Some are almost certainly illegals, but every media story I've seen has bee "Mennonite communities that tend to shun vaccination". Funny how nobody ever asks "well, where did it come from if everyone else is vaccinated?".
Also, I'm not sure we're actually seeing any more cases now than we have at any other point in the last 25 years. 200 cases/year is an insanely small number. But even if we are, who cares.
It's all propaganda to scare people into compliance.
They did the same thing in 2019 with measles. Intense propaganda push constantly claiming it's deadly and the unvaccinated are to blame. That time they found/created/whatever one case of encephalitis in Israel and told that story everywhere.
And at every family gathering it was "oh my, have you heard about the measles outbreaks. it's because of the unvaccinated". No matter how much you try to explain that measles is only dangerous if you have a vitamin A deficiency (and thus, really only third world countries), they would forget 2 minutes later and be back on "it's the unvaccinated".
Look back at 2015-2019 and it looks like an accelerated preparation for the covid plan (yes, they've spent decades building it up, but it clearly accelerated in the few years leading up to 2020). There definitely seems to be an acceleration now as well. Could be to counter RFK, but could also be setting the table for something else.
That's the point of tariffs, to increase prices on imported goods to make it more appealing to manufacture in the U.S.
Whether that's the real goal with these tariffs, hard to say at this point, but in general tariffs are a good thing for creating and maintaining a strong middle class. Wanting all of the cheap shit imported from China, Mexico and the third world is what creates the power imbalance we currently have.
It's like saying "limiting immigration will make labor more expensive and cause prices to go up". Yah, that's the point.
I don't think the basic infrastructure of BTC can be changed to accommodate the needs of a CBDC. First, once all BTC is mined no new money will be introduced in the system and second it will remain a decentralized, public and open source network, unless One world technocratic entities (governments and corporations) manage to amass most of the BTC.
Nothing guarantees that. All that is required is for the majority of nodes to accept a fork that introduces blacklists. There is nothing technologically or politically difficult about doing it. It just requires a big enough scare of "we need it to fight the terrorists".
Same with removing the 19 million bitcoin limit, though they would use a different scare tactic.
That's why I don't argue in favor of cryptos in general but for BTC specifically.
There is nothing special about Bitcoin from a technical standpoint that stops this. Only a mindset that is more prominent with BTC than with other cryptos. That can be changed with enough propaganda and false flags.
They said that about torrents 20 years ago and here I am still pirating most of the stuff I use. Seems like the government doesn't fare well cracking down P2P networks.
Oh, there will always be black markets. Always. But that won't stop them from coming after people. And it won't stop them from controlling the "legitimate" BTC network with their forced changes.
This sounds like fud talk. It's probably a campaign shills run to scare people off BTC and into "safer crypto" which is CBDC of course. Similar to the IMF worrying about El Salvador adopting BTC because it would lead to financial instability. They will cancel their loan too because of it. There's definitely a smear campaign against BTC ran by the central banks.
Possibly, but El Salvador rolled back their plans quite a bit, didn't they? If they need to introduce inflation into BTC, they will almost certainly get their way.
There are two many ifs and so far nothing has been done in that direction. Once things start happening I may take the "BTC is a stepping stone to CBDC" more seriously. I am well against digitalization and I don't even use a smartphone so I'm very skeptical to begin with but it's all conjecture and fearmongering so far.
You're a reasonable person. Can't argue with that.
It shouldn't seem like a stretch. Maybe you misunderstood what I meant by "one fork away". Bitcoin and all cryptos are constantly being updated. Big new forks are released regularly. As they are released, once a majority of nodes adopt the fork it becomes the new mainline.
I wasn't saying it will forked such that ownership goes to a central bank or something like that, I'm saying there will be forks that introduce all of the same track and control functionality that CBDCs are built for, and that BTC will be used in place of a CBDC for the purpose of the control grid.
It's already happened several times where governments have forced extremely popular cryptos to add in functionality to be able to blacklist specific wallets of those they determine to be "terrorists".
That will absolutely come to BTC. There is zero chance it won't. Slippery slope from there to social credit scores.
There won't be an option to "reject" these forks. Businesses will be required to only perform transactions on the approved network. Any fork network will be considered supporting terrorism and you will be fined, shut down or imprisoned.
This isn't far fetched. This is how government control has worked for many, many decades, and it will be extended to digital currencies in the next few years.
Also, BTC is not anonymous. I hope you don't think it is. Be careful how you are using it. The only way to be anonymous is to only use BTC ATMs or purchase directly from other people, and even then there are cameras or deliveries of online orders, etc. Any use of banks or exchanges and you are now linked to every transaction you make.
And the "limited money", the same fork probability exists there. There has already been a ton of talk, in the mainstream, of how BlackRock and Coinbase and others could easily remove the 19 million restriction in the future.
One last point, I think you underestimate the number of people that don't want to give up cash and the anonymity it offers. Sure, 70% will give in to fully digital currency, just like the vaccines, but they need the deception to get to a critical mass of 95% or so.
It's only a fork away though. That's the thing. And between BlackRock, Coinbase and the US Government it's pretty easy to force that fork to be the accepted one.
They aren't going to just let people freely use a non-sanctioned currency instead of theirs. And they need a digital-only currency to enforce the control grid.
That's why people talk bad about BTC. It is a backdoor way of tricking people into a CBDC-equivalent.
I'll pretend you don't already know this, but it's the fact that it's digital-only that makes it worse than the current fiat. It is designed to replace the current fiat currencies with all of that same enslavement features as the current system, plus full control on how and when you can use it (not to mention the impossibility of anonymity).
That is objectively worse.
I know, I know, but muh BTC isn't like that. Just wait. It will be.
There is zero chance it is what the new says it is.
I feel like (orchestrated) arson is more likely, but DEW is possible. The only reason I hesitate with DEW is because most of the DEW video from Maui looked fake AF and more like a well-poisoning of conspiracy people than actual truth seeking.
I don't do TikTok or Twitter, but I will note that I haven't really seen any DEW videos with the LA fires, whereas there were plenty with MAUI. Maybe that means something.
In my mind, it's obvious fuckery, but not worth spending as much energy going to every rabbit hole to figure out exactly which kind of fuckery it is. Primarily because their new tactic seems to be create 10 different stories and push them out into conspiracy realms to confuse everything (see drones, new year's vegas and nola).
Also, I think at least a partial reason for all of the intentional confusion is to create the "need" for AI to be the approved source of information.
I'm more kind of taking it all in and waiting for patterns to emerge.
I'm not delusional. I know what this site is and which parts can be valuable, which are bots, which are ops, etc.
The point is, your post was #2 when I replied, so they don't seem to be suppressing it do they?
I hear people in the grocery store talking about DEWs, seriously. I really don't think there is suppression of DEWs. Which should make you ask questions, because there is suppression of some things.
Everyone here already knows it's fuckery, to be fair. Nobody needs to be convinced.
This site tends to focus more on overarching patterns and narratives and agendas.
I've been surprised a couple of times when "the current event" isn't dominating discussion here, but again to be fair, nobody here needs to be convinced that this is all orchestrated.
Also, during the events they are generally trying to push out several competing and, more importantly, distracting narratives to confuse and to make people who question the official story look stupid. Getting caught up in that is a distraction. More thoughtful analysis after the fact is probably more beneficial.
There are absolutely bots, agents, etc. here and everywhere else, but I haven't seen much real "suppression". Doesn't mean it's not happening, and wouldn't surprise anyone if there was, I just haven't seen things like DEW discussion being suppressed.
Yep. In my mind, the high-level plan hasn't changed over the years, it just becomes more clear and the timelines become more clear. It's all a part of creating a more global system with digital ID, digital currency and a carbon-credit based economy and an absolute surveillance and control grid that will be largely managed by AI.
To me, you can't really stop that, but you can find ways for community and life outside of that system. Keep working on that and use the craziness more as a gauge of where things are at in the schedule.
Seems like a perfect setup for "see, this is why we need absolute surveillance and automatic shutdown controls on all cars".
In general it's best to trust no one in any kind of media, unless you are verifying it all yourself.
She's been good from what I've seen so far. I haven't hit the point where I think she's an idiot or a shill yet, we'll see what happens.
She is one of the very few that have consistently pointed out how bitcoin is being setup to be an effective cbdc implementation, and how the global technocracy control grid is being put in place.
It also breeds a culture of cheating and gaming the system to get your desired outcome, both of which result in only a surface-level understanding of whatever field they are competing in.
When you're naturally passionate about something you become an expert in a way that can't be matched when you're just doing it to check a box.
Wow, I don't check there much anymore. The bot and troll activity is off the charts.
Maybe that one was the only one stickied as a message that the core still believes in America First. Maybe they didn't get the memo yet.
Or maybe intentionally gaslighting people into thinking that's still what Trump is saying. I could see it either way.
I'm starting to come around on this and I think you're somewhat correct that the H1B focus is probably a distraction.
Well over one million new permanent residents (Green Cards) per year, depending on the year 1-4 million new illegals, and uncountable temporary workers of all kinds, H1, H2, L1, O1 and many more.
Focusing on the H1B and finding a "solution" for that will put the population at ease and they'll stop caring about it. Same with bringing back workplace raids for illegals, they'll do a few high profile small raids and the population will be appeased and stop paying attention.
Either way, let's not forget the reasons they do all of this crap:
-
Fed system is dependent on inflation, which requires a constant new stream of immigrants to hide it
-
They need to destroy Western civilization in order to bring in the new system, and flooding the system with immigration is a major part of that in several ways
Look into the National Council of Churches, and the conspiracies around it. Look at the denominations that are members and compare to those that are not.
It quickly becomes clear that is a major driving force in all of the churches inexplicably going gay and woke in the last 15 years or so.
I think you're misreading the Trump selection a bit, but I think you are correct on the "adding Canada and Greenland" thing. Same with the Panama Canal talk. It moves closer to the American Union they have been trying to build, and gets the right cheering it on and seeing it as a victory, instead of the further move toward a global system that it is.
The primary reasons for "controlled substances" are to protect the CIA and pharmas. It allows a near monopoly on drug trafficking revenues for the CIA and the medical/pharma complex is able to control the entire pipeline of "medicines" (while also putting competing options into the controlled list to stop competition if necessary).
Nice checklist to pass on to normies that are aware of the idea of pysops. Was going to point out the "ask ChatGPT" line but then noticed you did already in #8.
Definitely stay away from using LLMs as a trusted source of anything. It's a means of control, not an information dispensary. Use it for what it's good at: starter drafts for day-to-day writing, a decent natural language search tool for internal data and some dynamic automations. Or just don't use it at all, but definitely don't let yourself slip into using it as a first option.
EDIT: also, he kind of implies that AP, Reuters and Wall Street Journal are non-sensationalist and trustworthy sources of information. Obviously not true, though they generally won't be the first places to start ops, they always eventually play their parts in the longer running and permanent ops.
is everyone retarded
I think we all know the answer to that
Look around the normie "smart kid" forums. They all have the same pattern of comments: "we need a real medical system", "the insurance companies are what ruined the medical system", "I hope this is the impetus for real change"
And the buildup was apparent on youtube (and probably tik tok) the last few days. Tons of videos with the message that this was probably someone that had claims denied for themselves or their family, and therefore this is justified. Similar stuff across the traditional media.
And the supposed manifesto going around perfectly scripted to this narrative. And just the right amount of time for the discussion and buildup while he leaves all the clues and waits to be found.
It certainly all has that feel of orchestration to move the public in a direction. Whether it was real or not, the messaging and narrative are clearly being intentionally formed and pushed.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying here. Which of these guys have turned out to be anything other than fake? Wilders? Milei? BoJo? Who?
Are you implying that this stuff isn't all largely scripted, or controlled, or sandboxed? That seems unlikely based on how predictably things play out once they get elected.
Have any of these supposedly far-right heroes ever turned out to be anything other than zionist fakes?
This is all very well said. This all naturally falls into balance, and when things all of a sudden seem massively out of balance it's from two things: 1) human fuckery (vaccines, bioweapons, malnutrition), or 2) propaganda.