Coined by (((Leon Trotsky))) no less
(media.scored.co)
Comments (50)
sorted by:
And only White people are accused of racism, even though the modern definition of it better suits every other race which open displays racial pride, homogenization, no affirmative action or multicultural programs in non-White nations, etc i.e. China is 99% Chinese
For example in Israel the non-jews are literally second rate citizens
You have to completely discredit your statement by adding pure bs, you just can't be honest.
Sad.
What did i say that is incorrect:
Which non-White nation promotes diversity and multi-Culturalism and tries to import as many Whites to replace their non-White population? None
Which non-White races of people are consistently accused of racism?
Just ignore what you wrote so you can deflect. Your nigger bullshit is SO tiring ...
You're being a nigger by pretending only White people are racist.
Something a nigger would say. Stop behaving like a nigger. Oh wait, you can't stop behaving like one because you ARE one. How did you learn to get on a computer, nigger? Go back to your shack.
I never said anything of the sort.
Some year you should really try to learn to read.
Why don't you learn to read and articulate a point?
Which particular point did i get wrong? I re-read my comments and find them to be intellectually honest, factual and correct. This isn't a human resources seminar. We are on Conspiracies forum and people here care about the truth.
Your inability to accept that niggers are inferior is not MY problem.
You did not.
You have 0 ability to be honest. That means you don't care what truth might be, you're going to bang your fist on the table no matter what. Even when you have no point.
(We might get a mod someday who cracks down on that language. Also we have an Orthodox member here, whom I've been politely debating with, who might look down on it too, to say nothing of other Christians. Verbum sat.)
What language?
You guys are discussing censorship of me because you cannot defeat me in an intellectual debate. You always threaten censorship. Someone such as yourself should NEVER be allowed to be a moderator. A moderator is supposed to MODERATE DEBATE. But you always try to SHUT DOWN debate because you always LOSE DEBATE to me. Engage the debate instead of discussing with fags who will ban me when faggot. You're a faggot because jews promote LGBTQ in White Nations and all you do is make excuses for jews. Why don't you CENSOR gay jew porn that's all over the damned internet you fraud hypocrite? Censor something that SHOULD be censored.
Language regarded by dictionaries as offensive. I recognize that there are several views on it, so I state mine verbum sat.
I don't believe in censorship of content, I believe in enforcement against bad behavior. Your content is not dependent on using offensive words.
You state your opinion about me, but as soon as there was question raised about whether I should mod, I said no more about it.
However, I respect your debate skill, for instance I upvoted your last two statements directly above because I agreed generally. I would love for a moderator to establish baselines for objective debate and to analyze validity and illogic. We two have rarely had serious disagreement and certainly not formal debate, I've mostly suggested you self-moderate your tone (as above) and you've usually politely declined.
In this thread I had little I disagreed with so there's little for us to debate (except maybe over whether you need to speak belligerently with me). In fact I named Magnus Hirschfeld in relation to OP, as well as Americans and French who used the word "racist" in an older proud sense. You may be thinking of someone else. I merely meant to give a nudge to a friendly comment I noticed in the feed, so it wasn't directed to the context or to you personally. If you'd like to propose and define a binary proposition about OP where you think I disagree, and to join intellectual debate toward seeking truth about it, I'm on record as happy to participate, and you don't even need a moderator to facilitate.
jews are whoring out White women on Onlyfans and pornhub as we speak but you chose to be offended by my language instead.
While you pretend to be offended, Young White Women are being whored out by kikes and being raped or murdered by niggers. Find something more offensive to be offended by.
There's apparently 0 risk of that.
There's zero risk of you ever doing anything meaningful to condemn "globalism"
Actually, Magnus Hirschfeld in his book Rassismus was the primary popularizer of the word also used by Trotsky and others. It was used in English by antisegregationist Richard Pratt in 1902, and before that was in French, in both cases as a matter of proper pride in race; it was Hirschfeld that got the redefinition into common use.
As if (((Hirschfeld))) the genital mutilation pioneer was any less of a subversive, destructive influence than mr continous revolution trotsky.
I said and implied nothing for or against that proposition.
True only if 'your people' is defined simply by race. And good luck with that.
Although there are other categories of information you can collect about someone to determine how trustworthy they are, race is definitely one of the most predictable and determining factors. Many studies prove this. So to pretend race doesn't matter is silly when you rather argue dumb shit like socio-economic status is more important or how much public education and housing and food stamps you provided a nigger. The scientific studies utilizing scientific method proved rich niggers are still dumber than poor Whites. So obviously race is a good predictor of whether a Supreme White or a nigger are smarter, or which is likely to be more impulsive unreasonable and violent.
Race determines trustworthiness.
Amazing
I can trust you to be a bigot then. Thanks for the headsup.
Worldview matters. Throwing money is far less effective than giving people the true worldview. Throwing money at people generally amplifies the natural instincts of the person with the money.
A nigger is going to behave like a nigger no matter what worldview you try to teach him. You swapped out socio-economic status to "worldview" but it's the same deceptive bullshit used as an excuse why Supreme White Civilization should host infinite niggers and kikes to our own detriment.
How about you take your bitch ass to Niger and adopt the "worldview" of niggers?
Great; your input is ignored.
Textbook definition.
Maybe the mentally ill person should have used the textbook definition of “my people” instead of lying like a filthy, subhuman jew, right?
Accurate description of the person based on his statement, which is in direct violation of all linguistic definitions.
Guess that tells us who your people are.
Guess not.
Weird how every solution to "saving your people" just happens to involve women getting completely exonerated for their actions.
Zero effort. Switch back to your other sockpuppet and try again with that prompt.
Evidently you and i have wasted our precious time arguing with many alt accounts at Conspiracies.
I've also heard word that the moderation at c/Conspiracies is mostly asleep or on vacation.
It wouldn't surprise me if SwampRangers is trying to infiltrate this forum due to the void of moderation, since agent kikes like him are tasked with hijacking online forums to deflect attention away from jew crimes with constant suggests there are mythical "good jews" that should prevent us from discussing jews broadly.
JosephMalta may be aka DresdenFirebomber or a co-worker at the same tel aviv bot farm.
A few people have tried to broach this to the admins to get living mods put back into place, at least.
It can sometimes do good things, though. KotakuInAction2 has dead mods, which has allowed all of the real users there to start talking about the jews for once.
I’ve no doubt.
Did you want to take a formal position on the question?
When two others raised the question, I offered my services, and as soon as there was uncertainty from others about my offer I stopped pressing it. I do make my goals clear, I support the orthodox creeds, I ask people to follow local forum rules, I propose transparent, accountable, deliberative moderation. I don't generally complain about posts of crimes by individual named Jews, and I've spoken broadly in favor of unbiased compilations of criminals, only emphasizing that we not neglect the whole problem of satanism by focusing on a subset of it.
Now, I found your answer on the "good Jews" question and will come to it, thanks!
"nooooooo blame the girl who i asked out to prom who rejected me!!!" - MGTOW fag
How exactly does ending so called women's rights exonerate them?
For the same reason that we don't just force bank robbers to give back the money and all is forgiven.
What they have done requires holding them accountable, something you retards are allergic to.
Nice strawman, retard. Now try answering the question. How is removing someone's rights an exoneration? The robber in your example also has rights removed when imprisoned, are you going to call that an exoneration too?
Let me put this in the most basic terms to try and work with your room temp IQ.
I'll even include your favorite propaganda to keep your attention.
A Jewish man runs a fraud scheme. He makes millions of dollars. He is forced to pay it back, with extra fines, and jailed. This is considered justice for the fraud. He has ended up in a worse position than where he started.
Women run an obvious racket known as marriage. They make billions of dollars as a collective and become the majority of homeowners. People like yourself believe that simply resetting this is justice, which effectively just lets them enjoy the stolen assets for free. Your system also doesn't punish them at all for this. They are still protected and provided for. They are in the same position they were before all their malicious acts and have learned nothing.
You still aren't answering the question, catamite.
No, they aren't. Do you not understand the concept of removing rights?
Going back to tradcuck retardation by definition is resetting to an old position.
Oh, we're going to go back to the 50s
So they had 70 years of fucking everyone over and their punishment is...you stop the music and everyone has to sit down.
Yeah no. Room temp IQ is the only way anyone would think this is acceptable. Just talking about the lost opportunities due to female bias in education is already billions owed to the rest of society. That's one aspect of their malice, just one.
They need to be put in a worse position, and that position is pure meritocracy, no ability to leech off men, work or die in the streets ultimatum.
Fuck your birth rates, fuck your forgiveness, fuck your Christcuckery. The way forward is accountability and punishment, not turning back the clock.
Try 1750s.
Impossible. Meritocracy doesn't exist for women; she can simply spread her legs to avoid any need for hard work or talent.