There's an interesting and untold story underlying the "Axis of Evil". In very brief:
It looks like Science(tm) wanted to back up their Big Bang fable by studying the Cosmic Microwave Background. They sent up first the COBE then the WMAP satellites.
These were some rigged and bullshit experiments and--sure enough!--they proved the Big Bang and the age of the Universe, etc. But the rigging seems to have unintentionally induced a bias that shows itself as this Axis of Evil. Ooops!
So they had a real dilemma. On the one hand, they could get rid of the Axis of Evil by saying that their experiments were fucked up, but then their confirmation of the Big Bang goes out the window with it. On the other, they can stand pat and just let everyone forget about the whole Axis of Evil business.
The public memory being what it is, they're holding on to the Big Bang and gambling on the forgetting.
It is really weird when people who work with all that complex astrophysics stuff suddenly fall to Karen's level of assuming some basic things.
Current understanding of Universe is that it expands everywhere more or less evenly and everything moves in addition. So, if you began to measure this expansion from some point using, say, red shift or whatever, you will suddenly find that you are in the center of expansion. :) Adding to that overall movement of Earth around Sun, Sun around center of Milki Way, Milky Way in local galaxy cluster, cluster in respect to other clusters and background, you will easily get weird, irregular and unpredictable, but pretty obvious results.
Somehow that irregularities in CBM and impossibility to account for all possible forming components of movement went to that Axis of Evil thing.
BigBang theory is based on few unproven dogmas - that speed of light is a constant, nothing could move faster than light, photon could not lose energy while traveling, metric of space have exactly 3 dimentions everywhere, current expansion is one-way process and few other. And on top o that it all covered with that Karen's impression of that presumable BigBang as regular explosion when everything expands from single point. So, astrophysicist looking into the skies think that they see this CBM as remnants of flash from their BigBang, far away from distant past running much faster than closer objects, so light from flash turned into microwaves due to red shift they observe. Things could be completely different if only one of their holy dogmas turn out to be false for a little bit. And with high probability all of them are false and some in huge. So, when you try to rig your observations to fit some beloved theory with its dogmas, all kind of shit will pop up. :)
Interesting, when amount of inconsistencies in attempts to preserve current set of dogmas will overhelm the obedience of scientists who already looks bored in current dogmatism that hinder scientific progress almost for century.
That brings up the untold story underlying the untold story, and a part of what first drew my attention to the issue....
Maybe a decade or more ago, after the "Axis of Evil" thing came out, I watched an interview with a documentarian who had made a film about it called, "The Principle". He somehow got all the big mainstream astrophysics names: Laurence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Max Tegmark, Lisa Randall, etc.
But the thing was, the new findings violated the Copernican Principle: that there were no special places in the Universe. Thus the title. It all finally dawned on these geniuses and they tried to back out, but they had signed all the paperwork.
To top it off, this guy was a Christian and took it as confirmation of, you know, whatever. So lawsuits flew and all the rest and the film virtually vanished. Last time I looked, you could still scrape up some remnants of it's existence, but it wasn't easy.
expands everywhere more or less evenly...moves in addition
There cannot be expansion without motion....motion (inception towards death) adds expansion (life).
you are in the center of expansion
Indeed...center (life) of expansion (inception towards death) during motion.
speed of light is a constant
Speed implies measuring of ongoing motion by temporal matter from within. Light as constant implies before setting itself apart into a visible spectrum that can be measured.
nothing could move faster than light
Slow vs fast implies a conflict of reason aka measurement issue among rays within visible spectrum of light...not light itself.
Few trick many to measure while ignoring that each measurement aka each ones measuring mind is a fault within result.
could not lose energy
Lose energy into what and where? Energy implies all internal power aka both loss and growth in balance with each other, hence all being one in energy.
current expansion is one-way process
Current (inception towards death) expands (life) during a one-way process...internally/inherently.
And on top of that it all covered...
All reveals each one...one chooses to cover self by ignoring all (perceivable) for each other (suggested). Consenting to a suggestion puts oneself at bottom and another on top.
be completely different
A being cannot be complete...only a partial (matter) within an even (momentum) whole (motion) aka within the process of differentiation.
Few suggest progressivism (complete) to tempt many to heal the world by bringing together (tikkun olam) aka to complete that which is broken.
preserve current
Current moves...motion cannot be preserved. Prime example...currency. Many are tempted to hold onto currency; yet it miraculously flows out of their grasp...again, and again and a gain for few.
Oh wow. How did you find this genuine truthful accurate information?
Did you.... Goo goo gah gah google it?
And was the first search result Wikipedia?
And then, after making no effort to even scroll, you lazily clicked the first link given to you by a kike search engine taking you to a kike fake encyclopedia?
Bravo. I commend you for your strenuous and deep dive research. It is our honor to have you here at conspiracies where you can inform us of all the Wikipedia misinformation. Please post some snopes articles debooooooonking us too.
I guess I really have to be into tarot cards and the zodiac to fully grasp the concept... Teach me, master! Your ego is going through the roof, and you've said nothing of value... what a waste...
AXIS, noun - "motionless straight line around which a body rotates".
a) A straight line (inception towards death) implies motion, and a body (life) can only curve within it. If that straight line implies light (motion) establishing a spectrum (momentum), then each ray (matter) within can be bend...
b) Axis vs Allies...suggested vs perceivable...a trick to AX ALL.
Because they (OP included) are trying to push a known term (what I was talking about) to promote their own twisted "energy astrology bs", which OP incorrectly wrote as "cosmology".
Who are these people, who talk about astrological "axis of evil"? It's an entirely new term that only some girls in their 15s know, while they get high and pretend to know stuff about the world...
Which is evident from OPs use of:
"theirs" instead of "there's"
"thru"x2 instead of "through"
"blah, blah"
"your" instead of "you're"
Don't hate me. I just calls it like I sees it.
But what would I know? I guess I could simply believe the words of a user called u/MysteriousFEDKnight...
Do you think people can't check your 16-day profile? With 2 post score and 5 comment score?
Yes we are the center.
There's an interesting and untold story underlying the "Axis of Evil". In very brief:
It looks like Science(tm) wanted to back up their Big Bang fable by studying the Cosmic Microwave Background. They sent up first the COBE then the WMAP satellites.
These were some rigged and bullshit experiments and--sure enough!--they proved the Big Bang and the age of the Universe, etc. But the rigging seems to have unintentionally induced a bias that shows itself as this Axis of Evil. Ooops!
So they had a real dilemma. On the one hand, they could get rid of the Axis of Evil by saying that their experiments were fucked up, but then their confirmation of the Big Bang goes out the window with it. On the other, they can stand pat and just let everyone forget about the whole Axis of Evil business.
The public memory being what it is, they're holding on to the Big Bang and gambling on the forgetting.
It is really weird when people who work with all that complex astrophysics stuff suddenly fall to Karen's level of assuming some basic things.
Current understanding of Universe is that it expands everywhere more or less evenly and everything moves in addition. So, if you began to measure this expansion from some point using, say, red shift or whatever, you will suddenly find that you are in the center of expansion. :) Adding to that overall movement of Earth around Sun, Sun around center of Milki Way, Milky Way in local galaxy cluster, cluster in respect to other clusters and background, you will easily get weird, irregular and unpredictable, but pretty obvious results.
Somehow that irregularities in CBM and impossibility to account for all possible forming components of movement went to that Axis of Evil thing.
BigBang theory is based on few unproven dogmas - that speed of light is a constant, nothing could move faster than light, photon could not lose energy while traveling, metric of space have exactly 3 dimentions everywhere, current expansion is one-way process and few other. And on top o that it all covered with that Karen's impression of that presumable BigBang as regular explosion when everything expands from single point. So, astrophysicist looking into the skies think that they see this CBM as remnants of flash from their BigBang, far away from distant past running much faster than closer objects, so light from flash turned into microwaves due to red shift they observe. Things could be completely different if only one of their holy dogmas turn out to be false for a little bit. And with high probability all of them are false and some in huge. So, when you try to rig your observations to fit some beloved theory with its dogmas, all kind of shit will pop up. :)
Interesting, when amount of inconsistencies in attempts to preserve current set of dogmas will overhelm the obedience of scientists who already looks bored in current dogmatism that hinder scientific progress almost for century.
based and logical take like usual.
That brings up the untold story underlying the untold story, and a part of what first drew my attention to the issue....
Maybe a decade or more ago, after the "Axis of Evil" thing came out, I watched an interview with a documentarian who had made a film about it called, "The Principle". He somehow got all the big mainstream astrophysics names: Laurence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Max Tegmark, Lisa Randall, etc.
But the thing was, the new findings violated the Copernican Principle: that there were no special places in the Universe. Thus the title. It all finally dawned on these geniuses and they tried to back out, but they had signed all the paperwork.
To top it off, this guy was a Christian and took it as confirmation of, you know, whatever. So lawsuits flew and all the rest and the film virtually vanished. Last time I looked, you could still scrape up some remnants of it's existence, but it wasn't easy.
thats a good film. Robert Sungenis one of creators has a copy on his channel
There cannot be expansion without motion....motion (inception towards death) adds expansion (life).
Indeed...center (life) of expansion (inception towards death) during motion.
Speed implies measuring of ongoing motion by temporal matter from within. Light as constant implies before setting itself apart into a visible spectrum that can be measured.
Slow vs fast implies a conflict of reason aka measurement issue among rays within visible spectrum of light...not light itself.
Few trick many to measure while ignoring that each measurement aka each ones measuring mind is a fault within result.
Lose energy into what and where? Energy implies all internal power aka both loss and growth in balance with each other, hence all being one in energy.
Current (inception towards death) expands (life) during a one-way process...internally/inherently.
All reveals each one...one chooses to cover self by ignoring all (perceivable) for each other (suggested). Consenting to a suggestion puts oneself at bottom and another on top.
A being cannot be complete...only a partial (matter) within an even (momentum) whole (motion) aka within the process of differentiation.
Few suggest progressivism (complete) to tempt many to heal the world by bringing together (tikkun olam) aka to complete that which is broken.
Current moves...motion cannot be preserved. Prime example...currency. Many are tempted to hold onto currency; yet it miraculously flows out of their grasp...again, and again and a gain for few.
Very entertaining, but no.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil - George W. Bush promoted this phrase.
Would have took just a second not to look dumb there mate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil_(cosmology)
Words and phrases can have multiple meanings... ikr
I have a theory that "looking dumb" is actually one of the primary goals of Neo1.
That's the same hoax as solar flares, ice age, polar shifting or whatever...
It's interesting if you're really into the zodiac and tarot cards...
I am pretty sure you're a cancer. (The zodiac sign)
You need a proper definition before calling them a hoax.
You deny it if you just swap meanings like you did.
If you thought so, you could say it without redirections, which makes this of yours an awkward defensive comment.
Your choice, whether you want to waste your time with hoaxes...
I wasted my time, I advise others not to do that.
When you figure it out, you'd do the same.
You won't help anyone by pointing them to a redirect mate.
Redirect?
I don't think you know the meaning of the word.
It's only one direction. That all those astro-claims are kabalistic bs for the gullible.
But what would I know? I guess I could simply believe the words of a user called u/MysteriousFEDKnight...
Do you think people can't check your 16-day profile? With 2 post score and 5 comment score?
https://conspiracies.win/p/17tegZSGDy/friendly-reminder-on-how-to-spot/c/ - Do you really think I would post this, and not read it?
"Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known." - Matthew 10:26
Oh wow. How did you find this genuine truthful accurate information?
Did you.... Goo goo gah gah google it?
And was the first search result Wikipedia?
And then, after making no effort to even scroll, you lazily clicked the first link given to you by a kike search engine taking you to a kike fake encyclopedia?
Bravo. I commend you for your strenuous and deep dive research. It is our honor to have you here at conspiracies where you can inform us of all the Wikipedia misinformation. Please post some snopes articles debooooooonking us too.
I think you have a serious psychological problem, and I will block you.
Different "Axis of Evil". I know it's difficult, but please try to keep up or at least keep it to other riders on the short bus.
Thanks!.
Oh, sorry... I can't keep up...
Wasn't it solar flares?
Or an ice age?
Or global warming?
Or the poles shifting or whatever?
Can't keep up with all the propaganda...
I guess I really have to be into tarot cards and the zodiac to fully grasp the concept... Teach me, master! Your ego is going through the roof, and you've said nothing of value... what a waste...
a) A straight line (inception towards death) implies motion, and a body (life) can only curve within it. If that straight line implies light (motion) establishing a spectrum (momentum), then each ray (matter) within can be bend...
b) Axis vs Allies...suggested vs perceivable...a trick to AX ALL.
No, "axis of evil" is a term used by George W. Bush - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_evil
There are multiple definitions of it.
Why would yours stand exactly, when its not even what people are talkking about?
Because they (OP included) are trying to push a known term (what I was talking about) to promote their own twisted "energy astrology bs", which OP incorrectly wrote as "cosmology".
Who are these people, who talk about astrological "axis of evil"? It's an entirely new term that only some girls in their 15s know, while they get high and pretend to know stuff about the world...
Which is evident from OPs use of:
"theirs" instead of "there's"
"thru"x2 instead of "through"
"blah, blah"
"your" instead of "you're"
Don't hate me. I just calls it like I sees it.
But what would I know? I guess I could simply believe the words of a user called u/MysteriousFEDKnight...
Do you think people can't check your 16-day profile? With 2 post score and 5 comment score?
https://conspiracies.win/p/17tegZSGDy/friendly-reminder-on-how-to-spot/c/ - Do you really think I would post this, and not read it?
"Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known." - Matthew 10:26
How did you get a better comment score than me, without commenting then?