Pretty cool
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
Literally my line. The burden of proof is on you. It is physically impossible to move the mass in question at the speed in question using nothing more than electromagnetism without causing radiative pressure sufficient to REDUCE THE OBJECTS BEING MOVED INTO SUBATOMIC PARTICLES. You are incapable of proving otherwise.
The laws of physics forbid this nigger’s claims. But that’s true of basically everything any nigger has ever said, so I’m utterly unsurprised.
And this is the bullshit part. Inductive charging? Sure. Wireless power transmission, even? Sure. For static objects.
I’m going to completely disregard the unholy engineering nightmare that is “creating a power receptacle capable of outputting constant current when provided with a perpetually and violently changing intensity of current as input” and focus entirely on the input itself. The inverse square law means that allowing a receiver to be at an arbitrary and ever-changing distance (such as a moving vehicle) requires a transmission source that puts out an absolute goddamned fuckton of power to ensure that, at said arbitrary distance, the target can still receive whatever the minimum power it needs to operate. So that’s just untenable.
And even then that’s not taking into consideration what that minimum power would have to be to push a car and its cargo while “remaining charged.”
There’s hardware in the device to convert the variable voltage of the cranking into a smoothed voltage in order to send it to the battery without the battery exploding. That’s my point; the hardware required to do this WIRELESSLY for a VEHICLE IN MOTION doesn’t exist.
Oh boy, seven month charging times for 300 mile range!
It's impossible for a Virgin birth and a resurrection from death. Yet here we are.
Fuck off. We deal in actual conspiracies here, not delusional nonsense that is physically impossible.
Interesting how that your fake Quote is of your own volition. As it's actually really sound logic. If you believe in God, then you have no right to define his creation, or how it works. ☈.
Try again.
God almighty, being omnipotent, can do whatever He wants. Some random African "inventor" whose inventions aren't shown actually moving, not so much.
It was funny when you doxxed me before.
Did God tell you to do that?
Did they promise you could become a real boy one day?
Who they, coward? Why can’t you account for your own submission’s validity, coward? Why do you think your deflection is going to work, coward?