5G or even 4 or 3G to the nearest tower requires more RF power than a nanochip in the body could put out, and there would be no good antenna with which to transmit. I am familiar with low-power IoT chips for products and they still need a physical battery (not a bio-derived one). Conceivably one could use a pulsed scheme where an accumulator is charged up enough over time to send a brief comm burst but the problem is the RF signal from a transmitting antenna within a wet environment would be very very weak relative to RF noise in the general environment. 5G towers can't pick up that very weak signal.
There is no way anyone is able to put a 500 MHz CPU into a nanochip inside a body because even with ultra low power and especially with ultra low power you can't run a half GHz clock. My guess is any nanochip CPUs run at khz speeds at best, because there is no way to get enough energy out of a bio-based battery.
It might be the guy is not lying but simply was taken by fake data.
All the stories about Bluetooth IDs being detected in vaxxed people involve a very close radio - no way can the ID be read at a distance - Bluetooth is inherently very close range and not to a 5G tower at all.
So too many pieces are not right here. It's a boogeyman story is all it is.
How close is their cell phone to them? And don't people pass near towers all the time every day? So how hard would it be to grab data from some small chip? I don't think very difficult.
I have applied for a government grant to study wet fat girls as an antenna. I expect to hear back any day now and I included a paperclipped $20 bill with the form to bribe the examiner. My team of 15 horny technicians with a chunky fetish is ready to run tests. If we get enough money we will test it in space too.
Couldn’t the body itself be the antenna functionally? The reason I ask is it made me think of being in a parking lot hitting the fob button to make the car chirp to help find it. When out of normal range, nothing happens but if you press the fob against your skin/body, it can transmit the signal, even out of normal range.
Just a curious thought to provoke your seemingly educated feedback.
A problem with that theory is that antennas are specifically sensitive to length, and to work effectively they must resonate at the comm frequency, and be terminated in the right impedance to avoid reflected wave self-interference. My guess is you can't do that very well with a transmitter injected into a biosystem that has to use the biosystem materials. So the problem is the performance would be highly variable, plus a wet organic medium is really not super good for being an antenna. It can be a conductor, but that alone would not make it good to use as an antenna at 5G frequencies. I won't say it's impossible but so many factors say it's a lousy comm system.
On the power side of design, the body does have intercellular electric activity - that's what the nervous system does - but the power levels are nanowatts, and you can't produce RF from that that can go anywhere. It would be super weak. Today's world is very noisy electrically, and any bio RF at nanowatt levels would be drowned out. Cell towers are not designed to pick up RF that is that weak.
Now, the interesting thing is, biosystem RF systems could pick up cell tower RF, which is high powered. So this inverse direction is feasible, and my question is whether injected technology can be used to bring in 'orders' from outside.
You're right pertaining the wave form size and coupling into the antennas. There could possibly be more to the picture that we don't see, but that would definitely be a hard problem to overcome, unless the materials inside the body were able to act as a phased array antenna with frequency modulation. It's also possible that there are listening apparatus in the newer 5G towers that are spread everywhere, aside from the standard 5G listening. For example, towers broadcast signals at a different frequency for the purposes of telling you how much signal strength you have on your phone. I could imagine a scenario where there are various purpose built antenna inside of the standard 5G array that do things other than what ordinary people think they do.
I don't believe what they say.
It might be the guy is not lying but simply was taken by fake data.
All the stories about Bluetooth IDs being detected in vaxxed people involve a very close radio - no way can the ID be read at a distance - Bluetooth is inherently very close range and not to a 5G tower at all.
So too many pieces are not right here. It's a boogeyman story is all it is.
How close is their cell phone to them? And don't people pass near towers all the time every day? So how hard would it be to grab data from some small chip? I don't think very difficult.
Sadly, eisenhorn's mom while I'm fucking the dog shit out of her isn't the only vaxxed person we are talking about. What about all of the others? 🤣🤣😂
Seriously though, thanks for your addition, it makes me feel better to know at least PROBABLY not on this theory.
I have applied for a government grant to study wet fat girls as an antenna. I expect to hear back any day now and I included a paperclipped $20 bill with the form to bribe the examiner. My team of 15 horny technicians with a chunky fetish is ready to run tests. If we get enough money we will test it in space too.
🇺🇲 GOD BLESS AMERICA🇺🇲
Thank you in advance for your service.
Couldn’t the body itself be the antenna functionally? The reason I ask is it made me think of being in a parking lot hitting the fob button to make the car chirp to help find it. When out of normal range, nothing happens but if you press the fob against your skin/body, it can transmit the signal, even out of normal range.
Just a curious thought to provoke your seemingly educated feedback.
What if the power is being generated by the body and the antenna is composite, comprised of the materials within the body.
I'm not sure whether there's any truth in this video, but I think it's reasonable for a human body to generate enough power for something like this.
A problem with that theory is that antennas are specifically sensitive to length, and to work effectively they must resonate at the comm frequency, and be terminated in the right impedance to avoid reflected wave self-interference. My guess is you can't do that very well with a transmitter injected into a biosystem that has to use the biosystem materials. So the problem is the performance would be highly variable, plus a wet organic medium is really not super good for being an antenna. It can be a conductor, but that alone would not make it good to use as an antenna at 5G frequencies. I won't say it's impossible but so many factors say it's a lousy comm system.
On the power side of design, the body does have intercellular electric activity - that's what the nervous system does - but the power levels are nanowatts, and you can't produce RF from that that can go anywhere. It would be super weak. Today's world is very noisy electrically, and any bio RF at nanowatt levels would be drowned out. Cell towers are not designed to pick up RF that is that weak.
Now, the interesting thing is, biosystem RF systems could pick up cell tower RF, which is high powered. So this inverse direction is feasible, and my question is whether injected technology can be used to bring in 'orders' from outside.
You're right pertaining the wave form size and coupling into the antennas. There could possibly be more to the picture that we don't see, but that would definitely be a hard problem to overcome, unless the materials inside the body were able to act as a phased array antenna with frequency modulation. It's also possible that there are listening apparatus in the newer 5G towers that are spread everywhere, aside from the standard 5G listening. For example, towers broadcast signals at a different frequency for the purposes of telling you how much signal strength you have on your phone. I could imagine a scenario where there are various purpose built antenna inside of the standard 5G array that do things other than what ordinary people think they do.