Thoughts on this?
(media.scored.co)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Anybody who thinks O'Keefe is "organic", "in it for the truth and truth alone" and is not "connected" to people in high places with agendas.... well let's just say they haven't been paying attention and are not playing with a full deck.
He's personally admitted to going to Bohemia Grove as an attendant, he admitted this to his "Pfizer whistleblower" Justin Leslie who worked several months "undercover" for Veritas.
What does that change? Very little.
It's all a big theatre with O'Keefe, Rogan, and the rest of them.
it's a small club and we aren't in it.
He's being dogpiled by feds. That's how they roll.
O'Keefe's being honest ...
the jews in the comments are pilpulling him.
Possible. The CIA likes to muddy the waters.
Controlled opposition
In Psy Ops, as with all character development, the protagonist needs a backstory to appear legit and convincing.
O’Keefe reeling off some highlights of his story may speak more to the craft of those who wrote his character arc through choreographed events designed to give him a backstory which would make him appear legit to those who follow him. But really he’s just highlighting the deceptions that have already been perpetrated in his name by the scriptwriters to attain the trust of his marks.
He’s far too polished and media trained.
Notice how all Psy op people are far too slick in front of a camera - even the apparent nobodies that bear witness to events and are interviewed by the news etc.
They have been media trained by tptb in preparation for their roles and it shows.
None of them have that real, authentic people vibe. They don’t talk or behave like real people do - they behave like actors pretending to be real people
Good point on the “real” factor he and most pundits are missing (or have lost after being in the spotlight too long). I remember him even making some weird theatrical rendition of him exposing whatever the hot topic was at the time. Very cringy and popped the bubble for me right there. I remember thinking, okay this is weird, what normal dude goes from supposed investigator hardo to singalongs on the stage…
Same goes for all of Hollywood or most media for example. Look at the type of person you have to be to pursue a career like that (think acting/theatre type people)… crave attention, a little “off”, willing to to anything you’re told, not many real friends, willing to do anything to “make it big”… these people were all outcasts for a lack of better terms growing up and Hollywood can turn them into anything they want to be (at least in the publics mind) so they sell out and are willing to do whatever to keep that image of them alive.
https://xcancel.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1820546248954273880#m
So what is "BG"?
Bohemian Grove.
No thoughts necessary. If he was a threat in any capacity, he wouldn’t have a platform and no one would know anything about him.
Although at the same time, his investigation work, unlike most, has actually resulted in bad people losing their jobs or companies being exposed and resulting in tangible consequences.
Like what, specifically? What it usually looks like to me is a 10-minute video released, a little bit of a firestorm created on right-leaning and conspiracy site, a promise of "much more to come", and then nothing.
If you have time, watch the Project Whistleblower doc on rumble. It could be a psyop also, who knows, trust no one, but it does line up with what I've noticed. O'Keefe just seems like a person meant to capture and neutralize whistleblowers.
Who knows though.
Acorn ended because of Veritas.
https://rumble.com/v17w79t-vintage-veritas-the-fall-of-acorn.html
That was like15 years ago. That was O'Keefe's big break that made him famous. Not to take anything away from that, but he was a kid just trying to do crazy stuff to get famous. It was Hannity that made the story big, and other organizations that jumped in to take that event and go after Acorn.
What has happened since then, though? That's my point. Most controlled opposition is legit (by some definition of legit) when they start and then get co-opted to serve the agenda when they reach a certain level of popularity (sometimes not even something they are aware of).
It's hard to not at least question O'Keefe at this point. The pattern repeats over and over and over. Big whistleblower story and they only put out a short video. Then they say much more coming soon, implying the initial video is just the tip of the iceberg. Then nothing, until the pattern repeats again.
You wanted an example, I gave you an example.
No, I wanted to know what the person I was responding to was referencing.
They literally removed him from his own outfit and significantly reduced the size of his reach by making him grow a new channel that does not hit the same numbers. Best logic ever. Next time go with the 'he would be dead' route.
lol, and that’s “good enough,” right?
Still allowed to post anything he wants. And nothing he wants to post is against jews. How about that.
He would be. He isn’t. And you’re defending him.
If he's been to BG as a guest says he's controlled op. He doesn't deny it so that's your answer.
There is a video with an ex staffer who says it is real. The video is pretty harsh on him. I didn't save the link. However, I do believe there is power in convincing everyone that everything is falling apart and that belief bringing it into existence. I don't feel that James's stuff is fear based though, its more exposing people often making fools of them and creating change. With media like Info wars even though there might be truth to a lot of it,it is more fear induced like "the end is coming! Prepare! Be scared!" It's good to be informed but that is a red flag to me.
If this is real, he definitely was there.
He has rich backers, which does not necessarily make him controlled opposition.