral or immoral to one another aka start a fictitious conflict of reason, while ignoring reality.
How are hunger and thirst moral or immoral?
The problem is they don't acknowledge that their rulers don't adhere to such a framework, but that they are beyond good and evil.
a) If a jew suggests moralism, and consenting gentiles are reasoning (good vs evil) against each other about it, then a chosen one was selected by ones choice to be beyond good and evil aka outside the conflict of reason.
b) Nature doesn't require anyone within to acknowledge....nature forces each one within to adapt (life) to the known ledge (inception towards death).
Acknowledging each others suggestions permits few to bind many into a LEDGER aka a book of accounts, where the account-ability of gentiles is kept by a jewish bookie.
framework
Work implies energy; frame implies going forwards...energy implies motion forwarding momentum (inception towards death) for the coming into being of matter (life).
Rule/reg - "move in a straight line" implies the frame (forwarding) of work (energy). Gentiles who lack self discernment are being tempted to follow jewish rules instead of resisting forwarding energy, which would grow resistance.
Within a framework...resistance is fertile.
The masses are deceived because they mostly play by the rules and can't comprehend...
Com (together) prehendere (to catch hold of, seize)...the gentile consent given to catch hold of and seize a jewish suggestion is what AMASSES gentiles together.
All perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another through motion, which is why one needs to let go of what one wants to hold onto.
jews never play by the rules
A jew doesn't play...a jew suggests games for gentiles to play, which gets them played. Consenting to a suggestion tempts one to ignore the rule/reg - "move in a straight line" aka all perceivable moving straight through each ones perception.
Straight implies even...choosing to play implies gambling on odds. Chance represents the inversion of choice.
they want to define the rules
Rule implies motion moving; to define implies affixing suggested within mind while ignoring that perceivable moves.
Gentiles hold onto definitions, which makes them DEAF PHONETICIANS aka deaf to phonics (sound), when holding onto words. A jew utilizes spell-craft (words shaped within sound) to bend the rules for gentiles.
they want to be God
A jew suggests IN NOMINE (in the name of) patris et filii et spiritus sancti...a gentile consenting to that a) breaks the first commandment, and b) permits a suggesting jew a position above the father; the son and the holy ghost.
they want
We vs they implies want vs not want for a consenting gentile...a jew suggests both sides to tempt consenting gentiles to a) turn against each other and b) to ignore perceivable need.
To consent implies wanting from another, while ignoring all needed. Nature doesn't send together (con-sent)...it sends each one apart from one another. Coming together by consenting to each others suggestions implies the temptation for ones sustenance of self to ignore resisting.
Before consenting...think OFF-SPRING aka a setting apart of mother and child.
The protocols remain anonymous; while the Ford name was koshered into the jew empire...Hitler on the other hand is THE adversary icon for the jew narrative.
Gentiles are mentally trapped within moralism (good vs bad reasoning)...Hitler represents more than bad; which makes jews more than good. This is how talmudic reasoning adds layers...
All the world’s a stage
Stage implies a horizontal (inception towards death) division of structure (life)...
why the spitting
a) Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God", hence to spit/spite/contempt - "open disregard or disobedience".
b) If nature is balance based, then gentile ignorance attracts jewish insolence/insults.
they can transfer guilt and negative karma away so long as they "confess" in a backwards way
a) The forwards way reveals all perceivable through each ones perception...the backwards way implies ones ignorance (self concealment of perception) of all perceivable for the suggestions by others.
b) Ones consent to a suggestion implies transferring the guilt of ignorance aka ones mind paying (payment) for selling/sealing (to offer as sacrifice) self out to another.
c) Confess implies admission (fateri) together (con), which implies many admitting together the suggestions by few, when giving consent.
Gentiles represent the confession of each jew by their guilt of denial.
d) Karma/krnoti/kwer - "to make, form"...only flow (inception towards death) forms (life). To make/magic/mason/mag - "to knead, fashion" implies form shaping other form, while ignoring flow.
"Karma is an idea that permeates"... https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/596628/jewish/Do-Jews-Believe-in-Karma.htm
To permeate implies per (forwards) meare (to pass) aka life being passed forwards from inception towards death.
A jew suggests idealism to tempt gentiles to follow, which inverts permeate into dehydrate/drain/deplete/destroy/kill etc. It's ones consent to a suggested -ism, which tempts one to hold onto, while ignoring the permeating passage of all perceivable through each ones perception.
to change fate
TO implies towards aka both constant change and ones course of life (fate), which one needs to resist the wanted temptation of.
illness that compels
Compel aka com (together) pellere (to drive) makes one ill, because the closer together one tries to drive, the less at ease one becomes.
Taking words apart puts me at ease; gives me space to think freely, and permits me to see how few rearrange words by tempting many to hold definitions together.
to define words
To define implies to affix...I break apart words, just as sound is separating each instrumental being from one another.
force or oblige to do
Being (life) forced (inception towards death) isn't obligatory/obligare - "to bind", but a setting free from one another aka being driven apart.
Few suggest compel (driving together) as the artificial inversion of nature, which tempts ones consent to bind itself. Consenting to a suggestion implies religion/religio - "to bind anew".
iloveturtles
Turtle/testa - "shell"...choosing a side within a conflict of reason (love vs hate) doesn't shell one from harm, it shells those outside the conflict from the mutual destruction within.
Coherent aka co (together) haerere (to adhere; stick)...that's the foundation of sin aka taking onto self by holding onto others.
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies a setting apart from one another.
In other words...what one writes cannot be coherent until another consents to it, hence sticking suggestion and consent together.
Christ...taking on sin.
everything is antisemitic
Hence..."It's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness"
a) Oracle/ōrare - "to plead/to beseech", hence the jewish orator using spell-craft (talking) to tempt TikTok to take the offer, hence selling out by buying into.
b) A jew doesn't take over...a jew tempts gentiles to undermine self by giving up.
a) What does a block and chain enable? Leisure for the jailer?
b) How does a block and chain enable less wires? Especially while binding prisoners within a crypt(o)?
c) Wire/wei - "to twist; turn"...a wireless body implies ones FREE will of choice resisting the temptation to turn against others within conflicts of reason.
Consenting to a suggestion wires ones body and mind to another...that's how a net works, by tempting the fish to swim into it.
microwaving humans
a) Human aka the hue (color) of man implies the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) for each ray (matter) within; balancing as choice (life) in-between MIN (inception) and MAX (death), hence wavering.
Few tempt many to ignore wavering (ones growth within all loss) by weaving many together.
b) Only within macro (whole) can there be micro (partial) aka breaking the tide.
AI-Based Security Camera Systems vs Traditional
Security implies setting apart; versus implies coming together. The former implies natural; the latter artificial. Ones consent to suggested artifice implies tradition/traditio - "a delivering up, surrender, a handing down, a giving up"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tradition#etymonline_v_16852
camera
Aka chimera...
DEMORALIZED PEOPLE CANNOT BE RATIONAL
a) Demos implies "people" aka collectivization of natural units into artificial groups. Within such a group of people (demos) one rationalizes US vs THEM.
b) De-moral aka division of moral implies a further division of rationalization (conflict of reason). A moral people rationalize in-between good vs bad, which demoralization further divides into for example pure goodness vs utter evil. It's still the same conflict, yet with added mental layers to obscure the living being.
easily influenced by advertising
Easily (ones perception) influenced (all perceivable) by advertising (suggestions by another).
It's easy for ones perception to be turned against (ad vert) others...consent given implies offense taken.
susceptible to hypnosis. Why would that be?
Because consenting to suggestion puts ones perception (nosis) to sleep (hypno).
good information...
...implies ones rationalization (good vs bad) of suggested information (operation), while ignoring perceivable inspiration (psyche).
Psyche (animating power) moves through one, hence all perceivable moving through each ones perception, while holding onto suggested implies opera - "effort".
Rationalization/reasoning over information wastes effort (exertion)...adaptation to inspiration affords aka puts forth being (re-animation).
Torah Prophecy
Torah aka mosaic law implies putting pieces together into a whole...suggested prophecies tempt consenting followers to become the pieces being put together.
iraq
Aka araqa - "perspiring, deeply rooted, well-watered"...hence starting of the Iraqi war with "Operation Desert Thrust".
Already falling for revisionism...it was called "Coronavirus" before the Covid-19 rebrand.