Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
posted 3 years ago by GynaNumbaZero 3 years ago by GynaNumbaZero +6 / -1
8 comments share
8 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Ep0ch 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It depends on what age of technology we're in, you're stating currrent. You secured your borders. You always attack first if you're able. Today we have nukes, they stop most first strikes. You're stating there was a survival issue in your topic, only enough resources to sustain every 4 out of every 5 people. Proving first strike. You wouldn't sit there, you'd get attacked. You'd only defend if you held all the resources.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

If 4/5 of the globe are dying. Not many places to go. But you'd probably want somewhere in the steppes of Asia to survive. Not much in the way of natural disaster outside of the elements, cold, but plenty of natural resources, and wildlife, remote, and above sea level, and away from the major faultlines. But otherwise hostile. But those places can also be found on other Continents. Not quite but are often far more populated or much colder or hotter.

Otherwise your guess. Why are we talking about Russia as that topical comparison, yes it is resource rich and much is very remote. But a history of warfare, attacking, invasion, and defending. There are nukes preventing attacking first. Unless you attack somebody else without them. Haha.

If 4 in 5 people are dying it doesn't matter because somebody else will attack you first. It would be like the Walking Dead, the biggest threat is everybody else.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy