Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

27
()
posted 2 years ago by pkvi 2 years ago by pkvi +31 / -4
18 comments share
18 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– CrazyRussian 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

A short retrograde burn could send the 250kg mass straight down onto (assumingly) any launchpad-sized area on Earth

That does not work like that. Burn will just slow down 250kg and it begin to lower its orbit. As it reach higher layers of atmosphere, it begin to burn, loosing speed. At the moment it will get to stratosphere it will be already boiling.

To gracefully enter atmosphere you need nearly same amount of fuel that is used to launch that mass to the orbit or heavy heat protection to resist temperatures as spaceships and ballistic missiles have. AFAIK, starlink staellites have none of that on board. They are just aluminium cans with solar panels outside. So, they will just burn high in atmosphere.

You could target anything as a target for starlink satellite, but it is not the right projectile to reach the target. Also, the precision will be not very exciting, since even if burning cloud of aluminium will be able to get close to surface, it will not have engines or flaps to correct trajectory disturbed by winds and starlink satellite aerodynamics.

Even deorbited few tons satellites barely reach surface as single piece, not talking about being precise.

To be able to do the task you talk about, spacecraft have to be designed for that. From what I know about starlink ones, they had not.

IDK, if only starlink staellite outfit is just an external cover, and all their volume inside is reentry module of some kind, but then it is not clear how they are able to do their current internet job.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy