If your life sums up as kissing the Jewish Holy book and the "morality" it preaches under the fear of death you might as well as die. There is no difference.
If you're an atheist you believe your life to be meaningless so why would it matter? You also don't believe in objective morality so that doesn't matter too. You're already in a death cult and are on the road to eternal nothingness.
The Jewish holy book is my inspired Old Testament that my savior Jesus honored with his life. You seem to have some unstated assumptions imported here that would do well to be unpacked.
...then you ignore that living implies ones separation from one another; not a summation together.
Summation aka the sum of all things implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law (made of small pieces inlaid to form a pattern).
There is no difference.
What differentiates there/here + is/isn't + no/yes from one another?
Within nature...inception sentences life towards point of death without "fail". Viewing failure as deficiency tempts one to ignore that.
skip
Being alive implies being set free in-between inception and death...choosing to bind self to one another establishes the skipping aka the passing over and disregarding of freedom.
If your life sums up as kissing the Jewish Holy book and the "morality" it preaches under the fear of death you might as well as die. There is no difference.
If you're an atheist you believe your life to be meaningless so why would it matter? You also don't believe in objective morality so that doesn't matter too. You're already in a death cult and are on the road to eternal nothingness.
The Jewish holy book is my inspired Old Testament that my savior Jesus honored with his life. You seem to have some unstated assumptions imported here that would do well to be unpacked.
...then you ignore that living implies ones separation from one another; not a summation together.
Summation aka the sum of all things implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law (made of small pieces inlaid to form a pattern).
What differentiates there/here + is/isn't + no/yes from one another?
3 attempts to comment and nobody replies to you... :D
Fail bot...
Did you skip your last patch or something?
There can be only one.
Aka a temptation (a-tempt) to mend minds (ment) together (com)...free will of choice resists that by analysis.
Replying implies folding back...all perceivable unfolds into each ones perception, which permits perception to fold back within perceivable.
Replying to anything suggested tempts one to ignore that.
Bot/robot/robur - "strength", hence fail/fall (inception towards death) generating strength (life).
Within nature...inception sentences life towards point of death without "fail". Viewing failure as deficiency tempts one to ignore that.
Being alive implies being set free in-between inception and death...choosing to bind self to one another establishes the skipping aka the passing over and disregarding of freedom.
I never read your comments, but keep going.
I'm studying your programming.