When you forget to disable the comments
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
I got banned from patriots.win for talking about verboten WW2 info, not even talking about any specidic demographic, but the hinky stuff about Poland. My comments were removed by mods, so I started my own theead there asking why the mods deleted my comments, since they didnt break any rules. One of the head mods, f-b-i-, tells me I broke 3 specific rules, which I clear didn't, and told him so. He proceeds to tell me I'm brigading (even though I've been a member of that forum since 2016 on Reddit), and that I'm a "stormfag". I press him further on his hypocrisy, and then he says "do you know who I am?", quickly deletes his comment, and then perma bans me.
That mod isn't the only one either. About a week or two ago, I saw a post pinned which mentioned "schlomo" in the title. One of the lower upvoted comments asked why it was pinned, due to the evil antisemitism, to which doggos replied it was a mistake, and they don't tolerate evil antisemitism.
They tolerate people talking negatively about any other demographic, except Jews, even if the information is true. They allow conversation about pretty much anything, except WW2. They're a bunch of hypocrites and liars. It's clearly a false right wing trap, like a lot of normie right wing stuff is nowadays (the Republican party, Fox news, Daily Wire, PragerU, etc.). I've also seen blatant vote manipulation and rampant alt usage.
Unconnected to this, I've also had weird run ins with the mods of c/Christianity. I'm pretty sure two of the mods there (SwampRangers and CuomoisaMassMurderer) are the same person. It started when CuomoisaMassMurderer replied to one of my replies in a random ConPro thread, which was 3 months old. It was weird as hell, considering how this website works. Someone would have to dig for a long time to find that specific thread. A newer ConPro thread had tons more comments by CuomoisaMassMurderer, which made me curious, so I looked through his comment history. It was clear he was shilling the forum, so I posted the info I found in that newer thread. When I did that, SwampRangers comes in, and tries to defend Cuomo, saing he's a genuine user (very odd thing to say), that he frequents ConPro all the time, and other lies. I prove that's not the case, while also continuing the debate with Cuomo in the 3 month old thread. When I post a lengthy reply to Cuomo in the old thread (where SwampRangers had never been in), SwampRangers comes in, almost immediately, and says "TLDR". He forgot to change out his account between replying to me in the newer thread, and replying to me on his alt in the 3 month old thread. This made him extremely pissy, and he then spammed tons of replies at me.
Agreed. For people that were banned off of Reddit from undue and hypocritically applied censorship, they seem to embrace it wholeheartedly here.
It's also a blatant logical fallacy. Espousing for the truthful telling of history doesn't make one an advocate of the side that the truth casts a better light on. For any other historical topic a historian doesn't have to defend himself as being pro-[anything], for merely telling the truth about it, except for WW2. A historian about the Roman empire doesn't mean he's pro Roman empire and anti anyone else. A historian about the American Revolution doesn't make him pro U.S. and anti-British. Just because I believe in the truth about WW2 doesn't make me a "Nazi" or "stormfag". That argument is ridiculous just on the surface.