Would you like a video?
Just get a "I have aids" tattoo on your chest
There's a huge difference IMO. I was sad to see the "biased AI" debate go down the route it did. The left dodged a bullet because everyone decided to point fingers at this one particular company for being biased on this one thing, when the truth was staring everyone right in the face: the entire internet is biased towards leftists globalist propaganda, so any language model trained on it will be biased as well.
Now that should have been the real discussion. A clear and undeniable bias emerges after processing the whole internet. Not just a sample, not just a portion of comments from a handful of sites. They literally fed that thing as much garbage as they could gather, and it's spitting out globohomo propaganda as a result. There's a clear answer there, debate over. Anyone still claiming the internet is unbiased and free should be shot on sight. And anyone drawing attention away from that bombshell of a revelation by claiming it was "just" OpenAI doing it "just" this once should be next in line.
specifically by crafting propaganda for control over countries and governments
Is it really that they're injecting propaganda into the language model, or is it that the language model was trained on the vastness of the internet which is already full of propaganda? A biased AI is the only possible outcome no matter what.
Whats the problem here? Assuming they simply scraped the entire web of public content, good on them for figuring out how to monetize something that was already freely available to everyone else?
His own damn what? Go on
Frogs always been kinda gay. All oily and shit
I love how redditards see something like this and are able to shrug it off as not conclusive enough, but if Trump sneezes in the presence of a nigger that's 100% conclusive.
Idiots.
🚨GAY NIGGA ALERT 🚨
You sound like Kevin Nealon in Happy Gilmore.
There's no hope for people who haven't accepted this
Why does that make you optimistic?
To date, pacifying hopium enjoyers is the single most impactful thing that has come out of the Q larp.
Half of those labels could be removed
They're just gonna absorb all the big cryptos and then all the shitcoins, watch. They might buy people out at above market value. Then all the crypto tards in the world will suddenly have a stake in CBDC's success, and from there it's over.
The earth is a sphere of 24,901 miles in circumference, and our earth is spinning and orbiting simultaneously. If either of those claims can be dismantled, then your view of cosmology should be reassessed completely.
For all intents and purposes, yes absolutely. The entire field would need to be reassessed. Those two claims are big pillars of the foundation.
I admit I don't really have a good reason to believe it other than being told that it was the truth. But the reason I choose to believe it is because of the amount of stuff that has been built ontop of that foundation over the years. Many inventions and instruments depend so fundamentally on those numbers being accurate. It's like a good track record.
It's similar reasoning to why I refuse the covid vaccine but am ok with other vaccines. Those other vaccines have been tested on people, a lot. There's evidence that they work, even though I can't prove to you (nor myself) that the chemicals they claim are in those vaccine are actually in there. It could be sterilized donkey piss, I wouldn't know.
Same thing for the globe theory. I've seen good evidence, but no proof. Regarding the two claims, I'd sincerely like to hear counter evidence, or theories thereof. I'm open to it. What'chu got?
If you squint very narrow, you can see it
Can you provide anything in the way of proof, other than the fact that it fits with the flat earth theory?
The thing I see flat earthers do all the time is that they seem to work backwards from a flat earth conclusion, and then come up with theories to explain away the discrepancies with observable natural phenomena that would be violated by a flat earth model.
The last time a flat earther explained to me why the moon is occluded by a horizon, and I presented follow up scenarios that contradicted the original explanation, he dropped the bomb on me that he didn't even believe the moon to be a physical object as we know it, so my scenarios were not a valid way to disprove the flat earth model.
And that's pretty telling when you get there, because you find out that these people not only think the earth is flat, but they have also adopted god knows how many other beliefs to make the flat earth model work. And they never tell you those beliefs up front. It's never "hey the earth is flat, and the moon is a 38 mile wide ball of plasma, and the sun is a sphere of golden snakes". It's always "the earth is flat and lol at you for not knowing about the golden snakes, take this bitchute link and go educate yourself".
It feels very disingenuous. Usually when people have a hard-to-swallow theory that they're trying to convince me of, they do their best to explain it carefully and methodically, not by finding the quickest way to "gotcha" me out of the conversation.
I get that these things need to be true to make the flat earth model work. But that doesn't mean they are.
Is it a physical object thousands of miles away from the surface of the earth?
What is the moon?
You sound vaccinated
Quick question: have you ever taken a tally of how many of Epsteins pals are democrats vs republicans?
Sure, it's right next to the documentation that's you read to conclude that vaccines were safe and effective.
I got nose fucked only once. Shit hurts.