Ukrainian Jews Practicing Witch Craft
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
According to Mendel, the disgraced former gray eminence Andriy Yermak (Jewish), former head of the presidential office and Zelensky’s (Jewish) right-hand man, is alleged to seek help from witches of various stripes.
(Bonus) Check out the hand placement in this reporters wikipedia photo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iuliia_Mendel
Was it Zelensky or Yermak who appointed Satanic witch Marina Abramović to serve as ambassador to Ukraine and help rebuild the country’s schools for children?
I did not know this. Very interesting.
The same occultists who were going after the Ukrainian orthodox church
Witchcraft? THEY'VE ALWAYS BEEN SATANIC PSEUDO JEWS!!!! CHRIST CALLED THEM OUT LONG AGO.
Precisely. Also, Jesus was not a jew.
https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARwwlGtXg/
I'm not surprised at all. That's what jews have been involved with, witchcraft, since the return from ancient Babylon.
They are those Babylonians pushed out of Babylon and into Europe by Suljukids. They prefer "Jewish" over "Satanist". Can you blame them!
Do you have a relevant link to Suljukids?
Maybe it's an alternate spelling of Seljuks? They rolled down from the steppes and conquered that general region in the 9th century.
Thanks. But, of course... now it makes sense. The Seljuks of Anatolia.
a) Witch/wih (idol) + craft/kraf (strength)...suggestion represents a jewish idol which gentile consent gives strength to.
b) Directional (perceivable) > practical (perception) or theoretical (suggestion)...a jew practices within natural direction to trick gentiles with theoretical fiction.
c) If ones choice consents to any suggestion, then the chosen one who shaped the suggested becomes the Éminence grise (gray eminence).
Eminence implies to project aka all perceivable projecting through each ones perception...ignoring this for any suggestion by another grays out ones eminence.
What exactly do you wish for us to take away from this? Do you wish to retard our logic skills?
You already took...both offense at the comment and suggested pluralism (us)...while ignoring that nature gives which each being within needs to resist taking into wanted possession.
Away implies a way of motion aka procession, which cannot be taken into possession. A jew suggests procession (currency) to tempt gentiles to take it into possession, while not only constantly loosing it, but also paying interest on it.
Not just money, but any and all beliefs are based on taking artifice, while ignoring what nature gives.
Whatever you take represents the idol (witch) which transfers your strength (craft) to another.
Wish implies want, which establishes a logical conflict of reason (want vs not want); which then retards ones mind within motion. Why? Because wanting vs not wanting an outcome tempts one to ignore being moved forwards within origin.
Logic implies a singular being mentally deciding between one side (want) or the other (not want)...it's choosing one side over the other which establishes OUR conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka turning one against another.
Ask yourself...are you directed? Is it practical for you to respond to being directed? Would ignoring direction for one another represent theory? What if your mind stuck on theory permits another to practice witchcraft on you; through you; within you?
Seeing as you dodged the Questions and gave no proper replies. I will assume the answers to be, "No comment, and yes, I wish to retard your thinking skills.''
The user you speak of has a habit (that's gotten better with time) of limiting himself to narrow ranges of response. I find that he does promote thinking but that he is indifferent to what anyone else thinks, as his stated goal is only to respond when inspired. You'll get used to him, occasionally I even upvote him.
He only posts like this in this sub. Which mean's it's a persona he is putting on. He is being disingenuous. Therefor, nothing he says is in good faith.
Questionable wants answers; free-will-of-choice needs to adapt to solution, while resisting the temptation of both questions and answers.
All was given (perceivable) before each one (perception) comes into being.
Proper/privus - "one's own"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/proper
a) Nature cannot be owned by any being within, and b) if one gives what one owns, then into the possession of another, while out of ones possession.
Meanwhile...to reply implies by ones free will of choice. Why would one give away or trying to take into possession what nature gives for free?
𝙼𝚢 𝙰𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚂𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜: ☀
a) Nature represents the solution taking answers out of ones possession...
b) Standing within nature implies balancing within motion, while in the process of falling down. The infant finds balance; the adult balances; the elderly lose balance...each within the same motion.
Sleight of hand: "now you see the light...stand up (life) for your right (inception towards death)".