Hence tempting ones choice to choose one side or the other, while ignoring that choice can only exist in-between sides.
Isn't that what they're supposed to be meaning
Others tempt one to hold onto a meaning, which positions oneself under (sup-pose) the ones suggesting the meaning.
they kind of draw this line
Kindred (life) can only be drawn from within a line (inception towards death).
wind up in hell, they're bad
a) Winding up...down into hell? A contradiction.
b) Heaven vs hell + good vs bad...two opposing sides tempting ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
he's preparing them to head out
a) A head (ones perception) can only operate within (all perceivable)...heading out towards suggestions tempts one to ignore that, hence loosing ones head.
b) To prepare aka "set in order or readiness for a particular end" implies nature setting life into natural order (inception towards death); hence towards death as the end of particular life.
I could keep going on lots
a) Nature doesn't cast lots (plural)...it generates units (singular).
b) Going on implies motion...which cannot be kept, since it moves.
how you're supposed to help people in trouble
By sustaining self as chaos (life) during order (inception towards death), while resisting the temptation of supposition aka of "holding as a belief or opinion; making a hypothesis, assuming as the basis of argument".
The ongoing process of dying implies the only help for temporary life within to sustain itself. Ones growth depends on ones adaption to loss....others tempt one to burden self, while growing within loss.
The more one helps self, the more fruits of ones labor for others. Since labor implies adaption to motion...holding onto the fruits of ones labors spoils exponentially, hence the opportunity to share by letting go of that which one cannot hold onto without harming self.
the "enemy"
Enemy aka within (en/in) friend (amicus)...claiming as "my" establishes another as enemy. If one holds onto "good", then one establishes "bad" among others...that's how balance works.
not allowed if you try to help
a) The ALL in allowed implies everything...NOT aka nothing implies ones ignorance thereof.
b) To help implies TOWARDS support, which tempts one to ignore being (life) supported (inception towards death) by origin. To help tempts one to aim towards death, while ignoring that life needs to resist being moved from inception towards death...unless life wants to die sooner.
how come he just doesn't fix shit himself
Fixing implies putting together...yahweh sets apart whole into each shitty partial within, hence yahweh/hawah - "was"...all was before each one came to be within.
Why do we have to do it?
All does so that each one within can re-do self. You cannot DO anything without nature already doing everything to you...others suggest you to "JUST DO IT" so that you ignore redoing yourself for doing whatever others are suggesting you to respond to, and RE-sponding implies RE-doing.
WE implies ones response to suggested pluralism by another one. No matter how many other ones one joins...one cannot be more than one. WE doesn't exist in nature...those within nature can choose to ignore natural (one) for artificial (we). Why? FREE will of choice makes ignorance possible.
It's like you're on your own and you're supposed to do what he says
a) Nature doesn't say anything aka doesn't shape words by putting letters together...nature sets all sound apart into each one instrument within.
Only during the natural process of sound setting itself apart, can one artificially shape a saying by putting letters, words and meanings together.
b) One within all cannot own anything without ignoring that everything moves. What happens if one holds onto motion?
Without such personification, wouldn't it be easier to discern self by the implication of moving verbs like being (life) thrown across (inception towards death)?
Is being thrown (ballein) across (dia) good or bad? The devil in the details...
Hence tempting ones choice to choose one side or the other, while ignoring that choice can only exist in-between sides.
Others tempt one to hold onto a meaning, which positions oneself under (sup-pose) the ones suggesting the meaning.
Kindred (life) can only be drawn from within a line (inception towards death).
a) Winding up...down into hell? A contradiction.
b) Heaven vs hell + good vs bad...two opposing sides tempting ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
a) A head (ones perception) can only operate within (all perceivable)...heading out towards suggestions tempts one to ignore that, hence loosing ones head.
b) To prepare aka "set in order or readiness for a particular end" implies nature setting life into natural order (inception towards death); hence towards death as the end of particular life.
a) Nature doesn't cast lots (plural)...it generates units (singular).
b) Going on implies motion...which cannot be kept, since it moves.
By sustaining self as chaos (life) during order (inception towards death), while resisting the temptation of supposition aka of "holding as a belief or opinion; making a hypothesis, assuming as the basis of argument".
The ongoing process of dying implies the only help for temporary life within to sustain itself. Ones growth depends on ones adaption to loss....others tempt one to burden self, while growing within loss.
The more one helps self, the more fruits of ones labor for others. Since labor implies adaption to motion...holding onto the fruits of ones labors spoils exponentially, hence the opportunity to share by letting go of that which one cannot hold onto without harming self.
Enemy aka within (en/in) friend (amicus)...claiming as "my" establishes another as enemy. If one holds onto "good", then one establishes "bad" among others...that's how balance works.
a) The ALL in allowed implies everything...NOT aka nothing implies ones ignorance thereof.
b) To help implies TOWARDS support, which tempts one to ignore being (life) supported (inception towards death) by origin. To help tempts one to aim towards death, while ignoring that life needs to resist being moved from inception towards death...unless life wants to die sooner.
Fixing implies putting together...yahweh sets apart whole into each shitty partial within, hence yahweh/hawah - "was"...all was before each one came to be within.
All does so that each one within can re-do self. You cannot DO anything without nature already doing everything to you...others suggest you to "JUST DO IT" so that you ignore redoing yourself for doing whatever others are suggesting you to respond to, and RE-sponding implies RE-doing.
WE implies ones response to suggested pluralism by another one. No matter how many other ones one joins...one cannot be more than one. WE doesn't exist in nature...those within nature can choose to ignore natural (one) for artificial (we). Why? FREE will of choice makes ignorance possible.
a) Nature doesn't say anything aka doesn't shape words by putting letters together...nature sets all sound apart into each one instrument within.
Only during the natural process of sound setting itself apart, can one artificially shape a saying by putting letters, words and meanings together.
b) One within all cannot own anything without ignoring that everything moves. What happens if one holds onto motion?
Why personify (guy) devil/diablo/diaballein aka DIA "across, through" + BALLEIN "to throw"?
Without such personification, wouldn't it be easier to discern self by the implication of moving verbs like being (life) thrown across (inception towards death)?
Is being thrown (ballein) across (dia) good or bad? The devil in the details...