▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Women changing into men are still women. They can keep their damn womb. Removing it can cause worse problems. On removal they can be implanted. But they're inseminated, and have a cesarean. The risk is far higher than normally. The cost is far greater. The joke is it costs them absurdly because they produce estrogen increasingly regressing back into an abomination. And on top of their past blockers, hormones, change also puts their child at risk.

Literal insanity. No biological men cannot birth. No biological man has the capacity to birth. There is no current science that allow trans women, male to female, to birth.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Groundbreaking. Pig hearts give pig viruses. Who would have thought? I think it's a polite way of saying it didn't take. A few more tweaks needed to make the pigman.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha, it's safe enough. But I'm not eating from a food bank. It will irradiate something.

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Of course they are if they fight against this. They are protecting the constitution, rights, the nation's, everybody's interests. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Nothing more nothing less. The proposed legislation, not the Potus.

Who is to say it gets there. It should, aren't you horrified and outraged it has been ordered.

Justice if you please.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because no matter what, they screw you, and it causes them to blame you for it. Suddenly they have a choice to screw you even more. It's not their fault you didn't plan for them to get pregnant. They better just abort it. Next. It becomes a cycle. Like another spider or crocodile they lay eggs to eat. Suddenly they have the power too, I just don't know anymore. They had that power already, not get pregnant. But today they go to abortion rallies to get pregnant. They're at these rallies and they're not pregnant but they're demanding abortions. It's probably better to impregnate them first. I mean how does that work. Their body their choice. But they're not even making it. Better let them. How do we do that?

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

No it will be. It's a simple challenge. It's unconstitutional.

How it hasn't made every American livid is beyond all common sense. Wars would've been fought over it. Heads would've rolled. They would've been burnt at the stake. Instead of this other witchcraft. Listening to that shit. What's wrong with Americans. Demand justice. At least. There is literally nothing worse than it.

No it will be challenged. It is nothing short of bullshit. Why are these executive orders occurring today. He must think you're monkeys. Undoubtedly like his past mandate be deemed an infringement. She's a witch. Not your morality. The ministry of truth is unconstitutional. An outright infringement of justice and the liberty of the American Bill of Rights. Only Mickey Mouse would think something else. It's cartoonist, and evil.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because Evolution says life was a mistake, the comet fucked a blackhole birthing the milky way.

They didn't choose to get pregnant. It was a mistake. Contraception was a choice. But birth is blame. It happened and no responsibility for it. It's evolution's fault. Better devolve, quickly, climate change demands it.

Surely life is choice and abortion is blame for having a life choice. It's somebody else fault they're girls. Why do they even get pregnant. It's better not too. Evolution.

Not that it matters. There's no convincing anybody of the impact of mistakes. Because mistakes are blameless. They were mistaken.

But that impact has been critical to our present societies. Look at them. Tell me it hasn't had a much deeper run off. Inflation, cost of living, general services. The population simply services it makes more debt to turn its economy. Services importing, inflating, filling any drops with increasing immigration, and offshore investment as the costs keep rising more. Look at home ownership, lowest stats in history. Debt highest. Inflation skyrocketing. Opportunity are you nuts. More careers haven't been created, less is that fact. Matrimony lasting the lowest.

Of course there are victims too. But they aren't proportional to it.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is serious, but it's probably the Supreme Court who will have overturn any executive order after running through the circuits. Because he won't.

At least it's being challenged.

▲ 7 ▼
Ep0ch 7 points ago +7 / -0

Only the what people commit the racism the terrorism and the crime. Everybody else has the mental health. It's not their fault for killing the what people. It's definitely not racism. Because only what people are racists. Only what people are terrorists. Terrorism only exists in what countries. Everybody else is a victim and blameless. They didn't mean to have mental health, it's what people's fault.

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

All the latest breed have mickey mouse degrees. They pay the most. Odds of winning insert victim. It has corrupted this entire gen. Cancel woke insert baloney. But the degrees have gone to hell just like the reporting and most forms of media

Nothing leaks by accident. Not the way that works. It might have hit his clerks. But it's normally a much tighter house until any ruling. Perhaps she's a mole, but more than likely a pawn. Although who knows.

If it gets overturned it has always been a topic of controversy. When. It seems its motion now would cause this anyway. Worse on ruling. Why flip it before a larger power structure supports it. Lessen impact maybe. But it boosts opposition.

There's a different design here.

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

If Boris eats them first. Instead of flobbing them off to all the food banks. And they better have a clear label.

No real conspiracy, radiation, comes from Boris arse. Not entirely from Fukushima.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yawn. Because he has the women's interests. Abort them. Because it's the draft. No wonder he doesn't want them getting pregnant either.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yawn. They went around Kharkiv. In fact they never really bothered with it. Apart from continuous bombardment. Haven't pressed into it. Apart from along the outer highway, and surrounding towns. A tactic that simply caused defense too go to ground. Cutting it off from supplying, and being resupplied. It was heavily entrenched as Ukraine's second largest city. But it has been isolated and bombarded with little relief or respite. As they moved away from it. It drew them out. Picking a few more off.

The Ukrainian entrenchment along the separatist Oblasts is crumbling. Despite these propaganda morale boosters. Or the supposed blank check of unlimited arms. Heavily bombarded by superior weaponry with little respite. As any meat grinder produces another set of fresh conscripts to causality. What are they firing back with. Not the same artillery inching forward leisurely turning tenements bunkers and trenches into putty.

Hitting any lines is becoming quite severe, rail, roads, airports, bridges, power stations, infrastructure pounded, disrupting Ukrainian sability and its ability to halt anything else.

I haven't read anything with any battle accuracy like this press. It makes erratic claims to justify arms shipments. They have to be seen to be doing something. Like holding up the enemy. Basing conjecture off of different wars. Where victory conditions were different. Unlike in Syria. While providing nothing verified apart from the Ukrainians demanding more arms, by selling Russia is losing.

I literally switch my brain off when reading reports like this. It doesn't tell that story. I find it harder gauging what that truth is. Who is it convincing. But actually look at it. Looking at it suggests that Russia can take all the time it wants. It isn't going anywhere. It's invading. Ukraine however can only lose ground. Or annihilate that invasion. It isn't. It's still attacking.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

They used rocks. Sharpened flints. Or Obsidian. Jade. Then Copper. Etc.

But it needs severing. But it has perfected better procedures as the science has advanced. Otherwise there are health risks, apart from just having ugly navels. Deadly and such.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tiny penis is at it again. Feeling bad about your foreskin. It's definitely the jealously.

No babies aren't mutilated. When the umbilical cord is sliced off, are babies mutilated? Dumbass. You aren't crying about umbilical cords?

Instead you're calling removing excess skin, mutilation. No. Genital mutilation falls under female circumcision. It falls under castration. It falls under changing genitalia without consent.

Removing excess skin is a surgical procedure. It isn't genital mutilation. It happens in dermatology, in operations, and in surgery.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutilation

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutilate

Definition idiot.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha. I am not a retard for understanding why it was done. And why it continues to be done.

I think you have a very small dick syndrome. You're only projecting because you're jealous. You feel bad about foreskin. Retarded. Real issue like changing into a female prior to being able to consent. Ignored. You threw the topic by your petty ministrations. There is no comparison. It really is a simple global surgical option. It has no bearing on anything else.

Congregate, Muslim Jew Christian practice it. They congregate fine.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. It happens everywhere. It isn't Jewish. Muslims do it even more. Christians also do it less than those. Until everyone else does it.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're literally insane. The penis hasn't been sliced off. Excess skin which ran far greater risks of infection had been. It was for hygiene. Dumbass.

But it happens no matter your creed or faith. It's practiced globally as a simple surgical option. It isn't going away, all because you have an ugly midget dick.

You're probably so retarded you still wear the umbilical cord. OMG why was it multiated. What about the warts on your face? Or the cataracts on your eyes?

▲ 5 ▼
Ep0ch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Midterms is that one. The DNC was getting hammered by opinion, until they throw this out. It creates an opportunity to hold some ground. Hammered by so many issues. Now they Abortion lives don't matter.

There is a seasoning of truth with this. The vax has affected women. But not quite to the extent of infertility. Rather there are some irregularities. Yes the birthrate has declined. But it isn't what this shit is.

No seats no legislation. Can't have that with this guy, not now, when he wants spending on everything from Ukraine to peak carbon.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Being circumcised isn't mutilating genitals. In fact it's a hygiene thing. Done in a Biblical time when STDs ran rampant. It's why it was done. It has continued because it is aesthetic. Perhaps it also identified clean from unclean

But regardless under the foreskin is a hotspot for genital infection. Especially in unsanitary conditions. Isn't it also practiced on the majority of pornstars.

You're an idiot making the comparison. It isn't going anywhere. It might be done better today at hospitals. It's an option no matter your belief. Until Jew Muslim Christian all circumsize.

Female shit has no benefit. Horrible. Although there are designer vaginas today, it is an operation by removing some outer skin, and not the clit. Making it symmetrical. Nice and parallel lips. This happens after development.

But puberty blockers and trans therapy on kids is horrible. They should at least be at an age of consent before something irreversible.

▲ 6 ▼
Ep0ch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Midterm bullshit. Throwing the obvious swing. More deviseness. Because Biden's got no popularity. But suddenly it creates chaos right before voting. Giving the Dem's a bigger impression. All they need is to retain seats.

The vaxx is speculation. In fact it's a herring. You can try and sell it, but it doesn't stick. Besides the ministry of truth will throw it under a bus. It doesn't convince.

It probably has another point. It was always questioned. But that timing is laughable. It hurts which party more before midterms. At a time when nobody likes the Dems. Suddenly they might hate the GOP. At least the media will play it right up.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing to shill. A lot of his money is from shareholders. It makes sense in any acquisition, additional funding would be involved in every major purchase. It happens everywhere. Every merge every corporate investment.

Twitter itself was owned by shareholders. Look at the percentages involved in its purchase.

This article is suggesting what exactly? It makes exactly no difference.

How he runs his investment is speculatory, in regards to how the platform changes, but nothing that wouldn't change on ownership. Example on media, on corporate, sports, on any company. New owner means new ownership. They then change or run things differently.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›