Hi TINAE, 2025 is a jubilee year. The jubilee doors get opened on Christmas before the jubilee year starts. This has been going on regularly since 1300. I wouldn't worry about it.
Thank you so much for contributing! I am trying to understand what is a jubilee and what is it in Catholicism and I will look this over.
I am not worried per se, I am wondering, I'm curious if there are public ceremonies with hidden/occult messages and I think these things about a lot of administrations, not only this administration. I think of it in 'secular' terms and 'religious' (i'm ' ' for common era understanding of these words). I have these misgivings that all kinds of weirdness are going on and I think magic has been forgotten, and I'm just trying to sift through to see if there is any truth to this idea.
Yes thru sacrifice of virgin or innocent blood in a carefully performed satanic ritual even these bozos can open portals and let demons in. This is why the pope must be impaled for his heresy against the church. Does the Catholic church lack the procedure to bring this fraud to trial?
Saeculum obscurum (Ecclesiastical Latin: [ˈsɛː.ku.lu.m obsˈkuː.rum], "the dark age/century"), also known as the Pornocracy or the Rule of the Harlots, was a period in the history of the papacy during the first two thirds of the 10th century, following the chaos after the death of Pope Formosus in 896 which saw seven or eight papal elections in as many years. It began with the installation of Pope Sergius III in 904 and lasted for 60 years until the death of Pope John XII in 964. During this period, the popes were influenced strongly by a powerful and allegedly corrupt aristocratic family, the Theophylacti, and their relatives and allies. The era is seen as one of the lowest points of the history of the papal office. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saeculum_obscurum
There have been periods of fraudulent popes and the process of removing them is sometimes called depositions.
I wonder if u/CrusaderPepe has done a lecture on previous Depositions of Fraud Popes. Might be a good topic to study. This is a list of popes killed or martyred. A fraction of them might have been corrupt or worthy of death.
Saint Peter (c. 67), traditionally martyred by upside-down crucifixion[3]
Pope Linus (Saint) (c. 67 – c. 76)[4][5]
Pope Anacletus or Cletus (Saint) (c. 79 – c. 92)[6][4]
Pope Clement I (Saint) (c. 92 – c. 99), thrown into sea with anchor around his neck[4]
Pope Evaristus (c. 99 – c. 108),[4][5] not listed in the Roman Martyrology but executed[7]
Pope Sixtus I (Saint) (c. 119 – c. 128)[4][5]
Pope Telesphorus (Saint) (c. 128 – c. 138)[4][8]
Pope Anicetus (Saint) (155–166), traditionally martyred[4]
Pope Soter (Saint) (166–175), died a martyr [4]
Pope Eleuterus (Saint) (175–189), died a martyr[4]
Pope Victor I (Saint) 189–199, died a martyr[4]
Pope Calixtus I (Saint) (217–222), died a martyr[4]
Pope Urban I (Saint) 222–230, died a martyr[4]
Pope Pontian (Saint) 230–235, condemned to mines in Sardinia and
died on island of Tavolara[4]
Pope Anterus (Saint), elected 21 November 235, martyred at hands of Emperor Maximus[4]
Pope Fabian (Saint), elected 10 January 236 and died a martyr during persecution and decapitated by Decius[4]
Pope Cornelius (Saint), elected March 251 and died a martyr June 253[4]
Pope Lucius I (Saint), elected 25 June 253 and martyred 5 March 254[4]
Pope Stephen I (Saint), elected 12 May 254 and martyred 2 August 257[4][1]
Pope Sixtus II (Saint), elected 30 August 257 and martyred 6 August 258[4]
Pope Dionysius (Saint), elected 22 July 259 after year of persecutions and died 26 December 268, martyred[4]
Pope Felix I (Saint), elected 5 January 269 and died 30 December 274, martyred[4]
Pope Eutychian (Saint), elected 4 January 275 and martyred 7 December 283[4]
Pope Caius (Saint), elected 17 December 283 and martyred 22 April 296 but not at hands of his uncle Diocletian[4]
Pope Marcellinus (Saint), elected 30 June 296 and martyred 25 October 10 during persecution of Diocletian[4]
Pope Marcellus I (Saint), elected 27 May 308 after 4-year vacancy and martyred 16 January 309[4]
Pope Eusebius (Saint), elected 18 April 309 and martyred in Sicily 17 August 309.[4][9]
Pope John I (Saint), elected 13 August 523, during the Ostrogothic occupation of the Italian peninsula. Was sent as an envoy by Ostrogoth king Theodoric the Great to Constantinople. Upon return, Theodoric accused John I of conspiracy with the Byzantine empire. Imprisoned and starved to death on 18 May 526.[4]
Pope Martin I (Saint) Elected in 649. Died in exile 16 September 655.
Murdered popes
John VIII (872–882), poisoned and then clubbed to death[10]
Stephen VI (896–897), strangled[11]
Leo V (903), allegedly strangled[12]
John X (914–928), allegedly smothered with a pillow[13]
John XII (955–964), allegedly murdered by the jealous husband of the woman with whom he was in bed[14]
Benedict VI (973–974), strangled[15]
John XIV (983–984), died either by starvation, ill-treatment, or direct murder[16]
The "white" dope pope (exoteric head of pagan Catholicism) is just the dog of the black pope (esoteric head of pagan Catholicism) who is the superior general of the Jesuits, he pretty much runs the upper echelon of world freemasonry.
Remember the NWO will be,
Political: One world ruler, the antichrist
Financial: The Biblical beast system
Spiritual: One world religion in form of luciferianism
I'm not very Orthodox in most things, I think there are good Catholics and bad just like there are good Protestants and bad, I'm not here to further the gap of schism but rather bridge that gap through Jesus Christ, whom we can agree on.
a) One implies "free" from one another, we implies "joined" together aka open to choose freely or enclosed within a controlled environment.
b) BE implies "being" alive; TO implies being moved from inception "towards" death.
I think we
Aka singular (I) thinking plural (we)...that's an issue aka an artificial common way of thinking aka a so called "hivemind".
I know a word like passed/crossed over
Nature moves sound, which crosses thorough/passes over each one within. Words are passed across one another in exchange for holding onto them aka to affix them mentally as a "definition; meaning; imported significance".
Reality (perceivable sound) moves across; fiction (suggested words) nails one to the cross.
one who has crossed over to the Christ
a) Each anointed one implies Christ (life) crossing over (inception towards death). Coming through the birth channel implies ones anointment and the wicker/wican - "to give way" (inception towards death) of Christ (life).
b) If EACH one implies Christ, then wouldn't that explain why a jew is seen as both being against all non jews, and simultaneously self hating?
If one positions Christ and anti-Christ within self, then sustaining self by resisting outside temptations, implies a struggle within each one being (life) passed over/moved across (inception towards death).
c) Which part of the story of Christ doesn't describe each living being? What is the difference between Christ and each life coming into being? Isn't speaking in the name of Christ tempting one to ignore ones own voice?
I say we because I do think I stand together with a multitude I don't 'know' and I try to speak carefully when I speak that way. Hivemind brings a negative connotation to my mind with reference to the common era.
Though again, I do think I share a mind to a point.
The use of crossed over I mention is like crossing from death to life, something like passing from a state of not knowing God to then knowing Him.
My savior 'nailed Himself to the cross' before anything pierced His skin. Thank you Jesus!!!
Each one is made in the image of God in what specifications I haven't figured out completely yet, fun to try though. The difference between each one and the one Christ is that He is sinless and we are not but by His blood(sacrifice) we can be freed from the grip of death.
a) Thinking implies in response to origin, hence to all perceivable ones perception already GOT access to. Others suggest one to think about outcome, hence tempting one to GET.
b) Together implies "towards getting"...being alive implies, while being moved from inception TOWARDS death. That's what one gets, when ignoring to sustain what one got.
c) Coming through the birth channel implies as off-spring aka as each separated one. Few suggest pluralism; multiculturalism; collectivism; abrahamism (father of multitude) etc. to tempt many to join each other, which in return permits few to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
d) Standing implies balancing as matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion, hence during a process of separation between velocity and resistance, which is why both young and old are struggling to stand and find balance.
I speak that way
Way (inception towards death) separates each I (life) from one another, which only then allows speaking to one another.
Few suggest aboutism to trick many to think together about suggested information, while ignoring that way (all perceivable) set each I (ones perception) apart from one another. It's ones consent to suggested words which tempts one to think its about togetherness.
Hivemind brings a negative connotation to my mind
a) Negative implies vs positive aka a conflict of reason, already within your mind. You are viewing perceivable balance through a lens of suggested imbalance, hence connotate; verb - "to signify secondarily"...and you chose to do that to yourself by consenting to suggestions by another.
b) Circular logic implies ones mind closed to perceivable, while reason implies a conflict against others (within a ring) about suggested, and logic/reason is based on logos aka the suggested word, distracting one from perceivable sound.
c) Positive implies ones POSI-tion aka posited (life) within action (inception towards death), while negative implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing) thereof, when consenting to suggestions by another.
There's no conflict between positive vs negative in nature...until one ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
the common era
There's only each ones unique (life) era (inception towards death)...few suggest common-ism to lure unique ones together, and era/epoch aka epi (on) ekhein (to hold) to tempt many to hold onto fictitious eras, while ignoring that real era cannot be held onto, since it moves ones being.
Furthermore...suggested THE-ism tempts ones consent to give another authority over self.
I share a mind to a point
a) Being implies each life sentenced from inception towards point of death.
b) If one takes possession over self as "me; myself or I", then that contradicts sharing with others.
c) Only all (perceivable) shares with each one (perception) through separation...sharing among one another by giving (to sell) and taking (to buy) ignores each ones FREE will of choice.
like crossing from death to life
a) Only during the process of dying (inception towards death) can life grow aka A CROSS each one bears.
b) The ongoing process of dying implies "same"; each life within implies "different"...few distract many from that by suggesting them to respond "alike", hence the hivemind; order following; npc behavior.
c) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka transformation of ingredients out of base alchemy.
d) Crossing simply implies the momentum between motion (dying) and matter (living) simultaneously.
passing from a state of not knowing God to then knowing Him
a) God implies all known (perceivable) passing through each one being (perception)...by internal/inherent separation of all into each one.
b) Motion implies him; momentum implies her; matter implies a trans-form-ation of him through her into each FE (minine) MALE aka WO (mb) MAN aka S(plit) HE.
There can be only one father (motion) and one mother (momentum) for each one off-spring (matter).
nailed Himself to the cross' before anything pierced His skin
Christ (anointed one) implies being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death)...wielding the free will of choice to nail self by permitting the suggestions by others to pierce one, hence the nailing happening before the piercing.
What's the nail then? Suggested NIHIL-ism and ones de-NIAL of perceivable for it...nothing/nihil/nial/nail.
Thank you
YOU (phonetic jew)... imagine the chutzpah to trick the entire world to say "thank jew" over and over again.
Each one is made in the image of God
God implies (unmoving) mover aka first cause (action) for each secondary effect (reaction). An image implies "artificial representation; copy"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/image#etymonline_v_1520 hence playing within ones "imagination".
Made/make/mag - "to knead; fashion,fit" is the foundation of MAGIC, hence few utilizing suggestion to shape the imagination of consenting many.
what specifications
Specific implies particular, hence a sePARation of whole (all) into partials (one) aka of God into each Christ.
I haven't figured out completely yet
A figure (partial) can only exist within (whole) and thereby during separation of flow (motion) into form (matter).
Few suggest complete aka com (together) plere (to fill) to fulfill that which many "fail to live up to".
The difference between each one and the one Christ is that He is sinless
Sin implies what one takes on, hence holds onto. Few suggest the sinless Christ as a "self sacrificing" redeemer of the sinning multitude.
How does one (singular) become part of many? Joining aka giving consent to a suggestion sold aka entering a contract aka binding self aka holding onto aka falling for the temptation of sin aka shirking ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto a chosen one, who in return offer redemption (buy back, ransom, recover by purchase) in form of a redeemer outside of self.
If one says "Christ died for our sins"; then OUR (suggested pluralism) implies ONES (consent) sin.
the grip of death...
...implies the living choosing to hold onto anything within the moving process of dying.
All is always open when a pike is shoved anus through intestines through stomach through esophagus through pie hole. The pope will answer for his heresy
a) Shove - "push along by direct, continuous strength; attempt to move by pushing"...if life chooses to shove, while being moved from inception towards death, then life dies faster. Shoving others towards death implies the one shoving to also aiming at death, hence falling for a temptation instead of sustaining life by resisting temptation.
b) All allows each ones mind to be open, while aiming a pike at another one, focuses ones mind onto a target, hence closing ones mind off from all.
No matter how many pikes one used to impale others...one can never reach the target. Why? Because closing ones mind to a target draws more targets from all, as in...nature generates what each being wills within aka "ask and ye shall receive".
The pope will answer for his heresy
Ones consent to suggested THE-ism tempts one to call another father (pope), hence committing HEAR-SAY (here-sy).
When a demon possessed man is impaled, a portal at the base of the pike opens into which the man's forbidden soul slowly descends. To slowly descend into the abyss is all the more horrifying. Horrifying like the pope's statue he thrones before at Vatican's Paul VI Audience Hall https://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2018/04/currently-requested-inside-snakes-head.html Physical proof the fraud pope postures and sits on throne before a demonic serpent being
It's a theory, not a good one mind you but a theory none the less. The greater idea is not that the fallen angel is entombed but rather there might be underground rituals to the fallen angel being performed.
Apologies if any of this is redundant, I haven't watched third eye's latest and that's how I know this guy. Real interesting stuff tho
Hi TINAE, 2025 is a jubilee year. The jubilee doors get opened on Christmas before the jubilee year starts. This has been going on regularly since 1300. I wouldn't worry about it.
https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/holy-year-of-jubilee
Thank you so much for contributing! I am trying to understand what is a jubilee and what is it in Catholicism and I will look this over.
I am not worried per se, I am wondering, I'm curious if there are public ceremonies with hidden/occult messages and I think these things about a lot of administrations, not only this administration. I think of it in 'secular' terms and 'religious' (i'm ' ' for common era understanding of these words). I have these misgivings that all kinds of weirdness are going on and I think magic has been forgotten, and I'm just trying to sift through to see if there is any truth to this idea.
The dope pope is a powerless runt.
Sorcery is real, limited power sure, but it should be brought to light.
Yes thru sacrifice of virgin or innocent blood in a carefully performed satanic ritual even these bozos can open portals and let demons in. This is why the pope must be impaled for his heresy against the church. Does the Catholic church lack the procedure to bring this fraud to trial?
There are worse things than impalement and we don't have that kind of power.
There have been periods of fraudulent popes and the process of removing them is sometimes called depositions.
I wonder if u/CrusaderPepe has done a lecture on previous Depositions of Fraud Popes. Might be a good topic to study. This is a list of popes killed or martyred. A fraction of them might have been corrupt or worthy of death.
Saint Peter (c. 67), traditionally martyred by upside-down crucifixion[3]
Pope Linus (Saint) (c. 67 – c. 76)[4][5]
Pope Anacletus or Cletus (Saint) (c. 79 – c. 92)[6][4]
Pope Clement I (Saint) (c. 92 – c. 99), thrown into sea with anchor around his neck[4]
Pope Evaristus (c. 99 – c. 108),[4][5] not listed in the Roman Martyrology but executed[7]
Pope Sixtus I (Saint) (c. 119 – c. 128)[4][5]
Pope Telesphorus (Saint) (c. 128 – c. 138)[4][8]
Pope Anicetus (Saint) (155–166), traditionally martyred[4]
Pope Soter (Saint) (166–175), died a martyr [4]
Pope Eleuterus (Saint) (175–189), died a martyr[4]
Pope Victor I (Saint) 189–199, died a martyr[4]
Pope Calixtus I (Saint) (217–222), died a martyr[4]
Pope Urban I (Saint) 222–230, died a martyr[4]
Pope Pontian (Saint) 230–235, condemned to mines in Sardinia and died on island of Tavolara[4]
Pope Anterus (Saint), elected 21 November 235, martyred at hands of Emperor Maximus[4]
Pope Fabian (Saint), elected 10 January 236 and died a martyr during persecution and decapitated by Decius[4]
Pope Cornelius (Saint), elected March 251 and died a martyr June 253[4]
Pope Lucius I (Saint), elected 25 June 253 and martyred 5 March 254[4]
Pope Stephen I (Saint), elected 12 May 254 and martyred 2 August 257[4][1]
Pope Sixtus II (Saint), elected 30 August 257 and martyred 6 August 258[4]
Pope Dionysius (Saint), elected 22 July 259 after year of persecutions and died 26 December 268, martyred[4]
Pope Felix I (Saint), elected 5 January 269 and died 30 December 274, martyred[4]
Pope Eutychian (Saint), elected 4 January 275 and martyred 7 December 283[4]
Pope Caius (Saint), elected 17 December 283 and martyred 22 April 296 but not at hands of his uncle Diocletian[4]
Pope Marcellinus (Saint), elected 30 June 296 and martyred 25 October 10 during persecution of Diocletian[4]
Pope Marcellus I (Saint), elected 27 May 308 after 4-year vacancy and martyred 16 January 309[4]
Pope Eusebius (Saint), elected 18 April 309 and martyred in Sicily 17 August 309.[4][9]
Pope John I (Saint), elected 13 August 523, during the Ostrogothic occupation of the Italian peninsula. Was sent as an envoy by Ostrogoth king Theodoric the Great to Constantinople. Upon return, Theodoric accused John I of conspiracy with the Byzantine empire. Imprisoned and starved to death on 18 May 526.[4]
Pope Martin I (Saint) Elected in 649. Died in exile 16 September 655.
Murdered popes
John VIII (872–882), poisoned and then clubbed to death[10]
Stephen VI (896–897), strangled[11]
Leo V (903), allegedly strangled[12]
John X (914–928), allegedly smothered with a pillow[13]
John XII (955–964), allegedly murdered by the jealous husband of the woman with whom he was in bed[14]
Benedict VI (973–974), strangled[15]
John XIV (983–984), died either by starvation, ill-treatment, or direct murder[16]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_popes_who_died_violently
I have expectations for the great deposition of all evil powers and principalities, perhaps this is our middle ground? Cheers
The "white" dope pope (exoteric head of pagan Catholicism) is just the dog of the black pope (esoteric head of pagan Catholicism) who is the superior general of the Jesuits, he pretty much runs the upper echelon of world freemasonry.
Remember the NWO will be,
Political: One world ruler, the antichrist
Financial: The Biblical beast system
Spiritual: One world religion in form of luciferianism
You can also check Dr. Deep State channel and video on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kusR7Etz-tQ
u/#cheers
ORTHO BROS FOR THE W
I'm not very Orthodox in most things, I think there are good Catholics and bad just like there are good Protestants and bad, I'm not here to further the gap of schism but rather bridge that gap through Jesus Christ, whom we can agree on.
Portal aka a port within all where vessels (life) are loaded (inception) and unloaded (death). Hence...port/prtu/per - "to pass over".
The trick...all is always open, while each one within can be tempted to close self to it.
I think we should be closed/dead to evil, I know a word like passed/crossed over, hebrew. Christian Hebrew - one who has crossed over to the Christ.
a) One implies "free" from one another, we implies "joined" together aka open to choose freely or enclosed within a controlled environment.
b) BE implies "being" alive; TO implies being moved from inception "towards" death.
Aka singular (I) thinking plural (we)...that's an issue aka an artificial common way of thinking aka a so called "hivemind".
Nature moves sound, which crosses thorough/passes over each one within. Words are passed across one another in exchange for holding onto them aka to affix them mentally as a "definition; meaning; imported significance".
Reality (perceivable sound) moves across; fiction (suggested words) nails one to the cross.
a) Each anointed one implies Christ (life) crossing over (inception towards death). Coming through the birth channel implies ones anointment and the wicker/wican - "to give way" (inception towards death) of Christ (life).
b) If EACH one implies Christ, then wouldn't that explain why a jew is seen as both being against all non jews, and simultaneously self hating?
If one positions Christ and anti-Christ within self, then sustaining self by resisting outside temptations, implies a struggle within each one being (life) passed over/moved across (inception towards death).
c) Which part of the story of Christ doesn't describe each living being? What is the difference between Christ and each life coming into being? Isn't speaking in the name of Christ tempting one to ignore ones own voice?
I say we because I do think I stand together with a multitude I don't 'know' and I try to speak carefully when I speak that way. Hivemind brings a negative connotation to my mind with reference to the common era. Though again, I do think I share a mind to a point.
The use of crossed over I mention is like crossing from death to life, something like passing from a state of not knowing God to then knowing Him.
My savior 'nailed Himself to the cross' before anything pierced His skin. Thank you Jesus!!!
Each one is made in the image of God in what specifications I haven't figured out completely yet, fun to try though. The difference between each one and the one Christ is that He is sinless and we are not but by His blood(sacrifice) we can be freed from the grip of death.
a) Thinking implies in response to origin, hence to all perceivable ones perception already GOT access to. Others suggest one to think about outcome, hence tempting one to GET.
b) Together implies "towards getting"...being alive implies, while being moved from inception TOWARDS death. That's what one gets, when ignoring to sustain what one got.
c) Coming through the birth channel implies as off-spring aka as each separated one. Few suggest pluralism; multiculturalism; collectivism; abrahamism (father of multitude) etc. to tempt many to join each other, which in return permits few to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
d) Standing implies balancing as matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion, hence during a process of separation between velocity and resistance, which is why both young and old are struggling to stand and find balance.
Way (inception towards death) separates each I (life) from one another, which only then allows speaking to one another.
Few suggest aboutism to trick many to think together about suggested information, while ignoring that way (all perceivable) set each I (ones perception) apart from one another. It's ones consent to suggested words which tempts one to think its about togetherness.
a) Negative implies vs positive aka a conflict of reason, already within your mind. You are viewing perceivable balance through a lens of suggested imbalance, hence connotate; verb - "to signify secondarily"...and you chose to do that to yourself by consenting to suggestions by another.
b) Circular logic implies ones mind closed to perceivable, while reason implies a conflict against others (within a ring) about suggested, and logic/reason is based on logos aka the suggested word, distracting one from perceivable sound.
c) Positive implies ones POSI-tion aka posited (life) within action (inception towards death), while negative implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo, nothing) thereof, when consenting to suggestions by another.
There's no conflict between positive vs negative in nature...until one ignores natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
There's only each ones unique (life) era (inception towards death)...few suggest common-ism to lure unique ones together, and era/epoch aka epi (on) ekhein (to hold) to tempt many to hold onto fictitious eras, while ignoring that real era cannot be held onto, since it moves ones being.
Furthermore...suggested THE-ism tempts ones consent to give another authority over self.
a) Being implies each life sentenced from inception towards point of death.
b) If one takes possession over self as "me; myself or I", then that contradicts sharing with others.
c) Only all (perceivable) shares with each one (perception) through separation...sharing among one another by giving (to sell) and taking (to buy) ignores each ones FREE will of choice.
a) Only during the process of dying (inception towards death) can life grow aka A CROSS each one bears.
b) The ongoing process of dying implies "same"; each life within implies "different"...few distract many from that by suggesting them to respond "alike", hence the hivemind; order following; npc behavior.
c) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka transformation of ingredients out of base alchemy.
d) Crossing simply implies the momentum between motion (dying) and matter (living) simultaneously.
a) God implies all known (perceivable) passing through each one being (perception)...by internal/inherent separation of all into each one.
b) Motion implies him; momentum implies her; matter implies a trans-form-ation of him through her into each FE (minine) MALE aka WO (mb) MAN aka S(plit) HE.
There can be only one father (motion) and one mother (momentum) for each one off-spring (matter).
c) Know-ledge implies a separation, hence "livin on the edge"... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
Christ (anointed one) implies being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death)...wielding the free will of choice to nail self by permitting the suggestions by others to pierce one, hence the nailing happening before the piercing.
What's the nail then? Suggested NIHIL-ism and ones de-NIAL of perceivable for it...nothing/nihil/nial/nail.
YOU (phonetic jew)... imagine the chutzpah to trick the entire world to say "thank jew" over and over again.
God implies (unmoving) mover aka first cause (action) for each secondary effect (reaction). An image implies "artificial representation; copy"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/image#etymonline_v_1520 hence playing within ones "imagination".
Made/make/mag - "to knead; fashion,fit" is the foundation of MAGIC, hence few utilizing suggestion to shape the imagination of consenting many.
Specific implies particular, hence a sePARation of whole (all) into partials (one) aka of God into each Christ.
A figure (partial) can only exist within (whole) and thereby during separation of flow (motion) into form (matter).
Few suggest complete aka com (together) plere (to fill) to fulfill that which many "fail to live up to".
Sin implies what one takes on, hence holds onto. Few suggest the sinless Christ as a "self sacrificing" redeemer of the sinning multitude.
How does one (singular) become part of many? Joining aka giving consent to a suggestion sold aka entering a contract aka binding self aka holding onto aka falling for the temptation of sin aka shirking ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto a chosen one, who in return offer redemption (buy back, ransom, recover by purchase) in form of a redeemer outside of self.
If one says "Christ died for our sins"; then OUR (suggested pluralism) implies ONES (consent) sin.
...implies the living choosing to hold onto anything within the moving process of dying.
All is always open when a pike is shoved anus through intestines through stomach through esophagus through pie hole. The pope will answer for his heresy
a) Shove - "push along by direct, continuous strength; attempt to move by pushing"...if life chooses to shove, while being moved from inception towards death, then life dies faster. Shoving others towards death implies the one shoving to also aiming at death, hence falling for a temptation instead of sustaining life by resisting temptation.
b) All allows each ones mind to be open, while aiming a pike at another one, focuses ones mind onto a target, hence closing ones mind off from all.
No matter how many pikes one used to impale others...one can never reach the target. Why? Because closing ones mind to a target draws more targets from all, as in...nature generates what each being wills within aka "ask and ye shall receive".
Ones consent to suggested THE-ism tempts one to call another father (pope), hence committing HEAR-SAY (here-sy).
Sleight of hand by Danzig... https://genius.com/Danzig-mother-lyrics
When a demon possessed man is impaled, a portal at the base of the pike opens into which the man's forbidden soul slowly descends. To slowly descend into the abyss is all the more horrifying. Horrifying like the pope's statue he thrones before at Vatican's Paul VI Audience Hall https://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2018/04/currently-requested-inside-snakes-head.html Physical proof the fraud pope postures and sits on throne before a demonic serpent being
kek
who produces shit like this?
What do you take issue with?
The idea that there is a "Tomb of Lucifer".
It's a theory, not a good one mind you but a theory none the less. The greater idea is not that the fallen angel is entombed but rather there might be underground rituals to the fallen angel being performed.
That´s not a theory. A theory is supported by evidence.
It´s a retarded delusional fantasy story.