Time to write off James. Shame I thought he was a good one!
(media.scored.co)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Omg all of the proposed role models that were each offered to us through the same propaganda device are all seeming to push us towards ends that are solely beneficial for said propaganda device.
Day 3 of typing "Pied Piper" until the rats wake up and stop dancing.
Yep—this was the faustian deal he made with project veritas… and they forced james out of his own company. He fucked around and found out—never sell your soul when looking for “funding.”Now he’s got this OMG thing going, he said he has full control of it.
Marissa/mari/mary - "rebellion" + Streit (German for conflict)...that's a deckname covering an assignment.
Well-spotted.
I stated watching for these after Bernie Made-Off with everyone's money and Anthony Weiner's weiner.
They're always democrat ops, aren't they?
Mary/Miriam is a noun from prefix m- and H7355 raham "love compassionately". Etymology from H4843 marar "bitter" or H4784 marah "rebel" are suggested by others including Mara.
Debunk and counter his word games. I doubt he is a Christian.
u/free-will-of-choice is a pre-Christian. Think of middle-aged John Nash. "Pre-" does not suggest "pro-" or "anti-".
God was perceptible. What will be has not been made known. Death is an end. u/free-will-of-choice is tempted to split free and bound. Patience always wins.
So you mean he is about to be Christian?
Every tongue will confess, but not every heart will turn.
Pre aka before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life). The separation between all forwarding and each forwarded one within implies christ (to anoint), hence establishing the body of "each" christ by holy (whole) divination (division into partial).
The trick; ian/ianus/an - "pertaining to aka holding onto a possession". That's why one has to join to be a christ-IAN, which sacrifices being anointed (christ).
Each one within all implies christ...joining one another makes one a christ-ian aka anti-christ.
Only within all known can each one come into being..."not been" implies a beings free will of choice to deny (nihilo; nothing) everything known.
Motion WAS, before momentum (inception towards death) generates matter (life) to suggest one another what IS. Death doesn't end motion; it ends the transfer of each particular matter.
Freedom implies that one can only be free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...bondage is based on denying dominance by binding ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion aka willing submission.
Natural dominance gives free will of choice; artificial submission is taken by free will of choice.
Perceivable dominates free perception...suggestion binds free will of choice if consented to.
a) Suggested "always" implies more than one way...all perceivable moving through each ones perception implies the one and only way.
b) Wins vs loses implies an endurance conflict on an artificial timer aka patience vs haste.
Outside that circular conflict...nature implies patience (inception towards death); being (life) implies the struggle to resist the temptation of hasting. Nature endures; being succumbs.
Pre-Christ.
Death ends matter transfer. Life (being) goes on.
So free will is given by dominance over perception. Free and dominant are not split.
Patience endures this way:
https://media.scored.co/scale/4VRlTJIOIrzpLEAv.jpeg
Being implies temporal material essence...transferred within ongoing motion. Dying implies process; living implies potential...hence the potential of length in-between beginning and end.
You chose to view given will and perception within the confines of an over vs under conflict. Choice implies in-between balance...choosing over or under implies imbalance for ones choice.
The trick of logic (circular thinking) and reason (turning against one another) is about tempting ones choice into imbalance by choosing a side.
Only in-between sides can one wield sight...suggested sides put blinders upon ones sight, just like any book tempts ones sight in-between covers.
Ongoing dominance (inception towards death) splits internally into temporal free will of choice (life).
In christian terms...the splitting represents the spiritual moving through the essential.
Way implies patience; being implies wanderer within patience; tempted by haste. The process of dying implies patience; living within implies the need to resist the wanted temptation of haste.
Few suggest progressivism to hasten many into self destruction by impatience.
Endure implies being within/en (life) natural duress (inception towards death). What's the opposite of duress? Free-dom...
Bitter/bheid (to split) + rebel/rebellare (to respond to war)...before one can respond to war there has to be a split in-between the sides waging war against one another.
Compassion (passing together within action) is being suggested to tempt the natural split into an artificial conflict against one another, hence love vs hate reasoning aka a STREIT.