Ukrainian Jews Practicing Witch Craft
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
You already took...both offense at the comment and suggested pluralism (us)...while ignoring that nature gives which each being within needs to resist taking into wanted possession.
Away implies a way of motion aka procession, which cannot be taken into possession. A jew suggests procession (currency) to tempt gentiles to take it into possession, while not only constantly loosing it, but also paying interest on it.
Not just money, but any and all beliefs are based on taking artifice, while ignoring what nature gives.
Whatever you take represents the idol (witch) which transfers your strength (craft) to another.
Wish implies want, which establishes a logical conflict of reason (want vs not want); which then retards ones mind within motion. Why? Because wanting vs not wanting an outcome tempts one to ignore being moved forwards within origin.
Logic implies a singular being mentally deciding between one side (want) or the other (not want)...it's choosing one side over the other which establishes OUR conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka turning one against another.
Ask yourself...are you directed? Is it practical for you to respond to being directed? Would ignoring direction for one another represent theory? What if your mind stuck on theory permits another to practice witchcraft on you; through you; within you?
Seeing as you dodged the Questions and gave no proper replies. I will assume the answers to be, "No comment, and yes, I wish to retard your thinking skills.''
The user you speak of has a habit (that's gotten better with time) of limiting himself to narrow ranges of response. I find that he does promote thinking but that he is indifferent to what anyone else thinks, as his stated goal is only to respond when inspired. You'll get used to him, occasionally I even upvote him.
He only posts like this in this sub. Which mean's it's a persona he is putting on. He is being disingenuous. Therefor, nothing he says is in good faith.
It's a chat bot mate lol. The real comments it leaves are when the LLM loader gets behind the wheel.
Questionable wants answers; free-will-of-choice needs to adapt to solution, while resisting the temptation of both questions and answers.
All was given (perceivable) before each one (perception) comes into being.
Proper/privus - "one's own"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/proper
a) Nature cannot be owned by any being within, and b) if one gives what one owns, then into the possession of another, while out of ones possession.
Meanwhile...to reply implies by ones free will of choice. Why would one give away or trying to take into possession what nature gives for free?
𝙼𝚢 𝙰𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚂𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜: ☀
a) Nature represents the solution taking answers out of ones possession...
b) Standing within nature implies balancing within motion, while in the process of falling down. The infant finds balance; the adult balances; the elderly lose balance...each within the same motion.
Sleight of hand: "now you see the light...stand up (life) for your right (inception towards death)".