Pretty sure the military mandated it, and hospitals mandated it for specific surgeries, like transplant recipients.

I've been in a similar debate with what appeared to be an extremely patriotic Polish guy, who refused any wrongdoing of his country, back on TheDonald before I got banned. Don't remember the anon's name, though. I'd have to dig into my comment history.

You're comparing ancient practices of slavery to the modern evil of jews, in an attempt to suggest that White people are slaves to the people in power, and to jews, and that therefore we must do as they say?

I assume, since you're quoting the Bible, that you know that modern jews are Edomites, descendants of Esau who race mixed with Canaanites, a people cursed by God, and that Jesus was at odds with those Edomites, who infiltrated Judea and took positions of power in politics and religion, especially after King Herod (an Edomite) took the throne.

A Red Ice link. Nice.

However, I do appreciate that the Borderess doc helped to show that globalist NGOs have an entire fleet of ships that run from Africa and the Middle East to Europe, 24/7, all year, transporting non-whites into Europe. They're doing the same to the U.S. and Canada.

I don't mean to deflect from probable terrorism/false flags committed by our own governments, globalists, or their useful idiots. However, I want to bring up something connected to this topic.

Randall Carlson, on his Kosmographia podcasts, has discussed horrific wildfires where it seems probable that some past fires have been caused by comets depositing flammable gasses in our atmosphere, where multiple separate wildfires, separated by large distances, all start at the exact same time, and the fires seems to emanate from the sky itself. He specifically talks about the great conflagrations of 1871 in Chicago and the surrounding areas of Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The first hand accounts are the most harrowing stories I've ever heard. Specifically, check out Phineas' account on episode 83 at the 1:07:41 mark. If you've never heard of this, I highly recommend checking out these podcasts.

Randall talks about these wildfires on episodes 78 through 83. Links:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYpuW6UMjXU&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=83&t=3s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elmDoYvqpV4&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=84&t=3s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuVIiFe_pG8&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=85&t=5361s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRQ-KB4i150&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=86

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o31Rpfc0iwM&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=87&t=1s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kTdmWDN1rM&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=88&t=5092s

The fact that this, and many other inconvenient truths about the Holocaust, isn't widely known or taught, is a huge indication of who rules the world, who writes the history books, who runs the schools, and who owns the media.

As the world slides toward collapse, and the evil people in power fall back on their destructive philosophies and behaviors, they're going to oppress the people more and more, in the failing hope of trying to retain power that they'll quickly lose. More people will become aware of the blatantly obvious truths that they should've seen years and decades prior, but were prevented by the deluge of propaganda they were subjected to since childhood, and by the comforts of Western civilization, which is quickly disappearing as we slide toward collapse.

Thanks for reminding me. Shills and evil people also make baseless accusations in order to annoy and demoralize good people, which is exactly what you're doing.

They know they can't refute logical claims, so they resort to illogical arguments, like ad hominems, appeals to authority, appeals to popularity, appeals to emotion, etc., hoping idiots will agree with them. They know they can't defeat truth and those that wield it, so they tell lies and gain control of information dissemination within nations (schools and media), so they can brainwash the populace with their lies. They know their lies and illogic can't stand up to scrutiny, so they try to censor anyone and everything that runs counter to their propaganda. They know they can't win, so they try to molest and haggle good people, hoping we relent and become demoralized.

It's the easiest way to out evil, those that are, and those succumbed to it, because they all espouse lies in one form or another.

Also note that victims of cyanide poisoning will develop cherry-red colored skin. This can sometimes disappear after death, but as many victims are claimed to have been gassed, with such ruthless quick efficiency according to the official accounts, why would not a single guard or "survivor", throughout the entire Holocaust, never mention the distinctive cherry-red skin color of the victims, which were supposedly killed by Zyklon B (hydrogen cyanide)?

This also explains why, over time, more dense ("heavy") objects sink and less dense ("lighter") objects rise to the surface. This is because if two objects of the same size, but different mass, are accelerated to the same magnitude, the object with the greater mass has more inertia and force, and will displace the object with less mass.

It's one of the controlling aspects of weather phenomena, since cold air sinks and hot air rises (which creates clouds and rain). There's a neat kids physics experiment where you add multiple differently dense things to a tall clear container (stuff that can be shifted around, like dried rice, beans, foam peanuts, etc.), and shake the container. The greater density objects will sink to the bottom, and the lesser density objects will rise to the surface, creating clearly delineated layers.

Hillary is definitely involved. Here's a quote from one of the Wikileaks Podesta emails, where Hillary Clinton says:

With fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch

With all the code words they use in their emails, it's unknown what "chicken" refers to in the text.

Moloch worship is Saturn/Satan worship. It's old Babylonian/Canaanite religion, involving child sacrifice and sexual degeneracy. It's also mentioned in the Bible, when talking about the "golden calf" and Remphan (Kiyyun/Chiun in Hebrew), which is also Saturn worship. It's common among "the elite", on both sides of the political spectrum. It's so common that Israel put the star of Remphan on their flag. That's not the star of David. I speculate that the star of Remphan is symbolic of 666, the mark of the beast, because it has 6 lines, 6 points, and a hexagon in the center. Oddly enough, Saturn actually has a hexagon shaped storm at its pole (that is, if the pictures aren't shopped).

The Pizzagate investigation uncovered tons of Satanic imagery all over Washington D.C., as well as "spirit cooking" in D.C. and Hollywood, specifically surrounding Marina Abromovic. Spirit cooking is very similar to Kabbalah, which has similar notions to Satanism. It's also why the people in power love numerology so much.

Yuri Bezmenov is who I use to show people that our schools (the entire institution) were the first, and most crucial, part of society the globalists infiltrated.

Thanks for the extra screenshots. I still think they're different shoes, but you're right, the white square and shadow below it (especially in the 2nd pic) looks fake and manipulated.

Many tranny kids are indoctrinated by their parents, especially their mothers. The corrupted degenerate globalist controlled society can also play a huge role. Keep in mind that a lot of Western people spend most of their time online, in echo chambers, which can cause brainwashing all on their own. From the stories coming out about this shooting, it looks like the mom was likely responsible, as she was an avid anti-gunner. Most lefty NPCs parrot the mainstream media verbatim, so she also likely kowtows the LGBTQ tranny programming too.

Someone else posted this higher res video with both the school surveillance footage, and the bodycam footage. The relevant time stamps are at 1:07 and 8:14.

If the school surveillance video is crappy and artifacting/blending the colors of the yellow flame and white line of the shoe, then why doesn't the camera do the same thing to the camo pants, or to the carpet, which has much finer detailing? Look at the paper just to the right of the printer at 1:07, which has fine detailed markings in clearly different colors. If it can show that, it shouldn't mess up the shoes that badly.

Digital camera artifacting is due to the lack of resolution of the camera, where a color "block" (pixel) of one area gets blended with another. However, we can obviously see that much finer detail exists in the surveillance video, specifically with the carpet and the paper to the right of the printer. That camera should've been able to show the clear delineation of colors on the shoes.

Thanks for the higher res video. I keep hearing people say that the school surveillance video utilizes a crappy camera, resulting in blending the yellow of the flame with the white line of the shoe, but it doesn't look like that. It also doesn't make sense, because the camo pattern pants and the carpet don't have weird artifacting like that (at 1:07 in your video), both of which has much finer detailing than the shoes, and the colors in the surveillance video are clear and delineated everywhere else. Look at the paper to the right of the printer (at 1:07), which has clear and distinct fine markings in different colors. If the surveillance camera can show that detail, it shouldn't mess up the shoes as much as is claimed.

Are y'all even watching the videos I posted? The two videos have enough detail to see that both the color and design of the shoes is different.

Yeah, even without the color difference, you can tell just by the design, they're different shoes.

What? Even the design of the shoes is different.

Every scientific study done on prevention of spread of viral respiratory infections using masks (like the cold and flu), prior to Covid, said that masks made no negligible difference. It was literally the "science changed" meme right when Covid hit, and suddenly masks worked. It's because humans give off different sized water droplets, and below a certain size, they aren't pulled to the ground by gravity and can remain in the air for hours, these particles can flow through the spaces of a mask, and just a single droplet is large enough to contain enough virions to cause infection. However, masks do prevent larger droplets from passing through, which is why surgeons wear masks to prevent infection on patients (via spit). However, again, these droplets are so large they're removed from the air via gravity.

The entire scientific community "knew" this prior to Covid. It goes to show how easily doctors, like everyone else, can be brainwashed on medical knowledge. Still, there were a lot of doctors speaking up about this, but they were pretty much all censored. Many spoke up on actual free speech sites and conspiracy theory forums, bringing up these earlier mask studies.

In any case, I hope (and assume) you changed which sites you get your information from, and better learn who you can trust.

You too. I've always enjoyed your comments.

Also, from what I've seen of your comments the last week or two, you seem to have attracted some obsessives that are downvoting all of your comments.

Absolutely agree. I always try to give people a chance to prove their point, and always consider that I might be wrong about something, in full or in part. I prioritize truth first, above all else, so I can learn. It's the reason why my profile name is what it is. However, I'll always challenge someone's position in a debate, usually through poking holes in their logic, as I hate getting into the back and forth posting of articles that each side tries to dismiss. Almost invariably, it results in people getting vitriolic, they start name calling, and resort to all manner of logically fallacious arguments. It's sad. They treat their opinions like an anchor. They cling to it even if it'll drown them, thinking they have no choice. Everyone has free will and can change their minds. Most refuse to, though, at least at first.

Even people who consider themselves right wing, will use the exact same globalist propaganda and arguments as the far left when you challenge their conditioned assumptions. That's probably why it's more infuriating to debate a normie right winger than a lefty. The right winger already knows the news, media, and government all lie, about everything, but they still cling onto lies they were taught in school, especially about history, or what the "authorities" say on medicine. They fall victim to the same logical fallacies as the left, appeals to emotion, popularity, and authority.

This is why my research into conspiracy theories was so crucial in red pilling me. It opened my eyes to all of this, with how corrupted the world actually is, what the people in power have done, what they've said, and what they're willing to do. I found out who I could trust, and who I couldn't. It wasn't even intentional at first either. I was more interested in stuff like bigfoot, ghosts, and aliens. Instead I learned way more about political and historical conspiracies.

I've also discovered a lot of shills too. Honestly challenging someone, their ideas, and not relenting, is a really good way to find out who a person is. They almost invariably get emotional and let things slip that they normally wouldn't. You can also infer a lot by what people say and how they say it, with just a modicum of experience and understanding of human motivations. I've changed quite a lot of my views over the last 10 years, some subtle, and some major, due to coming across better information and arguments. So I know from experience it's not impossible to change one's mind.

Also notice how they downvote us, even in c/conspiracies, while not refuting anything we've said. They're weak, have no counterpoints, and they know it. They can only survive in a censorship heavy environment. It won't matter, though. Lies always fail.

On the contrary. Virtual particles is how Hawking postulated that black holes evaporate, via Hawking radiation. It's mostly accepted in the scientific community. You may disagree with the method of energy extraction, but it's based on sound science.

Agreed. For people that were banned off of Reddit from undue and hypocritically applied censorship, they seem to embrace it wholeheartedly here.

It's also a blatant logical fallacy. Espousing for the truthful telling of history doesn't make one an advocate of the side that the truth casts a better light on. For any other historical topic a historian doesn't have to defend himself as being pro-[anything], for merely telling the truth about it, except for WW2. A historian about the Roman empire doesn't mean he's pro Roman empire and anti anyone else. A historian about the American Revolution doesn't make him pro U.S. and anti-British. Just because I believe in the truth about WW2 doesn't make me a "Nazi" or "stormfag". That argument is ridiculous just on the surface.