2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe it was because you were bragging about it? You were claiming you proved the pedo wasn't really Indian because of IP location, even though Indians have flooded into basically every country on the globe.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't click that link, that poster has a history of posting malicious links to try to dox people, which is why its original account, impossible1, was permabanned sitewide.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

And don't forget the greatest bit of qtardation, the claim that whitehats secretly took over the government during president Kushner's first term, but the government continued to do blackhat things anyways because the people weren't ready to know yet.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, you're just going to change the subject, now that you were proven wrong on the Aramaic thing?

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see you didn't read the parable, which clearly isn't speaking about a physical place. Also, the Gospel of Luke I quoted from was written in Koine Greek and used the word hades.

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/luke/16.htm

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +4 / -0

flat-birthers

Might have to steal that one next time I see imp.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our concept of hell doesn’t have biblical origins

It's literally laid out by Christ Himself in the parable of Lazarus and the rich man.

And being in hell in torments, he lifted up his eyes, and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.

Then he cried, and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue: for I am tormented in this flame.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2016%3A19-31&version=GNV

5
BeefyBelisarius 5 points ago +5 / -0

A loving father doesn't coddle his children and make them weak. So why wouldn't our Heavenly Father be the same and give us things to struggle against and grow stronger?

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

They say ignorance is bliss, so maybe from their perspective it's not so bad.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

I suspect it depends on if you have an internal monolog. Those with think, decide, and exercise their will while those without simply react to stimuli.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe it's an alternate spelling of Seljuks? They rolled down from the steppes and conquered that general region in the 9th century.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, that's a topic definitely worth looking into. And not just chemtrails, geoengineering in general.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

TBF, it's generally used as an anti-White slur, which was originally mostly used against White women complaining about negroid monkeyshines.

So yeah, probably should come up with a different word for busybody types. Maybe go back to saying "janny" or "hall monitor"?

6
BeefyBelisarius 6 points ago +6 / -0

And yet Jackson's proudest accomplishment was killing the US central bank. How bizarre. Now I'm wondering if genestealers intentionally bred into his descendants as a posthumous fuck you.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

/pol/ was heavily lolbertarian at the time, this was back when 4chan and reddit were both huge Ron Paul fan clubs.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Eh, seems redundant to require that in a rule. If someone wants people to understand whatever idea they're posting about, they would have to lay it out clearly anyway. No need to formalize it.

7
BeefyBelisarius 7 points ago +7 / -0

while a friendly government is in power

Hilarious that you still think political parties are real. They're all fronts for the Epstein elites, a thin veneer atop the uniparty to make it look like they actually oppose each other.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Might be more clear to say no slide posts or off topic posts.

Also, maybe you could borrow a trick from KIA2 for preventing rapid fire bait threads; one of the rules the new mods added was "no posting more than five threads a day".

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +4 / -0

And never mind that /pol/ was originally libertarian and didn't start looking closely at the JQ until years later, after Ron Paul was screwed out of the presidential nomination by his own party, twice and Occupy was shut down. Also, /pol/ wasn't a new creation, it was the old /new/ board with a new name.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›