I could get lots of quotes here, eh.. where I'm gradually reading this.. and it's like.. they say oh do this or do that. Then nevermind like homeless people or whatever.. extrapolate that, to Lucifer and the bad guys. Isn't that what they're supposed to be meaning. But they kind of draw this line of when they wind up in hell, they're bad.
Just earlier too they talk about oh he had these 12 buddies and he's preparing them to head out. But he's like if you go into a town and there's trouble, get outta there. Shouldn't they keep going over there, instead. On and on with this stuff, eh. I could keep going on lots. But just the gist of it.. how you're supposed to help people in trouble.. and the "enemy" too, eh.. but oh.. not allowed if you try to help Satan.
And then.. Yahweh here, eh.. if he's so mighty.. how come he just doesn't fix shit himself. Why do we have to do it. It's like you're on your own and you're supposed to do what he says, I guess, eh.
And then if this Devil guy is so bad.. just take him out. But he doesn't. It'd be easy to fix lots of these "problems", you know what I mean.
Is Satan unknowingly working for God to weed out false righteousness, hypocrisy, and more?
Keep reading for the big plot twist.
What if holding onto "right" grows "false"? Doesn't your righteous garden attract the false pests you're trying to weed out?
Holding onto establishes a tether in-between sides...only letting go of one side breaks the bond between both.
What if it's a temptation to hold onto righteousness?
Notice that the letters/words/definitions you read are being given away...not kept.
Notice furthermore that those who give you to read to tempt you to keep, are distracting you with shaped words from a moving sound, which cannot be kept in any way, shape or form.
What if God implies work and all perceivable knowledge, while Satan implies ones consent to ignore (un) perceivable knowledge for what others suggest is?
Nature just works...it doesn't tell you what anything employed within work is. Instead...work inspires self discernment by employees through adaptation aka working.
You have the most schizo-writing style on this site. You need to pause, collect your thoughts and learn to write in a coherent manner. You need to take a writing course.
Where's is whatever I ramble on about, "incoherent".. give me some examples of how, you with your writing course education, would do it better. Do the red pen teacher analysis on anything I research.
If it's by and for aka by an origin forwarding towards outcome, then why are readers holding onto what is written?
Does holding onto contradict being (life) forwarded (inception towards death)?
Esoteric vs Exoteric interpretation/understanding.
A world of difference.
Anthropromorphism creates issues.
your following the trail of free thinking men that came before you. People wanna talk about Gnostics and gnosis. The truth at the bottom is that as long as that book has been around bad people have used it for evil. Satan, the devil what ever arbitrary term Christians use to justify there superiority simply means adversary.
the idea of monotheism was created for one reason, to bring the peasants under a single god so they can be easily ruled.
do what we say or you'll go to hell. live a passive life and be willing to sacrifice your self for the greater good. Don't think for your self, just go by the book. smh its ment to pacify the masses
All text needs to be contextualized. Even these words you are reading right now.
Hence tempting ones choice to choose one side or the other, while ignoring that choice can only exist in-between sides.
Others tempt one to hold onto a meaning, which positions oneself under (sup-pose) the ones suggesting the meaning.
Kindred (life) can only be drawn from within a line (inception towards death).
a) Winding up...down into hell? A contradiction.
b) Heaven vs hell + good vs bad...two opposing sides tempting ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
a) A head (ones perception) can only operate within (all perceivable)...heading out towards suggestions tempts one to ignore that, hence loosing ones head.
b) To prepare aka "set in order or readiness for a particular end" implies nature setting life into natural order (inception towards death); hence towards death as the end of particular life.
a) Nature doesn't cast lots (plural)...it generates units (singular).
b) Going on implies motion...which cannot be kept, since it moves.
By sustaining self as chaos (life) during order (inception towards death), while resisting the temptation of supposition aka of "holding as a belief or opinion; making a hypothesis, assuming as the basis of argument".
The ongoing process of dying implies the only help for temporary life within to sustain itself. Ones growth depends on ones adaption to loss....others tempt one to burden self, while growing within loss.
The more one helps self, the more fruits of ones labor for others. Since labor implies adaption to motion...holding onto the fruits of ones labors spoils exponentially, hence the opportunity to share by letting go of that which one cannot hold onto without harming self.
Enemy aka within (en/in) friend (amicus)...claiming as "my" establishes another as enemy. If one holds onto "good", then one establishes "bad" among others...that's how balance works.
a) The ALL in allowed implies everything...NOT aka nothing implies ones ignorance thereof.
b) To help implies TOWARDS support, which tempts one to ignore being (life) supported (inception towards death) by origin. To help tempts one to aim towards death, while ignoring that life needs to resist being moved from inception towards death...unless life wants to die sooner.
Fixing implies putting together...yahweh sets apart whole into each shitty partial within, hence yahweh/hawah - "was"...all was before each one came to be within.
All does so that each one within can re-do self. You cannot DO anything without nature already doing everything to you...others suggest you to "JUST DO IT" so that you ignore redoing yourself for doing whatever others are suggesting you to respond to, and RE-sponding implies RE-doing.
WE implies ones response to suggested pluralism by another one. No matter how many other ones one joins...one cannot be more than one. WE doesn't exist in nature...those within nature can choose to ignore natural (one) for artificial (we). Why? FREE will of choice makes ignorance possible.
a) Nature doesn't say anything aka doesn't shape words by putting letters together...nature sets all sound apart into each one instrument within.
Only during the natural process of sound setting itself apart, can one artificially shape a saying by putting letters, words and meanings together.
b) One within all cannot own anything without ignoring that everything moves. What happens if one holds onto motion?
Why personify (guy) devil/diablo/diaballein aka DIA "across, through" + BALLEIN "to throw"?
Without such personification, wouldn't it be easier to discern self by the implication of moving verbs like being (life) thrown across (inception towards death)?
Is being thrown (ballein) across (dia) good or bad? The devil in the details...