Satan's spiritual structure
(media.scored.co)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Except hate and jealousy are literally godly. And if death is satanic, why, then, is life centered around rejoining Christ and all previous souls in heaven?
What? How is hate and jealousy godly? No Christian is ever called to hate even his enemies, even if hatred is justified by pure evil. Christ is the way and the life - we gain eternal life in Him.
You can’t oppose sin without hating it. Apathy is sin.
Why shouldn’t we jealously guard what we have?
lol, there you go.
No, that would be dualism and it's heretical. Christians are not freemasons and we don't engage in dialectics (black and white checkerboard; two sides of the same coin; God and Satan being evenly matched and in an eternal battle over the world).
Love doesn't necessitate hate. Evil has no ontological existence, it's just the absence of the good (God), just like darkness is the absence of light and death is the absence of life.
That's a word-concept fallacy. What is meant by "hate sin" is not the human emotion of hatred but intolerance to sin and unwillingness to compromise with the Truth. Same goes for jealousy. The Church Fathers teach us that all our predispositions can be directed properly or improperly which decides whether they are virtues or vices. Religious fervor and piety are virtues, jealousy and envy are vices (except when used out of their usual context in figurative speech as in "jealousy over the true faith").
You got the cuck disease bro. Love your enemy bro.
Hate exist by nature, therefore if there is a god he made it for a reason.
No, you just have wrong theology. As I explained, all evil is uncreated and has no ontological existence. God didn't create hate and there was no hate in the world before the fall. Human emotions in our fallen world serve a function and when they're misused and misguided, they lead to sin. You can fight your enemy without hating him, and what we're called to hate is not the person but their sin. You interpret that as cuckery because you don't understand Christianity. Christianity is a religion of warriors more than any other. Idk what your alternative is, but if it's atheism this is the one that is most cucked, because it's nihilistic and there's literally no point in anything, including being courageous and fighting for a cause.
Nah, it’s literally not. Go worship sin somewhere else, fuckstick.
It does, yeah. Literally does. You’re too retarded to be considered human. I’m sure your wife appreciates it when you love other women, constantly, because you’d be a “heretic” if you didn’t.
Neat, so dualism. The thing you just railed against. Got it.
So… hatred. Yep. Got it. Intolerance is borne of that which is, violently rejecting that which is not. Refusal to be violent means tolerance.
Bible says you’re wrong. Misuse words at your own peril.
I don't have the time or the patience to argue theology with sub-zero IQ heretic, who I already know to be a troll.
Go worship your Bible, prot tard.
Translation: “Oh fuck, I can’t prove you wrong, uh… shit… I NO HAVE TIME TO PROVE U RONG BUT U R CUZ I SAY SOOOOOOO”
Thanks for admitting that jealousy is Christian and hate is required for love.
“Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.”
For you shall worship no other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God (Exodus 34:14)
What do you think this means?
He protects and guards what is His, will effect justice for the sake of His own. Jealous, not envious. It is in His nature
But everything is His since He created everything ex nihilo and His divine mind grounds all existence. There's no notion of possession for God. He has no needs or desires (in a human way) which jealousy presupposes.
What it means is that God doesn't commands His people not to have other gods and idols so He calls Himself jealous so that we can understand this through our human sensibilities. It's an analogy - God is not literally jealous. This seems like a problem of anthropomorphizing God, but His divine nature is nothing like our human nature.
We aren't created ex nihilo, but out of the dust of the earth, combined with a an organized intelligence, and born to human parents; however we're told be repent, be remade and reborn sons and daughters of God. Even the dust obeys gods laws. Jesus the Anointed has ransomed us each with his living blood. So he has claim on us, if we'll repent and do His will then he'll be our Father and we'll not serve other gods or serve sin, or self, or Babylon's king.
He would have us be free to do so, and not remain captive, but receive deliverance from unholy alliances we've entered into. God is jealous to claim us his in the face of other spirits who try to infect our minds and demand our loyalty, devotion. He gave us an Exemplar and Redeemer to show us to serve him freely, by loving others as ourselves. God is not envious, but feels lovingly protective and in fear of losing us. He is the god of healing of forgiveness and freedom and of truth and charity. The jealous husband doesn't want another suitor catching the attention of his wife, does he?
What I meant was that the world and matter was created ex nihilo, including the dust man was created from.
I reject the legalistic protestant notions of ransom, claim, etc. Ransom assumes God had to repay a debt, but to whom? To Himself? To Satan? This makes no sense in the Christian worldview. God sacrificed Himself in the person of the Son (the second Adam) to revert the result of Adam's sin and to give a new life to us in the new Eden which is God's Eternal Kingdom. He doesn't have to claim us for Him, because everything in existence is already His, even if created beings rebel against Him out of their free will which He imparted in them. God assumed human nature to elevate it to His divine nature, allowing us to participate in the divine through the sacraments. Christ established our way to sainthood and eternal life in His Kingdom in heaven for those in His Church on the earth.
Christ didn't oppose earthly hierarchies or governments and He didn't revolt against the tyranny of His time. Government isn't inherently bad but God's law always takes precedence as exemplified in 'Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, and to God what belongs to God.'. He commanded slaves to submit to their masters and women to submit to their men. Liberal Christians and anarcho-Christians always gloss over this.
Yes but as I stated above, God doesn't need us to come to Him. We're the one who are dependent and need Him. He calls us out of His perfect love for us but He doesn't lack anything. He's definitely not threaten by another suitor (Satan) and the human emotion of jealousy assumes fear of loosing the object of affection. God has no real competition and even Satan and evil exist because He allows them to (why He allows them to exist, we can only speculate about but many Church Fathers have written on the subject). God has already won any struggle we perceive in the world and there was never any real threat to His dominion.
Aka by the letter aka by ones consent LETTING the suggested words of another define.
Let implies "depart from", hence not God but each being departed from God, hence a division of partials within whole.
The root of IS aka ES implies essence (being)...the process of dying was before each life comes into being within.
Being implies center (perception) within (perceivable). A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentile consent to surround itself within circular logic, which goes back to "literally" aka by the letter of the suggested logos (word).
Aka suicide...Christ (anointed one) implies the separation of each one coming into being through the birth-channel.
A jew suggests religion/religio (to bind) to tempt each anointed ones free will of choice into bondage by consent aka by joining the suggested -isms.
Hence abrahamism (father of multitude) or mosaicism (joining together the pieces of a mosaic)...
a) All implies soul/sole aka "all for one and one for all".
b) Previous/praevius aka prae (before) + via (way) implies way (inception towards death) forwarding being (life).
Hence heaving oneself up within all or hell/kel (conceal) ones efforts to rise (living) during fall (dying).
How else could they sell it?
It's an eternity of gay nothingness probably wouldn't have the same effect.
Hell, you may even see St. Nick in heaven, you can finally thank him for that chemistry set. Haha!
Seems legit.
a) God (motion) > spirit (momentum) > structure (matter)
b) Satan (adversary; one who opposes) implies structure vs structure, while ignoring spirit of God.
Got that from this comic book I'm checking out.
https://ia801800.us.archive.org/9/items/jack-chick-angel-of-light-2013-chick-publications/Jack%20Chick%20-%20Angel%20of%20Light%20%282013%2C%20Chick%20Publications%29.pdf
What you list as Principalities are sins and daemonic (negative) energy results. Principalities are something else altogether and probably why the names have been withheld. Speaking the 'name' is how they are 'called out'. Not literally speaking, but 'naming' the force....knowing it. The name means things in the Gematria system and is the clue to its nature and defeat. Wrestling with 'angels'.
You might want to check out some earlier recipe books that actually include the ingredients, and instructions if you plan on smelling what they're actually cooking. By 'they' I mean all 'sides' of the literalist anthropromorphic traditions.
Satanist magick, is for minions, same as any church, while captains of most all religions are Luciferian in belief. They are not the same. Luciferians in turn, degrade, misunderstand and misuse gnosis in attempt to control. There are two on this high place, but only one sees the true Source. To everyone else, it's 'magic'.
Replace "Satan" with "Yahweh" or "Yaldabaoth" and the commanding General with "Moses" or "Samael".