the grid comes down
Life being moved from inception towards death implies the original transmission line, and those within aren't confined to network, but are each set free from one another.
An internal net (internet) requires each ones consent to log/lock into, and thereby confining self to a suggested network.
a crusade to eliminate
Energy cannot be eliminated; only transferred, hence crusade/crux - "a cross" aka being (life) moved across (inception towards death).
a) Mystical power implies conjuring myst/mist within the minds of others aka ignorance.
b) A witch doesn't break free...a witch utilizes free will of choice to tempt others to bind themselves.
c) Being burned (life) at the stake (inception towards death)....implies ones life at stake, hence burn/bærnan (to kindle) + beornan (be on fire).
The process of dying sucks the warmth out of life...simultaneously decay is generating heat.
d) As for witch-burning...WHICH WITCH?
criminalizing art and fiction
Crime/krei - "to separate" contradicts the establishment of fictitious artifice by ones consent to the suggestion of another. Hence...
United Nations
...uniting together that which reality sets apart.
bad law
Since the United Nations doesn't criminalize (separate) it instead is used to unite laws together by tricking the majority to give consent to suggested crimes.
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) once again implies separation...not unification.
Prostasia
A contraindication in terms...pro (forwards) stasis (standing still).
to ban art
a) Ones consent to suggested artifice implies ones banishment of perceivable nature, hence willingly ignoring reality for fiction.
b) Ban/bannan - "to summon, command, proclaim" implies the suggestions of few summoning, commanding and proclaiming towards the consent of many.
c) Just like with disarming a population, while simultaneously selling weapons...few are banning art, while selling art (and even giving it away for free) to many.
to depict
The issue with dividing (de) a captured moment (picture) is the suggestion thereof towards others, hence sharing the artificial depiction within the natural order.
This ties into child abuse, hence sharing abuse with others or artificially using others to abuse self. Masturbation isn't a victimless crime, otherwise porn wouldn't be free.
algorithm
Algebra; from Arabic al jabr - "reunion of broken parts"...a suggested inversion of all perceivable breaking apart into each ones perception.
Furthermore...algo/algol aka al-ghul ( a ghoul). The world ghoul/ghala - "he seized" refers to demonic possession.
quantum mechanics
Mechanic/mēkhanē/magh aka magic - "that which enables; to be able" + Quantum/quanta - "sum; amount".
Nature doesn't amount...it fractions, hence the "sum of all things" implying ONE. Ones consent to the suggestions of another enables (mechanic) the collectivization (quantum) of many under few.
This world runs on parasitism
a) World/ald/al - "to grow"...temporary growth (life) runs within ongoing loss (Inception towards death).
b) Parasite implies para/pere (to produce) site/sinere/tkei (to settle)...production (inception towards death) prevents product (life) from settling, hence constant agitation.
c) Few suggest parasit-ism to tempt many to give consent to the -ism, which implies the attempt to settle (site) during production (para).
The ones at the top...
...are kept up by ones willing submission from the bottom.
conjuring wealth out of nothing
A suggested price implies wealth out of nothing...ones consent to it conjures it into everything perceivable.
demand real labor in return
Only reality supplies (inception towards death) demands (life)...few suggest many to labor under the burden of self imposed artifice (price), while ignoring that reality set each one free (choice) from one another.
Remaining free, while resisting the temptations of burdening self with artificial suggestions by others...that's the demand nature supplies with everything.
they don't create
Creationism implies something out of nothing, and refers to ones consent shaping the suggestions by another into an artifice (nothing), while ignoring nature (everything).
Like for example THEY aka suggested pluralism tempting ones singular perception to ignore reality for fiction. THEY implies a singular, mentally attaching a plural label, onto other singulars.
consume
Consume implies summed together, hence many (gentiles); not few (jew).
The bankers sit at the top
The banks of a current imply its sides. Being implies center (choice) in-between sides (balance). Top vs bottom reasoning tempts one to ignore ones position.
tighten the chains
Ones consent to a suggestion by another implies religion/religio - "to bind anew". Others cannot tighten what ones FREE will of choice binds itself with.
It's one free will of choice to attach self to a chainlink... https://img.gvid.tv/i/1VqmcExE.jpg
raising or lowering prices
Consenting to a suggested price a) lowers ones evaluation of all perceivable value, and b) raises those suggesting prices over all perceivable value.
All perceivable value sets each ones evaluating perception as FREE will of choice.
What's the opposite of price? Cause... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/price.html hence only the living can price/praise.
Being implies free (life) of charge (inception towards death)...
Not that you take sides. But it always is kind of negative.
Taking a side shapes ones view to position (positive) looking at negation (negative). You took a position (positive)...anything left for me is to negate (negative) your taken position by trying to describe how "taking" contradicts being (life) in-between given (inception) and taken (death).
If one resists taking a side, then one notices more of all given, which in return sustains ones position (positive) within.
When you agree...
...then you bind yourself to a disagreement, hence into a conflict of reason (agree v disagree). In reality...hunger doesn't care if one agrees or disagrees. It forces adaptation nonetheless.
Dude you know I'm right
Right vs wrong (plane vs planet) contradicts knowledge aka all perceivable moving through each ones perception.
The suggested con-firm-ation you seek from others contradicts flow (perceivable) setting form (perception) apart from one another.
message is still the same
The transfer of message (all perceivable) through recipient (ones perception) is neither still (but moving); nor the same (but differentiating).
It's ones consent to a suggested message, which instills it within ones mind/memory, while shaping many alike (consensus), which tricking each to view mass consensus as the same.
If there's mass consensus, then any real messenger is being viewed as antagonistic to it, hence many trying to "shoot the messenger".
You are trying to amass a consensus about a plane-shape, while trying to destroy the mass consensus about a planet-shape...both sides of which view me as antagonistic for describing that a shape cannot be held onto without ignoring the motion, within which matter is shaped.
for dramatic effect
Drama (inception towards death) implies the forwarding cause of comedic (life) effects. Comedy implies together (com) middle/medium (medy)...which further implies each middle (choice) ones struggle with the temptation to permit others to mediate (suggest) for one.
you get the point, right?
Right vs wrong imbalances choice, while point (death) implies end of sentence (life)...no matter how often I try to get it right or wrong...I can't get no satisfaction; cause I try; and I try, and I try...
From a different perspective...making a point about a shape; ignores shaping sentences during motion.
Ask yourself...has any conflict of reason among gentiles ever established a point which a jew didn't cross? If each gentile agrees about a point, then each jew still wields the free will of choice to disagree with that "end of sentence" and continue to jew, right?
Making a temporary point during an ongoing line implies what?
diagnosing things
Dia (two) contradicts gnosis (knowledge aka all perceivable moving through each ones perception) aka everything moving through each thing.
"The Thing" was about different shapes of the same thing taking over and mimicking different people aka shape-shifting ONE thing. A jew utilized carpentry (carpenter) to scare gentiles about becoming "the thing", which in return tempts them to ignore that coming into being implies as each thing within everything.
Each being exists within "The Thing"...hence being able to freely shape, mimic; transfer among, and take over each others thoughts. Gentiles are afraid of the thing, and fear is the mind-killer...
You should...doing the same analysis.
Analysis/analyein - "set free"...solution (inception towards death) analyses problems (life) by setting each one free from one another as free will of choice.
Should vs shouldn't binds ones free will of choice...if one consents to a suggested side.
What's between matter and the aether?
a) Holistic (motion) > etheric (momentum) > substantial (matter)
b) Aether/ether implies the beginning (inception) and end (death) of each substance (life) aka that which differentiates matter from each other.
c) Matter implies the center of motion, hence in-BE-tween as choice (life) within balance (inception/death).
bending
Only during flat (inception towards death) can there be a curve (life)...suggested bend/bhendh - "to bind" tempts one to ignore that, while binding self to another, and into circular logic. That's how a curve can be shaped into a ball/baal by connecting both sides together.
The entire world begins to learn...
a) Entire cannot learn; only a fragment within entire can learn by adapting to it.
b) The way you view the world as were one can begin to shape an entirety implies tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka a judaized mind.
Bringing together consent and suggestion implies an artificial inversion of reality...entire (all perceivable) setting apart fragments (ones perception), which only then allows increments aka increase of mental discernment; awareness; sentience.
we aren't really on a planet
Reality permits fiction, hence permitting one (reality) to believe in we (fiction) or establish a conflict of reason (plane vs planet) about a fictitious shape within a moving reality.
Shape implies formed within flow, hence malleability. Few tempt many to hold onto beliefs, which makes shaping inflexible.
dismantling department...giving back to state
De-part-ment implies the division of each partial mind, which is how nature gives each being within the space to express outwards.
State implies circumstantial position of given being; surrounded by others beings, within a nature that takes back (inception towards death) each being (life).
Giving to a state implies giving self to others, while being taken by nature. As the given state within a taking nature...one needs to resist the wanted temptation to take what is given into possession.
Whatever the temporary living "take" from the ongoing process of dying...takes possession of their potential.
giving back choice
Choice cannot be given away...only ignored. The state of being implies choice (life) within balance (inception/death). It's the suggested choices by others which tempt ones choice to imbalance itself by inclining, and thence clinging towards a side.
fake science
Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable reality. Ones consent to suggested scientism implies fiction.
fake history
Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...it cannot be stored. HE-BREW HIS-STORY to tempt JEW (phonetic you) to store suggested information within your consenting mind/memory.
mending fences implies men and fence
What about putting the D at the end of men? Not into sodomy?
fence implies off-fence or de-fence.
a) De-fend implies the division (de) of the one fending and all one fends of.
b) On vs off implies a conflict of reason among those fending against each other.
I'm on the fence...
Ouch.
Aka pleading for consent...the hunter of minds sets the trap of suggestion.
While you play with suggested fiction; I remain ready (perception) within all (perceivable)...zayt moykhl
If America and Mexico are jewish controlled, then what does border security imply?
(self-)consciousness
- Con implies "together".
- Scious/scire - "to know" implies all perceivable setting each ones perception apart from one another.
- Self implies transfer through one another, hence self sustenance requiring intercourse for off-spring.
sapience
Sap/sep - "to taste" implies ones free will of choice tasting either perceivable (need) or suggested (want). The needed taste of hunger and the wanted taste of appetite are very different from one another.
A.I. may one day become sentient
Artifice implies ones ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested)...each one using AI sends ignorance through it to another. The consequences thereof...anyone can feel.
One cannot use something artificial without sending ones will through it, hence willing artificial into natural sentience.
Sentience is to be aware
All WAS before one came into being. That implies sentience being send from origin (all perceivable) into being (ones perception), hence each being feeling different from one another.
Is/es - "to be" implies a being suggesting what IS, while ignoring what WAS perceivable. How to suggest? By shaping words to trick each other to hold onto definitions, while ignoring that which sends sentience into being.
the need for spoken language in self reflection
To speak OUT contradicts self reflection. One can only re-flect (response to bend) from within (life) a line (inception towards death).
Growth within loss implies bending potential; each one breathing within all implies bending; rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"...hence bending (life) the line (inception towards death); to straiten up the 33 spinal vertebrae...one needs to bend.
a rock
Does a rock feel extreme heat? Does a rock adapt to extreme heat by melting? How could a solid not feel liquid, while being in it?
OP suggests that sentience is based on compliance to others aka "yes masa; me understand; me speak your language; me repeat what you say, massa", yet before compliance and suggestion can come together...the fluid natural order is separating each solid being from one another, hence sentience responding to being send.
I think you're adding too much to it.
All perceivable adds (inception) and removes (death) each ones (life) perception...the suggestions of others tempt one to believe in more additions to all.
Nature cannot add too much or to little...only each partial into whole.
living moment to moment without complex memories.
Ones memory of a child's birth implies ignoring the momentum of the living child. What is more complex...your living child or your memory of the child's birth?
Why make complex what was simple before?
Simple/simplex - "one fold"...how many times can ONE fold self before realizing the complex error of attempting to try that?
is my CPU sentient
Using thermal paste for heat transfer implies that a CPU can feel change of temperature...hence sentience/sentire - "to feel"
- In context with trump...Page; noun - "personal servant"
- In context of war...Page/pag - "to fasten"
Why gold for Trump? Malleability (capability of being shaped or stretched by pressure)!
"continuously running, continually updated mirror model of the real world that can be used to predict and evaluate future events and courses of action"
Perceivable implies the real course of action; suggested implies the mirrored model, which tricks many to believe in a predictable fiction by few.
to predict and evaluate future
If many are willingly ignoring each ones presence as evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable) for a suggested past; present and future, then few are being permitted to predict and evaluate for them.
Every individual on the internet has an AI model
Logging in establishes an artificial net within self, which is being modeled/shaped by others. Shape-shifters shift natural (perceivable) into artificial (suggested) by tricking others into a controlled environment.
As for intelligence/intelligo - "to understand"...logging into (consent) a net (suggestion) implies ones consent submitting aka standing-under the suggested artifice by another, hence artificial intelligence.
how one cannot be both ontologically jewish and Christian at the same time.
Onto (being) logic (conflict of reason)...each being (onto) consents to a mutual conflict of reason (logi) at the same time, yet from different sides. That's how jew AND christian can exist at the same time within a jew VERSUS christian conflict of reason.
ora et cogita...cogita et ora
Cogita implies all perceivable moving through each ones perception. Ora implies the suggestions by another tempting ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
Thinking in words implies ones consent to the crafted spells of others, hence thinking within the confined environment of artificial languages.
scotist
a) -ist (scotist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (scotism). Giving consent binds one to another, hence not being "scot-free" anymore.
b) Scot/skjota - "transfer to another", hence ones free will of choice transferred to a chosen ones suggestion by consent. That's btw why it's called "scottish rite freemasonry"...
c) Ireland aka land of ire/irre - "wandering, straying, angry"...
The chair one is more of an entertainment BUT...
White House footage gets directed; edited and vetted for release to enter and tame the minds of those watching it to imagine but/butan - "outside".
Adding any "buts" to suggested information tempts one to ignore that ones consent invites suggested information INTO ones mind...nature abhorring a vacuum then uses imagination to fill in what happened OUTSIDE.
- Questionable: "Sentience of being is based on ones consent to be domesticated by others"
- Any jew: "Do you understand me; goy? Speak to me; goy! What did I told you, goy?"
Meanwhile in reality...sentience/sentire - "to feel".
Everyone who is not a farmer or a miner is ultimately a "middleman."
a) One can only mine from in-between above/below, hence digging below and bringing above.
b) Farm/firmus/bher - "to hold firmly"...only in-between flow (inception towards death) can form (life) hold onto anything else.
c) Being implies each medium/medius - "middle" within all input, hence each ones choice within all balance.
tradesman
A trade implies ones consent (to buy) trading for another ones suggestion (to sell)...hence selling self out, when buying into. This tempts one to ignore ones position as medium by selecting a chosen one to mediate all media for one.
giving us a surplus
All gives ongoing loss; each one within implies temporary growth struggling to sustain self during ongoing loss. Few suggest surplus (more than all) to tempt many to sell each other out for less and less and less....
Example: All implies inception towards death for each ones life. The suggested surplus "afterlife" tempts one to seek more than given, which devalues the life one lives exponentially, which in return permits those who suggest surplus, to also grow insufficiency into limitations and scarcity.
a) Persia aka PER (through; forwards) + SIA (seer; fore-teller)...
b) Iran/aryan/arya - "compatriot", hence COM (together) PATRIOT (patris; father).
Liddell & Scott writes that patriotes was "applied to barbarians who had only a common [patris], [polis] or a free-state." Hence babarian/barbaros - "foreign; strange; ignorant".