Just a heads up, the negative ETI want to spread a new psyop claiming they made humans so they can later say they are our Gods and that legally we would have to worship them.
As usual, they will try and try to convince everyone so let's stop this psyop in it's tracks. As long as you know how the magician's tricks work, they won't work.
God making us in his image means our Spirit. This body is like a car and is actually the opposite of God's image. Our Spirit deep down inside is perfect and that is the true self. Being "reborn" in Spirit just means realizing that you aren't the body but the Spirit. This leads to salvation since it's like coming out of the insanity of thinking you are just a body. That is the truth.
I get the feeling you're a gnostic. My personal opinion is where it says we were made us in his image it could also be by his design. I agree we are spiritual beings within this body
But He designed everything. So my thinking is what have we got that nothing else has..
"In his image" means that a perfect personality expression of God is duplicated into an independent Spirit but in a younger form. This way, we can look up to our elder "Father".
No I'm not gnostic. I don't believe in them.
You get the right feeling. It's the Manichean heresy which appeared alongside gnosticism. The human body is sacred and was made perfect by God. It is subject to corruption due to the fall, but just like our heart and soul, can be sanctified and joined to Christ.
A spirit, with a soul that has a body.
They will pull any and all strings at their disposal, do not comply and do not be deceived.
Soul (motion) > spirit (momentum) > body (matter)...
Plural (they) pulls singular (will) into ignoring self for others...
All sets each one free...ones free will of choice consenting to another ones suggestion attaches strings to self.
Do implies all; be implies one..."not" implies a suggested deception tempting one to ignore all.
We agree!
Aldous Huxley - "Crome Yellow" (1921; his first book)...
That sounds highly pessimistic and manipulatable. Where does free will (edit: of choice) and choosing good (God) things come in?
Edit: I might be misunderstanding, but I doubt it and unfortunately this book is not high on my priority list. Here's some more quotes: https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/16335152-crome-yellow
Edit2: the end of this chapter reminded me of you: https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/19A1QIRa9m/a-pilgrims-regress-book-two-chap/c
a) The directing intelligences suggest "pessimism"; the men of faith speak for both sides within the conflict of reason between pessimism vs optimism, and the herd chooses to follow either side.
b) Sound doesn't divide into two but into each one, hence sound (whole) dividing into each instrument (partial).
It's the directing intelligences, which utilize the men of faith to manipulate the herd to view the world through the lens of dualism aka reason aka high vs low or optimism vs pessimism.
a) You writing free will without "of choice" is based on your choice already given to good over bad, hence bound to a side within a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
If you choose to let go of good, then you wouldn't be bound to bad, nor would you regard free will without "of choice".
b) A thing implies each one partial within whole oneness, which you choose to ignore for suggested pluralism (things).
c) To choose God implies ones ignorance of being choice (partial) within god (whole), hence being set apart from one another.
Choosing God implies holding onto aka having faith aka believing aka taking into possession aka consenting (to buy) to the suggestion (to sell) of another...of a men of faith selling the "good spell aka gospel" in the name (in nomine) of God.
In other words...choosing a side tempts one to ignore self discernment as choice IN-BETWEEN sides, hence life (choice) in-between inception/death (balance).
Your use of pessimism (bad) vs optimism (good) implies your consent to STAND UNDER those suggesting it to you. Consenting to suggested tempts one to MISS perceivable.
A fortune one seeks from suggested outcome...all perceivable value for each ones perceiving evaluation comes from origin aka God breathing knowledge through each Christ.
It's the directing intelligences which utilize men of faith to tempt the herd to seek fortunes by investing aka selling themselves out by buying into.
It's a boring coming of age/romance/high society novel, with the occasional intelligence drops mixed into it. It's also the foundation for what a decade later became Brave New World.
a) Ones meeting with one another contradicts being apart from one another.
b) C-ALL out inverts c-ing (seeing) as one within all. It's yet another layer of spell-craft used to manipulate.
c) Nature doesn't call...it moves hunger and thirst through each being; which forces adaptation by inspiring resistance (need), while tempting ignorance (want).
This is very interesting, thanks!
What ETI, all I see is a bunch of greedy senile old rich people speaking for planet earth.
Carl Sagan - Who Speaks for Earth?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QgIQzDqXmo
I believe we were created by them, but regardless of that.
I think the reality is they are doing their own thing and were just ants under a microscope. I dont think they really care about us. Not in a traditional sense. More like guilt maybe.
And they didnt really create us, but they likely did speed up our evolution by millions of years, using their own dna of all things.
https://files.catbox.moe/e13f59.mp4
I wonder why mushrooms are always a bad time. Never anything to learn, just feel very sad/bad.
you must be prepaird.
You must remove ego.
You must have a few chill projects or things to occupy your time.
You must connect with nature.
I wouldnt trust anything nowdays since the fent reactors came online.
Let us have a short Bible study on creation and the soul, where the Bible and the Bible alone is the teacher and interpreter.
This is the recipe of man: dust + breath = living soul.
Here, “In the beginning” is used as a definite article, meaning that there was a definite beginning, a definite starting time, to the creation of the heaven and the earth. The start of creation is a date which could be marked on a calendar. There is no everlasting, immortality inherent in man, for man was created at a set start-point. We will see affirmation of this soon, when we discuss the false teaching of the immortality of the soul.
But here, “In the beginning” is used as an indefinite article, meaning that the Word has no definite starting point. The Word, being Jesus Christ, is from before creation, before the start of time, and is eternal, everlasting, and immortal (John 5:26; 10:17, 1 Timothy 1:17).
The word used here for God is Elohiym: specifically used in the plural thus, especially with the article, of the supreme God. When it comes to creation, the plural Elohiym is used. In the book of Genesis, Elohiym is used thirty times, and is only used in the plural.
The word for “one” is ehad: expresses and contains the thought of unity; at least two, but one in thought, action, and expression. Created in the image of God are individual persons who are to be of one accord in thought, action, and expression.
Being in the image of God, humanity has a noble origin. However, after the fall of Adam, only the image of Adam could be inherited. Since humanity is now corporately in Adam, so too is humanity corporate in the fallen nature of Adam. But through Jesus Christ, Adam, and therefore all of humanity, still have corporate access to the perfect image of God:
Here is a quick explanation of corporate identity, or having a representative:
Humanity was left a Seed, a Representative, to restore humanity to the noble origins of creation: the Seed left for humanity, being Jesus Christ, gives an opportunity for each person to be restored in the image of God.
This is a starting point for reading and understanding the plan of salvation. For this study, let us continue to seek an answer to the condition of the living soul, and find what answers the Bible gives us when talking of death:
The immortality of the soul is a doctrine of the devil which today permeates the entire world, so let us be sure that the Bible presents man as a living soul, and death as its sleep.
Death is the return of the breathe of life to the Breather of life. Only God has immortality, and only God has life to give. Man, formed as a living soul comprised of dust and a breathe, returns to dust as the last breath is returned to its Breather. To us, death may seem frightful and permanent, but in the Lord, death only need be a short sleep.
What about the eating of the flesh, and the drinking of the blood?
Even the Jewish of the time knew that the eating and drinking was not literal, so where does the modern day practice come from?
Mithraism, the religious structure of roman catholicism, practiced theophagy. In Mithraic theophagy, followers would eat the flesh, and drink the blood, of a bull, which represented the flesh and blood of Mithra slaying a bull. When consumed, they believed it would grant salvation to those who partook of the sacrificial meal. An inscription in a Mithraeum, a temple of initiation into the Mithraic priesthood, under the Church of Santa Prisca in Rome, refers to Mithra saving men by “shedding the eternal blood of the bull”. Today, the Vatican's St. Peter's Basilica stands on the very spot on which the last Taurobolium, the sacrifice of the Mithraic bull, took place.
Biblically, to eat the flesh is to internalize the Word; to study and understand the Bible as it stands:
To drink the blood is to be sanctified by the Holy Spirit; to have a co-habitation with the Spirit, allowing Him to work through the living soul as proof of understanding that which was internalized:
Let us always strive to learn of Him who only hath life to give:
I'm not convinced God isn't a psy op too. Doesn't mean I'm an atheist.
We have soul, we have spirit, there is energy that we can experience with prayer and or meditation. But the western Christian religion is so rooted in corrupt over hundreds of years. It's garbage. There's probably 10% truth and the rest of the bible is deception for the cultish benefits
Kind of. Religion refines itself overtime and Christianity was the most recent refinement with spiritually coming up next. Spirituality is the practice of a relationship between you and God. Nobody can tell you anything outside of your partnership. And most spiritual people I know all believe in Jesus being authentic so it’s like a more refined form of practice.
Great points, especially the trend, or refinement as you put it, evolves into spirituality, and we consequently drag Jesus in with it because it makes the medicine go down smoother. Meaning Jesus, transitions 🤣 people from Christianity to spirituality. Then it will be God next? As religions go, spirituality with one's self is the highest refinement that can be made of religion, or any way that one chooses to reach that refinement. It's the connection to spirit that is our greatest potential for good for everyone. If a better world is all you want then genuinely unified teachings of godless spirituality would be it. Honestly, I would love there. Sounds fucking rad. Everyone is a guru, super talented, well rounded, I'll fucking take it.
You're saying that extraterrestrials are executing psychological operations on humanity so that we will have to legally worship them.
I'm not sure where to begin to address that and must ask why you would believe such a thing.
I have been doing down the rabbit hole for 10 years. I wouldn’t believe it myself 10 years ago but now I’ve seen enough proof.
I tracked all the ETI groups related to Earth. It’s a long and interesting story.
God created us in His image and we were made perfect. After the fall, He assumed human nature in the person of Jesus. This means the body was uplifted and sanctified. The body is sacred, it's your temple. Christ's body is the Church. On judgment day everyone will be resurrected in their body. In Christianity there are many relics of preserved bodies of saints which are venerated. The eucharist is the eating of the body and blood of Christ and this is crucial for our salvation.
Your theology is faulty and it is based on ancient Manichean heresy (matter bad - spirit good).
Let us agree to disagree but I have no idea what Manichean means.
It's a dualistic religious teaching that opposes spirit to matter with roots in ancient gnosticism (1st-2nd c). It was the main contender to Christianity in the 3rd and 4th c. and was deemed heretical by the Church fathers of the time.
Gnostics are controlled opposition made to infiltrate Christianity.
If they think good and evil are just part of overall life, they are wrong. Only good is part of overall life while we young and ignorant humans are learning to be good through trial and error. Error is evil. It doesn't have to exist forever but it can exist temporarely. So ya, I disagree with the gnostics on that and I disagree with their stupid idea that Jesus had kids and that he studied in an Indian mystery school. Gnostics also have incorporated Satanic concepts in there because the whole religion was made by Roman Satanists to infiltrate Christianity. They are still abound online pushing false teachings. I know all about them but I had never heard of Manichaesim. I disagree with the struggle of good and evil. Nothing can oppose God who is good.
What you say is correct if by error you mean sin and disobeying God. Except I wouldn't say we learn to be good through trial and error because we have the knowledge of good and evil written on our hearts. But if you mean it in sense of spiritual growth where sinning is inevitable, I agree.
We choose sin and evil (which leads to death) through our own free will because of our fallen nature, so it's not a matter of knowledge and the mind (gnosis) but of the heart, namely rebelliousness and pride - the things that led to the fall in the first place. We must return to the pre-fall state and that's only possible through communion with Christ (theosis) since He took Adam's sin upon Himself with His sacrifice and defeated death.