I don't think legality has much to do with this one.
That's what american alternative fuel enthusiasts told me, when I asked them about using moonshine. I was asking about it, because unlike other stuff, like vegetable oil, methane, hydrogen it does not need expensive equipment and have better output. I tried to get a picture of modern alternative fuel scene and found that strange, west-specific thing.
Most people don't even cook dinner, so why expect them to do something that requires some planning, attention, ventilated space, etc?
That people are not in target audience of free energy thing. As they are not in target audience of alternative DIY fuels. But they could have friends who are into that things.
Also, most people don't know that you can pretty easily tune/modify gasoline engines to run on ethanol.
You don't need to modify a car, you need to modify ethanol (C2H5OH) using zeolite catalist to convert it to a mix of hydrocarbons similar to high-octane gas composition. It is just passing ethanol wapours through heated tube filled with zeolite. It is dehydratation and alkylation combined in one simple process.
Are they all gov controlled op?
Not necessary. Conspiracy is a perfectly valid theory to explain some strange things that happens. If you have a little data on subject, conspiracy can't be thrown out, since non of theories to explain stuff is significantly better. So, if you have only low quality video of strange phenomena, it is absolutely normal to see conspiracy theories around it. As soon, as better data will be available, some theories would be disproved, others will stay valid. If conspiracy will be disproven, then phemomena is out f scope of conspiracy theorists. If conspiracy will be proven, it is not a theory anymore, so that phenomena will be out of scope of conspiracy theorists too.
That is why a lot of low quality materials circulating in conspiracy theorists circles. Because they are essential material conspiracy theorists have to work with.
Let's say, bigfoot theory. All we have is low quality photos and videos. If eventually, bigfoot will be captured and studied, there will be a lot of high quality photos and videos. Biology will get yet another species to put into atlasses and study them. But there will be no any conspiracy theory anymore.
Apart from all that amasing, but never-mass-replicated devices that promises free energy and other stuff, I still don't get why in US people don't make and process moonshine for using as fuel? I know, I know. It is "unlawful" in US. So, if people are so law-abinding, that can't even don't give a fuck to a completely stupid law, how is it supposed that people will be able to use some wonderful free-energy invention?
That's basic thing - if such device will be really invented, and if impossible will finally happen and inventor immidiately publish everything necessary for mass-replication, then, obviously, making and using such devices will be prohibited by authorities. So, how do you suppose to overthrow NWO with mass use free energy devices if even most devoted fans of alternate fuel literally afraid to make moonshine in US?
All that propaganda of hillarious inventions are completely senseless if target audience is not ready to break the laws and don't give a fuck to authorities.
PS: And, as usual, last thing I checked from the pool of wonderful free energy inventions is not working. Again. No way for self-sustaining mode and it eats more than giving out.
I'm really amased why that fires and other suspiciously multiplied accidents was not linked to russian spies or something like that? That could have been fit to whole narrative perfectly and build more sheeple anger towards us to show "population" support for US authorities external politics against russians.
Looks like NWO even out of mental ability to use pretty obvious things as reasons in their propaganda now. Elites degradation skyrocketed. Isn't that connected with re-activation of coal power stations forced by their own stupidest sanctions? Am I occasionaly hit something in my crazy theory?
Thanks for your perspective.
It could be that people are afraid of generating hard feelings if they are being overpaid compared to their friend or coworker. So fear of conflict. And fear of finding out that they are being underpaid.
So, for the unknown reason, there are no capitalism and free open market (labor is commodity too) in corporations?
And here comes very interesting question - if capitalism and free open market is superior over any other system of economic relations organisation, why corporations don't want to use it for labour market inside them?
Still don't get the point of such strange corporations approach with salary secrecy. Even in terms of corporation profits. In Russia, on many HR/job sites and in job sections of professional forums even prohibited to place vacancies without exact minimum and maximum wage. There exist well known average salaries for most jobs, so as employers could plan and estimate expenses and potential employees have full picture of existing opportunities. Employees with better skills nearly always get salary above average, ones with lower skills have a good motivation to gain more expirience and so on. Everything open and predictable. With salary secrecy even simple things looks obscure - how employer could estimate his expenses for new jobs? How to plan expansion of business if you have no idea what salaries new employees will agree for? With random salaries you could easily run out of funds looking for necessary competence, or vice versa, get worst possible employees if you cap the salary. Or it will get completely random result with incompetent dumbfucks with high salary and professionals working for food.
Isn't that approach destroy labour market and cause employees quality falling? Or it is an intentional attempt to force that new "post-whatever" negative selection where higher quality of life received by ones who are not better professionals, but ones who are better in lies, cheek, narcissism and all that stuff?
In latter case I see how modern west could had been degenerated to all that wokeism, ESG and other stuff.
I think they actually do know but they don't want to admit they fucked up.
Those, who got that they was fooled, are in sutuation like they was tricked into publicly eating shit under guise of chocolate. They just can't admit that they ate shit.
I think if we could create a narrative that let them keep their sense of superiority, they would come around.
I don't think that there exist any sane way to find out any superiority in eating shit. Normalizing coprophagy is the only way.
Hardly. Too exact and too specific descriptions. Nostradamus never fall to that plebeian exact and unambiguous details.
May be time traveller?
It is nearly impossible. Even if they will understand that they was fooled, they will never openly admit that they was fooled.
It's like in Chapter 23 of Mark Twain's "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn", when citizens had been fooled with shitty theater play.
“Hold on! Just a word, gentlemen.” They stopped to listen. “We are sold – mighty badly sold. But we don’t want to be the laughing stock of this whole town, I reckon, and never hear the last of this thing as long as we live. NO. What we want is to go out of here quiet, and talk this show up, and sell the REST of the town! Then we’ll all be in the same boat. Ain’t that sensible?” (“You bet it is! – the jedge is right!” everybody sings out.) “All right, then – not a word about any sell. Go along home, and advise everybody to come and see the tragedy.”
PS: Also, do you recall that "great tragedy" action? -
he rolled up the curtain, and the next minute the king come a-prancing out on all fours, naked; and he was painted all over, ringstreaked-and-striped, all sorts of colors, as splendid as a rainbow.
Mark Twain definitely knew something very specific about all that "pride parades" and other modern shit. But how?
JFYI: There exists USSR "Smerch" MLRS with characteristics similar to HIMARS. Smerch allow striking targets "deep" (in quotes, because 100miles is nothing for Russia) into Russian territory in the same way as HIMARS. Ukraine have 80 of them (at least had at 24Feb2022) on duty and each with at least one ammunition pack (to be on duty). Smerch could use a lot of different types of missiles, including guided ones, just like HIMARS. Apart from Smerch, Ukrainians always had a lot of ways to strike (or try to strike) targets "deep" into Russia territory, but did not want, or was not able to do it, you know, that strange staged war and all that stuff. How few HIMARS could change anything now?
I meet that strage obsession with HIMARS everywhere, like it is some marketing campaign for that things that pop up as soon as it was announced. HIMARS never popped up before, since the beginning of war in 2014 until US $40B "assistance".
Special relativity is a psyop too. But definitely not because Einstein was a jew and nazis wanted something.
And I'm not shure about "jewish psyop". It is a psyop of a much higher level, unachievable for jews, jews just not smart enough to do such things. Jews maximum is things like holohoax, whining about antisemitism and robbing people with usury and fiat money system. Fraud, cheating, chutzpa - that's jewish things. Science is not their strong point. And you have to be very good in science to create, push and sustain psyops like special and general relativity. Einshtein was just a dumb pawn of real perpetuators of that psyop.
Who the fuck that "US Treasury" to regulate things they don't have any connection to, any understanding of and any jurisdiction on?
However, really, I don't care about that "stablecoins". They are just stupid and failed attempt to somehow tie independent crypto to silly fiat currencies.
Pelevin wrote only "A naked to the waist man in camouflage pants rushed along the mountains on a fierce white bear." about bear in fresco description. :) All other stuff is up to artist who make that illustration.
This is an illustration to the Victor Pelevin's book "iPhuck".
Specifically for the chunk about "Feat number 12. Putin stealing rainbow from faggots" - an unknown piece of art, fresco, found by robot-author in distant future.
IDK if there exists English translation of that book, but if it is, I highly recommend it to read, as all V. Pelevin books. He is a real genius of modern Russian literature.
Awful (as usual) google translation of that text chunk with my small fixes to preserve sense and meaning:
"Rainbow is one of the highest sacred symbols created by nature itself, from the same category as the sun and the moon ... What is a rainbow? Clear white light, decaying into its components. The genome of the day. An extremely wide and universal code, a whole aircraft carrier of meanings, simultaneously accommodating a huge number of such one-color references as communism, islam, orange revolution, and so on. The question is, by what right is the entire existing color library usurped - and put in accordance with such a narrow and specific field of human experience as deviant recreational sex and identity built on its basis? Is something in homosexual or transgender practices (of course, free from narcotic influences) leads to the experience of the rainbow colors? For the exhaustive color representation of the LGBT experience, the brown area of the spectrum with interspersed pink and red would be enough. Maybe we are talking about two or three shades, but hands away from green and purple! We see that the question of revising the results of symbolic privatization was posed by an unknown artist extremely timely and acutely ... " - the museum caretaker fell silent.
"Why does it stealing, but not robbing?" - asked Mara.
"This is just very accurate. Say “robbing” - and the connotations of violence and enmity will immediately appear. But in this act of cultural redistribution there is no hatred of the LGBT community, here we are only talking about the restoration of symbolic justice. Therefore, “stealing” is more appropriate. Hercules, after all, could also first break the skull of Diomede. But no, he went to hardships, refused himself in a sleep - and steal his horses. And only then, when Diomede, to his misfortune, chased him ..." - the caretaker looked at the fresco again.
“The stealing is more plastic", she said. - "It is ancient, more authentic. There is no bloodthirstiness in it ... it's like Soft Power "
The irony is I ended up developing an intolerance for society, and exited.
Mee to, especially in last years, but my business allow to distance from society and I also delivered all business negotiations with customer managers, lawyers and finacists to my colleague/business partner, and I'm talking mostly with decently sane and competent engineers who directly work with our stuff so no need for me to exit.
In last years, top management, especially of large enterprises become completely dumb and insane. Sometimes seems that they even have their own crazy language and system of concepts, so it is impossible to maintain any dialogue with them. You could spend half of year just to make an agreement on each letter of contract, while enterprise losing multiples of our equipment price every month.
You don't need soap to wash that out....water and scrubbing...it's all...trust me.
There are no need for trust anybody. Everyone could easily check it by, f.e. touching mirror or other polished surface after washing hands. At least you have to spend very significant time washing and scrubbing to get rid of oily substances from your skin.
So, how much do you make?
Depends on how business going, now it runs a little better, it is $2.5k - $3k / month.
I haven't been an employee since the 80s, but I can see why people wouldn't want to risk the deal they've made by telling anyone else about it. If you knew I was getting $10,000 per hour, would you still be okay with only getting $65 per hour?
I also haven't been employee for a long time. :)
But I think it will depend on the average. If average is $5 per hour, I'll highly likely will be happy with my deal and will not care about your at all. Even if average is unknown, I'll prefer to rely on needs/spent efforts ratio. If that $65/hour cover all my needs and don't demand any significant efforts from me, I'll will not care about your salary too. Also, it depends on hours a month. Interesting, that this situation with $65/h and $10000/h is real. Say, you and I are electronics engineers with similar skills. But I'm repairing smartphones, and you repair highly sophisticated rare industrial equipment. I need an hour to repair smartphone, you need a hour to repair your thing. But I have endless customers who wish to pay me $65/h 24/7, and you could earn your $10000/h only few times a year, since there is only dozen pieces of that rare equipment in whole world. I could have questions only if average is $10000/h or if average is $65/h and we are doing exact same job with exactly same hours a year. And even in that case could be variants, when it could be OK for me. Either I'm altruist with other wealth source and this job is my hobby or lifework, either you just a relative of some top manager or supervising government official (high-ranked tax officer, f.e.). Or we are artists/actors/whatever where job itself does not matter.
In any case I'll try to find a reason for difference first. And highly unlikely I'll have intention to harm your wage, more likely will try to improve my own, by changing employer or acquiring skills.
Interesting, that if you do that with any other nation, say, make a flyer that state that some large successful company top managers are, say, Hungarians, then Hungarians will be proud of that - it is cool when your nation show some significant success.
But every single time when that happens with Jews, they began to whine about antisemitism and try to censor it. That is a hard proof that they perfectly know that their activity in that large company is harmful for the whole population who is a target audience of flyers. Always. Every single time.
I heard about such demands from employees of western (or with large western share) companies here, but nobody give a fuck to that strange, alien and completely unbased demands.
Thanks. So, this is a kind of saving employer money through obscurity? Does it really works? If it works, that means that average salary among similar positions have to be noticeably lower than fair one. So, most employees have to be underpaid.
Also strange that it is not a open free market where sellers and buyers know each other prices and quality of commodities. That could result in huge drop in quality of commodities, employees skills in that case. If buyers and sellers don't know average prices and quality of commodities, there could not be quality competition.
So, from the other side, employees don't have to improve their skills, they just need to find an employer with highest possible proposal.
It's like you enter the shop to buy a soda and see a shelf with a tons of different cans without price. To find out prices you have to buy all different types, which is impractical, so you just take few random cans and checkout. If quality is not satisfactory, you will have to repeat that random shopping. From the manufacturer side there are no any need to make a soda with better taste - since each buyer have to choose cans randomly, there always be a buyer who will pay your price for your product, independently from the product quality.
If you add all that modern immigrants, diversity and inclusivity crap to that situation, things become even worse. In the shop you have to buy at least one blue and one rainbow cans, so manufacturer could just fill them with water or pee and they will still be sold.
For me it looks like strange casino where both player and casino loose, just because players don't want to show their bids and casino don't want to show his cards.
You have a friendly bacterias on your skin and friendly viruses that limit friendly bacteria growth. It is perfectly normal and natural. They are a frontline of our skin protection from different pathogens. That is why excess use of sanitizers during coronahoax was a reason for unpleasant problems with skin of sheeple who just killed them. But that friendly buddies do their jobs and die. If your skin is oily, then all bacteria corpses and weared out viruses stay sticked to oil layer. That corpses not necessary began to stink, it depends on the person, some could began to stink after a hour of sweaty job, others could stay odorless a week, but that organic matter always decaying. Add old skin chips, pollen, dust and you'll get the picture.
Soap don't do any significant harm to living bacterias (if you are not zealously washing your body parts every 10 minutes with tons of soap, of course), but remove oil layer with that spent remnants.
IDK, if you are fine with wearing a layer of decaying organic matter on your oily skin and you are not a stinky person - that's fine. I'm not stinky too, but prefer to wash it out periodically. Without any problems with skin and hair.
Could work for dry hair without any serious activity, but will fail if you have oily hair or work physically. Your skin secreting not only salted water, but oils too. And you can't get rid of oils without some detergent.
And if you really want to feel absolutely CLEAN, you can't get this true feeling without finnish sauna or russian banya. :) Diving into snow is not necessary, cold shower will be good enough. Spend a half dozen minutes at least at 70-80°C (160-180°F) and take a shower. Repeat few times. Use soap at least at first shower. And only after that you could feel being really clean. :)
Liquid soap + fine sand works perfectly. Used ground coffee is more pleasant, but I'm too lazy to dry and preserve it :)
That shit is really bad for you.
Most shampoo based on lauryl/laureth sulfates as detergent, that is worse than stearates with ton of different shit that make shampoo look, smell, foam "better".
Use potassium stearate (liquid soap, same as usual soap, but with potassium instead of sodium) instead of shampoo, and that's all.
Soaps (stearates), unfortunately works bad in "hard" water, that is typical for drills and wells in most places, in that case you need either soften your water, either use other, not lauryl/laureth sulfate detergents, say, you could buy a barrel of Hostapon (should be most known in US trademark of natural coconut oil and glycin derivative, ~$10/liter for 30% solution) or similar thing and just use it instead shampoo without all that shitty bullshit marketing "modifiers".
There are a lot of interesting things that hidden from regular people that much better than shit they sell us. They could look not so great and rarely have any public advertising, but they are really cool, harmless and cheap.
AFAIK the deal with Turkey about new NATO members have a condition of declaring PKK, Komala and other kurdish organisations as terrorists by that new members and extradition of their activists from Sweden to Turkey, may be even including a member of Swedish parliament who is a member of Komala. I'm not shure that Sweden really ready to comply.
Biodiesel - yes, a lot, but you have to seed fields of plants to get necessary oil. Methanol - yes, you could make it from nearly any organic waste, but it is hard to convert methanol into hydrocarbons mix and as a direct fuel it is twice worse in MPG than gasoline and highly corrosive. Ethanol - all mentions I found - in US people buy it for their experiments, not make. From the side of independece it is senseless.
Of course you could run your car nearly on anything that burn, even directly on wood gas, but speaking about free energy I pay more attention on independence, not on the possibility.
Burning alcohol is less effective than burning carbonhydrates mix. You already have that pesky oxygen atom in alcohol, it is already partially oxidized (say burned), so you have to burn more to get same energy output.