Retreating from Kharkiv, yawn. That memo got sent a few months ago. I guess they retook some more of it, and now they're retreating again. What, so they can missile it. Wouldn't that be funner if they just used the nukes instead? Counter offensive, nope, gone. Unfortunately Kharkiv is a worse place to nuke, it's largely a Russian speaking populace, and on the border. But you'd never know about Kiev?
I have questioned why they haven't up until now. Much easier victory. If Kiev doesn't even call itself it. What point is there of it. It has been called Kiev since there was chicken, and it goes back a very long time. Up until some millennials recently went and nuked the chicken. Now it's called some other pronoun and gender neutral word, and it doesn't go by Kiev.
But it's because they largely won't, and it will lose them far more support both at home, and the territory they're invading, and internationally. But this speculation is false. It could increase the sale of nukes and their development globally, while bringing truce and terms back to the table, tactically, if it doesn't draw more into it.
But I'm still guessing they won't, otherwise the nuclear plant wouldn't have inspectors. They still seek to show another image internationally.
What the fuck is that shit. What class is that? Some real bullshit education that is. Real bullshit. Anything is better than learning that. If the pedo isn't judged for raping the 5 year old. Then don't judge anybody killing the pedo.
See how that works, the correct education, it's entirely the pedo's fault.
If 4/5 of the globe are dying. Not many places to go. But you'd probably want somewhere in the steppes of Asia to survive. Not much in the way of natural disaster outside of the elements, cold, but plenty of natural resources, and wildlife, remote, and above sea level, and away from the major faultlines. But otherwise hostile. But those places can also be found on other Continents. Not quite but are often far more populated or much colder or hotter.
Otherwise your guess. Why are we talking about Russia as that topical comparison, yes it is resource rich and much is very remote. But a history of warfare, attacking, invasion, and defending. There are nukes preventing attacking first. Unless you attack somebody else without them. Haha.
If 4 in 5 people are dying it doesn't matter because somebody else will attack you first. It would be like the Walking Dead, the biggest threat is everybody else.
It depends on what age of technology we're in, you're stating currrent. You secured your borders. You always attack first if you're able. Today we have nukes, they stop most first strikes. You're stating there was a survival issue in your topic, only enough resources to sustain every 4 out of every 5 people. Proving first strike. You wouldn't sit there, you'd get attacked. You'd only defend if you held all the resources.
Make the first move on other tribes? Yes. Not enough resources to support them. Have to conqueror any local tribes to make sure you're sustainabled and that any resources are managed into a single nation or territory. Otherwise there will be far less resources, and any other surrounding tribes will be plundering your resources and territory for the same reasons.
Not speculating where, the principle is the same inside of competiting tertorities. Sit there you'll be invaded sooner.
Not entirely, and yes. The story as previously explained is almost worth it. What happened, how did they forge the rings, and why. But that filler is sinking. The last fight was cartoonishly bad. The in-between filler has become hobbit cheesy, instead of LOTR epic. It has moments of really good imagery, and parts with beauty.
But yea. I wanted to like the story more, and its pacing is faster declining by the filler.
As series go about a 7 for effort.
It has started down that slope of getting plain awful. 3rd episode was just poor. That warg was wrong and it looked like a hyena off of the lion king, bar a few more fangs. Or was it those goblins in sheets. But those hidden tigger crouching elf matrix slow mo effects are by far even worse.
While it has quickly descended into rubbish filler. Filler becoming more and more woke. An insertion being provided for the fucking sake of it, and is just like somebody else drawing hitler moustaches on a Mona Lisa every sceen to instill some unrelated enrichment, because it isn't already abstract. Until it is becoming more and more distracting and contrary.
Meanwhile the story starts jumping about like somebody having an epileptic episode because it's just the way fantasy is told today after Game of Thrones. Instead of better dedicated episodes of just what it wants achieve as its formulation. Until the god damn retards are falling out of the sky.
It is sinking fast. At this rank I'll be abandoning ship. I wanted to like it for the story. There's still next week to wreck the Dwarfs.
Prior to unhealthy medicine, rosie cheeks were a sign of good health.
Unhealthy medicine emits more than the meat industry. Have a fucking think. Why it isn't being attacked like meat. Cosmetics, make ups, perfumes, and health consumables. Emit more than meat. Fun fact a baby in diapers, emits more than a life of flights from London to Paris. Tell me that cost of make up? You dumbass.
But he has got health problems. He is also quite old. But rosie cheeks aren't exactly it at all.
You're like one of those retards wear make up get plastic surgery for it. But somehow you're calling him prejudice? You dumbass.
I don't care much. It is what it is. No problem with it. It's a fact. It was going to happen. It doesn't mean I like the monarchy much. But the point you're making is irrelevant to the fact. He is king. It means a new anthem.
No. She was in very bad health already. Had been all year. Scotland was her last stop, she loved it up there.
What they aren't saying is how bad she was. Why her last duty was swearing in this PM. Wouldn't it have been done from bedside or near enough. Something isn't adding up there.
It's the only thing that doesn't add up. Why didn't she pass the gambit sooner. She did, Charles read the speech to parliament earlier in the year. For the sake of it. There was a different charade.
This forum is full of retards. Resident down voter.
The only thing I find odd was she swore in the new British PM all of two days ago. Next. Rather suddenly. Suddenly. Umm something is a lil bit odd.
Was she in poor health then or did she just come down with it. Did they not tell us how bad she was when she went up there to Scotland?
It just doesn't add up. Not on probable odds. Sick people don't just die. Old people get worse, period of hospital. My grandparents etc before passing.
I find it odd that was her last act of being the Queen. 2 days ago.
Old methods, traditional smoking and charcoal pits work great.
But you can build something real nice. Using brickwork. Having a barbecue in a segment, and gas in another. Under a bigger cover of durable flame weathering sheet metal. Or you can combine previously a bit riskier. Not impossible. Materials aren't expensive. Probably less than those barbagrills, hell you get some nice ones. But they don't last like a dedicated purpose built brickwork station, forever. You could make it big enough housing a spit. Using a removable tray for charcoal, or wood, probably cast iron, but bricks also work, and then cleaning them out. Enclosed into brick with cover and obviously any gas and holding arms. Beautuful. Stuff on clearing is probably good for soil, instead of disposing.
Be just like the Wilds. Where they made a flame pit. Few sticks later and after the hunt. No you can make them really nice and quite cheap. Bespoke is quite the premium. But there are loads who offer it.
No. They're provoking Chaos. They want Chaos. Then they can rebuild. Can't rebuild without the chaos. Otherwise it doesn't get built. Throw some chaos in just to force it. Of course they're trying to contain it. But that doesn't work either.
Real simple. If they want it to work. They'd seize control. Fun fact so the railways in the UK were privatised, then they got seized in WW2 and became nationalised and for years they worked all the way up until 1993, when they became privatised and now they have had fare increases every year. Hyperinflation. Has that service even improved. Sure more trains, quicker times when they aren't swamped to capacity on strike and generally delayed. Hell the nhs, the telecoms, everything all nationalised for years. Until today what went wrong. It's about time to seize control again. You're the government just take it.
If you want something done like energy you nationalise it. Where you simply seize it. Then you get your infrastructure built. Instead of being fucking stupid and paying taxes to energy companies. But they don't want it to work. They can't, it still needs oil and gas. But more importantly it just pays assholes profiting anyway. They're not trying to stop inflation. They're increasing taxation simply to keep the bullshit economy running. It doesn't work. Inflation needs industry. It doesn't need an energy company hiking their rates. It needs a national system. Then when it's running you can sell it off again.
In America the landscape is slightly different. Seizing it could be a huge disaster unless you're a president that had the majority. Because of competing systems and states. Constitutional laws. And nobody trusts their government anyway. But importantly what are they trying to achieve. Nothing smart it seems today. Just cut it keeping cutting then use the duct tape and watch it all leak out. Taxation, inflation, and a bunch of quacking idiots collapsing it. Then hell time to fix it.
I haven't got the foggiest. Nope.
You asked me a question. I gave an answer. But it was an oxymoron.
Adapted into what origin? Humanity goes through the same motions. It's a pattern. It happens every single time. Every single time a bottleneck occurs. Technology outpaces population. It is blamed on everything else except the technology being forced. It as per previous occurrences sooner results in depopulation. Until they sooner repopulate and do it all over again.
Adapted into what origin. New technology. Undoubtedly. Until it severely affects them. No sooner are they back at it again.
Do you think this topical idiot can control humanity? For how long. Seriously. It's the same history repeated a thousand times. Even if there were 10 humans left at the end of that result. 1000 years later there would be millions then billions more. But throughout it there would be thousands of this topical idiot saying the same thing. How he wanted to control them for his own gain, how he wanted to limit them. How he needs to sell them something else. If and when nature their own or this planet answers his woeful musings. It would be the same thing all over again.
Hence the oxymoron proposed but you answered with something else. It really makes no difference. Chuck him on the bonfire first. It's what he's suggesting.
Adapt into what origin? You're creating an oxymoron. Live to die. Quickly cut. Or die to live. Cut to survive. Neither, it's often simple technology paying him more for any attempt. It has outpaced the population funding it. Hence a bottleneck. It changing. In any event a few years later there will be another asshole like him no matter what. Humans will populate no matter what he decides. So if he's suggesting the bonfires, surely shouldn't he be their first offering?
But you feel there's some other urgency today. The weather is coming, and the sky is falling on our heads, because it's changing. It does anyway. No matter what he does. Our species will populate back on the Volcano anyway. Just be sure to drive an EV. It helps stop the Volcano. No, what?
Make your own, stack bricks into a larger design. If you needed a crappy electronic, and it being automated, buy it.
But couldn't you, build your dedicated brick structure, using what, a removable cast iron tray, for the charcoal, it also being your smoker that you light and control. Then buy additional rigging for your heated gas grid above it, and it would need just a few connections, the gas arms running across the brickwork with another connection to your propane tank under the cast iron tray or outside your brickwork structure, it needs a basic sparker to light the flame arms, and for your gas flow settings high to low. It completely housed in a larger durable weather proof cover. You could make a spit if you think big enough. What it wouldn't be is auto. But it all layered into your barbecue/grill.
Most people buy it, but I've seen quite a few bespoke ones, designed purposefully for restaurants, or engineered at home. There are the electric and gas ones. But sometimes traditional is the best with meats, it tends to be charcoal, or gas if you wanted it cooked quicker.
Who knows what you want, inside or outside. But there are also bespoke ones. They just cost far more.
Yawn they don't and haven't. A Canadian claims something. Why isn't the entire Planet on this. Why isn't and wasn't it, ground breaking news. I am not talking about those flying dildos either. The ones that fucked those pilots. There they are flying, and what do you know, they're sooner screwed. What was the alien doing, fucking with them. In an unidentified dildo. It ain't a dick. Object of unknown insertion. But okay. Seriously what are the aliens doing. Mythology. They just toy with you? Come on. They travel here just too. Nope they're still unidentified. They could be an alien, if you stare at them hard enough, just try not to get abducted.
No, it was another Canadian. We heard them all before. Did he speak for their government, himself, or Santa Claus. Dear Alien Santa please give me a UFO. I've been really good this year. But my energy bills are too high and a UFO would really help me get around using the free energy. What? Alien Santa is a fairytale. The Krampus however is abducting you, because you haven't paid your energy bills, naughty children go straight to orphanages, because they used too much energy, and they don't have the UFOs.
Tediously the concept could be anything they haven't been validated. It still requires a passport.
No, it was humour at Aliens. Turned into a concept I hoped anybody else would understand. Anybody else except an alien. Hahaha.
They're unidentified. It says so in their title. Proof they're unidentified remains the same today as it was in the pinnacles of mythology.
Although what has the alien actually caused. Taxes that's a certainty. Dystopia obviously. A narrative of constant racketeering. How many more taxes and dystopia does it take to identify them? I mean seriously.
Is there any other proof. None whatsoever. The concept is a hoax. They remain unidentified. Do aliens exist, but they could if you look at this. What am I looking at. Nothing factual. Or something secret. Or something fake. Until everybody is claiming they're something to get paid. What is it, an unidentified object, and it could be anything else, like the dildo. Anything else, all top secret, all syfi, all mythological. You'd never know, because it hasn't been identified. If they identified them, they probably wouldn't exist. Because it's a lens flare, weather balloon, spec of dust, mirage, flight sickness, paranoia, or God forbid. Outside of a belief being subplanted. Until every loon claims the aliens abducted them, the aliens impregnated them, the aliens are coming, and the aliens told them to do stuff. It's the same today as it was then, in the height of rituals, until after all the dystopia and taxes and regulations, they simply haven't come up with anything. Because they're a means of profit, power, and control.
Until you want to believe in them, and no sooner are you paying even more taxes to the Aliens.
I mean come on. Roswell was fake, it literally caused dystopia. I am not a Flat Earther either.
Proof not bullshit. Have you got any outside of a belief? That's still top secret and unidentified.
Nuclear meltdown apparently lasts for much longer. Historically, in the Ukraine with Chernobyl. Although this is quite unclear with Fukushima. The produce and surrounding crops were still being eaten immediately despite supposed contamination. The nuclear water being released into the Ocean. The biggest loss is seemingly the meltdown in a battle zone with nobody credible on site to prevent it. It could lead to greater catastrophe. Addressed now with inspectors.
Nukes historically are also questionable. But within disaster and fall out.
A tactical nuke and a nuclear meltdown. A tactical nuke seemingly affects far less people. But it all depends on the scale of denotation and the area being affected.
Although we're both speculating on if it occurs. Despite of the irradiated chicken.