2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting. They can revoke vaccine mandates, but somehow can't revoke vaccine manufacturers legal immunity.

I think former have no any sense without the latter. BigPharma will just increase fearmongering ads and bribes for doctors for pushing kid's vaccines onto parents brains. It will not be mandated, but fooled parents will ask for them willingly.

Only severe punishment, from huge payments for damage up to confiscations and jailtime for top mangers who participated in bringing imperfect medicine to market for any medicine damaging side effect will change something.

Interesting, that as I heard, in US you could get a huge compensation for too hot coffee served, or product that does not do something advertised, but at the same time you can't sue pharma manufacturer for medicine that does not work or even do harm.

Also, it should be noted, that software manufacturers also allowed to include same irresponsibility in their EULA. Even those who sell very critical software like OSes, different machinery control software and CADs that do strength calculations for architecture, bridges, railways and so on.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's easy - you could personally come and check my desk existence, if you need a proof of that. If you couldn't do that practically, for any fair reason, you could only have an unverified theory about my desk existence. It's up to you then, to somehow use that theory in a building of your world view or not.

There could be situation, when something you could personally check is impossible without my desk existence, then, you will have to accept that theory that my desk exists is correct to be able to move further. You could later find a theory how thing you could personnaly check is possible without my desk existence, but until that, you have to hold to the unverified theory that my desk exists. This does not work in opposite way - you can't prove non-existence of my desk disproving theory that depends on existing of my desk.

You can't prove non-existence, but you can exclude existence of something from being a foundation of anything else in your picture of reality.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just think what "most powerful and richest" have to do, to "feed fake data" of that kind, that is realtime, consistent with cloud pattern you see from below, and coming from something that is 800km above you moving with the speed around 7km/s. :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I question and challenge everything. That's how conscious humans receive knowledge. Only way to find out truth is reproduceable experiment. If you, personally, can't reproduce experiment, that proves something, then, it can't be accounted as truth. That simple.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Undoubtedly I has them. Otherwise, I would have already reformed science into what it should be, from the point of scientific method, that demand proving anything by real, actual, reproduceable experiment. If you can't set an experiment to check your theory, then it is not theory, but unfounded hypothesis, that does not deserve attention.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bullshit. You could easily receive realtime images of Earth from multiple meteo satellies directly, using only simple receiver and antenna, without any interference from any space agency. Completely unaltered and direct.

At least a dozen of satellites continiously transmit realtime unaltered images of Earth form space, from the altitudes from ~800 km to 30k km in open formats (including analog ones) right now, right from above you, available to anyone who want to receive them. If you are too dumb and ignorant to receive them by yourself, using DIY stuff, that absolutely does not mean that there are no such images.

Your bullshit is as dumb as denying existence of some radio station, just because you don't want to tune to it and listen.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even geology is nowhere near reality.

I wouldn't be so radiacal, but I will definitely insist on experimentally checking absolutely everything that accounted as a "settled science" in geology with available today methods, tools and knowledge.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Somehow Star of David is missing. Suddenly. Every Single Time.

Fuck Jews, and fuck their stupid propaganda.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

We know the Military Industrial Complex was getting rid of old equipment to generate demand and supply for new equipment.

I'm trying to find out at least a name/model of that misterious "US/NATO MIC new equipment" for a long time, but nothing pop up, except some BabylonBee-like reports about US copy of Russian Geran drones which is a copy of Iranian Shakhed drones.

I think there is no any real "new US/NATO weapons", only promises, prospects and weird CGI to back state money spending.

Looks like everything is fake, just pure money laundering, again, BabylonBee-like, because there is no any sense to launder money that exponentialy loosing its past glory of world reserve currency.

Was Ukraine picked due to how many research facilities existed there? Not destroy but use?

There was a lot of reserarch facilities of soviet era in Ukraine, but all of them, including manufacturer of world's largest plane AN-224 or shipyard specialized in mass-production of hydrofoil ships and several spaceship factories was destroyed by post-USSR Ukrainian government. Basically they was just sold to local oligarchs for symbolic price who then destroy everything to clean up territory for "offices for rent" under the local MSM hooting about "desroying disgusting soviet legacy". Current research facilities was built by Western companies nearly from scratch, sometimes using suitable buildings of soviet era like in case of biolabs.

PS: This factory was a completely new manufacturing facility of MIC contractor Flex, who rised mostly on manufacturing flexible cables and flexible circuits, so the name. Since around 2024 this factory manufactured electronic modules for Ukrainian drones. Eventually nothing left from that factory. Trump should be glad, actually. I mean that "return manufacturing to US" thing, you know... :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was lightning detection map with history somewhere in internet. I tried to find it again, but only realtime lightning strikes maps pop up, that show lightning strikes that happens right now without history. IDK, may be I missed something or historical data was paywalled, but, honestly, I didn't search hard.

Try to find lightning strikes map with historical archive, and you will get perfectly backed answer to your question.

That things looks like that - https://map.blitzortung.org

Very entertaining thing, I would say.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

it takes a multi million dollar company to create your own payment processor.

It does not. Adding processing crypto payments to your online shop cost nearly nothing (one working day of one not very skilled programmer) for the company.

Crypto is payment processor by itself. You absolutely don't need any "multi million dollar company" to use it. You should be smashing the one who told you that shit in the face until bloody snot and broken nose. You just create your own wallet on your server, and for each purchase just generate a new address in your own wallet, show it to customer, then check blockchain network for confirmation of transaction to that address of invoiced amount. If transaction is confirmed and amount is correct, then payment is done and money is in your own wallet irreversably. That's all. You can mark invoice as paid and ship goods or provide service to customer. Simple script around opensource crypto client. You don't need to mine anything and even don't need to store whole blockchain data for that.

Crypto is not some fucking asset. It is a distributed payment system. Those who try to use or pose it as an asset either degenerates, either fucking cheaters.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is always way out. There is no any problems to avoid absolute dependence on some shitty payment system. Just like there is no any problems to circumvent any state sanctions.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is absolutely no any difference in censorship due to state sanctions and due to wishes of some payment system bosses. There is exactly same people ("people") and intentions behind both, state and payment systems.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I rarely visit Japanese companies sites, not much Japanese things around me, mostly I'm looking for IC datasheets, and didn't notice any censorship, as with Western companies. Toshiba, Mitsubishi and other IC manufacturers sites didn't ban Russian visitors and their access to datasheets, appnotes and catalogues like Western ones.

And that's while Russia (as USSR legatee) still is in the official state of war with Japan since WWII.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely nothing prevents all that Steams, eBays and so on just accept BTC/XMR as a payment, and accept it to their own address without even any intermediate and shitty Coinbase and alike "processors". It could be done by them in a few minutes, literally, and there will be an option "pay with BTC/XMR". This also allows effectively circumvent all that stupid sanctions and other shit and reopen sanctioned markets for them.

Since none of them done that, all their whining about "censorship" by "payment systems" is a pure hypocrisy.

If they really wanted to severely fuck all that "payment systems" cabal, they could do that years ago. Technology is stable and works without problems for more than decade. Those companies who really don't give a fuck to modern financial totalitarism, use it without any problems for years.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is just renamed borelliosis, known for centuries as "mover's fever". So, nothing new, and today tetracyclin based antibiotics work well against that shit.

I suppose celebrities could easily get bit by a tick on golf fields or walking in the parks of their castles. But the probability to get borellios after tick bite is arond 1%, so celebrities have to be bitten by ticks hundreds of times to get ill for sure. IDK, may be they rolling over in the grass naked or something like every day. :)

I know few people who got that red circle around tick bite and fever, but there is nothing to talk about, actually. A week or two of antibiotics, and that's all. And of course they was not celebrities, just spend a lot of time in woods and fields, due to job or hobby and so get tick bites from time to time.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I understand something, there can't be any fight between Trump and Soros, like there can't be fight between a wrestler and one of administrators of the arena. They are from completely different castes. The fight could be between wrestlers (for public entertainment) or between administrators (for money or control). There will be no fight between wrestler and administrator. Well, we could imagine a completely rogue wrestler who have nothing to lose and who was heavily cheated by some filthy administrator, something like in blockbuster movie script, but that's definitely not the Trump case. Blockbuster movie scripts never come real, especially on that level.

From the other side, Trump have all legal levers to investigate Soros for endless crimes and easily turn his (and his spawn) life into nightmare, but I don't see Trump have any desire to do that.

Interesting, who is Soros of Trump?

8
CrazyRussian 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just ask yourself a question - "Trusted by whom?". And everything will become prety logical if you give yourself the right answer. Tip: You are not in that club.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is obviously connected with sanitation, medicine and feudal way of life with wars and death sentences for lower classes, than with "eating organic and free range".

Also, I doubt that 35 years figure for 1840. Those who survived as kids and youth and was able to reach 35 through all shit at the time, with high probability survived to at least 50 without much problems. So, that "half dead" characteristic for 1840 could be anywhere between 35 and 50. Dude just pick the value he needed.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any frequency in HZ that is divisible by 3 is good. 432, 528 are some of the best.

This does not have sense. Hz is a number of oscillations per second. And second is defined arbitrary, not even accurate enough to reflect Earth and Solar system mechanics. That's why we need all that corrections, and leap seconds.

So, divisibility by 3 have no any sense as a condition. Number 3, if you like it, could have sense f.e. as a number of harmonic of some base frequency, but you still have to name that frequency.

To be able to interfere with humans, your good and bad frequences should somehow correlate with frequences of human body and mind. It's a range, not some fixed number, due to variations from human to human and variations due to mood, state, healthiness and many other parameters. All that brain waves, neural pulses, organs resonances and all that stuff are bandwidths, ranges, not something constant.

You need to know frequency ranges you talk about to be able to find and locate sources of that assumed external influence.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Speaking about frequences, people usually tell some numbers with Hz unit attached. Please provide some, if you are serious.

Without this numbers, any talk about frequences is senseless.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

High compression is only in small high-performance engines. Turbocharged usually have lower compression ratio than normal, their enhanced over normal engenes power comes from more air-fuel mix pushed into same volume cylinder by turbocharger, so no need to rise compression ratio.

We have АИ-92 (Regular) and АИ-95 (Premium) gas here, rarely АИ-98 or АИ-102. If engine could run on both 92 and 95 then there is no any profit in one or another. Engine consume slightly less 95 than 92, and 95 sliglty more expensive than 92. So, there is no any point to use 95 instead of 92. But if engine is designed for 95, then there could be excess detonation if you will use 92, so more wear and lower power output, because ECU will lower power to avoid detonation. You could save some money, but will lose both in mpg and service.

Seems that big american engines don't care about gas octane at all. At least those with more than 3 liter volume made up to 2010. They could actually run on АИ-80, but it is nearly impossible to find one today on the market, it produced in limited amount mostly for old agriculture machines without diesel.

Also, LPG have octane number around 110 (104 by US standard), and most engines have no problems running on it. Installing LPG fuel system could save a lot of money because LPG is around twice cheaper than gasoline,

So, if your engine can run on low octane, then you could use any grade you want, the higher price will be compensated by higher mpg.

For modern small Japaneese, Korean and European engines better use highest grade available. They screwed reliability in exchange to higher efficiency, (HP per volume) so even little detonation could lead to faster wear.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but that wouldn't be a real belief

Belief is real. They truly and sincerely believe in what was said, Sinceree and honestly. That's the deal - the main problem with TPTB is that they demand sincere believe in their narratives, That is why they hate anyone who don't believe, even if they picture believe demanded. If things was as what you said, then TPTB had no any chance to rule for so long. False believe means actual opposition. And people with false believe will use any opportunity to resist. That's how USSR ended. The problem was in false belief in all that communism narratives everybody demonstrated in public, but nobody really believe that narrative.

The horror and disgust of the Western society is that everybody is truly believe in capitalism and all that shit about democracy and freedom regardless of political color. Just different meanings attached, but nobbody question system as whole. That's the problem and curse, That's why Western system can't be changed for so long time and sink to the bottom day by day.

That's a nice one! I haven't read Huckleberry Finn.

You really should. Mark Twain was in soviet school schedule, including Tom Sawyer and Huckeburry Finn. It was a bit in communism hoax failure. It could be a bit in capitalism hoax failure too.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

do those who blindly copy actually believe in it? Or it's more like cold calculation?

I think it's both. "I'll just believe in what was told by MSM to make my life easier".

Haha, didn't know it's called like that.

It's from famous Twain The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, chapter 23

“Hold on! Just a word, gentlemen.” They stopped to listen. “We are sold – mighty badly sold. But we don’t want to be the laughing stock of this whole town, I reckon, and never hear the last of this thing as long as we live. NO. What we want is to go out of here quiet, and talk this show up, and sell the REST of the town! Then we’ll all be in the same boat. Ain’t that sensible?” (“You bet it is! – the jedge is right!” everybody sings out.) “All right, then – not a word about any sell. Go along home, and advise everybody to come and see the tragedy.”

This kind of behaviour is surprisingly widespread phenomenon.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

All people need some picture of reality in their head to live. Smart ones carefully draw this picture by themselves, adjusting it to be consistent and logical as they acquire new knowledge about world, others just blindly copy what MSM paint them.

Also add a factor of Mark Twain shitty theater performance phenomena. Once normie bought some shit from MSM and placed it in mind, he will never acknowlege he was fooled, even if he fully understand that. Just like someone who bought EV car will never acknowledge he was fooled and paid big money for the shitty and problematic car.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›