Thoughts on this?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
No thoughts necessary. If he was a threat in any capacity, he wouldn’t have a platform and no one would know anything about him.
Although at the same time, his investigation work, unlike most, has actually resulted in bad people losing their jobs or companies being exposed and resulting in tangible consequences.
Like what, specifically? What it usually looks like to me is a 10-minute video released, a little bit of a firestorm created on right-leaning and conspiracy site, a promise of "much more to come", and then nothing.
If you have time, watch the Project Whistleblower doc on rumble. It could be a psyop also, who knows, trust no one, but it does line up with what I've noticed. O'Keefe just seems like a person meant to capture and neutralize whistleblowers.
Who knows though.
Acorn ended because of Veritas.
https://rumble.com/v17w79t-vintage-veritas-the-fall-of-acorn.html
That was like15 years ago. That was O'Keefe's big break that made him famous. Not to take anything away from that, but he was a kid just trying to do crazy stuff to get famous. It was Hannity that made the story big, and other organizations that jumped in to take that event and go after Acorn.
What has happened since then, though? That's my point. Most controlled opposition is legit (by some definition of legit) when they start and then get co-opted to serve the agenda when they reach a certain level of popularity (sometimes not even something they are aware of).
It's hard to not at least question O'Keefe at this point. The pattern repeats over and over and over. Big whistleblower story and they only put out a short video. Then they say much more coming soon, implying the initial video is just the tip of the iceberg. Then nothing, until the pattern repeats again.
They literally removed him from his own outfit and significantly reduced the size of his reach by making him grow a new channel that does not hit the same numbers. Best logic ever. Next time go with the 'he would be dead' route.
lol, and that’s “good enough,” right?
Still allowed to post anything he wants. And nothing he wants to post is against jews. How about that.
He would be. He isn’t. And you’re defending him.