Piracy’s always been the safeguard against shitty business practices. I’ve never worried about what any game company did because piracy will always be there if they piss you off enough.
Fair enough. Admittedly I see all of it as pretty made up so whenever I see people arguing over it, it all washes over me.
Your argument then is that people are already overloaded and the flu just adds a drop in the bucket to people already drowning then?
Is it fake or something?
Simple solution to all of this is defunding public education, then letting people just hire educators. Watch CRT drop off like a bomb real quick.
Which religion are you claiming did more good for the world than Christianity? Christian values are the basis for the US and the formation of the most impactful country in human history. I’m not even Christian and I can say that. Most great works of literature were all openly and profusely based on Christianity, the Bible, and Christian Values.
That’s short sighted on their part. The future at this rate’s going to be muslim if they’re afraid to criticize them and they’re having more kids than anybody else.
A lot of the things they claim to hate were also things Christianity had made better too. Like complaining that women are sexually objectified. In the 90’s and earlier, Christian values shamed girls for walking around in booty shorts and all else, and definitely would make anyone wanting to start something like an OnlyFans feel bad. Now we have teachers teaching Kindergarteners about anal sex and people consider internet hoe a viable career path. They’re even trans’ing the children. Things were infinitely better when schools were sending little girls home for wearing skirts that were too short. TV shows about HS kids having sex is a genre at this point.
I’m struggling to think of the downsides of when Christian values kept people more in check in America.
It’s hilarious that they chose to attack the one religion that did more good for the world than any other, and not one that promotes pedophilia or thinking everyone outside of your group is beneath you. Does kind of make them evil.
Scott always makes qualified statements, so even here he is not wrong. A vaccine that did all that does sound like good news, the trick then being that it ended up not being true. He also said he got vaxxed to get laid on vacation, which also sounds pretty honest.
I’m not seeing how that would at all relate to the reasons for pardoning Hunter before the election. The point was to force the media to acknowledge the laptop and crimes and contents and report on it despite trying to hide it.
Pardoning him would have been genius because for it to work they’d have to accept he did it all, and it would have forced it into mainstream media.
This generally is pretty funny.
When I heard the audio I figured it was a joke too because he changes his voice while doing it and if something this big came out years ago I’m sure it’d have been passed around more already if it was real.
Is this parody though? Kind of sounds like that.
Clothing doesn’t make nudity sexual, it in part gives us a space to not be sexual in most encounters. Keep reading the creation story if you want that part disproven too.
The point is the endless march towards sexualizing everything, which I gave short skirts as an example of. The point of girls, especially young girls, wearing short skirts is to sexualize them. A greater part of Christianity is reigning in women and sexuality. The line of modesty used to be at skimpy clothing. Pretty soon there will be no line.
I love sex but I’m hard pressed to argue that things weren’t better before Tinder culture.
I guess animal rape is next. Makes sense since it’s already a fetish thing. And with that, that’s all the living creatures on the planet. You’d be allowed to have sex with all of them. Necrophilia would be after that. Digging up folks to rape.
From there I guess locations could come into play. Making public sex okay. Raping dead animals in public would be legal.
20 years ago if someone told me letting girls wear short skirts would lead to where we are now, I’d have thought that was ridiculous, so with that in mind, I wouldn’t doubt the above could happen within 20 years if there’s no militant push back.
Thinking ahead, if sex with children becomes okay, what are they going to push after that? Full on rape’s okay? Before the line was at “don’t wear short skirts.” Now we’re at “some people just want to have sex with children, that’s okay.”
No worries! If there was something up with 9/11, I can see people owning the building doing the math and wanting it to burn down and calling people off, or the government knowing about it ahead of time and maybe letting it happen to let us go herd muslims and oil indefinitely, but not the rest of it.
There’s a lot of weird stuff about how the buildings fell, but we really have no idea how a building like that is supposed to fall. It falling easily would be more likely to have been caused by shoddy or lying construction, which I’ve had person experience with many times over.
Huh? I thought I was agreeing with you. I was saying the only thing I believe is that after the towers were hit, a Jewish owner sued people and tried maximizing the insurance claims and is probably still suing people to this day.
In general the believable part is that a Jew owned some or all of some buildings that were attacked and sued everything that could move in the aftermath and probably did want the buildings to come down after the attacks started.
People kept talking about how the Singer lady that made Planned Parenthood is a monster for wanting there to be less poor black and brown people having kids. I think she’s a genius. Then you have fat white chicks with blue hair covered in tats saying they want to kill their babies. I’m okay with that too.
That’s how I became with abortion. “Go ahead, kill your children. Don’t breed.”
The simpler explanation is that as a girl growing up famous and wealthy as an actress, she’s always been an emotionally unhinged attention whore. This is just her achieving her final form. It’ll make it easier to get future roles and higher pay as well because she’s playing the trans card now. There was that Orange is the New Black’s black guy that was trans but he isn’t very likable. Page has broader appeal I’m assuming based on the movies she’s been in.
Personally I was never a fan of Page because she’s not a very good actress and I hate emo people. She plays herself and that self isn’t something I enjoy, whereas at least with someone like Dwayne Johnson, you have him telling people to workout and try hard and succeed and shit. I don’t find Page likable and I’d have liked the series better if they killed her off. It’s also profoundly selfish of her to make the character she plays, who is not her anyway, also ‘transition’ as a public political statement. The funniest part of how the series handled it was that all she did to transition in the series was get a haircut. It’s insulting to men to suggest that all you had to do to become one was get a haircut.
There’s a character from an earlier time period in the series that meets her and acts like it’s all fine and that’s also implausible because he’s a character that’s highly conflicted over her and was from a time when people were more openly prejudiced. They’ve made Captain America parodies where he wakes up and is super racist and sexist. This would have been similar, with the character just laughing at her and asking for an explanation.
“You’re…a man? And you always have been? Like with a penis?”
“No, not with a penis. I got a haircut. It’s short now. Not manly short, but shorter.”
“How does that make you a man? Can you impregnate someone?”
“No, but you can call me Victor. I got a haircut. I’m like you now!”
It somewhat is the goals as well because the stated goals aren’t the real goals. When they say they want this or that, that’s the sales pitch like it always is. Their real goals are always achieved quickly: consolidating centralized power and control and eliminating individual autonomy. I don’t personally believe any of these people actually believe in the causes they claim to support because the means by which they want to achieve them have a complete track record of endlessly abject failure and death.
The same goes in the other direction, only in a more positive way. The stated goals of say libertarianism are always similar in the sense that the argument is that everything will be better, their means being doing that with less government control and less centralized power, which if given the chance they achieve immediately.
They could in theory curb carbon emissions to almost nothing if they took complete control of everything. The downside is that you’re part of the carbon they want to limit. They don’t at all change, they want everyone else to change while they fly around in private jets and eat beef and basically everything they’re telling people not to do. The people they tell to make it all happen also would be out of a job if they succeeded, so they never can. The people pushing for communism like the Canada guy know that. I mean he’s not stupid. All he actually wants is power and he panders to whatever’s popular to get and demonstrate it, like when he started trying to ban handguns because some kid in America used a rifle.
It’s the same with AOC. She just wants power and influence. She flat out makes shit up on prime time TV. She doesn’t care about any of the other stuff, she just wants power and influence. That’s the real goal for those people. Even Biden will change on a dime if it means more power. Before he fought against blacks because he thought they were crazy jungle people and now he tells them he’s fighting for them because it helped get him into office.
They’re the grifter class.
They didn’t hire somebody good to write it, either. Who the fuck says “the way it explores the themes of identity and mischief keep me hooked”? Even people majoring in comparative literature while in college or even getting their PhD’s don’t say that. Not even in essays.