...so I'm going to call you blue pilled and act like I've won the debate.
My friends, anybody on this cul de sac of niche shit-posting is not blue pilled. They might agree with you on 9/11 or the moon landing, but disagree with you about who killed JFK or the utility of the Federal Reserve.
Be open minded and debate the issue in your post, rather than bringing in outside BS purity spiral material.
Thanks!
There's a reason underlying this phenomenon, a reason that it happens so incredibly frequently, and it's one that we're not supposed to know about.
It has to do with a concept called "egosyntonicity". I heard Alan Watt mention many times while never clearly defining or discussing it, and it was years before I looked it up for myself. (That's how hard it is for things to get into people's consciousnesses.) Alan just kept saying that "They" wanted everyone to be egosyntonic.
I don't think he understood the mechanism clearly. Wikipedia does a horrible job of describing it and I imagine all the science backing it up is sparse and shitty as well. The concept is correct and it is key, which is why "They" make sure it isn't studied and discussed.
It involves the functioning of most human consciousnesses. What happens is that an egosyntonic person (which is most people) sees a claim that is contradictory to what they already believe. That claim is instantly and silently processed by the subconcious, which happens with everything.
This is key: the subconscious decides that it is certainly or probably true, and if it's true, that means the person was the dupe, the bad guy, on the wrong side of history, immoral, whatever. IOW, it threatens to wreck their worldview and their view of themselves in it.
That situation immediately engenders fear, insecurity, and intense anxiety. It is a crisis that cannot stand. The subconscious instruct the conscious to "fix it", and the easiest fix by far is that to make it so the claim, somehow, simply is not true. The conscious sets to work to make up whatever it can to "prove" the claim to be false, irrelevant, biased, whatever, doesn't matter.
This mechanism explains two thing: (1) Why people are so compelled to respond to claims they do not already believe are true, why they simply cannot let them stand, and (2) Why they say such stupid and irrational shit in an effort to do so.
In summary, there's almost never a point in arguing a point, because what is going on in the other person's head almost certainly has nothing to do with the truth of the claim in and of itself. In fact, deep down in their subconscious, they already know it's true.
Great comment.
Completely false because it contradicts Valentinian melon theory.
The federal reserve does have utility for those of us in the US, but I still hate it
Orchestrated, real planes, rigged explosives. Building 7 fell on time, even without the plane.
found ancient tech, either human or alien, but what's the difference because we were built on earth as a GMO superanimal spliced from the local fauna
jews by way of communists, as a measure to fully corrupt the democrats into making harmful policy (civil rights act, etc), Trump is how they took the other party.
tool of enslavement, all markets are controlled. Audit the gold they don't have the power they claim to possess.
Fight me.
Looks like they had to go to plan B with a "fire collapse" narrative because that plane or drone was unavailable
Tree of Life, Yggdrasil
Name the Jew for Real, Henry Kissinger voted yes
End the Fed
Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
Thank you for upholding the rule of law, King!
Funny how i always get attacked & brigaded by shills like you (TallestNaZiShill) and your 20 alt accounts because you can't handle the Truth.
Imagine upholding the law of disinfo glowie feds.
The masonic footsoldiers of the Illuminati killed JFK btw. https://pdfcoffee.com/downard-amp-hoffman-king-kill-33-masonic-symbolism-behind-assassination-of-jfk-1998-incomple-pdf-free.html
This is not a free for all (edit: thread), you're in violation of rule 1, again.
Edit so I don't have remove the whole comment, let's agree to disagree without the name calling, TallestSkil already removed his earlier violation towards you.
Scream. Cry. No one will ever believe a word you say.
This is not necessary. You can literally just say nothing and it would be better than this.
So you’re just ignoring this, then.
It’s rule one. Delete his post and we’ll say nothing more about this. Leave it up and you don’t have a fucking leg to stand on whining about others’ opinions. You’re a moderator, not a mother. You don’t control discourse. You are not the arbiter of acceptable opinion.
You're right, I replied to him about it, I'm hoping to not remove the whole comment. I'm also hoping he can be reasonable like you have been. Sorry to get on just your case at first. Edit: I should have looked at the whole thread before I said anything to you.
Hi 3rdEye. Sarc: I do identify as everything but u/TallestSkil doesn't want me to talk about identifying as him. /sarc
My recollection is that I add context to your perception of truth when I think needed but you never add context to mine.
Do you know the difference between your perception of truth, my perception of truth, and God's perception of truth?
I was just agreeing with you earlier here how all evils, including JFK assassination, were brought on by the stockholders of the FDR-HST wing (representing the 32nd and 33rd degree of Masons via their inaugural numbers). They were the heirs of the kaisers (caesars) via conquering Hitler. Even the date 11/22 calls it out.
Anyway, if you have a better plan for community management instead of just complaining about current management, I'm all ears.
Jews, you’re right.
These debates don't matter and are almost universally a distraction. That's why the government releases information. It's like kicking a hornets nest. It's perfect for them.
Meanwhile.. the question.. to all of this is always.. "who could have possibly arranged this event?" The answer is almost always "the government." There is no other reliable conclusion you can come to.
The debate is not significant. Stopping the acts and then holding people accountable are.
Agree vs disagree implies a circular conflict aka turning against one another...that's a conspiracy to distract one from thinking straight. Why a conspiracy? Because two sides together are conspiring to corrupt ones sight in-between...
The real conspiracy theorists get shut down in weeks. The few ones left are being gangstalked by agent Smith daily