Ahahahaahaha.
Retardation can be caused by many things. Lead in the drinking water. Bad diet as a child. Liberalism. Being the fatherless child of a welfare mother. Being related to AOC or Schiff or Maxine Waters. Having the name LaShondra Tonesha.
I do not see evidence this is much beyond speculative. I.e., not real science. It uses buzzwords but conceptually only applies them to some smoke and mirrors, so beware. There is no evidence of mechanisms in vivo using carbon nanotubes connecting neurons. Literature on CN and neurons started about 14 years ago but it covered making CN base structure then putting neurons on them. There are no known means to make nanotubes in vivo and using them to connect neurons, although it can be done in the lab.
Also, it contains some flaws. It references plasmonic nanoantennas but such structures are NOT organic nor compatible with an organic environment. These are made of metals and things like precious metals. There aren't really organic, cellular means to make them in vivo.
If there is someone putting this into vaccines, they are far ahead of human research. Might the fabled rumored alien labs under Dulce be real?
Also, I'm not buying the idea there are cellular-level routers made of nanotech.
A problem with that theory is that antennas are specifically sensitive to length, and to work effectively they must resonate at the comm frequency, and be terminated in the right impedance to avoid reflected wave self-interference. My guess is you can't do that very well with a transmitter injected into a biosystem that has to use the biosystem materials. So the problem is the performance would be highly variable, plus a wet organic medium is really not super good for being an antenna. It can be a conductor, but that alone would not make it good to use as an antenna at 5G frequencies. I won't say it's impossible but so many factors say it's a lousy comm system.
On the power side of design, the body does have intercellular electric activity - that's what the nervous system does - but the power levels are nanowatts, and you can't produce RF from that that can go anywhere. It would be super weak. Today's world is very noisy electrically, and any bio RF at nanowatt levels would be drowned out. Cell towers are not designed to pick up RF that is that weak.
Now, the interesting thing is, biosystem RF systems could pick up cell tower RF, which is high powered. So this inverse direction is feasible, and my question is whether injected technology can be used to bring in 'orders' from outside.
This article, along the way, mentions that Rockefeller et al is behind much of it.
Let's cut to the chase re Rockefeller: once you have massive money you don't need the population anymore. Rockefeller controls the CIA and the AMA and probably US pharma. With that you can do genocide via government actions.
I have applied for a government grant to study wet fat girls as an antenna. I expect to hear back any day now and I included a paperclipped $20 bill with the form to bribe the examiner. My team of 15 horny technicians with a chunky fetish is ready to run tests. If we get enough money we will test it in space too.
I don't believe what they say.
- 5G or even 4 or 3G to the nearest tower requires more RF power than a nanochip in the body could put out, and there would be no good antenna with which to transmit. I am familiar with low-power IoT chips for products and they still need a physical battery (not a bio-derived one). Conceivably one could use a pulsed scheme where an accumulator is charged up enough over time to send a brief comm burst but the problem is the RF signal from a transmitting antenna within a wet environment would be very very weak relative to RF noise in the general environment. 5G towers can't pick up that very weak signal.
- There is no way anyone is able to put a 500 MHz CPU into a nanochip inside a body because even with ultra low power and especially with ultra low power you can't run a half GHz clock. My guess is any nanochip CPUs run at khz speeds at best, because there is no way to get enough energy out of a bio-based battery.
It might be the guy is not lying but simply was taken by fake data.
All the stories about Bluetooth IDs being detected in vaxxed people involve a very close radio - no way can the ID be read at a distance - Bluetooth is inherently very close range and not to a 5G tower at all.
So too many pieces are not right here. It's a boogeyman story is all it is.
His mental spoon bending was shown to be third rate closeup magic and with props. There were other things too. As for his citing Von Braun, well, I was close friends with Tesla and Einstein and Louis Pasteur which makes me very credible. And, and, I dated Florence Nightingale. And I was married to, er, Morgan Fairchild.
Hah, you know, recently I've heard much good about Colorado. Two of my friends have kids who graduated college then got jobs in Colorado and they love it there. A friend I talked to today is staying with her ill sister in Boulder to help her, and she loves it there.
Absolutely. The only cases that might make sense for building are down in cave systems or as the military does, make a deep cavern with a nuke. Which we do by the way, and we have plenty of those scattered around.
If we have a magnetic pole reversal as some anticipate, earth surface radiation may be bad for awhile so we need a backup means to preserve some humans. I believe that we, Russia, and China all have such facilities for longterm survival. I am not sure what a 20 year old Russian MRE would taste like so I am not defecting any time soon.
Capt'n, I canna empty the woodchipper fast enough. It's straining the dilithium crystals!
Kirk: Bones, WTF wears a kilt in space? I think our engineer is a tranny.
McCoy: I saw him kissing the navigator.
Kirk: Shit. Khaaaaaan!
There has been an explosion of works in recent years - some good and some lousy. I have a bunch of books on mental imaging and have not been satisfied with them, so I've evolved a special architecture for it I believe is novel in the field. It uses a mental whiteboard for data and modeling and a mind's eye that applies perception viewpoints to extract meaning from it. On the output side I reverse that and the mind's eye applies styles to output to the mental whiteboard. There's much more complication to it than that, but anyway it works very well for generative AI. I live where all the autonomous vehicle r&d is done and I see better approaches than their perception frameworks. Heh, I'm just down the street from Fremont Tesla and used to be near pony.ai and saw their test vehicles all the time on slower streets. This is an exciting time to be here.
I don't have a totally conclusive answer on that, but all the AI chatbots using LLMs use a complex internal process that takes what you enter and reduces it to query terms, then searches the database for instances of those terms and aggregates the results where it makes sense to do so.
I do not know whether the big players give their bots access to the dark web, but if they did, one would look there for pen-test info on insecure targets. Some useful keywords are IoT (internet of things), building security, remote camera access.
Says mayor: "Together, we promote diversity, equity, and belonging, fostering an environment where every individual is represented, respected, valued, and heard.” Except for white guys, whose free speech is 'hate speech'.
Liberal jogger bitch. How does someone with sub 80 IQ get elected to role of mayor?