Mary/Miriam is a noun from prefix m- and H7355 raham "love compassionately". Etymology from H4843 marar "bitter" or H4784 marah "rebel" are suggested by others including Mara.
u/free-will-of-choice is a pre-Christian. Think of middle-aged John Nash. "Pre-" does not suggest "pro-" or "anti-".
God was perceptible. What will be has not been made known. Death is an end. u/free-will-of-choice is tempted to split free and bound. Patience always wins.
Pre aka before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life). The separation between all forwarding and each forwarded one within implies christ (to anoint), hence establishing the body of "each" christ by holy (whole) divination (division into partial).
The trick; ian/ianus/an - "pertaining to aka holding onto a possession". That's why one has to join to be a christ-IAN, which sacrifices being anointed (christ).
Each one within all implies christ...joining one another makes one a christ-ian aka anti-christ.
God was perceptible
God (motion) > perceivable (momentum) > perception (matter)
God (light) > perceivable (spectrum) > perception (ray)
What will be has not been made known.
Only within all known can each one come into being..."not been" implies a beings free will of choice to deny (nihilo; nothing) everything known.
Death is an end
Motion WAS, before momentum (inception towards death) generates matter (life) to suggest one another what IS. Death doesn't end motion; it ends the transfer of each particular matter.
free-will-of-choice is tempted to split free and bound
Freedom implies that one can only be free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...bondage is based on denying dominance by binding ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion aka willing submission.
Natural dominance gives free will of choice; artificial submission is taken by free will of choice.
Perceivable dominates free perception...suggestion binds free will of choice if consented to.
Patience always wins
a) Suggested "always" implies more than one way...all perceivable moving through each ones perception implies the one and only way.
b) Wins vs loses implies an endurance conflict on an artificial timer aka patience vs haste.
Outside that circular conflict...nature implies patience (inception towards death); being (life) implies the struggle to resist the temptation of hasting. Nature endures; being succumbs.
Bitter/bheid (to split) + rebel/rebellare (to respond to war)...before one can respond to war there has to be a split in-between the sides waging war against one another.
Compassion (passing together within action) is being suggested to tempt the natural split into an artificial conflict against one another, hence love vs hate reasoning aka a STREIT.
Marissa/mari/mary - "rebellion" + Streit (German for conflict)...that's a deckname covering an assignment.
Well-spotted.
I stated watching for these after Bernie Made-Off with everyone's money and Anthony Weiner's weiner.
They're always democrat ops, aren't they?
Mary/Miriam is a noun from prefix m- and H7355 raham "love compassionately". Etymology from H4843 marar "bitter" or H4784 marah "rebel" are suggested by others including Mara.
Debunk and counter his word games. I doubt he is a Christian.
u/free-will-of-choice is a pre-Christian. Think of middle-aged John Nash. "Pre-" does not suggest "pro-" or "anti-".
God was perceptible. What will be has not been made known. Death is an end. u/free-will-of-choice is tempted to split free and bound. Patience always wins.
So you mean he is about to be Christian?
Pre aka before implies forwarded (inception towards death) being (life). The separation between all forwarding and each forwarded one within implies christ (to anoint), hence establishing the body of "each" christ by holy (whole) divination (division into partial).
The trick; ian/ianus/an - "pertaining to aka holding onto a possession". That's why one has to join to be a christ-IAN, which sacrifices being anointed (christ).
Each one within all implies christ...joining one another makes one a christ-ian aka anti-christ.
Only within all known can each one come into being..."not been" implies a beings free will of choice to deny (nihilo; nothing) everything known.
Motion WAS, before momentum (inception towards death) generates matter (life) to suggest one another what IS. Death doesn't end motion; it ends the transfer of each particular matter.
Freedom implies that one can only be free (life) within dominance (inception towards death)...bondage is based on denying dominance by binding ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion aka willing submission.
Natural dominance gives free will of choice; artificial submission is taken by free will of choice.
Perceivable dominates free perception...suggestion binds free will of choice if consented to.
a) Suggested "always" implies more than one way...all perceivable moving through each ones perception implies the one and only way.
b) Wins vs loses implies an endurance conflict on an artificial timer aka patience vs haste.
Outside that circular conflict...nature implies patience (inception towards death); being (life) implies the struggle to resist the temptation of hasting. Nature endures; being succumbs.
Bitter/bheid (to split) + rebel/rebellare (to respond to war)...before one can respond to war there has to be a split in-between the sides waging war against one another.
Compassion (passing together within action) is being suggested to tempt the natural split into an artificial conflict against one another, hence love vs hate reasoning aka a STREIT.