no no, I haven't forgotten about how I've been treated or what this PM has said about people like me
I'm just not sure what to do about it
sue the government?
"hey guys, stop destroying Western civilization"
I'm not sure what the answers are to this spiralling clusterfuck of a clown world most of us are dealing with, but it's likely in the realm of things we don't discuss over technology
It is impossible for a convex object to uniformly reflect light equally outwards in all directions as the moon does. Only a flat or concave surface can do so
Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence: If the surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface, resulting in no reflection
Sun and Moon lights have different properties: The Suns light is golden, warm, drying, preservative, and antiseptic. The Moon's light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying, and septic
The Suns rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moons rays increase combustion. Its cooler in the moonlight than in the moonshade, but the opposite is true with sunlight and shade
https://www.bitchute.com/video/90g8RiwTT2Rp/
"This one proof, alone, demolishes forever the fabric of astronomical imagination and popular credulity" (end of the video)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/meteotek08/albums/72157614847488964
This is the album from the flight
Which of those pictures looks like a globe to you
Flat horizon, every picture
Fucking condescending retard
Who claims there is endless oceans beyond our known lands?
I do believe there is more to be seen beyond our Antarctic perimeter, but putting words in my mouth like that is absurd
Spend ten minutes watching a FAQ video sometime or continue making a fool of yourself
"flat earthers don't believe in geometry"
crepuscular rays
seeing things across a span of water that should long ago have been fully obscured from view due to earths curvature
we use geometry to disprove the spinning globe
we use geometry among other things to come to the conclusion that our surface is planar
you aren't serious
you're just a clown
common question! you can increase your viewable distance by increasing your optical power, i.e., binoculars or a telescope, or your altitude, but at some point you are going to be bottlenecked by the density of the atmosphere itself
the air, water vapour, etc
What I can't reconcile, is how we can see objects that should be blocked by the earth itself due to its supposed curvature
There's other evidence that contradicts the spinning globe model but the distant objects evidence is hard to wrap my mind around
Sphere with a 3959 mile average radius, we are told
This means on the surface of the sphere, and this is a simplified formula but is accurate up to hundreds of miles, but on the surface we should see a drop of 8 inches per mile, squared
8 inches after one mile 32 inches after two miles 72 inches after three miles, etc
When I go out to the shoreline and look across to a distant island, I can see everything, including the shoreline on the island
What I'm seeing should be blocked from my view due to the curve of the earth, and there's just no arguing against what I see with my own eyes
It does not reconcile with what we should expect to see, if this is a ball with an average radius of 3959 miles
There's videos of others performing the same observation across much greater distances, across spans of water, which is important because we know water finds and maintains its level in whatever container its in
We also have so many large famous flatlands around the "globe"
Earth surface is a minimum 70% covered in water, so, where's all of this supposed curvature?
you're lazy to ask when you could easily search this community or other .wins and get all the info you need about flat earth
"just go above the firmament bro and take a picture bro it's easy just do it"
eric dubay
OddTV
if you go to ericdubay.com and navigate to Flat Earth and then i think its "more articles about flat earth" and via there there will be a "Flat Earth FAQ" link you can click with a few videos up top two from eric dubay and the middle one is from OddTV, iirc
most of the information will overlap between videos but sometimes it helps to hear what is essentially the same information but said in a slightly different way or from a different voice that the listeners ear may be more receptive to
there's flat earth groups on Gab, as well, if you're on there
This video you've linked is embarrassing, imo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV39QwDY_JQ
Literally the first frame, showing the horizon rising to meet eye level at 127,523 feet
From 0:04 to 0:20 you get a great look at it
Did you spend any time looking around the internet to verify the claim in this shit tier video you've linked?
Oh you still believe the spinning globe fairy tale?
I'm not sure what piece of evidence will be the one to snap you out of it, but for me, I find the "we see too far" evidence to be quite the smoking gun
Distant landmark over a stretch of water, fully in view, that should be entirely blocked by the earth itself due to the supposed curvature
3959 mile average radius; we can calculate the curve and it doesn't match what we see with our eyes
https://youtu.be/G1BCY_r1w4I?t=170
If you live near a large body of water, somewhere you can see across a span of at least 10 miles, I encourage you to go see for yourself, fren