Pretty cool
(twitter.com)
Comments (66)
sorted by:
Literally not even remotely possible in any capacity.
Possible, probable and commercially viable are different things. And this is none of the above
Do you have evidence for anything fucking thing you say or you just have a custom made 8 ball that you shake for each question??
Literally my line. The burden of proof is on you. It is physically impossible to move the mass in question at the speed in question using nothing more than electromagnetism without causing radiative pressure sufficient to REDUCE THE OBJECTS BEING MOVED INTO SUBATOMIC PARTICLES. You are incapable of proving otherwise.
The laws of physics forbid this nigger’s claims. But that’s true of basically everything any nigger has ever said, so I’m utterly unsurprised.
And this is the bullshit part. Inductive charging? Sure. Wireless power transmission, even? Sure. For static objects.
I’m going to completely disregard the unholy engineering nightmare that is “creating a power receptacle capable of outputting constant current when provided with a perpetually and violently changing intensity of current as input” and focus entirely on the input itself. The inverse square law means that allowing a receiver to be at an arbitrary and ever-changing distance (such as a moving vehicle) requires a transmission source that puts out an absolute goddamned fuckton of power to ensure that, at said arbitrary distance, the target can still receive whatever the minimum power it needs to operate. So that’s just untenable.
And even then that’s not taking into consideration what that minimum power would have to be to push a car and its cargo while “remaining charged.”
There’s hardware in the device to convert the variable voltage of the cranking into a smoothed voltage in order to send it to the battery without the battery exploding. That’s my point; the hardware required to do this WIRELESSLY for a VEHICLE IN MOTION doesn’t exist.
Oh boy, seven month charging times for 300 mile range!
It's impossible for a Virgin birth and a resurrection from death. Yet here we are.
Fuck off. We deal in actual conspiracies here, not delusional nonsense that is physically impossible.
Interesting how that your fake Quote is of your own volition. As it's actually really sound logic. If you believe in God, then you have no right to define his creation, or how it works. ☈.
Try again.
O.K. As you have advised, I have edited my statement to what I was originally going to say. In advance, your welcome.
God almighty, being omnipotent, can do whatever He wants. Some random African "inventor" whose inventions aren't shown actually moving, not so much.
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ Well, I guess the science is settled then. ㅤ God's realm has been defined by man, and therefor 'it don't work like dat'.
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ Say, who do you think is backing this African 'inventor' and what do you think their motive is? ㅤ And what are the motives of the people controlling those people, and those controlling them?
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ But, I guess that is not for me to Question. ㅤ I am just to play along with everything I am being told to believe by those who control this world.
-̱͞|͞מ͟͞͞פ͟ו͟͞͞ק͞פ͟͞͞ק͞|̊̆ ‡.̗̀́
It was funny when you doxxed me before.
Did God tell you to do that?
Am I supposed to know who you are?
Did they promise you could become a real boy one day?
Who they, coward? Why can’t you account for your own submission’s validity, coward? Why do you think your deflection is going to work, coward?
Your masters
The video didn't demonstrate a single one of his supposed inventions, it just panned across some inert models while talking about unsupported claims. It's clearly a scam.
If he had a working prototype, he would be needing to push away investors.
Thanks debbie
Fake. Scam. Even the name is made up. People will fall for anything...
🥴🥴🥴
That poor investor is being taken for a ride (literally).
You don't believe in tartaria?
As someone of African decent we have two wonderful characteristics: optimism and confidence. Unfortunately that means a lot of confidence men conning optimistic people :)
As long as it can be verified independently by unbiased scientists and engineers, I'm all for it.
Yeah this stuff is usually a scam in one way or another
Tesla was experimenting with wireless power transmission back in the early 1900s so, it's in the realm of possibility. But, I'm not going to take the word of the guy who invented it or the people who work for (or finance) his company. Let a team of independent researchers verify that it's legit and I'll start to pay attention more closely.
He considered using resonant frequencies of that Earth. But even if it could be done, should it? Could be playing with fire there (or more like Earthquakes and hot lava).
Tesla can't be reverse engineered
Not yet, at least. But, it is in the realm of possibility. Independent verification is definitely needed here.
This is freakin' r/conspiracies literally everything needs independent verification
True. But, IMO, free energy devices deserve a whole category of their own.
Fair