You're being a nigger by pretending only White people are racist.
Something a nigger would say. Stop behaving like a nigger. Oh wait, you can't stop behaving like one because you ARE one. How did you learn to get on a computer, nigger? Go back to your shack.
Why don't you learn to read and articulate a point?
Which particular point did i get wrong? I re-read my comments and find them to be intellectually honest, factual and correct. This isn't a human resources seminar. We are on Conspiracies forum and people here care about the truth.
Your inability to accept that niggers are inferior is not MY problem.
(We might get a mod someday who cracks down on that language. Also we have an Orthodox member here, whom I've been politely debating with, who might look down on it too, to say nothing of other Christians. Verbum sat.)
You guys are discussing censorship of me because you cannot defeat me in an intellectual debate. You always threaten censorship. Someone such as yourself should NEVER be allowed to be a moderator. A moderator is supposed to MODERATE DEBATE. But you always try to SHUT DOWN debate because you always LOSE DEBATE to me. Engage the debate instead of discussing with fags who will ban me when faggot. You're a faggot because jews promote LGBTQ in White Nations and all you do is make excuses for jews. Why don't you CENSOR gay jew porn that's all over the damned internet you fraud hypocrite? Censor something that SHOULD be censored.
Language regarded by dictionaries as offensive. I recognize that there are several views on it, so I state mine verbum sat.
I don't believe in censorship of content, I believe in enforcement against bad behavior. Your content is not dependent on using offensive words.
You state your opinion about me, but as soon as there was question raised about whether I should mod, I said no more about it.
However, I respect your debate skill, for instance I upvoted your last two statements directly above because I agreed generally. I would love for a moderator to establish baselines for objective debate and to analyze validity and illogic. We two have rarely had serious disagreement and certainly not formal debate, I've mostly suggested you self-moderate your tone (as above) and you've usually politely declined.
In this thread I had little I disagreed with so there's little for us to debate (except maybe over whether you need to speak belligerently with me). In fact I named Magnus Hirschfeld in relation to OP, as well as Americans and French who used the word "racist" in an older proud sense. You may be thinking of someone else. I merely meant to give a nudge to a friendly comment I noticed in the feed, so it wasn't directed to the context or to you personally. If you'd like to propose and define a binary proposition about OP where you think I disagree, and to join intellectual debate toward seeking truth about it, I'm on record as happy to participate, and you don't even need a moderator to facilitate.
What did i say that is incorrect:
Which non-White nation promotes diversity and multi-Culturalism and tries to import as many Whites to replace their non-White population? None
Which non-White races of people are consistently accused of racism?
Just ignore what you wrote so you can deflect. Your nigger bullshit is SO tiring ...
You're being a nigger by pretending only White people are racist.
Something a nigger would say. Stop behaving like a nigger. Oh wait, you can't stop behaving like one because you ARE one. How did you learn to get on a computer, nigger? Go back to your shack.
I never said anything of the sort.
Some year you should really try to learn to read.
Why don't you learn to read and articulate a point?
Which particular point did i get wrong? I re-read my comments and find them to be intellectually honest, factual and correct. This isn't a human resources seminar. We are on Conspiracies forum and people here care about the truth.
Your inability to accept that niggers are inferior is not MY problem.
(We might get a mod someday who cracks down on that language. Also we have an Orthodox member here, whom I've been politely debating with, who might look down on it too, to say nothing of other Christians. Verbum sat.)
What language?
You guys are discussing censorship of me because you cannot defeat me in an intellectual debate. You always threaten censorship. Someone such as yourself should NEVER be allowed to be a moderator. A moderator is supposed to MODERATE DEBATE. But you always try to SHUT DOWN debate because you always LOSE DEBATE to me. Engage the debate instead of discussing with fags who will ban me when faggot. You're a faggot because jews promote LGBTQ in White Nations and all you do is make excuses for jews. Why don't you CENSOR gay jew porn that's all over the damned internet you fraud hypocrite? Censor something that SHOULD be censored.
Language regarded by dictionaries as offensive. I recognize that there are several views on it, so I state mine verbum sat.
I don't believe in censorship of content, I believe in enforcement against bad behavior. Your content is not dependent on using offensive words.
You state your opinion about me, but as soon as there was question raised about whether I should mod, I said no more about it.
However, I respect your debate skill, for instance I upvoted your last two statements directly above because I agreed generally. I would love for a moderator to establish baselines for objective debate and to analyze validity and illogic. We two have rarely had serious disagreement and certainly not formal debate, I've mostly suggested you self-moderate your tone (as above) and you've usually politely declined.
In this thread I had little I disagreed with so there's little for us to debate (except maybe over whether you need to speak belligerently with me). In fact I named Magnus Hirschfeld in relation to OP, as well as Americans and French who used the word "racist" in an older proud sense. You may be thinking of someone else. I merely meant to give a nudge to a friendly comment I noticed in the feed, so it wasn't directed to the context or to you personally. If you'd like to propose and define a binary proposition about OP where you think I disagree, and to join intellectual debate toward seeking truth about it, I'm on record as happy to participate, and you don't even need a moderator to facilitate.
There's apparently 0 risk of that.
There's zero risk of you ever doing anything meaningful to condemn "globalism"