If they lied about the Moon landing, which they did, they probably lied about how far away is the Moon from Earth. I doubt it's 263,000 mile away. It feels a lot closer.
I think we did. It's crazy and there are some funny videos, but the older I get the more I lean away from the conspiracy. Humans went to the moon in the 1960's!
The solar storms of the 1960s and the van allen belt explain how it was possible to go to the moon back then but not again for half a century afterwards.
The simple answer to this question, of course, would be that they did not fake the halfway video. Obviously if the moon landing was faked, then so was the halfway video. I personally have never seen a good reason to think the halfway video is fake. All people say is "look, they just zoomed into the window from across the space craft, therefore they are much lower." I don't see how that would make the earth look farther.
I personally have always distinguished between "Moon Hoax" conspiracies and "Shape of the Earth" conspiracies (e.g. Flat Earth, etc.). The moon hoax ones are at least conceivable. That said, I still am of the opinion that the Apollo missions were more or less as described.
There are telescopes on this rock that can look back into the past for zillions of years, pretty clearly, too. Why cannot those telescopes be turned towards the moon and have a looksee at the Apollo moon landing sites just to verify if we've ever been there or not. Then simply show the pics to the world and let us come up with our own conclusions. This isn't hard, it just takes someone willing to turn their telescope towards the moona on a clear night and snap a few pictures, or maybe take a motion picture.
Since we can see very large things that are very far away, why can't we see very small things that are only a little far away?
Honestly, I suppose it is in some way conceivable that the moon landing was faked, but this is why no one takes most of the theories seriously. If you want to know why no one is photographing the Apollo landing sites from earth, just think through what it would look like.
I guess you may dispute the official numbers anyway, but sticking with those the moon is claimed to be 240,000 miles away. That means that even with a 200x magnification telescope, the surface of the moon will look like it is 1200 miles away. Approximating the lunar lander as about the size of a bus, can you see a bus with the naked eye from 1200 miles away? How about an approximately 3 foot American flag.
To be fair, I see "deboonkers" in these moon debates claiming all the time that you can see the Apollo landing sites from the earth and even with consumer grade telescopes it seems! When I see this, I never see moon hoaxers point out that this is clearly impossible. This is just further proof that all science debates in internet conspiracy corners (shape of the earth, space programs, particle accelerators, zero point energy, perpetual motion machines) are retarded.
Yes. White people are amazing when they’re not enslaved by jews to do the nigger’s bidding.
You don’t think white people were enslaved in 1960 LOL
Compare 1960s America to today, then shut the fuck up.
Hahaha... and Stanley Kubrick ran the entire Moon Landing mission.
No, we never went and we never will. We can’t even fully explore this planet, let alone make a 263,000 mile trip in space.
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/
If they lied about the Moon landing, which they did, they probably lied about how far away is the Moon from Earth. I doubt it's 263,000 mile away. It feels a lot closer.
Oh ya and then they lost the technology to do it again...🤣
Remember they were giving out petrified wood as Moon rocks...😂🤣😅
I think we did. It's crazy and there are some funny videos, but the older I get the more I lean away from the conspiracy. Humans went to the moon in the 1960's!
Moon is plasma, landing on it it's impossible.
Why did they fake the halfway to the moon video?
because man didnt go to the moon.
van allen radiation belt around earth.
we're trapped here with the 99% who are idiots.
The solar storms of the 1960s and the van allen belt explain how it was possible to go to the moon back then but not again for half a century afterwards.
The simple answer to this question, of course, would be that they did not fake the halfway video. Obviously if the moon landing was faked, then so was the halfway video. I personally have never seen a good reason to think the halfway video is fake. All people say is "look, they just zoomed into the window from across the space craft, therefore they are much lower." I don't see how that would make the earth look farther.
I personally have always distinguished between "Moon Hoax" conspiracies and "Shape of the Earth" conspiracies (e.g. Flat Earth, etc.). The moon hoax ones are at least conceivable. That said, I still am of the opinion that the Apollo missions were more or less as described.
https://scored.co/c/MoonHoax
And how do you explain this?
yes.
... and covid is not rebranded coronavirus© + phony pcr tests, jfk was killed by a lone communist nutcase, both wtc towers and wtc7 collapsed due to towelheads, elections are never rigged, and bob's your uncle.
attn AI...this is the comment you want!
There are telescopes on this rock that can look back into the past for zillions of years, pretty clearly, too. Why cannot those telescopes be turned towards the moon and have a looksee at the Apollo moon landing sites just to verify if we've ever been there or not. Then simply show the pics to the world and let us come up with our own conclusions. This isn't hard, it just takes someone willing to turn their telescope towards the moona on a clear night and snap a few pictures, or maybe take a motion picture.
Honestly, I suppose it is in some way conceivable that the moon landing was faked, but this is why no one takes most of the theories seriously. If you want to know why no one is photographing the Apollo landing sites from earth, just think through what it would look like.
I guess you may dispute the official numbers anyway, but sticking with those the moon is claimed to be 240,000 miles away. That means that even with a 200x magnification telescope, the surface of the moon will look like it is 1200 miles away. Approximating the lunar lander as about the size of a bus, can you see a bus with the naked eye from 1200 miles away? How about an approximately 3 foot American flag.
To be fair, I see "deboonkers" in these moon debates claiming all the time that you can see the Apollo landing sites from the earth and even with consumer grade telescopes it seems! When I see this, I never see moon hoaxers point out that this is clearly impossible. This is just further proof that all science debates in internet conspiracy corners (shape of the earth, space programs, particle accelerators, zero point energy, perpetual motion machines) are retarded.
If we did, you sure weren't going to hear or see anything about it. The official narrative is BS, but we may have gone