You must practice the liberal white cat lady version of Buddhism. Actual Buddhism says one should not crave sensual pleasure and being that this is not an act of creation it is an act taken part in solely for sensual pleasure.
When we did the Sodomite Reparations Rosary (stationed at the Cathedral, fully clothed men, just praying and not saying anything "mean" to the sodomites) we saw naked sodomites, along with tons of parents and their young kids in the parade... If we are the "bad guys", then you are delusional lol!
Uhh, a corpse isn't a person, neither is an animal, so consent isn't a factor; they're just objectively disgusting so healthy societies don't tolerate them.
To illustrate: a dildo can't consent, so do you think using one is morally rape?
My religion says I have a duty to discriminate and condemn such behavior. Your religion says you shouldn't discriminate against other people's behavior and convictions. You don't have a case against bigoted Christians.
Ah we are also committed to not tolerate intolerance. I think your religion makes no sense but respect your right to believe it. I think you're intolerance is abhorrent and will fight it to my last dying breath
I know about it. I've studied logic and epistemology. Calling it a paradox doesn't stop it from being self-defeating and logically fallacious.
The conundrum refers to the real-life application of that principle and the pragmatic problems arising from it, which are assessed post-factum. As far as deductive formal logic goes, it's contradictory.
If you watch the SF pride parade (the whole thing is on YouTube), you could see that the organizers attempted to make an effort to make it friendly to the general public while intermixing it with corporate interests and sponsorships.
They need to do a better job in self-policing the deviant assholes that feel compelled to bring their bedroom activities out in public.
If they can't do that they don't deserve the support of the general public and can go fuck themselves.
u/Zongo8
That's me! Your local Buddhist rabble rouser.
Another paid operative faggot. You jackasses come out like clockwork when the check clears.
You must practice the liberal white cat lady version of Buddhism. Actual Buddhism says one should not crave sensual pleasure and being that this is not an act of creation it is an act taken part in solely for sensual pleasure.
Get bent
When we did the Sodomite Reparations Rosary (stationed at the Cathedral, fully clothed men, just praying and not saying anything "mean" to the sodomites) we saw naked sodomites, along with tons of parents and their young kids in the parade... If we are the "bad guys", then you are delusional lol!
From the 14 mindfulness trainings of the order of Interbeing
Recognizing the diversity of human experience, we are committed not to discriminate against any form of gender identity or sexual orientation
I firmly believe in what my faith teaches. You clearly believe in yours. Only one of us has a big enough crush to make posts about the other.
Not even against pedophiles, zoophiles, or necrophiles?
Apparently not... Zongo thinks they are on the right side of history, and we are going to be remembered as the bad guys...
Those are crimes not orientations. All involve at least one party not having consent and are morally rape
Uhh, a corpse isn't a person, neither is an animal, so consent isn't a factor; they're just objectively disgusting so healthy societies don't tolerate them.
To illustrate: a dildo can't consent, so do you think using one is morally rape?
Homosex is also morally wrong. A twisted perversion that effectively rapes nature itself. Checkmate, heathen.
My religion says I have a duty to discriminate and condemn such behavior. Your religion says you shouldn't discriminate against other people's behavior and convictions. You don't have a case against bigoted Christians.
Ah we are also committed to not tolerate intolerance. I think your religion makes no sense but respect your right to believe it. I think you're intolerance is abhorrent and will fight it to my last dying breath
That makes you intolerant also. It's a self-contradictory position. Talk about making no sense.
"I'm committed to pacifism, but I will wage war against any warmonger till my dying breath".
Read up on Popper's paradox for more on this conundrum. We're not the first two to discuss this
I know about it. I've studied logic and epistemology. Calling it a paradox doesn't stop it from being self-defeating and logically fallacious.
The conundrum refers to the real-life application of that principle and the pragmatic problems arising from it, which are assessed post-factum. As far as deductive formal logic goes, it's contradictory.
In our current reality it's how i live and believe. I work as a drug counselor and respect sex orientation and religion, but need to act on bullying
Sexual misconduct is the 4th precept.
Face the wall degenerates.
Kill it. With fire.
If you watch the SF pride parade (the whole thing is on YouTube), you could see that the organizers attempted to make an effort to make it friendly to the general public while intermixing it with corporate interests and sponsorships.
They need to do a better job in self-policing the deviant assholes that feel compelled to bring their bedroom activities out in public.
If they can't do that they don't deserve the support of the general public and can go fuck themselves.
All public demonstrations of pride, sodomy, and effeminacy are sinful, evil, and offensive to God Almighty.