1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

A likely answer to this is that it is very hard, if not impossible, to engineer a dangerous virus.

Of course it is hard since nearly nobody want to study what is really encoded in RNA and how it really works. All they know is how aminoacids encoded in RNA codons, and that proteins are made from amino-acids, but that's all. They don't even know for shure what protein exactly they will get from one or another codons sequence if they will get anything at all.

They literally create random viruses, randomly tossing DNA/RNA parts in the hope that next try will give them virus with necessary properties. Probability of making working one is very low. Because you need not only create a working virus, but also it should be not very deadly to be able to spread and harmful enough to cause any sympthoms. It is a very narrow range and probability to occasionally hit that range is extremely low in their try and trial method.

Same with GMO - they just try and trial random pieces without knowing what they really do.

And as you correctly noticed, humans have millenias of training to fight viruses when that "scientists" just for a few decades know that RNA encodes creature.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whatever. To leak from lab virus have to be working. Virus can't leak if it does not infect people and transmit from them to others. If it does not, it can't "leak", just like a pencil stolen or taken out from lab is not leaked, it is just a pencil out of lab, nothing more.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eating up Putin's propaganda as always.

In case I have to choose for whatever reason, I'll definitely prefer Putin propaganda over woke bullshit about "democracy and freedom" from jaws of globalist elites.

And what about Russian speaking population in Russian territories West pretend to be some "Ukraine"? How West suppose to deal with people who hate all that woke bastards who ban their language, their culture, their traditions, and killing them for over 9 years?

Tell me a cool story, how Russians will be fed with cookies and cakes by West on occupied territories. Will they be allowed for visa-free entry to any Western country? Will they be allowed to choose a place of living in Western countries? Will they be treated equally with any Western etnicity?

Tell me moar, please. :)

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Enjoy washing your clothes in a river and shitting in a hole in the ground.

I wash my clothes in Belarus made washing machine, shit into a normal wc pan made in Russia that is connected to personal sewage disposal station made in Russia and pump fresh water from personal well with Russian made high-pressure pump, And I'm living in a forest with only utility connections to electricity and internet.

Where did you getting your shit about Russia? From projections of poor Ukrainians who think that washing machine is something cool and a wc pan is a sign of wealth? Or may be your TV tell that bullshit stories? Whatever. The main question is why you believe that bullshit. Some kind of ethnic mental illness? Everything goverment tell you is a lie, except everyting it tell about Russians.

Fascinating :).

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Delivering something from planes is not a new thing at all, but in that case plane have to fly just over surface, not at cruise altitude of planes that usually connected with chemtrails.

IDK, AFAIK nobody named spraying herbicides from planes as chemtrails.

Perhaps those clouds of "sanitizing spray" we saw early on in pandemic.

Meanwhile exactly those "sanitizing sprays" that is marked "alcohol-free" with high probability based on PHMG that is basically was developed as "sanitizer". So there was no need for expensive things involving planes - just recommend feared crowd to use sanitizers and sell it to them. That's all. Sheeple will gladly poison themselves and pay for it.

Read about PHMG, and notice sympthoms of PHMG poisoning. You will be amased.

by pkvi
5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

A short retrograde burn could send the 250kg mass straight down onto (assumingly) any launchpad-sized area on Earth

That does not work like that. Burn will just slow down 250kg and it begin to lower its orbit. As it reach higher layers of atmosphere, it begin to burn, loosing speed. At the moment it will get to stratosphere it will be already boiling.

To gracefully enter atmosphere you need nearly same amount of fuel that is used to launch that mass to the orbit or heavy heat protection to resist temperatures as spaceships and ballistic missiles have. AFAIK, starlink staellites have none of that on board. They are just aluminium cans with solar panels outside. So, they will just burn high in atmosphere.

You could target anything as a target for starlink satellite, but it is not the right projectile to reach the target. Also, the precision will be not very exciting, since even if burning cloud of aluminium will be able to get close to surface, it will not have engines or flaps to correct trajectory disturbed by winds and starlink satellite aerodynamics.

Even deorbited few tons satellites barely reach surface as single piece, not talking about being precise.

To be able to do the task you talk about, spacecraft have to be designed for that. From what I know about starlink ones, they had not.

IDK, if only starlink staellite outfit is just an external cover, and all their volume inside is reentry module of some kind, but then it is not clear how they are able to do their current internet job.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hardly. Chemtrails are unpredictable. They are good enough for cloud forming/dissolving, but unuseable for delivering something to the surface. I'm in doubt that elites will risk with poisoning their own mansions and villas by the substances released at 10km somwhere far away.

As chemtrail apologists notice, chemtrails stay in air for a long time. So, they do not fall to the ground immidiately and have enough time to sail thousand miles whatever direction different winds on different altitudes blow. It is unpredictable at the current state of meteorology. Meteorology could for some extent predict the spread of something near surface, but high altitude streams is still a land of unknown.

To get chemtrails useable for delivering something to surface, you should be able to predict the airflows on all layers from the cruise altitudes of 10km within span of several days. It is impossible for now.

Just recently, that "china baloons" clearly show that there are no any way to predict their trajectory even for a day. All you have is to folow this slow moving object and watch what happens. And that is the reason why meteorologists are so obsessed with weather baloons - to research that air flows on different altitudes. You don't need to reserach sonething you already studied.

So I highly doubt chemtrails have something to do in that case.

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

The truth is they never even needed a virus, just a corrupt and complicit media and the PCR test.

They definitely tried to create a virus - all that gain-of-function biowarfare research is not a new thing and well documented.

Obviously, they did not succeed.

If some virus was created or not - I have no idea. There was no scientific proof of their COVID-19 virus existence presented, so the question is open.

However, it does not really matter. Strange death of Kary Mullis right before active phase of their plan with high probability was part of preparations for main plan and/or plan B where they need to misuse PCR tech for "testing", Kary, being inventor of PCR was actively against.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Or "lab leak" was in the initial plan, but it was found out that it is impossible to make barely working virus they created to really leak out. To be able to leak out, virus should work. Since even by most biased papers on covid it is hard to breed it even on special genetically selected cells of monkey kidneys that does not exist in nature that covid virus just could not leak out. So PCR shenanigans on everybody with slightest symptoms of flu was introduced as plan B to create an impression of epidemic. Or poisoning with something PHMG/fosgen/whatever substance in public places to pose effects of poisoning as sympthoms of covid.

by pkvi
4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everything that goes up must come down.

Small debris and unused nails will just burn in high atmosphere without any significant effect on surface. In the worst case you will just have slightly increased meteor activity within few years after wiping out starlink constellation.

Really it is overhyped concern in all. Not everything that goes up will fall down in any observable time. Navy satellite from 1964 (Transit 5B-5 if you are interested) that went rogue after a week of operation is still alive (but kind of crazy, singing senseless, but sometimes very nice songs when exposed to sun, listen them on 136.5MHz LSB modulation when it is over you at daytime), being unattended for nearly 60 years and will not fall down from his 1000km orbit in closest millenias, and will continue to amaze us singing his crazy songs in sunrays.

Only LEO satellites expirience some significant drag and lose speed noticeably.

Also, threat of space garbage to new satellites is miniscule, since it is not even 100 thousand cars on whole Earth, it is 100 thousand cars on whole earth on endless different layers. Probability of occasional unintended collision is very small, at least on current level of space expansion we have.

by pkvi
3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

But it is vulnerable as fuck to the railroad car with nails. All you need to get rid of all that satellites is just launch few dozen tons of nails on the polar orbit at the same altitude and release them with blast. Within few days all that satellites would become a cloud of rubble.

So, that satellites constellation is too vulnerable to be something more than just satellite constellation.

To use it in supposed manner, for all that ultimate surveillance and control things, elites have to be shure that there are no any power left that could launch a few dozen tons of nails into the orbit. Otherwise they could fall into situation when such power could easily blackmail them as it want, since elites tied all their important stuff to that highly vulnerable structure.

And the role of such power could be played by any rogue military commander with access to ballistic missile (it could perfectly launch few tons of nails to starlink orbit) or those who work in space industry with access to launches.

At best Starlink is a beta version of such elites plan. Proof-of-concept, nothing more. Or elites lost last bits of intellect and believe in their own dreams completely.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

And then, tens of millions Russian speaking citizens of Ukraine will be killed by jewish Ukraine government with help and support of your civilized globalists. Then, they will continue to attack other Russian regions that will be blatantly declared "sovereign state that need to be freed from Russian orcs" in exactly same way they already did that with Russian Ukraine region. That is what you name "end of war"?

Also, you still don't provide any proof that Ukraine is not a complete LARP state created by globalists on Russian territory in 1991 for the sole purpose of starting a war with Russia.

If some Tolkien fans declare themselves as Elves, began to speak on artificialiy created Elves language and establish an Elves state named "Outskirts" inside one of Western countries - will you also talk about sovereignity of that Elves state, its borders and demand that all of that Western country forces have to leave that LARP state?

All that games with "sovereignity, freedom and democracy" are over. It is not a valid argument anymore, and one who still using it is just a dumb globalist shill without any connection to reality left. There is no single bit of real democracy, freedom and sovereignity in any Western elites sentence anymore, if you are not aware. West completely destroyed them by coronahoax, and it is clearly visible that West never had them in the first place, it was only blatant propagandist trick against Western rivals, nothing more.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Russia is a 3rd world country with nukes, oil and gas.

With titanium, uranium, complex steel alloys, space industry, nuclear icebreakers, and everything between. Tell me please, if US can't produce its own titanium, due to absence of affordable technology of producing it from garbage that left from producing steel, and buy that high-end material from Russia, who is really 3rd world country? Country that can not afford own titanium production or country that sells it? Same with many high-tech products, from fuel rods for nuclear power stations and special glass for UV/IR optics to rocket engines.

So who is 3rd world country - one that produce high-tech products or one that buy them?

High-tech is not just designing overengineered microprocessors to run overbloated software. There are a lot of things that need high-tech and can't be produced by 3rd world country. And by any accounting it is more like US/Europe today become 3rd world countries, not Russia/China and even Iran.

They could have joined the civilized world

You mean that "civilized world" ruled by insane globalists with woke ESG crap, population extermination, stupid law religion and all that stuff? No, thanks, we don't want to be a part of your crappy "civilized world".

And Russian globalist authorities thried a lot, from USSR fall. Russia tried to join NATO - what did your "civilized world" tell? "No, first you have to buy crappy US weapons of NATO standard", "Wait, but we could produce weapons according to NATO standards by ourselves, no problem for us to switch from 152mm to 155mm f.e." - said Russia. "No, you have to buy US weapons to become part of NATO" - they told. That's what all that NATO about - buying crappy overpriced weapons from US. Made from Russian materials, by the way. Russia joined every single "civilized world" terrorist organizations, from IMF to WTO. But still was not allowed to sell Russian planes, spaceships, agricultural machinery and other stuff. "They are not ecological!, planes are slightly noisy, spaceships are not designed for trans people and machinery have no vendor lock". And even now, Russian government still stay in all that shitty "civilized" organizations for unknown reason, when it is absolutely obvious that they are just a tools for globalists. On the citizen level all that was the same - from humiliating procedure of getting US visa to unacceptance of Russians in all "civilized" spheres as equal. "Yes, you are genius author, but, uh, you know, um, you are Russian, you don't like gays and do not run to shoot Putin, so no, we can't accept you in our civilized circle".

That shit with "joining civilized world" cost millions of lives, huge loss of industry and creation of oligarchs class in Russia. And it gave absolutely nothing. Russians did nearly everything "civilized world" told us, except few things unacceptable for us for religious or traditional reasons. But we got nothing. Even our oligarchs and globalist shills was not accepted as equals in same circles of "civilized world". Russians will never accept being second class members of anything. Either completely equal, either GTFO.

So fuck your "civilized world", fuck your "civilization", fuck your "civilizers". We don't need your "civilization", we have our own, and we absolutely don't give a fuck about your "civilization" views on us.

West lost its credibility completely. Today Western "civilized world" is accounted as dirty swamp with serpent liars and dishonest thieves and bastards who can't hold their word for a second, who also for completely unjustified reason think that they are "more civilized". West is done. Western "civilization" is not attractive anymore for anybody, including unlucky Western people who have to suffer in that "civilization" that destroyed everything they valued earlier.

When we all gather on the funeral of your "civilization" eventually, we will gladly piss on its grave. Together, Russians and Westerners.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you are not some well-known Soros shill, in the worst case you will pay some fine for "uncoordinated rally" if any. You again know about Russia only bullshit that Russia's worst enemies told you. There are no any punishment for protesting against the war. Even the loudest protestor, TV channel editor Ovsiannikova is back in Russia, free and well. There is punishment for spreading lies (like that stupidest Bucha fake) with intention to discredit Russian Armed Forces and you have to try hard to attract an state attention.

With Soros shills anything could be used to detain and neutralize them - from manufactured financial charges (like was done with Navalny) to the made up convictions in all that stupid "extremism", "therrorism", "discreditation of armed forces" or whatever. If you are regular citizen not connected with Western financial circles, there is nothing serious could happen with you.

Separate case is so called "ethnic hatred". Designed specifically by jews and to protect jews this law could be applied to regular citizens with up to few years in jail if you was too active in public. It used mostly in cases of "hatred" against Jews and Caucasus tribes. Only once it was used for "hatred" towards Russians to detain one Soros shill who posed as "journalist". And you could be convicted in "hatred" towards Ukrainians too, as one jewish faggot that worked on one of mainstream TV channels nearly had. Being Jew saved him from criminal prosecution.

Meaning of the "law" in Russia is different from one the West used to. You could don't give a fuck to some stupid law and nobody will care. And even stupidiest and unconnected law could be used to neutralize state enemy that have serious resources from outside to evade conviction directly connected with his activity.

Law is not some dogmatic or absolute thing in Russia. At all. Good or bad, but unless you understand that, you can't began to understand how things here work and will always do a wrong assumptions and conclusions about Russia and Russians.

What happens to a Americanr in the US who will demand change of political system in his country, say, removing POTUS position or insisting on direct voting, not that stupid "voters" scam?

What happens to a European in EU for uncovering lies about Holocaust?

What happens to a Westerner in West for demanding return of psychological ilness definitions for faggots, trans and other evolution garbage?

For current state of affairs, looks like you will be more free to express your views in Russia, than on the West.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just like short while ago there was millions more of those who supported lockdowns and mask/vaccine mandates? And those who called bullshit was "fucking nothing". And who eventually was right?

Do you understand the difference between those who just blindly follow official lies and those who have enough brains to have their own opinion and why the latter will always have less numbers?

by pkvi
1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

then why did amoeba survive at all

Some survived, some don't, really. For those who survived it is all about probabilities. If virus would be deadly it will extinct with amoebas fast. If it is not, it will survive as amoebas Also those amoebas who developed protection against deadly viruses (occasional change in wall protein, f.e.) will survive too.

Whereas the virus concept requires such extraordinary parameters to achieve success yet has been limited for millions of years.

Taking in account trillions of trillions amoebas who live fast and divide young, this small probabilities moves from region of impossible to region of inevitable.

It is obvious that viruses can't evolve by themselves because they are not alive and could not survive without the cell with that protein fabric inside. But every cell have virus-like particles that transfer parts of DNA/RNA from core to their protein fabrics to grow and divide. billions of years and trillions of trillions primeval bacterias/amoebas/single-cell creatures give a good chance for such thing as virus to be created.

My argument here is that viruses, are a rebranding of simpler bacteria and do not exist in the modern formulation ie branding.

Bacterias are alive, all in all. Concept of virus is that it is a chemical substance, complex, but not able to reproduce by itself. And in simpliest possible bacteria you still have to have protein fabric to build and repair that bacteria. And that fabric have to somehow get instructions of what protein to build and how. And there should be a way to transfer parts of whole DNA to that fabrics. So we again have a ground for a virus creation.

how electronmicroscopy is misguided when searching for microscopic interactions with proteins --er-- viruses.

Not all viruses "found" only by PCR tests. Long time ago, when scientists wanted to know the truth, viruses was properly separated, purified and then that purified sample (water and particles of interest only) was used to produce same disease in plants or whatever test species. Separation process clearly point to the average size of studied objects and they was definitely much smaller than any potential bacteria. You can't have bacteria smaller than certain dimentions, because it needs certain parts to exists. estimated virus size was like single bacteria part. And they do not multiply by themselves, so they definitely need a host to reproduce.

There is no better theory of that observed phenomena. Even if methods used for preparation of samples for electron microscopy are questionable, they does not disprove that theory.

Since theory explains everything about viruses, and there are no disproofs, why should we throw it out?

Fact that some bastards use some theory for their scams does not make that theory wrong or evil. It is just a theory, and if it is incorrect, it should be disproven scientifically, and not politically of just because we don't like bastards who base their scam on it.

As for particle physics - imagine that you have a model that perfectly destcribe some part of curve. Every experiment in knwon range validates it. But it is unknown how that curve behave outside that known range. So, everybody is formally free to continue that curve as they wish. Rise it up, bent it down, for any degree. And every such "prediction" is a source of money. Standard model have a strict range. "Randomly continuing curve" is an equivalent of predicting new particle "based on standard model" with certain parameters. Parameters could be validated by actual experiment that will or will not show a particle with predicted parameters. Each prediction of new particle and experiment is a grant money. And nobody care if experiment disprove that random prediction, Publication is not retracted if prediction was proven false. "Scientists with publications" will just roll out a new one and those who give grants will give next grant for "opening new particle" because it sounds cool and it is a "scientist" with publications. You get a business instead of science based on perfectly valid theory.

That problem with commercialising even physics science is perfectly known, but too little scientists risk to talk about that in current circumstances.

With bio sciences things are much worse.

by pkvi
3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Many proteins in ameoba is much more complex than ones used by viruses.

As for viruses origin, one of theories is that one of amoeba organella that carry DNA/RNA parts to organellas that build proteins of amoeba occasionally have DNA/RNA of itself to produce inside, this DNA/RNA was damaged by whatever cause so to add ability of outer proteine to pierce cell walls and when that broken DNA/RNA was transcribed by protein producing organella, new entities broke out of amoeba into external world and began to pierce into other ameobas.

Really, virus is not something alive, it is just a chemical substance with information of how to build that substance suitable for cell part that produce proteins. So, when that substance is reached part of cell that produces proteine according to given DNA/RNA it will produce same substance,

Technically there is nothing impossible in existing of such substances. So, the real question is not if they could exist, and even not if they exist (there are enough proofs that at least some of them are real) the question is how many of them are real and what they really do, apart self-replicating, and how many was thinked out for cookies by scumbags who pose themselves as scientists.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Shutoff is a multiple different things now. Often, when you shutdown laptop by button or from win/ios, it does not turn off the power, but fall into suspend mode, where everything except RAM is turned off to keep the contents of the RAM intact and immidiately continue from the place you stopped when you turn it on. But RAM used in modern PCs is dynamic one and eat noticeable amount of power. And things goes worse with every new dynamic RAM generation.

  2. If modern OS sheduled applying updates, it will not shutdown really, it will just turn off screen and continue to work installing updates. This could eat battery very fast, since for unknown reason applying updates in win/ios is not just unpacking new binaries in place of old ones as in normal systems, but a lot of power hungry searches, rebuilding databases and tons of other stupid stuff due to stupid OS design.

  3. I met some laptops that had strange vendor software, something like "WhateverBrand Laptop Control Center" with "battery care" folder/section with option of "thorough battery check" - it tries to discharge battery for some time loading processor with useless calculations and calculate battery real current capacity from voltage drop under serious load. As usual for "vendor" soft such utilities are low quality and often have serious bugs. So, if "periodic thorough bettery check" option is turned on, it could occasionally endlessly loop in that discharging test. Always remove any "vendor helper utilities" from your computer if you are not ready to investigate sudden strange accidents.

9
CrazyRussian 9 points ago +9 / -0

One small remark - there was no such thing as "Ukraine" nor 1000 years before Khazaria, nor diring Khazaria nor long after Khazaria. However there always was some outskirts of Rus/Russia everywhere on its borders. Word "outskirts" in ancient Russian written as "oukraina" ("ѹкраина" where "ѹ" is single letter of ancient russian alphabet). So, there was multiple ukraines in Russia, and none was something more than just outskirts. LARPers that find mentions of word "ѹкраина" in ancient Russian texts and pose them as a proof of existing of their "Ukraine" state are just lying directly to your face. As a kind of state Ukaine was first established by Lenin in 1922 as part of future USSR and it was assembled from Malorossia and Poland regions of Russian Empire.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Confirm that. Also, in Orthodox Christianity skull symbol have a different meaning than in Catolicism or wider in the Western culture, f.e. Skull symbolic in Orthodox Christian culture symbolize freedom from the death and possibility of salvation for anyone and also is a reminder about frailty of this world. It is not grim and frightening as in the West.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

We also nodding but more to people we know, like colleagues, neighbours, not to strangers. Silent version of "hello". However, in rural areas it is accepted to say hello to everybody, even to someone you don't know.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

IDK, it is cultural thing, I think. I know people on the West smile more that Russians, but it is mostly act of politeness, not always a demonstration of real feelings. We smile only when we really feel so, not just to be good looking. Of course, the lovely girl is often the case for me. :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fear is a side effect of the low vibe.

That sounds more reasonable.

Helps you determine who to smile at.

I'll smile only if I have a reason to, regardless of who is before me.

by DrLeaks
2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Weird.

We had something from that area of knowledge in Soviet school, but it was combined military/survival preparedness lessons where we was teached everything from how to disassemble/assemble AK47 and use it to PPE stuff and how to get clean water in case of disaster using things laying around. It named "Basics of Military Training", and was mandatory for both boys and girls. Nothing weird, really. Of course with grain of some politics and learning ceremonial steps, but overall now I still think it was useful and sometimes fun. Still could disassemble/assemble AK in less than a minute. :) And most of girls from my class still could too. :)

by DrLeaks
1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody to blame but the governor

I already get it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›