It does actually. A majority in America means what. No more partisan mules. It could adopt sweeping change from a majority. Like seize the gold or break some mules in.
So yea a face, as you claim is a sock puppet, of the majority could get stuff done. But I dunno what that stuff is today, apart from collapse shit?
Yea it makes a difference. But you're right any hopes aren't there. They'll rig it. Cannot legislate without the mud, bugs, and the coupon electricity edging into even greater partisan mess.
But there can't be a majority, because there's some other guy in office, and he's not very adorable.
If the GOP takes the majority, Biden is out. He cannot legislate. Does he resign. Not since the civil war. But if he leaves office what happens. Collapse occurs.
Does the GOP take both, doubtful it would be historic. If he stays for another two years, it keeps collapsing anyway.
Hahaha, never seen it, like it is today. They'll probably rig something or another, gotta have some more mud and bugs and coupon electricity.
I am a student of history. Why war occurred then. You're missing what winning means. It isn't suicide. Nukes are still preventing direct war. It would be easier. Except there's no profit. Instead they bring collapse off the prop and provocation of it. Study your own material.
I am not saying it won't happen. There are much greater risks now. But currently it is simply being used to play into a different agenda. Or we'd be stealing Russian gas. Removing Putin. Nuking Iran.
But there still is that danger. It needs to convince why collapse occurred and control you paying more.
Or yea let's war? It would be easier than listening to today's assholes.
Yawn. You're missing the point of today's exercise.
Can war today be won conventionally? It hasn't effectively been since WW2. Sure they removed some despot but did they win? No but change occurred. Instead it forces collapse to bring change. Today's collapse is simply adopting another method.
War can still occur and runs far greater risk now. But it hasn't directly yet. Now why is that? Because it will later. It hasn't yet despite even more opportunities too. You're suggesting it still will. Instead of it simply causing change. Look at the change being forced?
War would be simpler. It would be easier. There aren't those kind of winners, haven't been for awhile. I agree it can still occur. But today it is being used to force agenda and cause control. It is causing collapse to adopt another means and method of control. It is quite profitable. You will buy more electricity, paying even more for bugs, but they aren't the irradiated cockroaches, not yet.
Or war already. 2 more weeks. Nope. But you're still paying more for it. Hahaha, and it will wipe all the debt out. No, debt is profitable. There's always more debt for you to pay more for, or they'll sell it to another investor anyway.
I'd laugh if it occurs because everywhere else decides to mass formation against their governments taxing them more, and the only way they stay in power is to go too war. Not happening. They'll get the next government in beforehand, and it will promise more debt. But the banks will continue to laugh all the same.
I don't think so. Not yet. It drags into further collapse because it causes redistribution. Importantly it forces change.
But specifically with the boosts in the form of unlimited blank checks to the Ukraine for contuned armament, and training, etc. There is no need for direct involvement. It's Russia becoming pressured. That action is on Russia to beat the current Ukrainian offensive threatening any claimed territories.
Why would America or the West need to get directly involved in War? Perhaps if another flank opens, another proxy or nation becomes involved in conflict. There are grounds for war. Perhaps. Iran gaining nukes. China attacking Taiwan. Or in today's global recession other conflict emerges. Or if supposedly Ukraine is targeted worse, nuke, or an overwhelming force.
As of yet it collapses simply to force agenda. It is still a cold war despite its hotspots.
Any recessions are quite orchestrated. As they were in lockdown, to the peaking inflation causing change.
Yes historically, war is the leveller establishing control, winners, dominance, gains, but it here is something that runs a greater danger of being blundered into. Instead of it being a prop to cause change. That change uses it to cause collapse to force something else.
I mean there are a host of scenarios it can increasingly occur. They remain quite concerning. But it's speculative they are indeed the above driving point forcing change, behind all the bullshit today. For example how do many of these unpopular governments succeed when it seems they just continue to fail regardless, and as they do it causes an establishment to become threatened? War certainly exerts control over any gaining unrest, unrest increasing in the collapse occurring.
But it still remains controlled. Because a larger question asks can war even be won today, conventionally? It hasn't yet. Instead it simply seeks to force change.
Because they didn't have to be such assholes. At what point and I mean at what point was sponsoring another ant good for the environment? All they have done. It in turn has become far more rampant. If ants don't have another food source, they don't populate. It used to be so simple. You grow it you eat it. Today nope. Some other twat grows it too feed all the ants, so they can sing them little ant songs, and create ant lives matter. And then what happens, you don't fucking say. I mean it's obvious.
Know if the, will. It becomes expected. It happens regardless, cycles on a changing globe, the more you change it the more you feel it, despite its obvious occurrences. But importantly it happens the more ants there are, they ramage against each other, and if you affect their chains, sources, supplies, what happens.
But you're assuming they know. Nope they don't know shit, they're ants with gimmicks and tea leaves. They can't tell me even 2 weeks in advance Taiwan would earthquake then it would bounce to Mexico then cause New Zealand to volcanically start peaking. All they can assume is more electricity will help grow more moths.
I think they know a little more. But they're as prepared as they will ever get it for it. Besides there is no clarity other than the increasing possibility. And it they have told you repeatedly. It remains distinct. What is it you want to know exactly?
The odds of a tipping point. 100%. Population will start decreasing. When. Expected. Those motion's are already occurring despite its break neck gain this year of a milestone 8 billion. How, it is being forced with their sources and supply lines changing. And it is causing conflict.
Weather predicted and not as accurate in a percentage but within the highest odds, it is increasingly felt and expected to get worse, with predictions placing huge odds on it causing far worse extremes. A much larger eruption is due, possibly even a solar outburst on a bigger scale. Because a period of cooling is due after prolonged warming. It will affect those numbers.
Nature takes time to breathe and then breathe back out. But it is due to provide its timeless answer to its simple course. Until a cycle is occuring, perhaps even sped up from the ants very nature, they know nothing else, Klaus feeds, and he knows nothing else. Until it conflicts naturally from both human cause and affects, and the planet.
I don't rely on it, except I rely on causality. It today is becoming both rampant and immenient. No matter what mismanagement they propose, it will become worse. It has peaked, and is faster tipping.
Who knows, another 2 more weeks. Except it's probably sooner and less than a few decades at this rate. Imminent. Nature. Human and Natural are due their date.
But immediately there will be worse as we go through this decade.
Where all these cucking woke idiots, who have since the 80s been sponsoring another ant farm, donate to the ants they're so endangered, they just need more food, because ants don't rampantly expand, will probably try to reign in the damage they're causing with the even more expensive electricity, because it must create more moths, look they're butterflies. All they needed too was migrate into the West and then they can blame it for all the mismanagement. Where a run off is occurring, and it ain't the silk road, but so many of those bottom feeders who must've thought you know I know buy the Ukrainian grain to triple their populations of unregulated schisms. Tripling their populations like tedious little ants in all of a few years, are really gonna feel the affects of a tipping point. The thing with ants is the weather really fucks them up, and electricity won't help the moths very much today at all.
It is a cycle called a tipping point. Where no matter how much Klaus Slob eats them, nature sooner has other ideas.
It today is in a planetary cycle, of immediate change, and it's man-made to the extent of another ant farm, they are gonna be in for real turmoil ahead.
Put pressure on their governments? Why?
Because Putin won't lose, at a proxy war? Or because he has nukes?
Remind me again. How winning works?
Wake me up when Russia wins.
Yawn. If he has nukes, he'll use them to a win proxy war. Or he won't win much. Pressuring governments to let him win, is almost as tedious. It doesn't go to direct nuclear war unless he's prepared to lose. It of course drags into some other agreement. A game of proxy. Can't think of it, until somebody else loses. Except buy more electricity, Russia is charging far more for the gas.
You vill die and be grateful there's no electricity.
I honestly cannot think of anything worse. Police won't use. Military won't use. Ambulances won't use.
I cannot think of anything stupider than a battery operated electric vehicle. It just doesn't perform in the conditions they're selling. Climate change. Or emergency.
Eeeeeveee is for everyone else.
Seriously an ambulance out of charge. What about the police. Or military. Laughable until they run a lot better. They don't.
I read an article. Police aren't even considering them currently. They're redundant in pursuit, and emergency. Same as ambulance services on constant call out. They cannot mince about with charge times. Police simply cannot rely on them. Military on the current battlefield, no way, chuck.
The point being oh look there's Internet. It is largely military anyway and contracted business getting both the subsidies off its coverage and premiums.
But it's a fools errand if the weather gets worse. Sun or a destructive volcano would massively interrupt it. Whoops. Not like it can't eventually realign its gridwork. But it lost a lot of satellites this year. Those odds won't diminish with increasing coverage. Making it costly, vital debatable.
We are due a major eruption and the sun is in increased activity. I'd almost bet against it, except it or likewise would have gone up anyway.
Perhaps but debatable. I am trying to stick to the facts. As CNN the topic is so factual. Not. But I mean okay. If I take a measles vaccine I am immunised. I won't catch measles because the vaccine has provided immunity. Not completely it can perhaps be argued. But okay. What it hasn't provided is efficacy. It has provided immunity. So the risk, yes there are risks even with the measles vaccine, but not as many no. Not as many side affects. It is worth the reward the greater good, immunity, the disease is often worse. The same with almost every other vaccination. Up until this bullshit modern woke fraud came along. It hasn't been effective by the definition of vaccination. It is a con. Take more vaccines and you might, god forbid, it still needs further vaccines to provide a simple definition of immunisation. Because it simply isn't effective. Therefore the risk, numerous risks, has not been worth the reward, efficacy.
Kinda but a fraud towards the medical meaning of vaccine. The risk death for immunisation wasn't worth the reward if all it provided is efficacy. Where is the greater good? Efficacy isn't greatness, it hasn't succeeded in immunity.
But like the film just watched, god damn it, it was shit. In the shadow of the moon. There hasn't been a vaccine that has completely eradicated any disease. But they have provided far better immunity towards disease vaccinated. Immunity simply isn't efficacy. But on the margin of risk. The numbers, few deaths, for immunity. Obviously a vaccine, causes the greater good. Disease, immunised.
So not like Pol Pot, that's a comparison for any later courts. If it goes on trial. Simply a loophole exploited where the risk hasn't been worth the reward. How many vaccines later did it take to achieve contrary status, failing to provide immunity. Your own body did most of that. Or it also wained. But unlike a murderous vaccine, it became became immune.
This vaccine meant a detailed social media and data study into who bowed before the summary executioner providing them with a lottery ticket. The luck of the draw where the winner was rewarded speculative efficacy, or side effects. Obviously the winner went onto the next round, winning nothing, except waining efficacy, or more side effects. And if they survived both rounds. There was all the increasing bonus rounds of even less efficacy, and more side effects
This was all in aid of a very detailed social and data study, but had almost nothing to do with any known medicine providing health benefits.
This vaccine simply wasn't effective by every known definition of the word. It is a fraud.
This vaccine isn't effective regardless of it killing people.
Vaccination means immunisation not take more vaccines killing people to achieve nothing else. It provided next to no immunisation. Debatable what protection it even offered except repeatedly vaccinate. The risk wasn't worth the reward. Immunity. No.
Except it was a big dumb social study. It simply exploited.
Global leaders must go. Nobody wants a global leader.
It's like a very bad woke Netflix episode of Star Trek. Global leaders. Until no sooner aren't they your leader. They're off ruling somebody else and buying a bunch of crap from everywhere else.
America has been populating the World with everybody else, just so it can buy its crap. I always wondered at just how the World populated so quickly and so stupidly. Would you look at this shit. It's how. Imagine similar operations everywhere else. Not just Americans, but British, and European companies.
Until no small wonder that Global. population has become 8 billion in a century, quadrupling.
Now look at that cost when they decided Ukraine made the fertiliser, or fed a bunch of other useless eaters.
But at what point is it a good idea? This shit. Ukraine makes all that food for a bunch of useless populations of eaters. Look at all these shithole countries today, shithole countries that cannot feed themselves, completely non self sufficient, tripling their population in all of a few decades, relying on Americans fattening them up and they've been doing this globally.
Unhappy with a president. Unheard of. But it probably comes from having the least popularity in the history of USA presidency. I mean it's no wonder. He's more unpopular than Nixon. Nixon got re-elected. Nixon wouldn't have said it's because they're psychologically unable to be happy. That would be a joke. Here we must have maniac instead?
He didn't have anything better to do?
Almost as bad as the coffin going by and the British public clapping, some even cheered at a coffin, others said hip hip hurray. There's this coffin and people are clapping at it. WTF. Isn't that your minute of silence. You clap when she's alive. You freaks.
This guy is singing for the wake?
No argument. Except bullshit. Instead you presume it's all black and white. That is one side and that's another. Instead of an agenda causing. War would be simpler. It has winners and sides.
Never the facts. It was simple cause and effect. Bringing immediate change.
Because you're still presuming some other cause is affecting. Russia is doing what. Under sanctions it decreases the flow of gas. Genius. It will cause the West to use all those renewables, right. Must be, otherwise they wouldn't have been selling them. But it's because Russia is causing the West to lose. Lose what, the gas it's replacing with renewables. You don't say. No? It will collapse the West from not using it's gas. Hang on. I thought it was going to be using all those renewables? You mean it's gonna stop Ukraine joining Nato. Umm Ukraine still hasn't. Or is Russia gonna lose. Because it can easier. Europe isn't even fighting. It isn't losing with or without gas. It's only its citizens who are paying more for any bullshit. They affect the globe far more. A recession and higher prices in Europe causes a bunch of people everywhere else to go on have a guess.
Europe's military and industry still have gas despite all the bullshit. I mean they're gonna war. No. Nukes still prevent that, or the threat of them. In the meantime. Things collapse changing to the even more expensive renewable industry. Like they were supposed too. Or they wouldn't have been selling them. Instead they'd be stealing Russian gas.
Tediously.
Look at it tell me I'm wrong. I'm not wrong.
Yawn you don't. At all. Geopolitics. Is that your excuse for Fetch?
Here fetch. Make it real easy. Fetch. It will cause all this stuff too. Change. Because it was so unexpected. They didn't leave it sitting there all nice and tempting. So you'd fetch. You just did it out of the blue no matter how much they tempted you to fetch.
But it's because the West are losing? Or because it needs to force an agenda causing change?
Obviously Russia can't lose, it still has to win something, or it will collapse much worse, and with all those nukes there's nothing worse. It's not because the West didn't cause it. They literally went out of their way to cause it. It's not so Russia will lose. It would be laughable if they do. But it's not the point. The point was forcing an agenda to cause immediate change to the supply lines so they can implement something else.
Or direct war would occur. Hell it still hasn't. It is still on the notion it won't. Because the point of it is forcing. No, not what they're selling. I mean no way. It's impossible right? They're selling all these EVs, then suddenly, I mean abracadabra, whistle bang pop. Would you look at that. Magical.
You dumbass, Geopolitics.
You make no sense. You're really fucking dumb.
What did Russia do that wasn't expected? Tell me please? Turn off the gas. Suddenly out of the blue? When the West has been selling EVs and climate change. Omg it's unexpectedly shocking. Attack Ukraine when Ukraine has been telling it to give up the Crimea for the past decade? I mean what?
Cause the West to collapse. Hahaha. Get bent. Has Russia attacked the West? Contrarily who prompted Russia? But you're winning. Keep on trying. Laughable.
Simple agenda causing change needs a catalyst or things don't change quickly.
Perhaps there still might be a winner here. Not its point. Obviously Russia needs to win something still. If it loses in the Ukraine, it will be worse. But it will drag until change is forced. Because that was the point.
Or try to do something unexpected?
Your pay grade. You have some other dumb notion. Point and click. See how easy you're pointed, now click, because you're winning. What. It wasn't the point.
The point of it was about as obvious as the village idiot. He's an idiot obviously. I mean seriously the point was causing an agenda in line with all the other change being forced. Presto it has been, and all they needed was somebody to blame for it. You vill pay more for electricity, food, and bugs, because it's so much better. No why. Just blame Russia. Simple. Like that, you're now buying even more electricity, and it stops the weather. No, it doesn't. But that's not the point. The point was forcing change. It simply needs a catalyst, or things don't change quickly. Now they're, because there's no gas, the supply lines are redistributing. How easy was it turning it off. Fetch Russia.
Seriously, what sanctions dumbass.
True today the minority is dictating the majority. Why is that. It forces control over it, it polices society, diverting it away from the real issues blighting it, causing compliance. Nobody wants to hear about poverty when it's those people. Those people gain status because they're not privileged. But take any other issue, ignored when all they have to do is incite and then pass another dumb law. If you have those fighting each other, they won't rally against all the taxes, or etc. They can blame it back and forth and the issues simply become another minority passing another dumb law empowering the elite, controlling. Simple control after WW2. Far easier than the population having a communist revolution, civil war, and it becoming Napoleon or Hitler.
But we are taking about the current odds on the midterms. Not how society is manipulated, by the minority assuming the majority. So it can police everyone else, for simple control. Faster becoming a majority divided and it never achieving very much except continued servitude to its elites. They all fawn for status. Until it is more unequal than it ever has been. It truly is pathetic today. So pathetic. Another woke lame stupid thought crime, and do not call anybody else retarded, because you all have something to aspire too. I mean look at that president. Oops a bit glib. But I mean he was drooling, literally blank out, as he wiped his chin, it was on the news. Such aspirations.
Those odds again on the midterms. What happens if, a historical if, the president cannot legislate. No minority. If the presidential party doesn't have the house or the senate. What happens?