That's much closer to accurate than the u/Mrexreturns title of OP.
The tweet is saying communism resembles centralized authority (communism loses the thread because human dictators are not known to be sufficiently benevolent). Baal however was the rebel like Zeus and demanded child sacrifice as an act of rebellion against the social order rather than as Abraham's (complex) demonstration of submission of his son's fate to Yahweh.
So it appears OP has fallen for the other lie that Baal equals Yahweh, which only comes up because (1) Yahweh claims original rights to all positive titles like "baal" or lord, and (2) There is an animus against Old Testament religion that, for obvious atheistic reasons, wants to pretend Yahwism originated as and was nothing more than the worst of what we now know as Baalism. With the help of evolutionists who have excised Genesis 1-11, they believe covenant theology has no foundation in the communal history of creation and cataclysm (Peter said they wilfully forget), and then recast Abraham as a fictional ideal of mere Canaanites from Ham. Do they not even teach comparative religion in high school any more?
OP is a militant atheist that's why. He twists everything because of this. Had he any knowledge of the true teaching of the Church, he'd know that the God of Abraham (who is Trinity/Yahweh and not the god of judaism who is Satan/Lucifer) is the reason we don't have human sacrifices in Christian society.
At the time of Abraham people used to sacrifice their children to the pagan gods (like Baal, Molloch, Remphan/Saturn). Prior to the covenant Abraham was a pagan himself and likely participated in such rituals. God asked Abraham to sacrifice his son to test his loyalty but provided him with an animal sacrifice in place of his son* which taught Abraham that He wasn't like the other deities and didn't require human sacrifice. This is God's covenant with Abraham.
*This is foreshadowing God sacrificing His own Son for us - He does what He didn't ask from Abraham proving that His love and self-sacrifice far exceeds ours.
Very good, Winston. It's essential to know why Abraham trusting God was so different from all the folks around who trusted their own righteous works to be satisfactory to their gods. I do suggest a bit of language tweak, in that lucifer (translation of helel) is more the god of Judaizing than of Judaism as we define those words today, and is a title for satan; and Remphan (probably Rephaim) and Saturn (Chiun) came much later than Abraham, in whose time baal and moloch were still relatively generic titles for several gods. So it's pretty twisty. Some Jews are willing to say their god is in fact named Yahweh, and if they have the guts to say that then Yahweh will hold them to their confession for good or ill. Some Jews and some others are so unwilling to describe their god that they may as well be offering to Dagon, who was one of the oldest and most clearly distinguished Canaanite deities among the baalim.
I don't remember anything about worshipping some ancient entites from my soviet past. It was mostly agnostic with some shift to the side of atheism, but this shift was mostly ignored by population that was after traditional Orthodox Christianity regardless of jewish attempts to force atheism.
As for death, switch to capitalism was as deadly, as wars. In USSR white population steadily grow, despite all communist shit, with capitalism white population on ex-USSR territory began to shrink.
So, speaking about death cult, I'll choose modern capitalism as a nominate. When population put profit above anything else, that does not help with producing life.
If ones choice consents to a chosen ones suggestion, then ones perception ignores all perceivable. A jew corrupts the natural BA'AL (perceiving all) into an artificial BALL (circular logic) within the minds of gentiles.
That artificial ball implies circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others aka ouroboros (the continues cycle of life eating itself).
But all are agreed as they join the stampede
In the circle of life
It's the wheel of fortune
It's the leap of faith
It's the band of hope
'Til we find our place on the path unwinding
That "path unwinding" implies all perceivable unwinding through each ones perception...
If your life sums up as kissing the Jewish Holy book and the "morality" it preaches under the fear of death you might as well as die. There is no difference.
If you're an atheist you believe your life to be meaningless so why would it matter? You also don't believe in objective morality so that doesn't matter too. You're already in a death cult and are on the road to eternal nothingness.
The Jewish holy book is my inspired Old Testament that my savior Jesus honored with his life. You seem to have some unstated assumptions imported here that would do well to be unpacked.
...then you ignore that living implies ones separation from one another; not a summation together.
Summation aka the sum of all things implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law (made of small pieces inlaid to form a pattern).
There is no difference.
What differentiates there/here + is/isn't + no/yes from one another?
Within nature...inception sentences life towards point of death without "fail". Viewing failure as deficiency tempts one to ignore that.
skip
Being alive implies being set free in-between inception and death...choosing to bind self to one another establishes the skipping aka the passing over and disregarding of freedom.
Com (together) + uni (apart from one another)...a contradiction in terms established by ones consent to suggested abrahamism aka abh (father) + raham (multitude).
Ones consent to ABH (father) contradicts "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
Judaism and Islam both make blood sacrifices, which is what YHWH commanded. It is strange that many Christians worship YHWH and think he is the Father of Jesus.
YHWH is not the Father, it's a name referring to the Holy Trinity. God commanded animal sacrifices in the OT but those were fulfilled with the ultimate sacrifice of the Lamb of God - Jesus Christ. No other sacrifices are adequate or needed after Christ. I don't see what's the contradiction here.
Communism is against religion (me, literally living in post-communist country)
No worship of Baal, just no religion. It's really simple, if you actually review what communism is...
Just because communism is created by jews, it doesn't make it Abrahamic. Actually, there are no jews during the time of Abraham. How is it a death cult?
Also, if you think Abrahamic religion is a death cult, then who tf are the "gentiles" and "baal"? You literally take them from the so-called "death cult"... WTF?
Most absurd title I've read. And the tweet you copied doesn't provide anything to back up that absurd title.
They changed the premise, but nothing else actually changes. Communism itself is religion. It is Abrahamic religion reskinned to worship a man and not a divine being.
It's basically the same sort of "I push something so insane and evil that no sane person will like it and paint it like a good thing, this thing is now reality and if you do not bow down to this very ideology and its divine figurehead, you will die, you will be tortured and your soul will be tortured beyond death."
And then people will all bow down not to receive salvation but under the fear of total death.
Using that logic, then every ideology is a religion.
Even your current one, whatever it is.
Sorry, remind me how Communism was promoting "soul torture" in your statement?
If I were you, I'd check the difference between ideology and religion. I would also check on Communism too in that regard and how they treated religious people... Frankly, if I were you, I'd just research stuff better than that.
No, it's Talmudic. Big difference.
That's much closer to accurate than the u/Mrexreturns title of OP.
The tweet is saying communism resembles centralized authority (communism loses the thread because human dictators are not known to be sufficiently benevolent). Baal however was the rebel like Zeus and demanded child sacrifice as an act of rebellion against the social order rather than as Abraham's (complex) demonstration of submission of his son's fate to Yahweh.
So it appears OP has fallen for the other lie that Baal equals Yahweh, which only comes up because (1) Yahweh claims original rights to all positive titles like "baal" or lord, and (2) There is an animus against Old Testament religion that, for obvious atheistic reasons, wants to pretend Yahwism originated as and was nothing more than the worst of what we now know as Baalism. With the help of evolutionists who have excised Genesis 1-11, they believe covenant theology has no foundation in the communal history of creation and cataclysm (Peter said they wilfully forget), and then recast Abraham as a fictional ideal of mere Canaanites from Ham. Do they not even teach comparative religion in high school any more?
OP is a militant atheist that's why. He twists everything because of this. Had he any knowledge of the true teaching of the Church, he'd know that the God of Abraham (who is Trinity/Yahweh and not the god of judaism who is Satan/Lucifer) is the reason we don't have human sacrifices in Christian society.
At the time of Abraham people used to sacrifice their children to the pagan gods (like Baal, Molloch, Remphan/Saturn). Prior to the covenant Abraham was a pagan himself and likely participated in such rituals. God asked Abraham to sacrifice his son to test his loyalty but provided him with an animal sacrifice in place of his son* which taught Abraham that He wasn't like the other deities and didn't require human sacrifice. This is God's covenant with Abraham.
*This is foreshadowing God sacrificing His own Son for us - He does what He didn't ask from Abraham proving that His love and self-sacrifice far exceeds ours.
Very good, Winston. It's essential to know why Abraham trusting God was so different from all the folks around who trusted their own righteous works to be satisfactory to their gods. I do suggest a bit of language tweak, in that lucifer (translation of helel) is more the god of Judaizing than of Judaism as we define those words today, and is a title for satan; and Remphan (probably Rephaim) and Saturn (Chiun) came much later than Abraham, in whose time baal and moloch were still relatively generic titles for several gods. So it's pretty twisty. Some Jews are willing to say their god is in fact named Yahweh, and if they have the guts to say that then Yahweh will hold them to their confession for good or ill. Some Jews and some others are so unwilling to describe their god that they may as well be offering to Dagon, who was one of the oldest and most clearly distinguished Canaanite deities among the baalim.
I don't remember anything about worshipping some ancient entites from my soviet past. It was mostly agnostic with some shift to the side of atheism, but this shift was mostly ignored by population that was after traditional Orthodox Christianity regardless of jewish attempts to force atheism.
As for death, switch to capitalism was as deadly, as wars. In USSR white population steadily grow, despite all communist shit, with capitalism white population on ex-USSR territory began to shrink.
So, speaking about death cult, I'll choose modern capitalism as a nominate. When population put profit above anything else, that does not help with producing life.
Communism is definitely Jewish
If living implies within the process of dying, then dying implies returning the living to origin.
Ba'al aka Bēl (lord) + al (all) from lord/wer (to perceive)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/lord
If ones choice consents to a chosen ones suggestion, then ones perception ignores all perceivable. A jew corrupts the natural BA'AL (perceiving all) into an artificial BALL (circular logic) within the minds of gentiles.
That artificial ball implies circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against others aka ouroboros (the continues cycle of life eating itself).
That "path unwinding" implies all perceivable unwinding through each ones perception...
If your life sums up as kissing the Jewish Holy book and the "morality" it preaches under the fear of death you might as well as die. There is no difference.
If you're an atheist you believe your life to be meaningless so why would it matter? You also don't believe in objective morality so that doesn't matter too. You're already in a death cult and are on the road to eternal nothingness.
The Jewish holy book is my inspired Old Testament that my savior Jesus honored with his life. You seem to have some unstated assumptions imported here that would do well to be unpacked.
...then you ignore that living implies ones separation from one another; not a summation together.
Summation aka the sum of all things implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law (made of small pieces inlaid to form a pattern).
What differentiates there/here + is/isn't + no/yes from one another?
3 attempts to comment and nobody replies to you... :D
Fail bot...
Did you skip your last patch or something?
There can be only one.
Aka a temptation (a-tempt) to mend minds (ment) together (com)...free will of choice resists that by analysis.
Replying implies folding back...all perceivable unfolds into each ones perception, which permits perception to fold back within perceivable.
Replying to anything suggested tempts one to ignore that.
Bot/robot/robur - "strength", hence fail/fall (inception towards death) generating strength (life).
Within nature...inception sentences life towards point of death without "fail". Viewing failure as deficiency tempts one to ignore that.
Being alive implies being set free in-between inception and death...choosing to bind self to one another establishes the skipping aka the passing over and disregarding of freedom.
I never read your comments, but keep going.
I'm studying your programming.
Com (together) + uni (apart from one another)...a contradiction in terms established by ones consent to suggested abrahamism aka abh (father) + raham (multitude).
Ones consent to ABH (father) contradicts "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
Notice ONE/UNI is your father...
Judaism and Islam both make blood sacrifices, which is what YHWH commanded. It is strange that many Christians worship YHWH and think he is the Father of Jesus.
YHWH is not the Father, it's a name referring to the Holy Trinity. God commanded animal sacrifices in the OT but those were fulfilled with the ultimate sacrifice of the Lamb of God - Jesus Christ. No other sacrifices are adequate or needed after Christ. I don't see what's the contradiction here.
That's such an absurd title...
Communism is against religion (me, literally living in post-communist country)
No worship of Baal, just no religion. It's really simple, if you actually review what communism is...
Just because communism is created by jews, it doesn't make it Abrahamic. Actually, there are no jews during the time of Abraham. How is it a death cult?
Also, if you think Abrahamic religion is a death cult, then who tf are the "gentiles" and "baal"? You literally take them from the so-called "death cult"... WTF?
Most absurd title I've read. And the tweet you copied doesn't provide anything to back up that absurd title.
They changed the premise, but nothing else actually changes. Communism itself is religion. It is Abrahamic religion reskinned to worship a man and not a divine being.
It's basically the same sort of "I push something so insane and evil that no sane person will like it and paint it like a good thing, this thing is now reality and if you do not bow down to this very ideology and its divine figurehead, you will die, you will be tortured and your soul will be tortured beyond death."
And then people will all bow down not to receive salvation but under the fear of total death.
Using that logic, then every ideology is a religion.
Even your current one, whatever it is.
Sorry, remind me how Communism was promoting "soul torture" in your statement?
If I were you, I'd check the difference between ideology and religion. I would also check on Communism too in that regard and how they treated religious people... Frankly, if I were you, I'd just research stuff better than that.
Free thought isn't an ideology or religion.
Literally every religion can say that about itself. You obviously don't understand irony.
But you ignore my question, which is not surprising, since you do that all the time... but still:
Waiting on your reply...
Unless you're a coward and can't defend your own statement.